Sy Hwang
2026
SemAnTICA Lab at MediQA-SYNUR 2026: Route, Extract and Verify – An LLM-gated Ensemble for Parsing Nurse Dictations
Sy Hwang | Katherine S. Pitcher | Sue Hyon Kim | Yoonjae Lee | Hayoung K. Donelly | Harsh Bandhey | Andrew J. King | Karen O’Connor | Ryan J. Urbanowicz | Danielle L. Mowery
Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Clinical Natural Language Processing (Clinical NLP) @ LREC 2026
Sy Hwang | Katherine S. Pitcher | Sue Hyon Kim | Yoonjae Lee | Hayoung K. Donelly | Harsh Bandhey | Andrew J. King | Karen O’Connor | Ryan J. Urbanowicz | Danielle L. Mowery
Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Clinical Natural Language Processing (Clinical NLP) @ LREC 2026
We describe the Semantic Analysis of Text to Inform Clinical Action (SemAnTICA) Lab’s system for the MediQA-SYNUR 2026 shared task on extracting structured clinical observations from nurse dictation transcripts. The task requires mapping observations from disfluent conversational text to a large, fixed ontology and producing strictly normalized outputs, where small amounts of concept over-selection severely degrade micro-F1 score. Our approach evolved from a full-schema in-context baseline to a pipeline that explicitly separates concept selection from value extraction. We first preprocess transcripts, then generate transcript-specific concept candidates using hybrid sparse–dense retrieval. The candidates are then pruned with an evidence-based filter. For extraction, we adopt a system-level mixture-of-experts design with an online LLM router that selects a subset of domain-specialized experts per transcript. Each expert operates over a constrained schema partition to reduce spurious predictions. We enhance robustness with agreement-gated ensembling and targeted adjudication for ambiguous cases. Finally, we intersect complementary high-recall and high-precision runs to produce the best submission. Our system ranked first on the official test leaderboard with F1 = 0.814, P = 0.826, R = 0.801.
2021
Discovering Black Lives Matter Events in the United States: Shared Task 3, CASE 2021
Salvatore Giorgi | Vanni Zavarella | Hristo Tanev | Nicolas Stefanovitch | Sy Hwang | Hansi Hettiarachchi | Tharindu Ranasinghe | Vivek Kalyan | Paul Tan | Shaun Tan | Martin Andrews | Tiancheng Hu | Niklas Stoehr | Francesco Ignazio Re | Daniel Vegh | Dennis Atzenhofer | Brenda Curtis | Ali Hürriyetoğlu
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE 2021)
Salvatore Giorgi | Vanni Zavarella | Hristo Tanev | Nicolas Stefanovitch | Sy Hwang | Hansi Hettiarachchi | Tharindu Ranasinghe | Vivek Kalyan | Paul Tan | Shaun Tan | Martin Andrews | Tiancheng Hu | Niklas Stoehr | Francesco Ignazio Re | Daniel Vegh | Dennis Atzenhofer | Brenda Curtis | Ali Hürriyetoğlu
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE 2021)
Evaluating the state-of-the-art event detection systems on determining spatio-temporal distribution of the events on the ground is performed unfrequently. But, the ability to both (1) extract events “in the wild” from text and (2) properly evaluate event detection systems has potential to support a wide variety of tasks such as monitoring the activity of socio-political movements, examining media coverage and public support of these movements, and informing policy decisions. Therefore, we study performance of the best event detection systems on detecting Black Lives Matter (BLM) events from tweets and news articles. The murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, at the hands of police officers received global attention throughout the second half of 2020. Protests against police violence emerged worldwide and the BLM movement, which was once mostly regulated to the United States, was now seeing activity globally. This shared task asks participants to identify BLM related events from large unstructured data sources, using systems pretrained to extract socio-political events from text. We evaluate several metrics, accessing each system’s ability to identify protest events both temporally and spatially. Results show that identifying daily protest counts is an easier task than classifying spatial and temporal protest trends simultaneously, with maximum performance of 0.745 and 0.210 (Pearson r), respectively. Additionally, all baselines and participant systems suffered from low recall, with a maximum recall of 5.08.
Search
Fix author
Co-authors
- Martin Andrews 1
- Dennis Atzenhofer 1
- Harsh Bandhey 1
- Brenda Curtis 1
- Hayoung K. Donelly 1
- Salvatore Giorgi 1
- Hansi Hettiarachchi 1
- Tiancheng Hu 1
- Ali Hürriyetoğlu 1
- Vivek Kalyan 1
- Sue Hyon Kim 1
- Andrew J. King 1
- Yoonjae Lee 1
- Danielle L. Mowery 1
- Karen O’Connor 1
- Katherine S. Pitcher 1
- Tharindu Ranasinghe 1
- Francesco Ignazio Re 1
- Nicolas Stefanovitch 1
- Niklas Stoehr 1
- Paul Tan 1
- Shaun Tan 1
- Hristo Tanev 1
- Ryan J. Urbanowicz 1
- Daniel Vegh 1
- Vanni Zavarella 1