<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="vanni-reeder-2000-look">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>How are you doing? A look at MT evaluation</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Michelle</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Vanni</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Florence</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Reeder</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2000-oct&quot; 10-14&quot;</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Springer</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Cuernavaca, Mexico</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Machine Translation evaluation has been more magic and opinion than science. The history of MT evaluation is long and checkered - the search for objective, measurable, resource-reduced methods of evaluation continues. A recent trend towards task-based evaluation inspires the question - can we use methods of evaluation of language competence in language learners and apply them reasonably to MT evaluation? This paper is the first in a series of steps to look at this question. In this paper, we will present the theoretical framework for our ideas, the notions we ultimately aim towards and some very preliminary results of a small experiment along these lines.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">vanni-reeder-2000-look</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-39965-8_11</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2000-oct&quot; 10-14&quot;</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>109</start>
            <end>116</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T How are you doing? A look at MT evaluation
%A Vanni, Michelle
%A Reeder, Florence
%S Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers
%D 2000
%8 oct" 10 14"
%I Springer
%C Cuernavaca, Mexico
%F vanni-reeder-2000-look
%X Machine Translation evaluation has been more magic and opinion than science. The history of MT evaluation is long and checkered - the search for objective, measurable, resource-reduced methods of evaluation continues. A recent trend towards task-based evaluation inspires the question - can we use methods of evaluation of language competence in language learners and apply them reasonably to MT evaluation? This paper is the first in a series of steps to look at this question. In this paper, we will present the theoretical framework for our ideas, the notions we ultimately aim towards and some very preliminary results of a small experiment along these lines.
%U https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-39965-8_11
%P 109-116

Markdown (Informal)

[How are you doing? A look at MT evaluation](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-39965-8_11) (Vanni & Reeder, AMTA 2000)

• How are you doing? A look at MT evaluation (Vanni & Reeder, AMTA 2000)

ACL

• Michelle Vanni and Florence Reeder. 2000. How are you doing? A look at MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers, pages 109–116, Cuernavaca, Mexico. Springer.