@inproceedings{atanasova-etal-2020-generating-fact,
title = "Generating Fact Checking Explanations",
author = "Atanasova, Pepa and
Simonsen, Jakob Grue and
Lioma, Christina and
Augenstein, Isabelle",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
month = jul,
year = "2020",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.656",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.656",
pages = "7352--7364",
abstract = "Most existing work on automated fact checking is concerned with predicting the veracity of claims based on metadata, social network spread, language used in claims, and, more recently, evidence supporting or denying claims. A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process {--} generating justifications for verdicts on claims. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context, and how this task can be modelled jointly with veracity prediction. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system. The results of a manual evaluation further suggest that the informativeness, coverage and overall quality of the generated explanations are also improved in the multi-task model.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="atanasova-etal-2020-generating-fact">
<titleInfo>
<title>Generating Fact Checking Explanations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pepa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Atanasova</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jakob</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Grue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Simonsen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lioma</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Isabelle</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Augenstein</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-jul</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Most existing work on automated fact checking is concerned with predicting the veracity of claims based on metadata, social network spread, language used in claims, and, more recently, evidence supporting or denying claims. A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process – generating justifications for verdicts on claims. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context, and how this task can be modelled jointly with veracity prediction. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system. The results of a manual evaluation further suggest that the informativeness, coverage and overall quality of the generated explanations are also improved in the multi-task model.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">atanasova-etal-2020-generating-fact</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.656</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.656</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-jul</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>7352</start>
<end>7364</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Generating Fact Checking Explanations
%A Atanasova, Pepa
%A Simonsen, Jakob Grue
%A Lioma, Christina
%A Augenstein, Isabelle
%S Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2020
%8 jul
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F atanasova-etal-2020-generating-fact
%X Most existing work on automated fact checking is concerned with predicting the veracity of claims based on metadata, social network spread, language used in claims, and, more recently, evidence supporting or denying claims. A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process – generating justifications for verdicts on claims. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context, and how this task can be modelled jointly with veracity prediction. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system. The results of a manual evaluation further suggest that the informativeness, coverage and overall quality of the generated explanations are also improved in the multi-task model.
%R 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.656
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.656
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.656
%P 7352-7364
Markdown (Informal)
[Generating Fact Checking Explanations](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.656) (Atanasova et al., ACL 2020)
ACL
- Pepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, and Isabelle Augenstein. 2020. Generating Fact Checking Explanations. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 7352–7364, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.