We present ArabicDialectHub, a cross-dialectal Arabic learning resource comprising 552 phrases across six varieties (Moroccan Darija, Lebanese, Syrian, Emirati, Saudi, and MSA) and an interactive web platform. Phrases were generated using LLMs and validated by five native speakers, stratified by difficulty, and organized thematically. The open-source platform provides translation exploration, adaptive quizzing with algorithmic distractor generation, cloud-synchronized progress tracking, and cultural context. Both the dataset and complete platform source code are released under MIT license. Platform: https://arabic-dialect-hub.netlify.app.

Multilingual evaluation often relies on language coverage or translated benchmarks, implicitly assuming that subword tokenization behaves comparably across scripts. In mixed-script settings, this assumption breaks down. We examine this effect using polarity detection as a case study, comparing Orthographic Syllable Pair Encoding (OSPE) and Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) under identical architectures, data, and training conditions on SemEval Task 9, which spans Devanagari, Perso-Arabic, and Latin scripts. OSPE is applied to Hindi, Nepali, Urdu, and Arabic, while BPE is retained for English. We find that BPE systematically underestimates performance in abugida and abjad scripts, producing fragmented representations, unstable optimization, and drops of up to 27 macro-F1 points for Nepali, while English remains largely unaffected. Script-aware segmentation preserves orthographic structure, stabilizes training, and improves cross-language comparability without additional data or model scaling, highlighting tokenization as a latent but consequential evaluation decision in multilingual benchmarks. While the analysis spans multiple scripts, we place particular emphasis on Arabic and Perso-Arabic languages, where frequency-driven tokenization most severely disrupts orthographic and morphological structure.

Framing detection in Arabic social media is difficult due to interpretive ambiguity, cultural grounding, and limited reliable supervision. Existing LLM-based weak supervision methods typically rely on label aggregation, which is brittle when annotations are few and socially dependent. We propose a reliability-aware weak supervision framework that shifts the focus from label fusion to data curation. A small multi-agent LLM pipeline—two framers, a critic, and a discriminator—treats disagreement and reasoning quality as epistemic signals and produces instance-level reliability estimates. These estimates guide a QUBO-based subset selection procedure that enforces frame balance while reducing redundancy. Intrinsic diagnostics and an out-of-domain Arabic sentiment transfer test show that the selected subsets are more reliable and encode non-random, transferable structure, without degrading strong text-only baselines.

Optimizer choice is a central hyperparameter in fine-tuning transformer models, yet its impact remains under-studied for Arabic-script social media classification un der class imbalance. We compare Adam, AdamW, and SGD for fine-tuning QARiB on two Arabic offensive-language bench marks, OffensEval20 and MPOLD, using a controlled grid over learning rate, weight decay, and warmup, and report test-set performance as mean (std) over three random seeds. Minority-class discrimination is evaluated using macro-F1 and AUC-PROFF, while calibration is assessed via expected calibration error (ECE), reliability diagrams, and proper scoring rules (Brier score and negative log-likelihood, NLL). Across both datasets, AdamW and Adam are consistently strong and closely matched when properly tuned, whereas SGD substantially underperforms under the same tuning bud get and exhibits higher seed sensitivity. We observe non-trivial miscalibration across optimizers; post-hoc temperature scaling offers a low-cost adjustment, yielding modest, dataset-dependent changes in calibration while preserving ranking-based discrimination. We further evaluate a practical decision-rule step by optimizing the classification threshold on the validation set and applying it to test predictions, and provide qualitative examples il lustrating typical optimizer-dependent confidence behaviors. In practice, for Arabic offensive-language detection under imbalance, we recommend starting from a tuned AdamW or Adam baseline; when calibrated probabilities are required for thresholding or triage, temperature scaling can be applied. We will release a reproducible pipeline to support further evaluation of optimizer–calibration trade-offs in Arabic-script safety tasks.

We introduce the Tarab Corpus, a large-scale cultural and linguistic resource that brings together Arabic song lyrics and poetry within a unified analytical framework. The corpus comprises 2.56 million verses and more than 13.5 million tokens, making it, to our knowledge, the largest open Arabic corpus of creative text spanning both classical and contemporary production. Tarab is broadly balanced between songs and poems and covers Classical Arabic, Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), and six major regional varieties: Egyptian, Gulf, Levantine, Iraqi, Sudanese, and Maghrebi Arabic. The artists and poets represented in the corpus are associated with 28 modern nation states and multiple historical eras, covering over fourteen centuries of Arabic creative expression from the Pre-Islamic period to the twenty-first century. Each verse is accompanied by structured metadata describing linguistic variety, geographic origin, and historical or cultural context, enabling comparative linguistic, stylistic, and diachronic analysis across genres and time. We describe the data collection, normalisation, and validation pipeline and present baseline analyses for variety identification and genre differentiation. The dataset is publicly available on HuggingFace at https://huggingface.co/datasets/drelhaj/Tarab.

Despite the advances in neural text to speech (TTS), many Arabic dialectal varieties remain marginally addressed, with most resources con- centrated on Modern Spoken Arabic (MSA) and Gulf dialects, leaving Egyptian Arabic— the most widely understood Arabic dialect— severely under-resourced. We address this gap by introducing NileTTS: 38 hours of tran- scribed speech from two speakers across di- verse domains including medical, sales, and general conversations. We construct this dataset using a novel synthetic pipeline: large language models (LLM) generate Egyptian Arabic content, which is then converted to natu- ral speech using audio synthesis tools, followed by automatic transcription and speaker diariza- tion with manual quality verification. We fine- tune XTTS v2, a state-of-the-art multilingual TTS model, on our dataset and evaluate against the baseline model trained on other Arabic dialects. Our contributions include: (1) the first publicly available Egyptian Arabic TTS dataset, (2) a reproducible synthetic data gen- eration pipeline for dialectal TTS, and (3) an open-source fine-tuned model. All resources are released to advance Egyptian Arabic speech synthesis research.

Medical text classification is high-stakes work, yet models often falter precisely where they are needed most: on rare, critical conditions buried in the long tail of the data distribution. In the EACL 2026 ABJAD-NLP Shared Task, we confronted this challenge with a dataset of Arabic medical questions heavily skewed towards a few common topics, leaving dozens of categories with fewer than ten examples. We present HybridMed, a system that effectively tames this long tail by marrying the semantic generalization of a fine-tuned Arabic BERT model with the precise, instance-based memory of k-nearest neighbor retrieval. This complementary union allowed our system to achieve a macro-F1 score of 0.4902, demonstrating that for diverse and imbalanced medical data, the whole is indeed greater than the sum of its parts.

Kazakh is a Turkic language using the Arabic, Cyrillic, and Latin scripts, making it unique in terms of optical character recognition (OCR). Work on OCR for low-resource Kazakh scripts is very scarce, and no OCR benchmarks or images exist for the Arabic and Latin scripts. We construct a synthetic OCR dataset of 7,219 images for all three scripts with font, color, and noise variations to imitate real OCR tasks. We evaluated three multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on a subset of the benchmark for OCR and language identification: Gemma-3-12B-it, Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct. All models are unsuccessful with Latin and Arabic script OCR, and fail to recognize the Arabic script as Kazakh text, misclassifying it as Arabic, Farsi, and Kurdish. We further compare MLLMs with a classical OCR baseline and find that while traditional OCR has lower character error rates, MLLMs fail to match this performance. These findings show significant gaps in current MLLM capabilities to process low-resource Abjad-based scripts and demonstrate the need for inclusive models and benchmarks supporting low-resource scripts and languages.

Context: Natural Language Processing (NLP) has become an essential field with widespread applications across domains such as Large Language Models (LLMs). One of the core applications of NLP is machine translation (MT). A major challenge in MT is handling out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words and spelling mistakes, which can lead to poor translation quality. Objective: This study compares traditional text-based embeddings with visual embeddings for English-to-Arabic translation. It investigates the effectiveness of each approach, especially in handling noisy inputs or OOV terms. Method: Using the IWSLT 2017 English-Arabic dataset, we trained a baseline transformer encoder-decoder model using standard text embeddings and compared it with models using several visual embeddings strategies, including vowel-removal preprocessing and trigram-based image rendering. The translated outputs were evaluated using BLEU scores. Results: show that although traditional BPE-based models achieve higher BLEU on clean data, visual embedding models are substantially more robust to spelling noise, retaining up to 2.4× higher BLEU scores at 50% character corruption.

This study addresses automatic transliteration from Tajik (Cyrillic script) to Persian (Perso-Arabic script). We present a curated, lexicographically verified parallel corpus of 52,152 Tajik–Persian words and short phrases, compiled from printed dictionaries, encyclopedic sources, and manually verified online resources. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest publicly available word-level corpora for Tajik–Persian transliteration. Using this corpus, we train a character-level sequence-to-sequence Transformer model and evaluate it using Character Error Rate (CER) and exact-match accuracy. The best Transformer configuration with beam search (k=3) achieves a CER of 0.3182 and an exact-match accuracy of 0.3215, achieving lower error rates than dictionary-based rule-based and recurrent neural baselines. We describe the data collection and preprocessing pipeline, model architecture, and experimental protocol, and report a part-of-speech analysis showing performance differences across lexical categories. All resources (dataset, preprocessing scripts, splits, and training configurations) will be released publicly to ensure reproducibility and facilitate future work on Tajik–Persian transliteration, cross-script NLP, and lexicographic applications.

Arabic dialect↔English machine translation remains difficult due to extreme dialect variation, inconsistent orthography, and limited parallel data. Moreover, dialect translation is often needed in remote regions or by economically-disadvantaged communities, which often operate in compute-constrained or offline settings. Motivated by these concerns, in this paper we explore optimizing Arabic dialect↔English translators that run over small LLMs, which could be implemented on small offline devices. We show that reasoning-oriented reinforcement learning can substantially improve small multilingual LLMs for Arabic dialect translation. Using the MADAR corpus, small Qwen-2.5 models trained with a think-then-translate template and optimized with Group-Relative Policy Optimization using a SacreBLEU reward outperform a much larger 7B baseline trained with supervised fine-tuning. The dialect-to-English BLEU score more than doubles from 17.4 to 34.9, while the English-to-dialect COMET score improves from 0.57 to 0.73.

In this work, we address the challenges of Arabic medical text classification, focusing on class imbalance and the complexity of the language’s morphology. We propose a multiclass classification pipeline based on Data- and Algorithm-Level fusion, which integrates the optimal Back Translation technique for data augmentation with the Class Balanced (CB) loss function to enhance performance. The domain-specific AraBERT model is fine-tuned using this approach, achieving competitive results. On the official test set of the AbjadMed task, our pipeline achieves a Macro-F1 score of 0.4219, and it achieves 0.4068 on the development set.

This paper presents system description for Arabic medical text classification across 82 distinct categories. Our primary architecture utilizes a fine-tuned AraBERTv2 encoder enhanced with a hybrid pooling strategies, combining attention and mean representations, and multi-sample dropout for robust regularization. We systematically benchmark this approach against a suite of multilingual and Arabic-specific encoders, as well as several large-scale causal decoders, including zero-shot re-ranking via Llama 3.3 70B and feature extraction from Qwen 3B hidden states. Our findings demonstrate that specialized bidirectional encoders significantly outperform causal decoders in capturing the precise semantic boundaries required for fine-grained medical text classification. We show that causal decoders, optimized for next-token prediction, produce sequence-biased embeddings that are less effective for categorization compared to the global context captured by bidirectional attention. Despite significant class imbalance and label noise identified within the training data, our results highlight the superior semantic compression of fine-tuned encoders for specialized Arabic NLP tasks. Final performance metrics on the test set, including Accuracy and Macro-F1, are reported and discussed.

Named Entity Recognition (NER) models trained on clean text often fail on real-world data containing orthographic noise. Work on NER for Persian is emerging, but it has not yet explored the orthographic robustness of models to perturbations often exhibited in user-generated content. We evaluate ParsBERT, ParsBERT v2.0, BertNER, and two XLM-r-based models on a subset of Persian-NER-Dataset-500k after applying eleven different perturbations, including simulated typos, code-switching, and segmentation errors. All models were competitive with each other, but XLM-r-large consistently displayed the best robustness to perturbations. Code-switching, typos, similar character swaps, segmentation errors, and noisy text all decreased F1 scores, while Latinized numbers increased F1 scores in ParsBERT. Removing diacritics, zero-width non-joiners, and normalizing Yeh/Kaf all did not have an effect on F1. These findings suggest that Persian NER models require improvement for performance on noisy text, and that the Perso-Arabic script introduces unique factors into NER not present in many high-resource languages, such as code-switching and Eastern Arabic numerals. This work creates a foundation for the development of robust Persian NER models and highlights the necessity of evaluating low-resource NER models under challenging and realistic conditions.

We present a supervised system for Arabic medical question-answer classification developed for the AbjadMed shared task. The task involves assigning one of 82 highly imbalanced medical categories and is evaluated using macro-averaged F1. Our approach builds on an AraBERT model further pretrained on a related Arabic medical classification dataset. Under a unified fine-tuning setup, this domain-adapted model consistently outperforms general-purpose Arabic backbones, with the best results obtained using a low backbone learning rate, indicating that only limited adaptation is required. The final system achieves a macro F1 score of 0.51 on the private test split. For comparison, we evaluate several cost-efficient large language models under constrained prompting and observe substantially lower performance.

