<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="stasimioti-etal-2020-machine">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Machine Translation Quality: A comparative evaluation of SMT, NMT and tailored-NMT outputs</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Maria</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Stasimioti</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Vilelmini</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Sosoni</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Katia</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Kermanidis</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Despoina</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Mouratidis</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2020-nov</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>European Association for Machine Translation</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Lisboa, Portugal</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>The present study aims to compare three systems: a generic statistical machine translation (SMT), a generic neural machine translation (NMT) and a tailored-NMT system focusing on the English to Greek language pair. The comparison is carried out following a mixed-methods approach, i.e. automatic metrics, as well as side-by-side ranking, adequacy and fluency rating, measurement of actual post editing (PE) effort and human error analysis performed by 16 postgraduate Translation students. The findings reveal a higher score for both the generic NMT and the tailored-NMT outputs as regards automatic metrics and human evaluation metrics, with the tailored-NMT output faring even better than the generic NMT output.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">stasimioti-etal-2020-machine</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.eamt-1.47</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2020-nov</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>441</start>
            <end>450</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Machine Translation Quality: A comparative evaluation of SMT, NMT and tailored-NMT outputs
%A Stasimioti, Maria
%A Sosoni, Vilelmini
%A Kermanidis, Katia
%A Mouratidis, Despoina
%S Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation
%D 2020
%8 nov
%I European Association for Machine Translation
%C Lisboa, Portugal
%F stasimioti-etal-2020-machine
%X The present study aims to compare three systems: a generic statistical machine translation (SMT), a generic neural machine translation (NMT) and a tailored-NMT system focusing on the English to Greek language pair. The comparison is carried out following a mixed-methods approach, i.e. automatic metrics, as well as side-by-side ranking, adequacy and fluency rating, measurement of actual post editing (PE) effort and human error analysis performed by 16 postgraduate Translation students. The findings reveal a higher score for both the generic NMT and the tailored-NMT outputs as regards automatic metrics and human evaluation metrics, with the tailored-NMT output faring even better than the generic NMT output.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.eamt-1.47
%P 441-450

Markdown (Informal)

[Machine Translation Quality: A comparative evaluation of SMT, NMT and tailored-NMT outputs](https://aclanthology.org/2020.eamt-1.47) (Stasimioti et al., EAMT 2020)

• Machine Translation Quality: A comparative evaluation of SMT, NMT and tailored-NMT outputs (Stasimioti et al., EAMT 2020)

ACL

• Maria Stasimioti, Vilelmini Sosoni, Katia Kermanidis, and Despoina Mouratidis. 2020. Machine Translation Quality: A comparative evaluation of SMT, NMT and tailored-NMT outputs. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, pages 441–450, Lisboa, Portugal. European Association for Machine Translation.