@article{hardt-2013-uniform,
    title = "A Uniform Syntax and Discourse Structure: the Copenhagen Dependency Treebanks",
    author = "Hardt, Daniel",
    editor = "Fern{\'a}ndez, Raquel  and
      Dipper, Stefanie  and
      Zinsmeister, Heike  and
      Webber, Bonnie",
    journal = "Dialogue {\&} Discourse",
    volume = "4",
    month = apr,
    year = "2013",
    address = "Bielefeld, Germany",
    publisher = "University of Bielefeld",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/tt-tag/2013.dnd-4.10/",
    doi = "10.5087/dad.2013.203",
    pages = "53--64",
    abstract = "I present arguments in favor of the Uniformity Hypothesis: the hypothesis that discourse can extend syntax dependencies without conflicting with them. I consider arguments that Uniformity is violated in certain cases involving quotation, and I argue that the cases presented in the literature are in fact completely consistent with Uniformity. I report on an analysis of all examples in the Copenhagen Dependency Treebanks involving violations of Uniformity. I argue that they are in fact all consistent with Uniformity, and conclude that the CDT should be revised to reflect this."
}