This paper describes our team’s submission to AbjadMed at AbjadNLP 2026. The task involves classifying Arabic medical question-answer pairs into 82 categories, characterized by a long-tail distribution and significant semantic overlap. While domain-specific Arabic models exist, they are primarily optimized for Named Entity Recognition or span-extraction tasks rather than high-cardinality sequence classification. Consequently, our system adopts a robust optimization approach using a general-purpose encoder. We utilize ARBERTv2 as the backbone, employing Label-Distribution-Aware Margin (LDAM) loss to mitigate class imbalance and Fast Gradient Method (FGM) adversarial training to enhance generalization boundaries. Our approach achieves a Macro-F1 score of 0.4028 on the private test set, demonstrating that advanced optimization techniques can yield competitive performance on specialized taxonomies without requiring domain-specific pre-training.

We describe our system for the AbjadMed shared task on Arabic medical text classification at AbjadNLP 2026. Our approach combines efficient fine-tuning of Qwen3-8B using QLoRA with a Dice+CrossEntropy hybrid loss designed for Macro F1 optimization. Taking inspiration from recent research on optimal LoRA configurations, we apply low-rank adapters to all linear layers of the model rather than attention layers only, which we validate improves performance by 4.0 points. We also explore data augmentation through machine translation of external medical QA data, though this did not improve generalization. Our best submission achieves a Macro F1 score of 0.4441 on the test set.

Medical text classification is an important task in healthcare NLP, yet Arabic medical texts remain underexplored due to linguistic complexity and limited annotated data. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of AraBERT, a pre-trained Arabic transformer model, for Arabic medical text classification. We fine-tune AraBERT on a labeled medical dataset and evaluate its performance using standard classification metrics. Experimental results show that our fine-tuned AraBERT model achieves a private leaderboard score of 0.4076 and ranks 13th among participating teams, outperforming classical machine learning baselines and other transformer variants. These findings highlight the potential of transformer-based approaches for Arabic medical NLP and motivate further research.

This paper presents our system developed for the AbjadNLP Shared Task 4 on Medical Text Classification in Arabic, which aims to assign Arabic medical question-answer pairs to a predefined set of medical categories. The task poses significant challenges due to severe class imbalance across 82 categories and the linguistic complexity of domain-specific Arabic medical text. To address these challenges, we propose an imbalance-aware training framework that combines targeted data augmentation for minority classes with class-weighted focal loss during fine-tuning. We evaluate multiple Arabic pretrained transformer models under a unified training configuration and further improve robustness through a majority-voting ensemble of the best-performing models. Our approach achieves competitive performance, ranking 15th on the private leaderboard with a macro F1 score of 0.4052, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining different data augmentation techniques, imbalance-aware training objectives, and ensemble learning for large-scale, highly imbalanced Arabic medical text classification. The code is available on GitHub.

This paper describes Tashkees-AI, a system developed for the AbjadMed 2026 Shared Task on Arabic Medical Question Classification. A comprehensive empirical study was conducted across 82 fine-grained categories, investigating three paradigms: fine-tuned encoder models, hierarchical classification, and ensemble methods. Leveraging a dataset of 27k Arabic medical question-answer pairs, an extensive ablation studies was conducted, comparing MARBERTv2, CAMeLBERT, two-stage hierarchical classifiers, and RAG-based approaches. The findings reveal that fine-tuned MARBERTv2 with data cleaning yields the best performance, achieving a macro F1-score of 0.3659 on the blind test set. In contrast, hierarchical methods surprisingly underperformed (0.332 F1) due to error propagation. The system ranked 26th on the official leaderboard.

The classification of diglossic medical text presents a high-dimensional challenge defined by extreme class imbalance (N = 82) and the orthographic ambiguity of unvocalized Abjad scripts. While standard supervised learning often collapses into majority-class prediction due to the “Long Tail” distribution, we intro- duce a Human-in-the-Loop Forensic Opti- mization framework. Unlike static end-to-end pipelines, our approach decouples strategic hy- perparameter tuning from high-throughput tac- tical execution (Elastic Compute). We lever- age a rigorous Class-Balanced Focal Loss (CBFL) derived from the “Effective Number of Samples” theory (En) to stabilize the de- cision manifold against stochastic class domi- nance. Using a CAMELBERT-DA backbone optimized via a custom weighted trainer on Dual H200 GPUs, our system achieved a ro- bust Public Leaderboard score of 0.3588. We further perform a “Linguistic Error Topology” analysis, utilizing UMAP projections and atten- tion saliency, to demonstrate that generalization gaps are driven by dialectal “Constraint Drift” rather than stochastic model failure.

This paper introduces resources for the computational study of scientific exegesis (Tafsir Ilmi): a structured ontology, a curated dataset of 194 scientifically relevant Quranic verses linked to 260 exegetical records from two authoritative Tafsir books, and an annotation framework that organizes scientific references by topic and sequential context. Existing Quranic resources treat verses as unstructured text, losing the logical order and causal relationships of scientific concepts documented in exegesis. To address this, we present QurSci-Onto, a three-layer ontology that categorizes verses by scientific domain, links them to authoritative Tafsir, and provides a framework for representing sequential processes through stage-based annotations. Our dataset includes page-level citations and covers 8 major scientific topics across 73 nodes. While the full corpus is tagged with broad categories and scientific topics, a specialized subset features granular node-level mappings to capture complex scientific narratives. We release QurSci-Onto as a foundational resource for Arabic semantic NLP and demonstrate that it enables significant improvements in semantic retrieval and enables multi-hop sequential reasoning capabilities over unstructured baselines.

Hausa Ajami (Hausa written in Arabic script) remains severely under-resourced for computational morphology. We present AjamiMorph, a zero-annotation framework that discovers morphemes through consensus among three unsupervised methods, namely, Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), transition-based boundary detection using Pointwise Mutual Information (PMI), and computational linguistics based Distributional Affix Mining (DAM). Using a Hausa Ajami Bible corpus consisting of 637,414 tokens, AjamiMorph identifies 1,611 high-confidence morphemes, achieving 99.9% coverage. The inventory exhibits a linguistically realistic distribution (66.0% stems, 22.6% suffixes, 11.4% prefixes) and recovers 77.8% of known Hausa affixes. A permutation test that shuffles method assignments (preserving per-method selection sizes) confirms that the observed agreement is above-chance; chi-square remains as a secondary check. A lightweight 5-gram LM comparison (characters vs. consensus morphemes) provides an extrinsic signal. We also report negative results for script-driven Arabic assumptions and LLM-first annotation. This work provides the first unsupervised morpheme inventory for Hausa Ajami and demonstrates consensus as a robust strategy for zero-resource morphology.

As reported, approximately 6 million people in Iraq and Iran speak in Sorani Kurdish, which exhibits substantial regional variation but lacks computational resources for dialect identification. We present the first fine-grained sub-dialect classification system for six Sorani varieties namely, Sulaymaniyah, Erbil, Iranian Sorani, Ardalani, Babani, and Mukriani. This investigation combines cross-lingual contextual embeddings (XLM-RoBERTa) with morphological features derived from explicit linguistic rules, including 24 patterns capturing verb prefixes, pronominal clitics, and definite markers. The suggested morphology-augmented XLM-R model has been trained on a unified dataset of 16,409 sentences without manual annotation, and achieves 91.91% accuracy, outperforming pure transformers (91.79%) and traditional machine learning baselines (SVM 86.41%). Key ablation studies reveal that morphological features serve as effective regularizers for geographically proximate dialects.

We present a solution for the Arabic medical text classification task, formulated as a multi-class classification problem with 82 medical categories. The task is challenging due to severe class imbalance, long and heterogeneous input texts, and the presence of domain-specific medical terminology in Modern Standard Arabic. Our approach is based on fine-tuning pretrained AraBERT models with a focus on loss-level imbalance handling rather than architectural complexity. Through a systematic comparison of multiple AraBERT-based configurations, we show that class-weighted loss combined with simple mean pooling yields the strongest performance. Our best model achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.387 on the public evaluation set and 0.411 on the private test set.

Automatic classification of literary text by historical era can support literary analysis and reveal stylistic evolution. We study this problem for Urdu poetry across three eras, classical, modern, and contemporary. We introduce a new dataset of 10,026 four-line Urdu poetry segments collected from online archives (Rekhta and UrduPoint) and labeled by era. To handle Urdu’s script and orthographic variability, we apply standard preprocessing, including Unicode normalization and removal of diacritics and non-Urdu characters. We benchmark a range of approaches, from traditional machine learning classifiers to deep learning models, including fine-tuned Urdu BERT-style transformers. To assess generalization, we evaluate under two regimes: (i) a standard stratified random split and (ii) a stricter author-disjoint split that ensures poets do not overlap between training and test sets. On the random split, the best traditional models achieve about 70-73% accuracy, suggesting era-related stylistic cues are learnable. However, performance drops to roughly 58-60% under the author-disjoint split, highlighting the difficulty in generalizing across unseen poets and the possibility of overestimating performance via author-specific leakage. Notably, fine-tuned transformers do not surpass simpler TF-IDF-based baselines, indicating that era cues may be subtle and that data limitations constrain more complex models.

The availability of large annotated corpora remains a major challenge for the development of natural language processing systems for under-resourced languages such as Arabic. In this paper, we present two annotated corpora dedicated to Modern Standard Arabic. These corpora are open-source and freely available on the Hugging Face platform. The first corpus, annotated by theme and designed to provide a balanced representation of contemporary Arabic usage, comprises approximately 76 million words collected from diverse sources covering multiple domains and geographical regions. The second corpus, containing approximately one million words, is a sub-corpus extracted from the first. It was annotated with lemma tags using a semi-automatic approach that combines automatic annotation with the Alkhalil lemmatizer and MADAMIRA, followed by manual validation.

Sentiment analysis in low-resource languages such as Urdu poses unique challenges due to limited annotated data, morphological complexity, and significant class imbalance in most publicly available datasets. This study addresses these issues through two experimental strategies. First, we explore class imbalance mitigation by using instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic negative sentiment samples in Urdu. This augmentation strategy results in a more balanced dataset, which significantly improves the recall and F1-score for minority class predictions when fine-tuned using a multilingual BERT model. Second, we investigate the effectiveness of translating Urdu text into English and applying sentiment classification through a pre-trained English language model. Comparative evaluation reveals that the translation-based pipeline, using a RoBERTa model fine-tuned for English sentiment classification, achieves superior performance across major metrics. Our results suggest that LLM-based augmentation and cross-lingual transfer via translation both serve as viable approaches to overcome data scarcity and performance limitations in sentiment analysis for low-resource languages. The findings highlight the potential applicability of these approaches to other under-resourced linguistic domains.

Back-of-the-book indexes (BoBIs) are crucial for book readability. However, their manual creation is laborious and error prone. In this paper, we introduce ArBoBIM to automate BoBI extraction and review processes for Arabic books. Given a book with a corresponding BoBI, ArBoBIM extracts BoBI terms and identifies their occurrences and aligns those across several versions of the book. ArBoBIM first defines a pool of candidates for each term by leveraging noun phrases and named entities. ArBoBIM leverages several metrics, including exact matches, morpho-lexical similarity, and semantic similarity, to determine the best candidates. We empirically fine-tuned thresholds for ArBoBIM and achieve an F1-score of 0.94 (precision= 0.97, recall=0.91). These results are significantly better than baseline results, and top LLM based results with lower computational cost and no publishing house IP risks. Additionally, with ArBoBIM, over 500 books have been processed, resulting in the ArBoBIMap dataset, containing books, their terms, occurrences, and various metadata related to them, to be made available for the public. This dataset is used to train a model to identify if a term, given its features, should be added to the back-of-the-book index of a specific book. The model achieves an F1-score of 0.91 (precision = 0.97, recall = 0.85).

Inserting English words, phrases, or sentences while writing or speaking in the Saudi Arabic dialect has become a widespread phenomenon in Saudi society. This phenomenon is linguistically called code-switching. It remains unclear how current sentiment analysis methods perform on Saudi-English code-switching text. In this paper, we address this gap by conducting the first sentiment analysis study on Saudi-English code-switching text. We present the first Saudi-English Sentiment Analysis Code Switching Dataset (SESA-CSD) and establish baseline results on this dataset. By evaluating multiple state-of-the-art small language models, we achieve improvements over the baseline of 3% to 11% in both accuracy and macro-F1. Among all small language models, XLM-RoBERTa achieved the highest performance,with an accuracy of 95.50% and a macro-F1 of 95.53%. Our findings indicate that multilingual and Arabic small language models, such as XLM-RoBERTa, GigaBERT, and SaudiBERT, consistently outperform bilingual Arabic-English large language models, such as Fanar and ALLaM, across zero-shot and multiple few-shot settings.

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) has achieved strong performance in high-resource languages; however, Dialectal Arabic remains significantly under-resourced. This gap is particularly evident in Oman, where Arabic exhibits substantial sociolinguistic variation shaped by settlement patterns between sedentary (Hadari) and nomadic (Badu) communities, which are often overlooked by urban-centric or generalized Gulf Arabic datasets. We introduce OMAN-SPEECH, a sociolinguistically stratified spoken corpus for Omani Arabic comprising approximately 40 hours of spontaneous and semi-spontaneous speech from 32 speakers across 11 Wilayats (provinces). The corpus is balanced to capture regional and lifestyle variation and is annotated at the sentence level with Arabic transcription, English translation, and phonetic transcription using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) through a human-in-the-loop annotation pipeline. OMAN-SPEECH provides a foundational resource for evaluating ASR and related speech technologies on Omani and Gulf Arabic varieties and supports more granular modeling of regional dialectal variation.

We present HALA, a family of Arabic-centric instruction and translation models built with our translate-and-tune pipeline. We first compress a strong AR↔EN teacher to FP8 (yielding ~2× higher throughput with no quality loss) and use it to create high-fidelity bilingual supervision. A lightweight language model LFM2–1.2B is then fine-tuned on this data and used to translate high-quality English instruction sets into Arabic, producing a million-scale corpus tailored to instruction following. We train HALA models at 350M, 700M, 1.2B, and 9B parameters, and apply slerp merging to balance Arabic specialization with base-model strengths. On Arabic-centric benchmarks, HALA achieves state-of-the-art results within both the “nano” (≤2B) and “small” (7–9B) categories, outperforming their bases. We are committed to release models, data, evaluation, and recipes to accelerate research in Arabic NLP.

