@inproceedings{brenneis-etal-2021-will,
title = "How Will {I} Argue? A Dataset for Evaluating Recommender Systems for Argumentations",
author = "Brenneis, Markus and
Behrendt, Maike and
Harmeling, Stefan",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue",
month = jul,
year = "2021",
address = "Singapore and Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.sigdial-1.38",
pages = "360--367",
abstract = "Exchanging arguments is an important part in communication, but we are often flooded with lots of arguments for different positions or are captured in filter bubbles. Tools which can present strong arguments relevant to oneself could help to reduce those problems. To be able to evaluate algorithms which can predict how convincing an argument is, we have collected a dataset with more than 900 arguments and personal attitudes of 600 individuals, which we present in this paper. Based on this data, we suggest three recommender tasks, for which we provide two baseline results from a simple majority classifier and a more complex nearest-neighbor algorithm. Our results suggest that better algorithms can still be developed, and we invite the community to improve on our results.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="brenneis-etal-2021-will">
<titleInfo>
<title>How Will I Argue? A Dataset for Evaluating Recommender Systems for Argumentations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Markus</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Brenneis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maike</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Behrendt</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Harmeling</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2021-jul</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Singapore and Online</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Exchanging arguments is an important part in communication, but we are often flooded with lots of arguments for different positions or are captured in filter bubbles. Tools which can present strong arguments relevant to oneself could help to reduce those problems. To be able to evaluate algorithms which can predict how convincing an argument is, we have collected a dataset with more than 900 arguments and personal attitudes of 600 individuals, which we present in this paper. Based on this data, we suggest three recommender tasks, for which we provide two baseline results from a simple majority classifier and a more complex nearest-neighbor algorithm. Our results suggest that better algorithms can still be developed, and we invite the community to improve on our results.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">brenneis-etal-2021-will</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2021.sigdial-1.38</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2021-jul</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>360</start>
<end>367</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T How Will I Argue? A Dataset for Evaluating Recommender Systems for Argumentations
%A Brenneis, Markus
%A Behrendt, Maike
%A Harmeling, Stefan
%S Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
%D 2021
%8 jul
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Singapore and Online
%F brenneis-etal-2021-will
%X Exchanging arguments is an important part in communication, but we are often flooded with lots of arguments for different positions or are captured in filter bubbles. Tools which can present strong arguments relevant to oneself could help to reduce those problems. To be able to evaluate algorithms which can predict how convincing an argument is, we have collected a dataset with more than 900 arguments and personal attitudes of 600 individuals, which we present in this paper. Based on this data, we suggest three recommender tasks, for which we provide two baseline results from a simple majority classifier and a more complex nearest-neighbor algorithm. Our results suggest that better algorithms can still be developed, and we invite the community to improve on our results.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2021.sigdial-1.38
%P 360-367
Markdown (Informal)
[How Will I Argue? A Dataset for Evaluating Recommender Systems for Argumentations](https://aclanthology.org/2021.sigdial-1.38) (Brenneis et al., SIGDIAL 2021)
ACL