@inproceedings{kruspe-etal-2021-changes,
title = "Changes in {T}witter geolocations: Insights and suggestions for future usage",
author = {Kruspe, Anna and
H{\"a}berle, Matthias and
Hoffmann, Eike J. and
Rode-Hasinger, Samyo and
Abdulahhad, Karam and
Zhu, Xiao Xiang},
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021)",
month = nov,
year = "2021",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.wnut-1.24",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.24",
pages = "212--221",
abstract = "Twitter data has become established as a valuable source of data for various application scenarios in the past years. For many such applications, it is necessary to know where Twitter posts (tweets) were sent from or what location they refer to. Researchers have frequently used exact coordinates provided in a small percentage of tweets, but Twitter removed the option to share these coordinates in mid-2019. Moreover, there is reason to suspect that a large share of the provided coordinates did not correspond to GPS coordinates of the user even before that. In this paper, we explain the situation and the 2019 policy change and shed light on the various options of still obtaining location information from tweets. We provide usage statistics including changes over time, and analyze what the removal of exact coordinates means for various common research tasks performed with Twitter data. Finally, we make suggestions for future research requiring geolocated tweets.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="kruspe-etal-2021-changes">
<titleInfo>
<title>Changes in Twitter geolocations: Insights and suggestions for future usage</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kruspe</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Matthias</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Häberle</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eike</namePart>
<namePart type="given">J</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hoffmann</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Samyo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rode-Hasinger</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Karam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Abdulahhad</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xiao</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Xiang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2021-nov</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021)</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Twitter data has become established as a valuable source of data for various application scenarios in the past years. For many such applications, it is necessary to know where Twitter posts (tweets) were sent from or what location they refer to. Researchers have frequently used exact coordinates provided in a small percentage of tweets, but Twitter removed the option to share these coordinates in mid-2019. Moreover, there is reason to suspect that a large share of the provided coordinates did not correspond to GPS coordinates of the user even before that. In this paper, we explain the situation and the 2019 policy change and shed light on the various options of still obtaining location information from tweets. We provide usage statistics including changes over time, and analyze what the removal of exact coordinates means for various common research tasks performed with Twitter data. Finally, we make suggestions for future research requiring geolocated tweets.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">kruspe-etal-2021-changes</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.24</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2021.wnut-1.24</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2021-nov</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>212</start>
<end>221</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Changes in Twitter geolocations: Insights and suggestions for future usage
%A Kruspe, Anna
%A Häberle, Matthias
%A Hoffmann, Eike J.
%A Rode-Hasinger, Samyo
%A Abdulahhad, Karam
%A Zhu, Xiao Xiang
%S Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021)
%D 2021
%8 nov
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F kruspe-etal-2021-changes
%X Twitter data has become established as a valuable source of data for various application scenarios in the past years. For many such applications, it is necessary to know where Twitter posts (tweets) were sent from or what location they refer to. Researchers have frequently used exact coordinates provided in a small percentage of tweets, but Twitter removed the option to share these coordinates in mid-2019. Moreover, there is reason to suspect that a large share of the provided coordinates did not correspond to GPS coordinates of the user even before that. In this paper, we explain the situation and the 2019 policy change and shed light on the various options of still obtaining location information from tweets. We provide usage statistics including changes over time, and analyze what the removal of exact coordinates means for various common research tasks performed with Twitter data. Finally, we make suggestions for future research requiring geolocated tweets.
%R 10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.24
%U https://aclanthology.org/2021.wnut-1.24
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.24
%P 212-221
Markdown (Informal)
[Changes in Twitter geolocations: Insights and suggestions for future usage](https://aclanthology.org/2021.wnut-1.24) (Kruspe et al., WNUT 2021)
ACL