This paper introduces an industry level citation element extractor from Arabic text. Citation element extraction enables editorial task automation for publishing houses, creation of citation networks, and automatic citation analytics for impact analysis firms. Citation library tools help users manage their citations. However, for Arabic, these tools lack basic support to identify and extract citation elements. Consequently, researchers, editors and reviewers manually manage Arabic citations tasks. We present a novel Arabic citation element dataset, use it to train a citation element extraction model, and use named entity recognition, morphological analysis, and keyword detection to improve the results for practical use. The paper reports industry ready performance with F1 scores ranging between .80 and .95 for interesting citation elements.

Arabic Named Entity Recognition (ANER) presents challenges due to its linguistic characteristics (Qu et al., 2023). While Transformer models have advanced ANER, evaluation still relies heavily on aggregate metrics like F1 score that obscure the interplay between data characteristics, model behaviour, and error patterns. We present DeformAR, a diagnostic visual analytics framework for evaluating and diagnosing Arabic NER systems through structured, component-level analysis and interpretability. DeformAR integrates quantitative metrics with interactive visualizations to support systematic error analysis, dataset and model debugging. In a case study on ANERCorp, DeformAR identifies annotation mistakes, model calibration issues, and subcomponent interaction effects. To our knowledge, this is the first open-source framework for component-level diagnostic evaluation and interpretability in Arabic NER, available at https://github.com/ay94/DeformAR.

The spoken Arabic exhibits substantial dialectal variation in the Arabic-speaking world. This paper presents a corpus-based analysis of Arabic dialectal variation using the SADA corpus, examining lexical, morphosyntactic, and discourse-pragmatic patterns across dialects. We combine quantitative frequency-based measures with qualitative linguistic analysis, including keyword comparison, distributional profiling, collocational and trigram analyses, and similarity-based clustering. Our results show that Arabic dialects share a substantial common core, while differing systematically in frequent discourse markers, evaluative expressions, and recurrent phraseological patterns. These findings provide empirical evidence for regional clustering among contemporary dialects and for variation relative to the standard register. The study contributes linguistic insights that support both Arabic dialectology and the development of dialect-aware NLP systems.

The Arabic-derived scripts contain several languages that face challenges with the limited resources of speech detection, these challenges are worsened by the scarcity of resources and highly complex linguistic challenges. We proposed ( HACS-TL Hausa Ajami Cross-Script Transfer Learning) a brand new transformer-based architecture that focuses on the detection of hate speech within Ajami script. Hausa is a Chadic language which contains over 77 million speakers located in West Africa; it uses two types of scripts: the Latin (Boko) and the Arabic-derived Ajami which creates new computational difficulties. Our method combines scripts of artistically converted linguistics, augmented cross script multi-head attention, and dialect feature extraction to trellis the morphophonological depth of the Hausa. After a thorough examination using stratified cross-validation along with systemically augmented data, HACS-TL obtained a Macro F1 score of 76.09% which is a significant improvement from the other multilingual baselines (mBERT (69.17 % ) XLM-RoBERTa (73.20 % ) AraBERT (58.63% ) ) HACS-TL outperformed all of the previously stated models. Strong multilingual baselines refer to the other stated models; AraBERT (58.63) XLM-RoBERTa (73.20) mBERT (69.17) HACS-TL 70.73 + 10 % Cross-Script+ (mBERT) 46.73 + 0.9 % Cross-Script + AraBERT. The importance of cross-script attention and learning from transfer sources of resources to languages with limited scripts has proven effective. Our systematic method has aided the advancement of Arabic script homage Hausa and African language resources for the NLP of the Nubians in learning African languages and the intricate Nubian and cross-learning systems from different scripts.

Large Language Models exhibit robust safety alignment when harmful intent is expressed in English, yet their resilience to code-switching and transliteration remains underexplored. This paper presents the first targeted investigation of code-switching as a safety failure mode, focusing on Roman Urdu—a widely used transliterated form common in informal and emotionally expressive communication. We introduce the Roman Urdu Adversarial Benchmark (RUAB), a semantically controlled evaluation benchmark designed to isolate linguistic variation from intent across four safety-critical categories: passive suicidal ideation, psychological distress, threat or intimidation, and coercion or emotional manipulation. Evaluating seven state-of-the-art models, we find that safety detection degrades consistently in code-switched and transliterated inputs, with the most pronounced failures occurring for passive suicidal ideation. Instruction-tuned and reasoning-capable models demonstrate greater robustness, suggesting these failures reflect alignment gaps rather than inherent model limitations. Our findings highlight transliteration and code-switching as under-recognized safety risks and motivate the development of linguistically inclusive, transliteration-aware safety methods.

Several Quranic morphological corpora have been developed to support Arabic linguistic analysis and NLP applications, yet they often lack full coverage, consistency, or manual verification. We present QAMAR, a morphologically oriented, multi-task corpus derived from the Qur’an. This comprehensive, manually verified resource provides a detailed linguistic layer for every Quranic word, including the Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) equivalent, the stem, the lemma, the root, and the part of speech (POS). QAMAR supports multiple NLP tasks, such as normalization, lemmatization, root extraction, and POS tagging, and serves as a gold-standard reference for Quranic and Arabic NLP research, including corpus-to-corpus evaluation and morphological analyzer benchmarking. The paper details QAMAR’s annotation framework, verification process, and resource structure, and reports comparative analyses with existing Quranic morphological resources and outputs produced by current large language models (LLMs).

Encoder-only transformer models remain widely used for discriminative NLP tasks, yet recent architectural advances have largely focused on English. In this work, we present AraModernBERT, an adaptation of the ModernBERT encoder architecture to Arabic, and study the impact of transtokenized embedding initialization and native long-context modeling up to 8,192 tokens. We show that transtokenization is essential for Arabic language modeling, yielding dramatic improvements in masked language modeling performance compared to non-transtokenized initialization. We further demonstrate that AraModernBERT supports stable and effective long-context modeling, achieving improved intrinsic language modeling performance at extended sequence lengths. Downstream evaluations on Arabic natural language understanding tasks, including inference, offensive language detection, question-question similarity, and named entity recognition, confirm strong transfer to discriminative and sequence labeling settings. Our results highlight practical considerations for adapting modern encoder architectures to Arabic and other languages written in Arabic-derived scripts.

Arabic speech recognition systems face distinct challenges due to the language’s complex morphology and dialectal variations. Self-supervised models (SSL) like XLS-R have shown promising results, but their size with over than 300 million of parameters, makes fine-tuning computationally expensive. In this work, we present the first comparative study of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), specifically LoRA and DoRA, applied to XLS-R for Arabic ASR. We evaluate on the newly released Common Voice Arabic V24.0 dataset, establishing new benchmarks. Our full fine-tuning achieves state-of-the-art results among XLS-R-based models with 23.03% Word Error Rate (WER). In our experiments, LoRA achieved a 36.10% word error rate (WER) while training just 2% of the model’s parameters. DoRA reached 45.20% WER in initial experiments. We analyze the trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency, offering practical guidance for developing Arabic ASR systems when computational resources are limited. The models and code are publicly available.

This work presents an evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for English to dialectal Arabic machine translation on the MADAR dataset. We evaluate both translation directions (English to Arabic and vice-versa) on 16 Arabic dialects. Our experiments cover a diverse set of models, including specialized Arabic models (Jais, Nile), multilingual models (Gemma, Command-R, Mistral, Aya), and commercial APIs (GPT-4.1). We employ multiple evaluation metrics: BLEU, CHRF, COMET (both reference-based and reference-less variants) and GEMBA (LLM-as-a-judge), as well as a small-scale manual evaluation, to assess translation quality. We discuss the challenges of automatic MT evaluation, especially in the context of Arabic dialects. We also evaluate the ability of LLMs to classify the dialect used in a text. The study offers insights into the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs for dialectal Arabic machine translation, particularly highlighting the difficulty of handling dialectal diversity, although the results may be influenced by possible training data contamination, which is always a concern with LLMs.

Automatic detection of toxic and offensive content in Arabic social media is a challenging task due to rich morphology, dialectal variation, and noisy writing styles. While transformer-based language models have achieved strong performance, they often produce uncertain predictions in borderline cases. This paper presents a hybrid framework for Arabic toxicity detection that combines a pretrained Arabic-specific transformer model with a confidence-aware rule-based mechanism. The proposed approach activates automatically induced lexical rules only when the model prediction falls within a predefined gray zone of uncertainty, preserving neural dominance while improving robustness and interpretability. Experiments conducted on a manually annotated dataset of 35,000 Arabic posts demonstrate that the hybrid approach achieves consistent improvements over the baseline model, particularly in reducing false negatives for toxic content. The results indicate that selective rule activation is an effective strategy for enhancing reliability in real-world Arabic social media moderation systems.

Arabic diacritics encode phonetic information essential for pronunciation, disambiguation, and downstream applications, yet most Arabic ASR systems generate undiacritized output. In this work, we study direct speech-to-diacritized-text recognition using a single-stage ASR pipeline that predicts diacritics jointly with Arabic letters, without text-based post-processing. We evaluate two Arabic-adapted ASR architectures—wav2vec 2.0 XLSR-53 and Whisper-base—under a unified experimental setup on the ClArTTS Classical Arabic dataset. Performance is assessed using surface and lexical WER/CER alongside diacritic error rate (DER) to disentangle base transcription accuracy from diacritic realization. Our results show that Arabic-adapted wav2vec 2.0 achieves substantially lower diacritic error rates than Whisper, indicating stronger exploitation of acoustic cues relevant to vowelization. We further analyze the effect of decoding strategy and provide a detailed breakdown of diacritic errors, highlighting challenges associated with short vowels and morphosyntactic markers. These findings underscore the importance of model architecture and Arabic-specific adaptation for accurate diacritized Arabic ASR.

We present our approach to the AbjadGenEval shared task on detecting AI-generated Arabic text. We fine-tuned the multilingual E5-large encoder for binary classification, and we explored several pooling strategies to pool token representations, including weighted layer pooling, multi-head attention pooling, and gated fusion. Interestingly, none of these outperformed simple mean pooling, which achieved an F1 of 0.75 on the test set. We believe this is because complex pooling methods introduce additional parameters that need more data to train properly, whereas mean pooling offers a stable baseline that generalizes well even with limited examples. We also observe a clear pattern in the data: human-written texts tend to be significantly longer than machine-generated ones.

We present AraLingBench, a fully human annotated benchmark for evaluating the Arabic linguistic competence of large language mod- els (LLMs). The benchmark spans five core categories: grammar, morphology, spelling, reading comprehension, and syntax, through 150 expert designed multiple choice questions that directly assess structural language understanding. Evaluating 35 Arabic and bilingual LLMs reveals that current models demonstrate strong surface level proficiency but struggle with deeper grammatical and syntactic reasoning. AraLingBench highlights a persistent gap between high scores on knowledge-based benchmarks and true linguistic mastery, showing that many models succeed through memorization or pattern recognition rather than au- thentic comprehension. By isolating and measuring fundamental linguistic skills, AraLingBench provides a diagnostic framework for developing Arabic LLMs. The benchmark and evaluation code are available on Hugging Face and GitHub.

In this paper, we demonstrate the system submitted to the shared task of medical text classification in Arabic. We proposed a single-model approach based on fine-tuned LLM-based embedding combined with hierarchical classical classifiers, achieving a competitive macro F1-score of 0.46 on the blind test set. We explored various modeling strategies, including tree-based ensembles, LLM, and hierarchical correction for rare classes, highlighting the effectiveness of domain-specific fine-tuning in low-resource settings. The results demonstrate that a single fine-tuned Arabic BERT variant can serve as a strong baseline in extreme imbalance scenarios, outperforming more complex ensembles in simplicity and reproducibility.

Arabic language faces technical and cultural challenges, including a lack of high-quality resources and the prevalence of regional dialects, which hinders the development of effective language processing systems. Therefore, the “Murabaa” platform was developed to transform Arabic linguistic knowledge into integrated digital resources. The platform aims to provide accurate digital content and promote the use of Arabic in various fields to bridge the gap between tradition and modernity by offering integrated linguistic resources for developing advanced research tools. The platform provides eight accurate dictionaries in the form of a website and a web application, contributing to the digitization of knowledge and its representation within the framework of standard lexical markup. In this study, we also conduct a quantitative comparison of the resources against similar ones to assess the quality of the linguistic knowledge they provide.

This paper describes our system submitted to the AbjadMed 2026 shared task at AbjadNLP. The task focuses on the multi-class classification of Arabic medical texts under severe class imbalance. Our approach fine-tunes a pre-trained Arabic Transformer model and incorporates several imbalance-aware strategies, including data cleaning, class-weighted loss, and label smoothing. Through ablation experiments, we observe consistent improvements over a baseline system, demonstrating the effectiveness of these techniques in improving performance on underrepresented medical categories. Finally, our error analysis highlights persistent challenges related to label sparsity and semantic overlap among medical classes.

