We present the MultiplEYE Text Corpus, a large-scale, document-level, multi-parallel resource designed to advance cross-linguistic research on reading and language processing. The corpus provides paragraph-level alignment for texts in 39 languages spanning seven language families and seven scripts. Unlike many existing multilingual corpora, a substantial number of documents were originally written in languages other than English, reducing English-centric bias and supporting more typologically diverse investigations. The texts are carefully selected to balance linguistic richness with experimental feasibility, particularly for eye-tracking-while-reading studies. Developed within a multi-lab initiative, the MultiplEYE Text Corpus follows unified translation, alignment, and experimental design guidelines to ensure cross-linguistic comparability. Its inclusion of texts varying in type and difficulty enables research on discourse- level processing, genre effects, and individual differences across a wide range of languages. The text corpus and accompanying metadata provide a robust foundation for multilingual psycholinguistic and computational modeling research. Data and materials are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22294.

We investigate belief-like representations in decoder-only autoregressive LLMs using linear controlled probes on residual stream activations and single attention heads. Following Herrmann and Levinstein’s (2025) criteria (Accuracy, Use, Coherence, and Uniformity) we find that large models exhibit strong truth sensitivity (Accuracy), and steering activations along probe directions reliably changes downstream behavior (Use). Coherence, measured via calibrated probes and cross-dataset probing, is moderate across models, while training on diverse data yields domain-consistent truth directions (Uniformity). The results are particularly encouraging at the head level and align with some standard philosophical accounts of belief, e.g., minimal functionalism, supporting the view that LLMs can maintain propositional attitudes under such theoretical frameworks.