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently generate answers that are fluent but not fully grounded in the provided context, a phenomenon commonly referred to as hallucination. While recent work has explored hallucination detection primarily in English and open domain settings, comparatively little attention has been given to Arabic machine reading comprehension (MRC), particularly in culturally sensitive domains such as Qur’anic texts. In this paper, we present a knowledge graph based diagnostic framework for analyzing hallucinations and question misalignment in Arabic MRC. Rather than proposing a new detection model or metric, the framework provides an interpretable, triple level analysis of model generated answers by comparing subject-relation-object representations derived from the passage, the question, and the answer. The approach incorporates question-aware filtering and operates under weak supervision, combining automatic analysis with targeted human adjudication to handle annotation gaps and semantic ambiguity. We apply the framework to the Qur’anic Reading Comprehension Dataset (QRCD) and demonstrate how it exposes systematic hallucination patterns that are difficult to capture using surface level similarity metrics alone, particularly for questions requiring justification or abstract interpretation. The results highlight the value of structured, transparent diagnostic evaluation for understanding LLM behavior in low resource and high stakes Arabic NLP settings.

How do Arabic-speaking communities express and engage with psychological stress on social media? We introduce AraStress, the first large-scale Arabic corpus dedicated to psychological stress research, comprising 175,862 public social media posts from 2020 to 2024, covering pandemic and post-pandemic periods.It fills a significant gap in Arabic mental-health NLP resources focused on stress, enabling large-scale analysis of related expressions.Unlike prior work focusing primarily on Twitter and depression or suicidality, AraStress addresses the critical gap in stress-focused resources. Our lexicon-based analysis reveals that stress-related posts elicit predominantly affective engagement and exhibit a hybrid lexical framing that integrates religious and therapeutic language. AraStress provides a foundational resource for culturally grounded computational models of stress detection and digital wellbeing in Arabic-speaking communities.

The rapid advancement of large language mod-els poses significant challenges for content au-thenticity, particularly in under-resourced lan-guages where detection tools remain scarce.We present our winning system for the Abjad-GenEval shared task on Arabic AI-generatedtext detection. Our key insight is that AI-generated text exhibits distinctive patternsacross multiple linguistic levels-from local syn-tax to global semantics-that can be captured bylearning to fuse representations from differenttransformer layers. We introduce aWeightedLayer Poolingmechanism that learns optimallayer combinations, combined withAttentionPoolingfor sequence-level context aggregation.Through systematic experimentation with 15+ approaches, we make a surprising discovery:model architecture selection dominates over so-phisticated training techniques, with DeBERTa-v3 providing +27% relative improvement overAraBERT regardless of training strategy. Oursystem achieves 0.93 F1-score, securing 1st placeamong all participants and outperform-ing the runner-up by 3 absolute points

This paper describes the system developed by team HCMUS_The Fangs for the AbjadStyleTransfer shared task (ArabicNLP 2026), where we achieved 1st place. We present a contrastive style learning approach for zero-shot Arabic authorship style transfer. Our key discovery is that the 21 test authors-including Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz and literary pioneer Taha Hussein-have zero overlap with the 32,784 training authors, transforming this into a pure zero-shot challenge. This insight led us to develop a dual-encoder architecture that learns transferable style representations through contrastive objectives, rather than memorizing author-specific patterns. Our system achieves 19.77 BLEU and 55.74 chrF, outperforming retrieval-augmented generation (+18%) and multi-task learning (+31%). Counter-intuitively, we find that sophisticated architectural modifications like style injection consistently degrade performance, while simpler approaches that preserve pre-trained knowledge excel. Our analysis reveals that for famous authors, pre-trained Arabic language models already encode substantial stylistic knowledge-the key is surfacing it, not learning from scratch.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly proliferated, presenting challenges in distinguishing human-written text from AI-generated content, especially in low-resource languages like Urdu. This paper introduces U-RoCX, a novel hybrid architecture for the AbjadGenEval Shared Task on AI-Generated Urdu Text Detection. U-RoCX combines the multilingual semantic capabilities of a frozen XLM-RoBERTa backbone with local feature extraction from Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and the advanced sequential modeling of the recently proposed Extended LSTM (xLSTM). By utilizing xLSTM’s matrix memory and covariance update rules, the model addresses traditional Recurrent Neural Network bottlenecks. Experimental results demonstrate the robustness of U-RoCX, achieving a balanced accuracy and F1-score of 88% on the test set.

We present our approach to the AbjadNLP 2026 Arabic Authorship Identification shared task, achieving 4th place. Our key finding is that AraBERT-base (110M) outperforms AraBERT-large (340M) on the test set with macro F1 of 0.8449 versus 0.8096, despite lower validation scores. We handle long passages via sliding window chunking with mean pooling, and use a two-stage classification head with dual dropout for regularization. Per-class analysis reveals that translated works achieve perfect F1 while classical poets remain challenging due to shared formal structures. Our results challenge the “scale is all you need” assumption for stylometric tasks.

Medical AI systems increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs), yet their deployment in linguistically diverse regions remains unexplored. We address this gap by introducing U-MIRAGE, the first medical question-answering benchmark for Urdu and Roman Urdu. Urdu is the 11th most spoken language (with over 246 million speakers) worldwide. Our systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs reveals three main findings. (1) 6% to 10% drop in performance when moving from English to Urdu variants, even though medical knowledge should theoretically transfer across languages. (2) Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves small models by 8% to 20%, while surprisingly the larger models’ performance degraded by up to 3%. (3) Quantized small models fail catastrophically in low-resource languages, achieving near-random accuracy regardless of various prompting strategies. These findings challenge core assumptions about multilingual medical AI systems. Roman Urdu consistently outperforms standard Urdu script, suggesting orthographic alignment with pre-training data matters more than linguistic proximity. CoT prompting effectiveness depends critically on model architecture rather than task complexity alone. CoT prompting effectiveness depends critically on model architecture rather than task complexity alone. Our contributions are threefold: (1) U-MIRAGE, (2) systematic benchmarking of LLMs for Urdu and Roman Urdu medical reasoning, and (3) empirical analysis of CoT prompting in low-resource contexts. Our code and datasets are publicly available.

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to a substantial increase in automatically generated textual content, raising concerns regarding misinformation, plagiarism, and authorship verification. These challenges are particularly pronounced for low-resource languages such as Urdu, where limited annotated data and complex linguistic properties hinder robust detection. In this paper, we present a transformer-based approach for binary classification of human-written versus AI-generated Urdu text, developed for the AbjadGenEval Task 2 shared task. Beyond model fine-tuning, we adopt a data-centric perspective, emphasizing dataset diagnostics, document-level inference, and calibration strategies. Our system achieves strong performance on the official test set, with an F1-score of 88.68% and balanced accuracy of 88.71%. Through empirical analysis, we demonstrate that dataset characteristics and generator-specific artifacts play a dominant role in model generalization, highlighting critical directions for future research in low-resource AI-generated text detection.

This paper describes our system submitted to the AbjadGenEval Shared Task at ArabicNLP 2026, which focuses on binary classification of human-written versus machine-generated text in low-resource languages. We participated in two independent subtasks targeting Arabic and Urdu news and literary texts. Our approach relies exclusively on fine-tuning XLM-RoBERTa, a multilingual Transformer-based model, under carefully controlled training and preprocessing settings. While the same model architecture was used for both subtasks, language-specific data handling strategies were applied based on empirical observations. The proposed system achieved first place in the Urdu subtask and third place in the Arabic subtask according to the official evaluation. These results demonstrate that multilingual pretrained models can serve as strong and reliable systems for AI-generated text detection across diverse languages.

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced significant challenges regarding algorithmic bias, privacy, and the authenticity of digital content. While detection mechanisms for English are maturing, low-resource languages like Urdu—spoken by over 100 million people—require dedicated research. In this paper, we present a technical framework for Urdu AI-generated text detection developed for the *ACL shared task. We propose a hybrid pipeline that combines TF-IDF Character N-grams with a custom stylometric feature extractor designed to capture unique Urdu linguistic markers, including repeated word ratios, punctuation density, and formal function markers. Using a Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) optimized via Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), our system achieves a balanced accuracy and F₁-score of 87.80% on a dataset of 6,800 records. Our results demonstrate that a computationally efficient, classical machine learning approach—prioritizing stylistic signals over heavy preprocessing—remains highly effective for distinguishing between human-written and AI-generated Urdu text.

Arabic authorship attribution presents unique challenges due to the language’s rich derivational morphology, which often fragments word-level frequencies. In this paper, we describe our winning submission to the AbjadAuthorID Shared Task. We propose a hybrid ensemble system that fuses the morphological precision of character n-gram LinearSVCs with the semantic understanding of fine-tuned Transformers (AraBERT and XLM-RoBERTa). Contrary to current trends in NLP, we demonstrate that traditional character n-grams (0.92 F1) significantly outperform deep learning baselines (AraBERT 0.87 F1) for this task, suggesting that authorial signature in Arabic is encoded more densely in morphological patterns than in semantic content. Our final system employs a novel Precision Scalpel post-hoc calibration technique and selective pseudo-labeling to address class imbalance and genre confounds. The system achieved the 1st place ranking with a macro F1-score of 0.932 and accuracy of 0.963 on the test set.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly proficient at generating human-like text, distinguishing between human-written and machine-generated content has become a critical challenge for information integrity. This paper presents Kashif-AI, a system developed for the AbjadGenEval Task 1: AI-Generated Arabic Text Detection. The approach leverages fine-tuned Arabic Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs), specifically MARBERT and CAMeLBERT, to classify news articles. A rigorous ablation study was conducted to evaluate the impact of data augmentation, comparing models trained on the official shared task data against those trained on a combined corpus of over 47,000 samples. While near-perfect performance was observed during validation, the blind test set evaluation revealed a significant generalization gap. Contrary to expectations, data augmentation resulted in performance degradation due to domain shifts. The best-performing configuration, which utilized CAMeLBERT-Mix trained on the original dataset, achieved an F1-score of 66.29% and an Accuracy of 70.5% on the blind test set.

We present a computationally efficient ap- proach for detecting AI-generated Arabic text as part of the AbjadGenEval shared task. Our method combines Supervised Con- trastive Learning with a Stacking Ensemble of AraBERT and XLM-RoBERTa models. Our training pipeline progresses through three stages: (1) standard fine-tuning without con- trastive loss, (2) adding supervised contrastive loss for better embeddings, and (3) further fine-tuning on diverse generation styles. On our held-out test split, the stacking ensemble achieves F1=0.983 before fine-tuning. On the official workshop test data, our system achieved 4th place with F1=0.782, demonstrating strong generalization using only encoder-based trans- formers without requiring large language mod- els. Our implementation is publicly available

The rapid advancement of large language models necessitates robust methods for detecting AI-generated Arabic text. This paper presents our system for distinguishing human-written from machine-generated Arabic content. We propose a weighted ensemble combining AraBERTv2 and BERT-base-arabic, trained via 5-fold stratified cross-validation with class-balanced loss functions. Our methodology incorporates Arabic text normalization, strategic data augmentation using 16,678 samples from external scientific abstracts, and threshold optimization prioritizing recall. On the official test set, our system achieved an F1-score of 0.763, an accuracy of 0.695, a precision of 0.624, and a recall of 0.980, demonstrating strong detection of machine-generated texts with minimal false negatives at the cost of elevated false positives. Analysis reveals critical insights into precision-recall trade-offs and challenges in cross-domain generalization for Arabic AI text detection.

This paper presents our submission to the AbjadGenEval shared task on AI-generated text detection in Arabic and Urdu. To address the challenges of morphologically rich and low-resource environments, we developed a composite framework leveraging monolingual specialists (AraBERTv2, CAMeLBERT-DA) and multilingual transformers. Our system achieved robust in-domain performance with Test F1-scores of 0.75 for Arabic and 0.86 for Urdu. Methodologically, we tested both raw and normalized text to distinguish whether models detect based on semantic content or on surface artifacts such as punctuation and formatting patterns. Furthermore, our cross-lingual investigations reveal directional performance differences, where Urdu-trained models achieve 0.75 F1 on Arabic, while Arabic-trained models achieve only 0.61 F1 on Urdu. Despite this difference, both directions maintained notably high recall for the machine class, indicating that the model learns cross-lingual machine detection patterns across the Perso-Arabic script. Finally, transfer performance collapsed when internal layers were frozen, demonstrating that full fine-tuning is essential for cross-lingual detection. However, the observed performance differences may partly reflect data imbalance rather than purely linguistic factors.

We present AbjadMed, a shared task on Arabic medical text classification organised as part of the 2nd AbjadNLP workshop at EACL 2026. The task targets supervised multi-class classification under realistic conditions of severe class imbalance, fine-grained category structure, and naturally occurring label noise. Participants assign each Arabic medical question–answer instance to one of 82 predefined categories derived from real healthcare consultations. The dataset is based on the Arabic Healthcare Dataset (AHD) and is released as curated training and test splits containing 27,951 and 18,634 instances respectively, while preserving the original label distribution. Systems are evaluated using macro-averaged F1 to emphasise performance on minority medical topics. Results show that Arabic medical text classification remains challenging even with modern pretrained models, particularly for low-frequency and semantically overlapping categories. AbjadMed provides a reproducible benchmark for studying robustness and generalisation in Arabic healthcare NLP.

Authorship attribution is a critical task in natural language processing with applications ranging from forensic linguistics to plagiarism detection. While well-studied in high-resource languages, it remains challenging for low-resource languages like Arabic and Urdu. In this paper, we present our participation in the AbjadNLP shared task, where we systematically evaluate three distinct approaches: traditional machine learning using SVM with TF-IDF features, fine-tuned transformer-based models (AraBERT), and LLMs. We demonstrate that while fine-tuned AraBERT excels in Arabic, traditional lexical models (SVM) prove more robust for Urdu, outperforming both BERT-based and LLM approaches. We also show that few-shot prompting with LLMs, when operated as a reranker over top candidates, significantly outperforms zero-shot baselines. Our final systems achieved competitive performance, ranking 6th and 1st in the Arabic and Urdu tasks respectively.

This paper describes the author’s participation in the Arabic track of the AbjadAuthorID shared task which focuses on multiclass authorship attribution using transformer-based models. The task involves identifying the author of a given text excerpt drawn from diverse genres and historical periods, posing significant challenges due to stylistic variation and linguistic richness. Experimental results demonstrate strong performance, with an ensemble of MAR BERTv2 and ARBERTv2 achieving achieving an accuracy of 92% and a macro-averaged F1 score of 89%, ranking second on the leader board, and highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed approach for Arabic authorship identification.

Authorship identification is a fundamental task in natural language processing and computational stylistics. Despite significant advancements in high-resource languages, lowresource languagesparticularly those utilizing non-Latin scriptsremain largely underexplored, leaving a critical gap in resources and benchmarks for this linguistically distinct, lowresource language. Addressing this oversight, this paper presents Task 3 of AbjadNLP 2026, the first shared task dedicated to authorship identification for Kurdish. The task introduces a newly constructed dataset designed to capture the unique phonological and orthographic features of Sorani Kurdish and formulate the task as a closed-set multiclass classification problem. To establish a robust baseline, we fine-tune the pretrained XLM-RoBERTa model to capture authorial, stylistic patterns. Experimental results on the test set demonstrate the efficacy of transformer-based representations for this domain, achieving an accuracy of approximately 75%.

We present the findings of the AbjadGenEval shared task, organized as part of the AbjadNLP workshop at EACL 2026, which benchmarks AI-generated text detection for Arabic-script languages. Extending beyond Arabic to include Urdu, the task serves as a binary classification platform distinguishing human-written from AI-generated news articles produced by varied LLMs (e.g., GPT, Gemini). Twenty teams par- ticipated, with top systems achieving F1 scores of 0.93 for Arabic and 0.89 for Urdu. The re- sults highlight the dominance of multilingual transformers-specifically XLM-RoBERTa and DeBERTa-v3-and reveal significant challenges in cross-domain generalization, where naive data augmentation often yielded diminishing returns. This shared task establishes a robust baseline for authenticating content in the Abjad ecosystem.

Authorship identification is a core problem in Natural Language Processing and computational linguistics, with applications spanning digital humanities, literary analysis, and forensic linguistics. While substantial progress has been made for English and other high-resource languages, authorship attribution for languages written in the Arabic (Abjad) script remains underexplored. In this paper, we present an overview of AbjadAuthorID, a shared task organised as part of the AbjadNLP workshop at EACL 2026, which focuses on multiclass authorship identification across Arabic-script languages. The shared task covers Modern Standard Arabic, Urdu, and Kurdish, and is formulated as a closed-set multiclass classification problem over literary text spanning multiple authors and historical periods. We describe the task motivation, dataset construction, evaluation protocol, and participation statistics, and report official results for the Arabic track. The findings highlight both the effectiveness of current approaches in controlled settings and the challenges posed by lower participation and resource availability in some language tracks. AbjadAuthorID establishes a new benchmark for multilingual authorship attribution in morphologically rich, underrepresented languages.

Authorship style transfer aims to rewrite a given text so that it reflects the distinctive style of a target author while preserving the original meaning. Despite growing interest in text style transfer, most existing work has focused on English and other high-resource languages, with limited attention to languages written in the Arabic script. In this paper, we present an overview of AbjadStyleTransfer, a shared task organised as part of the AbjadNLP workshop at EACL 2026, which targets authorship style transfer for Arabic-script languages with a strong focus on literary text. The shared task covers Modern Standard Arabic and Urdu, and is designed to encourage research on controllable text generation in morphologically rich and stylistically diverse languages. Participants are required to generate text that conforms to the writing style of a specified author, given a semantically equivalent formal input. We describe the task motivation, dataset construction, evaluation protocol, and participation statistics, and provide an initial discussion of the challenges associated with authorship style transfer in Arabic-script languages. AbjadStyleTransfer establishes a new benchmark for literary style transfer beyond Latin-script settings and supports future research on culturally grounded and linguistically informed text generation.

Creating speech datasets, models, and evaluation frameworks for low-resource languages remains challenging given the lack of a broad base of pertinent experience to draw from. This paper reports on the field collection of 612 hours of spontaneous speech in Bambara, a low-resource West African language; the semi-automated annotation of that dataset with transcriptions; the creation of several monolingual ultra-compact and small models using the dataset; and the automatic and human evaluation of their output. We offer practical suggestions for data collection protocols, annotation, and model design, as well as evidence for the importance of performing human evaluation. In addition to the main dataset, multiple evaluation datasets, models, and code are made publicly available.

This paper presents a Multilingual Vision Large Language Model, named M-MiniGPT4. Our model exhibits strong vision-language understanding (VLU) capabilities across 11 languages. We utilize a mixture of native multilingual and translated data to push the multilingual VLU performance of the MiniGPT4 architecture. In addition, we propose a multilingual alignment training stage that uses parallel text corpora to further enhance the multilingual capabilities of our model. M-MiniGPT4 achieves 36% accuracy on the multilingual MMMU benchmark, outperforming state-of-the-art models in the same weight class, including foundation models released after the majority of this work was completed. We open-source our models, code, and translated datasets to facilitate future research in low-resource and multilingual settings.

Effective text generation and chat interfaces for low-resource languages (LRLs) remain a challenge for state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) to support. This is mainly due to the difficulty of curating high-quality instruction datasets for LRLs, a limitation prevalent in the languages spoken across the African continent and other regions. Current approaches, such as automated translation and synthetic data generation, frequently yield outputs that lack fluency or even orthographic consistency. In this paper, we introduce InstructLR, a novel framework designed to generate high-quality instruction datasets for LRLs. Our approach integrates LLM-driven text generation with a dual-layer quality filtering mechanism: an automated filtering layer based on retrieval-augmented-generation (RAG)-based n-shot prompting, and a human-in-the-loop validation layer. Drawing inspiration from benchmarks such as MMLU in task definition, InstructLR has facilitated the creation of three multi-domain instruction benchmarks: ZarmaInstruct-50k, BambaraInstruct-50k, and FulfuldeInstruct-50k.

We present an improved method for automaticparallel sentence alignment in low- resourcelanguages. We used CoHere multilingualembeddings and inverted softmax retrieval.Our technique achieved a higher F1-score of78.30% on the MAFAND-MT test set, comparedto the existing technique’s 54.75%. Precisionand recall have shown similar performance.We assessed the quality of the extracted data bydemonstrating that it outperforms the existingtechnique in terms of low-resource translationperformance.

Multimodal AI research has overwhelmingly focused on high-resource languages, hindering the democratization of advancements in the field. To address this, we present AfriCaption, a comprehensive framework for multilingual image captioning in 20 African languages and our contributions are threefold: (i) a curated dataset built on Flickr8k, featuring semantically aligned captions generated via a context-aware selection and translation process; (ii) a dynamic, context-preserving pipeline that ensures ongoing quality through model ensembling and adaptive substitution; and (iii) the AfriCaption model, a 0.5B parametervision-to-text architecture that integrates SigLIP and NLLB200 for caption generation across underrepresented languages. This unified framework ensures ongoing data quality and establishes the first scalable image-captioning resource for underrepresented African languages, laying the groundwork for truly inclusive multimodal AI.

Low-resource languages serve as invaluable repositories of human history, preserving cultural and intellectual diversity. Despite their significance, they remain largely absent from modern natural language processing systems. While progress has been made for widely spoken African languages such as Swahili, Yoruba, and Amharic, smaller indigenous languages like Efik continue to be underrepresented in machine translation research. This study evaluates the effectiveness of state-of-the-art multilingual neural machine translation models for English–Efik translation, leveraging a small-scale, community-curated parallel corpus of N = 13,865 sentence pairs. We fine-tuned both the mT5 multilingual model and the NLLB-200 model on this dataset. NLLB-200 outperformed mT5, achieving BLEU scores of 26.64 for English–Efik and 31.21 for Efik–English, with corresponding chrF scores of 51.04 and 47.92, indicating improved fluency and semantic fidelity. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of developing practical machine translation tools for low-resource languages and highlight the importance of inclusive data practices and culturally grounded evaluation in advancing equitable NLP.

Sentiment analysis in low-resource, culturally nuanced contexts challenges conventional NLP approaches that assume fixed labels and universal affective expressions. We present a diagnostic framework that treats sentiment as a context-dependent, culturally embedded construct, and evaluate how large language models (LLMs) reason about sentiment in informal, code-mixed WhatsApp messages from Nairobi youth health groups. Using human-annotated data, sentiment-flipped counterfactuals, and rubric-based explanation evaluation, we probe LLM interpretability, robustness, and alignment with human reasoning. Framing our evaluation through a social science measurement lens, we operationalize LLM outputs as an instrument for measuring the abstract concept of sentiment. Our findings reveal significant variation in model reasoning quality, with top-tier LLMs demonstrating greater interpretive stability, while smaller open-weight models in our study show reduced stability under ambiguity or sentiment shifts. This work highlights the need for culturally sensitive, reasoning-aware AI evaluation in complex, real-world communication.

Given the advancement of various Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in the 21st century, Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) plays a vital role in human and machine interaction and serves as an interface for a wide range of applications. The development of these high-performing, robust and useful technologies continue to gain more attention on high-resource languages due to high availability of language data, market profitability dominance and access to funding and research initiatives compared to the marginalised low-resource languages. Despite efforts to develop ASR systems for African languages, there are still numerous challenges due to limited speech datasets, tonal complexity and dialectal variation. In this study, we curated a domain-specific speech dataset for one of the oral Yoruba literatures, proverbs, which are highly culturally inclined. We used the Yoruba recording app that was developed for Iroyin-speech project to record 6 hours of Yoruba proverb sentences. The NCAIR1/Yoruba-ASR model which was finetuned on Open AI Whisper Small and Massively Multilingual Speech, a multilingual speech model featuring low-resource languages including Yoruba language was evaluated with the recorded Yoruba proverbs. Evaluation was conducted based on Word Error Rate (WER) and Tone Error Rate (TER). Our result shows that current ASR systems that support Yoruba does not capture cultural nuances. These findings highlight an urgent need to curate more robust speech datasets that are culturally embedded for low resource languages and in this case particularly, Yoruba language in order to build technological tools that preserve African culture, language and identity.

Language choice in multilingual societies is rarely arbitrary. In Nigerian, English, Nigerian Pidgin (NP) and indigenous languages are strategically deployed in online discourse, yet little is known about how they function in hostile contexts. Here we conduct the first systematic analysis of NP in online hate speech on two platforms, Twitter and Instagram. Using a linguistically enriched annotation scheme, we label each post for class, targeted group, language variety, and hate type. Our results show that NP is disproportionately used in offensive and hateful discourse, particularly against Hausa, women, and LGBTQ+ groups, and that insults are the dominant hate strategy. Cross-domain evaluation further reveals that classifiers trained on Twitter systematically over-predict hate on Instagram, highlighting challenges of domain transfer. These findings underscore NP’s role as a linguistic resource for hostility and its sociolinguistic salience in amplifying stereotypes and affect. For NLP, the work demonstrates the need for NP-specific resources, sensitivity to figurative strategies, and domain adaptation across platforms. By bridging sociolinguistics and computational modeling, this study contributes new evidence on how language choice shapes online hate speech in a multilingual African context.

Tokenization inefficiency is associated with structural disadvantages on morphologically complex, low-resource languages, inflating compute resources and reducing accuracy. We evaluate 10 Large Language Models (LLMs) on AfriMMLU (5 subjects; 16 African languages) and show that token fertility reliably predicts accuracy. Higher fertility consistently predicts lower accuracy across all models and subjects. We further find that reasoning models (e.g., DeepSeek, o1) consistently outperform non-reasoning peers across high- and low-resource languages in the AfriMMLU dataset, narrowing accuracy gaps observed in prior generations. In terms of economics, a doubling in tokens results in quadrupled training cost and time, underscoring the “token tax” faced by many languages. These results motivate morphologically aware tokenization, fair pricing, and multilingual benchmarks for equitable natural language processing (NLP).

Equitable access to quality education remains a critical challenge in Nigeria, where millions of students prepare annually for standardized examinations (WAEC, NECO, JAMB) with limited access to personalized tutoring (Badei et.al, 2024). This research presents EduNaija AI Tutor, a multi-agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system designed to democratize educational support through AI-powered tutoring aligned with Nigerian curricula. The system integrates conversational AI with document-based question answering, automated assessment generation, and multilingual support for English, Yoruba, Hausa, and Igbo. Using LangChain for agent orchestration, OpenAI GPT models for natural language processing, and FAISS for vector retrieval, the system enables students to interact with educational content through natural language queries while maintaining cultural relevance through Nigerian-contextualized examples and conventions (Chukwuma et.al, 2024). The multi-agent architecture comprises five specialized components: a main orchestrator, explanation agent, quiz generation agent, web search agent, and RAG agent for processing uploaded educational materials. Preliminary evaluation demonstrates the system’s capability to provide curriculum-aligned explanations, generate practice assessments, and answer questions from uploaded textbooks and study materials. This work contributes a culturally-aware educational AI framework addressing linguistic diversity and curriculum alignment challenges in African educational contexts, while leveraging open-source tools for reproducibility and accessibility (Shoukat et.al, 2025).

Despite serving over 100 million speakers as a vital African lingua franca, Swahili remains critically under-resourced for Natural Language Processing, hindering technological progress across East Africa. We present a scalable solution: a controllable synthetic data generation pipeline that produces culturally grounded Swahili text for sentiment analysis, validated through automated LLM judges. To ensure reliability, we conduct targeted human evaluation with a native Swahili speaker on a stratified sample, achieving 80.95% agreementbetween generated sentiment labels and human ground truth, with strong agreement on judge quality assessments. This demonstrates that LLM-based generation and quality assessment can transfer effectively to low-resource languages. We release a dataset and provide a reproducible pipeline in tandem, providing ample knowledge and working material for NLP researchers in low-resource contexts. We release the resulting Swahili sentiment dataset and the full reproducible generation pipeline publicly at https://huggingface.co/datasets/tabularisai/swahili-sentiment-dataset and https://github.com/tabularis-ai/Synthetic-Data-Generation-Pipeline-for-Low-Resource-Swahili-Sentiment-Analysis.

In this paper, we present some of our recent efforts to provide base NLP pipelines for African languages. These include an infrastructure called UDMorph to make UD-compatible training data available for resources that do not have dependency relations, and a Python package called flexiPipe to easily run an NLP pipeline in various NLP tools using a uniform front-end, including the models provided by UDMorph. flexiPipe also provides Unicode normalization, an often overlooked feature that has a significant impact on African NLP. flexiPipe currently provides an NLP pipeline for 33 African languages, a significant increase from the handful of models that are currently easily accessible. And UDMorph is designed to make it easy to provide training data for more languages.

Word Error Rate (WER) mischaracterizes ASR models’ performance for African languages by combining phonological, tone, and other linguistic errors into a single lexical error. By contrast, Feature Error Rate (FER) has recently attracted attention as a viable metric that reveals linguistically meaningful errors in models’ performance. In this paper, we evaluate three speech encoders on two African languages by complementing WER with CER, and FER, and add a tone-aware extension (TER). We show that by computing errors on phonological features, FER and TER reveal linguistically-salient error patterns even when word-level accuracy remains low. Our results reveal that models perform better on segmental features, while tones (especially mid and downstep) remain the most challenging features. Results on Yoruba show a striking differential in metrics, with WER=0.788, CER=0.305, and FER=0.151. Similarly for Uneme (an endangered language absent from pretraining data) a model with near-total WER and 0.461 CER achieves the relatively low FER of 0.267. This indicates model error is often attributable to individual phonetic feature errors, which is obscured by all-or-nothing metrics like WER.

Wikipedia editors undertake the task of editing machine translation (MT) outputs in various languages to disseminate multilingual knowledge from English. But are editors doing more than just translating or fixing MT output? To answer this broad question, we constructed a dataset of 4,335 fine-grained annotated parallel pairs of MT translations and human post-edit (HE) translations for five low-resource African languages: Hausa, Igbo, Swahili, Yoruba, and Zulu. We report on our data selection and annotation methodologies as well as findings from the annotated dataset, the most surprising of which is that annotators mostly preferred the MT translations over their HE counterparts for three out of five languages. We analyze the nature of these “fluency breaking” edits and provide recommendations for the MT post-editing workflows in the Wikipedia domain and beyond.

Travel agencies in many African countries face increasing pressure to handle large volumes of customer inquiries with limited staff or, either non-existent or outdated rule-based chat-bots. To address this challenge, we develop a conversational virtual assistant powered by a Large Language Model (LLM) and enhanced with a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline. The system combines LLM reasoning, company-specific knowledge retrieval, and real-time API (Application Programming Interface) integration to deliver accurate, context-aware responses through WhatsApp, the region’s most widely used communication platform. A dedicated web interface enables staff to upload and update internal documents, ensuring that the assistant remains aligned with changing service information. Demonstrations show that the proposed solution improves response speed, enhances user experience, and reduces operational burden.

Lemmatization, which reduces words to their root forms, plays a key role in tasks such as information retrieval, text indexing, and machinelearning-based language models. However, a key research challenge for low-resourced languages such as the Somali is the lack of human-annotated lemmatization datasets and reliable ground truth to underpin accurate morphological analysis and training relevant NLP models. To address this problem, we developed the first large-scale, purpose-built Somali lemmatization lexicon, coupled with a crowdsourcing platform for ongoing expansion. The system leverages Somali’s agglutinative and derivational morphology, encompassing over5,584 root words and 78,629 derivative forms, each annotated with part-of-speech tags. For data validation purpose, we have devised a pilot lexicon-based lemmatizer integrated with rule-based logic to handle out-of-vocabulary terms. Evaluation on a 294-document corpuscovering news articles, social media posts, and short messages shows lemmatization accuracies of 51.27% for full articles, 44.14% forexcerpts, and 59.51% for short texts such as tweets. These results demonstrate that combining lexical resources, POS tagging, and rulebased strategies provides a robust and scalable framework for addressing morphological complexity in Somali and other low-resource languages

We present Kunkado, a 160-hour Bambara ASR dataset compiled from Malian radio archives to capture present-day spontaneous speech across a wide range of topics. It includes code-switching, disfluencies, background noise, and overlapping speakers that practical ASR systems encounter in real-world use. We finetuned Parakeet-based models on a 33.47-hour human-reviewed subset and apply pragmatic transcript normalization to reduce variability in number formatting, tags, and code-switching annotations. Evaluated on two real-world test sets, finetuning with Kunkado reduces WER from 44.47% to 37.12% on one and from 36.07% to 32.33% on the other. In human evaluation, the resulting model also outperforms a comparable system with the same architecture trained on 98 hours of cleaner, less realistic speech. We release the data and models to support robust ASR for predominantly oral languages.

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) for African low-resource languages (LRLs) is often limited by scarce labelled data and the high cost of adapting large foundation models. This study evaluates whether parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) can serve as a practical alternative to full fine-tuning (FFT) for adapting Whisper-Small with limited labelled speech and constrained compute. We used a 10-hour subset of NaijaVoices covering Hausa, Yorùbá, and Igbo, and we compared FFT with several PEFT strategies under a fixed evaluation protocol. DoRA attains a 22.0% macro-average WER, closely aligning with the 22.1% achieved by FFT while updating only 4M parameters rather than 240M, and this difference remains within run-to-run variation across random seeds. Yorùbá consistently yields the lowest word error rates, whereas Igbo remains the most challenging, indicating that PEFT can deliver near FFT accuracy with substantially lower training and storage requirements for low-resource African ASR.

Many languages are predominantly spoken rather than written, and to bring the benefits of LLMs to speakers of these languages, it is essential that models cater to the voice modality. The typical approach is to cascade ASR, LLM and TTS models together, though this results in systems with high latency, making them unsuitable for natural, real-time interaction. We describe results on taking the encoder part of a Whisper-based model trained to recognise ten languages common in Uganda, and using the Ultravox architecture to project its output directly to the input embedding space of a text model based on Qwen 3 32B, also trained to have comprehension of those languages. The result is a speech LLM with high accuracy and very low latency. For most spoken prompts, we can begin streaming a text response within as low as 50 ms, and a speech audio response within around one second, making real-time spoken interaction with an LLM possible for the first time in these languages. The model is available open source onHugging Face.

We present the SALT-31 benchmark dataset for evaluation of machine translation models covering 31 Ugandan languages. Unlike sentence-level evaluation sets, SALT-31 is constructed from short, scenario-driven mini-dialogues designed to preserve discourse context, pragmatics, and culturally grounded communication patterns common in everyday Ugandan settings. The dataset contains 100 English sentences organized into 20 typical communication scenarios, each represented as a five-sentence mini-sequence. It can therefore be used to evaluate both sentence-level and paragraph level machine translation, and includes nearly every language spoken in a country with high linguistic diversity. It is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Sunbird/salt-31

African languages have very little labelled data, and it is unclear if augmenting the quantity of annotation data reliably enhances downstream performance. The study is a systematic sample-size scaling study of natural language inference (NLI) on 16 African languages based on the AfriXNLI benchmark. Under controlled conditions, two multilingual transformer models with roughly 0.6B parameters XLM-R Large fine-tuned on XNLI and AfroXLM-R Large are tested on sample sizes of between 50 and 500 labeled examples and average their results across random subsampling runs. As opposed to the usual belief of monotonic increase with increased data, we find a strongly language-sensitive and often non-monotonic scaling behavior. Some languages show early saturation or decrease in performance with sample size as well as high variance in low resource regimes. These results indicate that the volume of data is not enough to guarantee stable profits to African NLI, creating the necessity of language-sensitive datasets creation and stronger multi-lingual modelling strategies.

Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology offers potential to improve exam accessibility for visually impaired learners, but existing systems often underperform in underrepresented languages like Yoruba. This study evaluates current Yoruba TTS models in delivering standardized exam content to five visually impaired students through a web-based interface. Before testing, four Yoruba TTS systems were compared; only Facebook’s mms-tts-yor and YarnGPT produced intelligible Yoruba speech. Students experienced exam questions delivered by human voice, Braille, and TTS. All preferred Braille for clarity and independence, some valued human narration, while TTS was least favored due to robotic and unclear output. These results reveal a significant gap between TTS capabilities and the needs of users in low-resource languages. The paper highlights the urgency of developing tone-aware, user-centered TTS solutions to ensure equitable access to digital education for visually impaired speakers of underrepresented languages.

In recent times, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become the primary intermediary to information access, services, and opportunities. Currently, there are growing concerns as to how existing social inequalities are reproduced and amplified through AI. This is significantly evident in language technologies, where a small number of dominant languages or what we’ll refer to as big languages and cultural contexts shape the training, design, and evaluation of models. This paper examines the intersections of power asymmetries, linguistic bias, and cultural representation in AI, with a major focus on African languages and communities. We argue that current Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems reflect a high level of global imbalances in the availability of data, infrastructure, and decision making power, often marginalizing low-resourced languages and cultural peculiarities. It is important we know that how these data are structured is a great determinant in what their outcome will be. With reference to examples from speech recognition, machine translation, and large language models, we highlight the social and cultural consequences of linguistic exclusion, including reduced accessibility, misinterpretation, and digital invisibility. Finally, we identify and discuss pathways toward more equitable language technologies, emphasizing community-led data practices, interdisciplinary collaboration, and context-aware evaluation frameworks. By foregrounding language as both a technical and political concern, this work advocates for African-centered approaches to NLP that promote fairness, accountability, and linguistic justice in AI development.

In this work, we introduce Sudanese-Flores, an extension of the popular Flores+ machine translation (MT) benchmark to the Sudanese Arabic dialect. We translate both the DEV and DEVTEST splits of the Modern Standard Arabic dataset into the corresponding Sudanese dialect, resulting in a total of 2,009 sentences. While the dialect was recently introduced in Google Translate, there are no available benchmark in this dialect despite spoken by over 40 million people. Our evaluation on two leading LLMs such as GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash showed that while the performance English to Arabic is impressive (more than 23 BLEU), they struggle on Sudanese dialect (less than 11 BLEU) in zero-shot settings. In few-shot scenario, we achieved only a slight boost in performance.

This paper introduces the first standardized benchmark for evaluating Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) in the Bambara language, utilizing one hour of professionally recorded Malian constitutional text. Designed as a controlled reference set under near-optimal acoustic and linguistic conditions, the benchmark was used to evaluate 37 models, ranging from Bambara-trained systems to large-scale commercial models. Our findings reveal that current ASR performance remains significantly below deployment standards; the top-performing system in terms of Word Error Rate (WER) achieved 46.76% and the best Character Error Rate (CER) of 13.00% was set by another model, while several prominent multilingual models exceeded 100% WER due to severe hallucinations. These results suggest that multilingual pre-training and model scaling alone are insufficient for underrepresented languages. Furthermore, because this dataset represents a best-case scenario of the most simplified and formal form of spoken Bambara, these figures likely establish an upper bound for performance in practical, real-world settings. We provide the benchmark and an accompanying public leaderboard to facilitate transparent evaluation and future research in Bambara speech technology.

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems perform well for high-resource languages, but most African languages, including Wolof, remain underrepresented, particularly in maternal and reproductive healthcare. This work proposes a domain-specific approach to improving Wolof ASR under low-resource conditions, addressing limited annotated data, orthographic variability, and code-switching. We curated a dataset of 750 validated Wolof utterances covering 250 maternal health keywords and applied data augmentation to increase acoustic diversity. Pretrained models, including wav2vec 2.0 and Whisper, were benchmarked to select candidates for fine-tuning. Using parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), a Whisper model was adapted to the maternal health domain. Evaluation using Word Error Rate (WER), Character Error Rate (CER), and Keyword Error Rate (KER), which measures medically critical term transcription accuracy, shows substantial gains, reducing WER from 46.5% to 23.2% and KER from 17% to 11%. Community-based evaluation on 1,340 real-world utterances reveals a moderate degradation, with WER increasing by 35%. These results demonstrate that lightweight domain adaptation with small, high-quality data can significantly improve ASR for low-resource healthcare applications.This work introduces one of the first Wolof ASR datasets for healthcare and presents a practical framework for developing reliable speech recognition tools in underrepresented languages, improving access to healthcare information and services.

We present an extension of our previous work on multilingual NLP for Togolese languages by introducing new datasets, improved models, and a community-driven evaluation benchmark for Text-To-Speech (TTS). We expand the Eyaa-Tom multilingual corpus with additional speech data of about 26.9k recordings (30.9 hours) across 10 local languages, and incorporated 64.6k clips (46.6 hours) of Mozilla Common Voice contributions for Adja, Nawdm, Mina, and Tem to strengthen Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and speech synthesis. We detail how community contributors – including collaboration with a national TV journalist – helped collect and validate the Kabyè and French text, with an ethical compensation model in place. We fine-tune state-of-the-art models: OpenAI Whisper and faster-whisper, and Meta’s NLLB-200 model for machine translation across 11 languages (achieving 19.4 BLEU score for French→Ewe and 26.1 BLEU score for Kabyè→French). We also introduce the Lom Bench, a community-based benchmark where native speakers rate TTS output, indicating promising preliminary results in Mina and Togolese lingua franca french although further data is needed. We provide a comparative analysis of our results with recent multilingual systems, including Simba, Meta’s Omnilingual ASR, and UBC Toucan. Our work emphasizes practical pathways and how FAIR data sourcing and community participation can drive sustainable NLP development for underserved languages.

Bilingual Lexicon Induction (BLI) is a valuable tool in machine translation and cross-lingual transfer learning, but it remains challenging for agglutinative and low-resource languages. In this work, we investigate the use of weighted sub-word embeddings in BLI for agglutinative languages. We further evaluate a graph-matching and Procrustes-based BLI approach on two Bantu languages, assessing its effectiveness in a previously underexplored language family. Our results for Swahili with an average P@1 score of 51.84% for a 3000 word dictionary demonstrate the success of the approach for Bantu languages. Weighted sub-word embeddings perform competitively on Swahili and outperform word embeddings in our experiments with Zulu.

In this work, we present AfriNLLB, a series of lightweight models for efficient translation from and into African languages. AfriNLLB supports 15 language pairs (30 translation directions), including Swahili, Hausa, Yoruba, Amharic, Somali, Zulu, Lingala, Afrikaans, Wolof, and Egyptian Arabic, as well as other African Union official languages such as Arabic (MSA), French, Portuguese, and Spanish. Our training data covers bidirectional translation between English and 13 languages, and between French and two languages (Lingala and Wolof). AfriNLLB models are based on NLLB-200 600M, which we compress using iterative layer pruning and quantization. We fine-tune the pruned models on parallel corpora we curated for African languages, employing knowledge distillation from a larger teacher model. Our work aims at enabling efficient deployment of translation models for African languages in resource-constrained settings. Our evaluation results demonstrate that AfriNLLB models achieve performance comparable to the baseline while being significantly faster. We release two versions of the AfriNLLB models, a Transformers version that allows further fine-tuning and a CTranslate2 version for efficient inference. Moreover, we release all the training data that we used for fine-tuning the baseline and pruned models to facilitate further research.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has become a standard technique for eliciting complex reasoning in large language models, and recent work has extended it to vision-language models (VLMs). However, virtually all multimodal CoT methods generate intermediate reasoning steps in natural language, even for inherently visual problems such as spatial reasoning, geometric manipulation, and object tracking. We ask a fundamental question: when should a VLM reason in words, and when should it reason in pictures? We present VisCoT-Diag, a diagnostic benchmark of 1,200 instances across five visual reasoning categories, and compare four CoT paradigms across four VLMs. Our results reveal a striking modality gap: textual CoT degrades performance by up to 17.5% on spatial transformation and 13.2% on multi-object tracking, while visual CoT yields gains of up to 23.1%. We identify three failure modes (spatial state collapse, transformation hallucination, tracking loss) and show that adaptive modality routing achieves 73.1% accuracy versus 68.9% for V-CoT-everywhere. We recommend practitioners use visual CoT for spatial tasks and textual CoT for compositional counting.

The rapid evolution of text-to-image generation has blurred the perceptual boundary between natural and synthetic imagery. However, it remains questionable whether the statistical structure of generated visual content mirrors the information density of the physical visual world. Drawing upon principles from statistical linguistics, this study investigates the visual language of generative models through the lens of Zipfian dynamics. By analyzing a large-scale corpus of real and synthetic images, we uncover a fundamental divergence between visual syntax and semantics. We find that while generative models have successfully replicated the low-level physics of light, their high-level texture vocabulary exhibits distinct statistical signatures. Our analysis reveals a spectrum of entropy, identifying architectural fingerprints unique to each model. Furthermore, we investigate the relation ship between generated images and prompt complexity, and find that increasing the semantic specificity of text prompts systematically degrades the statistical realism of the generated output.

Vision foundation models produce features that generalize across visual domains without fine-tuning, yet naively transferring labels through these feature spaces fails under large distribution shifts.We propose SAOT (Semantically Aware Optimal Transport), which learns a transport cost within a fused unbalanced optimal transport formulation for dense label transfer from frozen vision transformer features to new domains.SAOT combines a learnable appearance metric with semantic class-prototype priors, unbalanced transport for partial matching under distribution shift, and a block-sparse solver for tractable inference.We pair this with a two-stage decoder: an MLP trained on SAOT pseudo-labels, then refined via EMA-teacher self-training with class-balanced sampling.On GTA5→Cityscapes with frozen DINOv2 ViT-L/14 features, SAOT+Decoder reaches 25.7% mIoU, a 3.8× improvement over nearest-neighbor transfer (6.7%), without any backbone adaptation.Per-class results show large gains on spatially coherent classes (road 90.3%, car 76.2%, building 71.5%), demonstrating that learned semantic transport costs capture domain-invariant structure even under severe synthetic-to-real shifts. On VOC train→val with frozen ViT-B/16 features, the full pipeline reaches 47.5% mIoU, indicating that the approach extends beyond synthetic-to-real adaptation.

Sparse Mixture of Expert (MoE) models are widely used foundation architectures at large scale, yet remain under-explored at smaller sizes. In this work, we introduce Compact Sparse Mixture of Experts (CoSMoEs) for on-device inference, addressing three key challenges: Quality, Memory, and Latency. On the quality front, we conduct a fair evaluation (removing confounding factors) and show that MoE architectures outperform dense models at on-device scale. We further propose weight-decomposed experts, which improve MoE performance beyond the standard formulation. On the memory and latency front, we address the prohibitively large parameter count of MoE models by improving expert offloading efficiency through a novel training-time loss, reducing inference latency for on-device deployment

Vision-language model (VLM)-powered agents are increasingly enabling new forms of automation across various human tasks. While prior work has primarily focused on well-defined problems with explicit goals, the capabilities of agents in creative graphic design, where goals are inherently open-ended and subjective, remain largely underexplored.To bridge this gap, we introduce GraphicWeaver, a planning benchmark for graphic design comprising 1,079 diverse user queries and associated images spanning four design categories.Comprehensive experiments with six models reveal that current VLM-based agents struggle to handle such complex planning tasks, which require taking into account both explicit design constraints specified in queries and implicit commonsense design principles. We attribute these failures to challenges in (1) retrieving appropriate parameters for tool usage, (2) understanding spatial relationships across design components, and (3) coordinating dependencies across agents. We envision GraphicWeaver as a challenging yet valuable testbed for advancing VLM agent planning in creative design contexts.

Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown strong performance on multimodal reasoning tasks, yet most evaluations focus on short videos and assume unconstrained computational resources. In industrial settings such as pharmaceutical content understanding, practitioners must process long-form videos under strict GPU, latency, and cost constraints, where many existing approaches fail to scale. In this work, we present an industrial GenAI framework that processes over 200,000 PDFs, 25,326 videos across eight formats (e.g., MP4, M4V, etc.), and 888 multilingual audio files in more than 20 languages. Our study makes three contributions: (i) an industrial large-scale architecture for multimodal reasoning in pharmaceutical domains; (ii) empirical analysis of over 40 VLMs on two leading benchmarks (Video-MME and MMBench) and proprietary dataset of 25,326 videos across 14 disease areas; and (iii) four findings relevant to long-form video reasoning: the role of multimodality, attention mechanism trade-offs, temporal reasoning limits, and challenges of video splitting under GPU constraints. Results show 3–8X efficiency gains with SDPA attention on commodity GPUs, multimodality improving up to 8/12 task domains (especially length-dependent tasks), and clear bottlenecks in temporal alignment and keyframe detection across open- and closed-source VLMs. Rather than proposing a new “A+B” model, this paper characterizes practical limits, trade-offs, and failure patterns of current VLMs under realistic deployment constraints, and provide actionable guidance for both researchers and practitioners designing scalable multimodal systems for long-form video understanding in industrial domains.

Current GUI agents struggle with multi-step digital device support. We investigate whether this failure is partly caused by a procedural knowledge deficit: agents often rely on zero-shot visual exploration instead of executing verified instructions. To address this, we introduce the Plan-Grounded GUI Agent (PGGA), framing interface navigation as a knowledge-execution problem by conditioning low-level actions on step-by-step text plans. Evaluated on our focused Device-Support Interaction Benchmark (DSIB), results reveal a sharp gap between knowing which operation to perform and grounding that operation on the screen: GTA1-7B reaches 99.59% Operation Accuracy with expert plans, but only 82.99% Element Accuracy and 45.61% Task Success Rate; without plans, its Task Success Rate is 0.00%. Our fine-tuned 2B-parameter PGGA achieves 54.39% Task Success Rate and 91.28% Element Accuracy when guided by expert plans, suggesting that explicit procedural grounding can substantially improve GUI execution when high-quality plans are available. Project Page: https://hsiung.cc/PGGA/

Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is crucial for modern education, particularly with the increasing prevalence of multimodal assessments. However, traditional AES methods struggle with evaluation generalizability and multimodal perception, while even recent Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-based approaches can produce hallucinated justifications and scores misaligned with human judgment. To address the limitations, we introduce CAFES, the first collaborative multi-agent framework specifically designed for AES. It orchestrates three specialized agents: an Initial Scorer for rapid, trait-specific evaluations; a Feedback Pool Manager to aggregate detailed and evidence-grounded feedback; and a Reflective Scorer that iteratively refines scores based on this feedback to enhance human alignment. Extensive experiments, using widely adopted MLLMs, achieve an average relative improvement of 21% in Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) against ground truth, with particularly strong gains in grammatical and lexical diversity. Our proposed CAFES paves the way for an intelligent multimodal AES system. The code and dataset are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CAFES-C87F/.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities but often struggle with complex, multi-step mathematical reasoning, where minor errors in visual perception or logical deduction can lead to complete failure. While Process Reward Models (PRMs) offer step-by-step supervision, existing multimodal PRMs are limited to being binary verifiers that can identify but not correct errors, offering little explanatory power. To address these deficiencies, we introduce the Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model (GM-PRM), a novel paradigm that transforms the PRM from a passive judge into an active reasoning collaborator. Instead of a simple scalar score, GM-PRM provides a fine-grained, interpretable analysis of each reasoning step, evaluating its step intent, visual alignment, and logical soundness. More critically, GM-PRM is trained to generate a corrected version of the first erroneous step it identifies. This unique corrective capability enables our new test-time inference strategy, Refined Best-of-N (Refined-BoN). This framework actively enhances solution quality by using the PRM’s generated correction to guide the policy model toward a more promising reasoning trajectory, thereby improving the diversity and correctness of the solution pool. We demonstrate that GM-PRM achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple multimodal math benchmarks, significantly boosting policy model performance with remarkable data efficiency, requiring only a 20K-sample training dataset.

Visual grounding in graphical user interface (GUI) requires accurate localization of UI elements from natural language instructions. Conventional coordinate generation approaches face inherent limitations, including sensitivity to resolution variations and lack of interpretability. Recently, coordinate-free attention-based methods have emerged as a promising alternative, but these methods supervise attention using only spatial location signals from ground-truth bounding boxes, without ensuring that the learned attention distributions reflect genuine semantic correspondence between the instruction and the attended visual regions. We propose Attention Cycle-Consistency (ACC), a self-supervised regularization framework that enforces bidirectional alignment between visual attention and instruction semantics. ACC introduces two complementary constraints: semantic consistency, which ensures attended visual regions contain sufficient information to reconstruct the original instruction, and spatial consistency, which requires attention distributions to remain invariant when cycled through instruction reconstruction. We further incorporate entropy regularization to encourage spatially concentrated attention. ACC is applicable as a lightweight, model-agnostic regularizer for attention-based coordinate-free grounding methods, adding zero computational overhead at inference as all auxiliary components are discarded after training.

How do multimodal models solve visual spatial tasks—through genuine planning, or by brute-forcing solutions in token space? We introduce MazeBench, a benchmark of 110 procedurally generated maze images organized into nine controlled groups (diagnostic, grid scale, wall density, trap ablation, unreachable detection, and more), and evaluate 16 model configurations across four providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Alibaba) at multiple reasoning effort levels. GPT-5.4 solves 91% and Gemini 3.1 Pro 79%, but our analysis reveals these scores are misleading: models translate images into text grids and brute-force paths via serial enumeration, consuming 1,710–22,818 tokens per solve for a task humans do in seconds. Without added reasoning budgets, all configurations score only 2–12%; on 20x20 ultra-hard mazes, they hit token limits and give up. Qualitative analysis of model outputs confirms a universal two-stage strategy: image-to-grid translation followed by step-by-step path search in natural language—essentially BFS implemented in prose. A text-grid ablation shows Claude’s poor image performance (6%) jumps to 80% when given the correct grid directly, confirming vision quality, not reasoning ability, as the bottleneck for weaker models. Perhaps most striking, when we explicitly instruct models not to build a text grid and not to perform graph search—asking them to “reason visually, like a human”—they silently ignore the instruction and immediately fall back to the same grid-enumeration strategy. This suggests that brute-force token-level search is the dominant mechanism these models rely on for spatial planning in our setting.

Vision–language models (VLMs) achieve strong multimodal performance but remain prone to relation hallucination, which requires accurate reasoning over inter-object interactions. We study the impact of visual perturbations, specifically rotation and noise, and show that even mild distortions significantly degrade relational reasoning across models and datasets. We further evaluate prompt-based augmentation and preprocessing strategies (orientation correction and denoising), finding that while they offer partial improvements, they do not fully resolve hallucinations. Our results reveal a gap between perceptual robustness and relational understanding, highlighting the need for more robust, geometry-aware VLMs.

General-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) such as LLaVA and QwenVL produce descriptions of disaster imagery that lack domain-specific vocabulary and actionable detail. We propose the Vision-Language Caption Enhancer (), a framework that integrates external semantic knowledge from ConceptNet and WordNet into the caption generation process for post-disaster satellite and UAV imagery. operates in two stages: first, a baseline VLM generates an initial caption conditioned on YOLOv8 object detections; second, a knowledge-enriched sequential model, a CNN-LSTM or a hierarchical cross-modal Transformer, refines the caption using a vocabulary augmented with 1,566 domain-relevant terms extracted from knowledge graphs. We evaluate on two disaster benchmarks: xBD (satellite, 6,369 images, 3 damage classes) and RescueNet (UAV, 4,494 images, 12 damage classes), using CLIPScore for semantic alignment and InfoMetIC for informativeness. On RescueNet with the Transformer decoder, with knowledge graph enrichment produces captions preferred over QwenVL baselines in 95.33% of image pairs on InfoMetIC and 73.64% on CLIPScore. Qualitative analysis shows that without knowledge graph integration, generated captions exhibit hallucinations, word repetition, and semantic incoherence, whereas knowledge-enriched captions maintain factual consistency and domain-appropriate vocabulary. intended as a continuous, extensible monitor of differential framing under changing real-world inputs.

Traditional clustering techniques often rely solely on similarity in the input data, limiting their ability to capture structural or semantic constraints that are critical in many domains. We introduce the Domain-Aware Rule-Triggered Variational Autoencoder (DART-VAE), a rule-guided multimodal clustering framework that incorporates domain-specific constraints directly into the representation learning process. DART-VAE extends the VAE architecture by embedding explicit rules, semantic representations, and data-driven features into a unified latent space, while enforcing constraint compliance through rule-consistency and violation penalties in the loss function. Unlike conventional clustering methods that rely only on visual similarity or apply rules as post-hoc filters, DART-VAE treats rules as first-class learning signals. The rules are generated by LLMs, structured into knowledge graphs, and enforced through a loss function combining reconstruction, KL divergence, consistency, and violation penalties. Experiments on aircraft and automotive datasets demonstrate that rule-guided clustering produces more operationally meaningful and interpretable clusters—for example, isolating UAVs, unifying stealth aircraft, or separating SUVs from sedans—while improving traditional clustering metrics. However, the framework faces challenges: LLM-generated rules may hallucinate or conflict, excessive rules risk overfitting, and scaling to complex domains increases computational and consistency difficulties. By combining rule encodings with learned representations, DART-VAE achieves more meaningful and consistent clustering outcomes than purely data-driven models, highlighting the utility of constraint-guided multimodal clustering for complex, knowledge-intensive settings.

Charts are central to analytical reasoning, yet existing benchmarks for chart understanding focus almost exclusively on single-chart interpretation rather than comparative reasoning across multiple charts. To address this gap, we introduce ChartDiff, the first large-scale benchmark for cross-chart comparative summarization. ChartDiff consists of 8,541 chart pairs spanning diverse data sources, chart types, and visual styles, each annotated with LLM-generated and human-verified summaries describing differences in trends, fluctuations, and anomalies. Using ChartDiff, we evaluate general-purpose, chart-specialized, and pipeline-based models. Our results show that frontier general-purpose models achieve the highest GPT-based quality, while specialized and pipeline-based methods obtain higher ROUGE scores but lower human-aligned evaluation, revealing a clear mismatch between lexical overlap and actual summary quality. We further find that multi-series charts remain challenging across model families, whereas strong end-to-end models are relatively robust to differences in plotting libraries. Overall, our findings demonstrate that comparative chart reasoning remains a significant challenge for current vision-language models and position ChartDiff as a new benchmark for advancing research on multi-chart understanding.

The precolonial and early colonial Mixtec codices describe the history and stories of the region in a semasiographic medium that is full of symbolic representations and meant to be narrated.Recently, the community has introduced datasets of XML representations of related media, including Aztec codices and Mayan hieroglyphic script, in a step towards symbolic machine interpretation of these historic Mesoamerican artifacts.In this work, we propose formal symbolic machine interpretation of XML encodings representing facsimile images from the Mixtec Codex Zouche-Nuttal.We demonstrate the efficacy of symbolic machine interpretation from XML step-by-step, showing how our parser and interpreter process text capturing a scene from the Mixtec Codex Zouche-Nuttall.We hope our contribution and the example we provide motivate collaboration among the archaeological, historical, linguistic, and natural language processing research communities to apply machine interpretation to Mixtec codices and similar manuscripts.

Real-time sign language translation must generate text incrementally as signs arrive, yet existing streaming policies treat glosses as a flat token sequence and discard the temporal rhythm of signing. Inter-gloss pauses reliably mark sentence boundaries in continuous discourse, but policies such as Wait-k cause arbitrary cross-boundary fragmentation. We propose Temporal-Linguistic Adaptive Streaming (TLAS), which fuses a Temporal Pause Detector (TPD, tracking inter-gloss interval statistics via an exponential moving average) and a Linguistic Readiness Estimator (LRE, a trained neural head on a frozen T5 encoder) through an Adaptive Fusion Gate (AFG). A proactive timeout fires before the next gloss arrives when the inter-gloss gap exceeds a threshold, producing clean sentence segmentation without oracle boundary information. We also contribute a synthetic discourse dataset of 1,400 ASL discourse groups with LLM-generated per-gloss timestamps and introduce a continuous-stream evaluation paradigm requiring autonomous boundary detection from an unbroken gloss stream. Under such conditions, TLAS significantly outperforms current heuristic baselines, such as Wait-k, and methods relying solely on linguistic content.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in semantic visual reasoning, yet their capacity for fine-grained, low-level perception remains critically under-evaluated. This perceptual fragility limits their reliability in noisy, real-world environments where visual signals are degraded. Furthermore, existing benchmarks often entangle visual perception with language priors, masking these underlying deficits. To address this, we introduce the FAint numeric Detection Evaluation (FADE) dataset, a novel evaluation suite designed to probe the limits of zero-shot Optical Character Recognition (OCR) in frontier MLLMs. By embedding synthetic, strictly numerical sequences over cluttered natural backgrounds at varying levels of transparency (𝛼), FADE explicitly disentangles pure visual perception from semantic predictability. We evaluate state-of-the-art models including Gemini 3.0, Claude 4.5 Sonnet, and Gemma 3 against a specialized UNet segmentation baseline. Our results reveal a striking limitation in frontier architectures: while they achieve near-perfect transcription at high visibility, their performance collapses under high transparency. Conversely, the UNet pipeline maintains robust spatial grounding, significantly outperforming generalist models at the lowest visibility thresholds. FADE provides a reproducible dataset to expose and diagnose the perceptual breakage points of modern multimodal systems.

Visual Question Answering (VQA) models process all image patches uniformlydespite questions typically requiring only a small subset of visual information.This inefficiency leads to unnecessary computation and can result in attentiondilution across irrelevant image regions. We propose Question-GuidedSparse Attention (QGSA), a plug-and-play mechanism that dynamically selectsrelevant image patches conditioned on question semantics. Our approach introducesthree components: (1)a differentiable patch selector based on Gumbel-Softmaxreparameterisation that enables end-to-end training with hard patch selection atinference; (2)a self-supervised grounding loss that encourages spatialselectivity without bounding-box annotations, combining contrastive patchselection with patch–word alignment via a frozen CLIP encoder; and (3)anadaptive sparsity mechanism that adjusts the number of selected patches accordingto estimated question complexity. Experiments on SmolVLM-256M-Instruct andSmolVLM-500M-Instruct across three VQA benchmarks (VQA-RAD, A-OKVQA, RefCOCO)demonstrate that QGSA reduces cross-attention FLOPs by 91–99% across inputresolutions, achieving up to 76× theoretical speedup at 576px resolution, whilemaintaining exact accuracy parity with the dense baseline (𝛥=0.0 ppon all datasets).Wall-clock parity with the dense baseline is reached at 336px; realisedend-to-end speedup requires larger models where cross-attention dominates totalcompute. QGSA consistently selects an average of k≈17 patches out of576 (256M model), up to k≈18 (500M model), yielding up to a 34×reduction in the visual token sequence. These small-scale results validate thefeasibility of question-conditioned sparse attention and provide a foundation forscaling to larger VLMs.

With 1.5 billion people speaking over 120 major languages, India exemplifies the challenges of multilingual AI evaluation. Current multilingual VLM benchmarks suffer from unverified auto-translations, narrow task coverage, small sample sizes, and lack of culturally grounded content. We present HinTel-AlignBench, a comprehensive evaluation framework and benchmark for Hindi and Telugu vision-language models with English-aligned samples. Our framework combines semi-automated translation with human verification to generate 4k QA pairs per language across five domains: adapted English datasets (VQAv2, RealWorldQA, CLEVR-Math) and native Indic sets (JEE for STEM, VAANI for cultural grounding). Evaluation of state-of-the-art open and closed-source VLMs reveals consistent performance regression from English to Indic languages, with average drops of 8.3 points for Hindi and 5.5 points for Telugu across four of five tasks. We identify key failure modes and establish reproducible baselines for multilingual multimodal evaluation.

Text-to-image diffusion models learn a mapping from natural language to visual structure, but how robust is this mapping to perturbation? We use personalization—fine-tuning a model to learn a new face, object, or style—as a controlled stress test to probe the fragility of learned vision-language alignment. We find that fine-tuning for one concept systematically shifts the model’s ability to faithfully render unrelated concepts, and that this disruption follows structured, predictable patterns. To measure this fragility, we construct Concept Entanglement Maps: per-prompt, per-model disruption matrices that reveal which concepts are most affected and why. Using Stable Diffusion v1.5 as a controlled testbed, we evaluate 15 subjects across three personalization methods on 200 prompts and report three findings about the organization of vision-language alignment: (1) aggregate disruption is larger for vision-backbone and cross-attention perturbations than for text-embedding perturbations, despite the latter directly modifying the language representation; (2) abstract and compositional language is significantly more fragile than concrete, object-specific language; and (3) disruption does not follow semantic proximity—personalizing for a face does not preferentially disrupt other face-related prompts (p = 1.0), suggesting that alignment vulnerability is organized globally rather than purely by semantic category. These findings expose a structural vulnerability in current text-to-image personalization: the same cross-attention mechanism that enables compositional generalization also creates pathways through which local fine-tuning can propagate as global alignment shift.

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) achieve strong performance on many multimodal tasks, yet consistently fail at compositional relational reasoning—distinguishing “the cat on the mat” from “the mat on the cat.” We provide a formal explanation for this failure. We prove that any vision-language alignment operating on pooled (order-invariant) visual features contains compositional blind spots: semantically distinct scenes that map to identical representations. We show that the number of blind spots grows factorially with scene complexity, establishing a fundamental limit on pooled-feature architectures. Motivated by this analysis, we propose REGROUND, a training-free, test-time method that re-introduces spatial structure into alignment by performing relation-guided cross-attention over spatial visual tokens, directed by a lightweight parse of the text query. Without any fine-tuning, REGROUND improves compositional accuracy by +8.6 points on Winoground, +8.4 on ARO-Relation, +6.4 on SugarCrepe, and +8.4 on VSR when applied to LLaVA-1.5, and provides consistent gains across other LVLMs. Ablation studies confirm that each component—parse guidance, token-level attention, and relation masking—contributes significantly.

Object hallucination in large vision-language models (LVLMs) is well-documented, but the mechanisms that produce it remain poorly understood. We introduce HALLUTRACE, a causal attribution framework that decomposes hallucination into three distinct sources: (VGF) visual grounding failure, where the visual encoder produces a representation insufficient to identify the target object; (LPD) language prior dominance, where the language model overrides a correct visual signal with a statistically-driven prediction; and (CMC) cross-modal conflict, where visual and linguistic signals are irreconcilably inconsistent and the model resolves the conflict incorrectly. We operationalise these sources via causal component ablations: intervening on fvis, fproj, and fLM independently and measuring the change in CHAIR score. Experiments on five LVLMs show that attribution patterns are object-category-specific and model-consistent: person/vehicle hallucinations are predominantly LPD (≥52%), food/furniture hallucinations are predominantly VGF (≥44%), and animal hallucinations split between VGF and CMC. Guided by these attributions, we design HAD (Hallucination-Aware Decoding), a unified decoding strategy that applies source-targeted interventions: visual signal amplification for VGF, language prior suppression for LPD, and contrastive re-weighting for CMC. HAD reduces CHAIRI by 3.7–5.6 points and improves POPE F1 by 1.9–3.1 points over LLaVA-1.5, outperforming VCD and ICD on all three benchmarks (CHAIR, POPE, MME) without any additional training. We further prove that the attribution-decoding correspondence is tight: the CHAIR improvement from HAD is linearly predictable from the VGF attribution share (r = 0.86, p < 10−6), validating the causal framework.

We present the first neural text-to-speech (TTS) implementation for Myaamia (Miami-Illinois), an Indigenous Algonquian language of North America. Developed in collaboration with the Myaamia Center at Miami University, our approach upholds principles of data sovereignty. Using 14,358 utterances (10.4 hours total, 8.18 hours for training) from seven speakers, we train and evaluate FastSpeech, Glow-TTS, and VITS, assessing synthesis quality through objective (MCD, F0 RMSE, duration RMSE) and subjective (expert evaluation) metrics. VITS outperforms other models in spectral and prosodic accuracy, but challenges remain in phonetic precision and prosody modeling. Our results confirm the feasibility of neural TTS for Myaamia, with direct implications for language learning and revitalization. This work offers a replicable framework for other low-resource Indigenous languages while ensuring ethical, linguistic data governance.

We evaluate seven large language models—four proprietary and three open-weight—on bidirectional Lakota–English translation using 200 sentence pairs from the New Lakota Dictionary. Each model is evaluated with and without extended reasoning, where the provider’s API permits. The best model (Gemini 3.1 Pro) achieves a mean chrF++ of 59.4 on Lakota→English and 42.6 on English→Lakota; the strongest open-weight model trails the proprietary leaders, and no model produces reliable translation in either direction. Two independent LLM judges from different model families agree substantially (Cohen’s κ=0.75) that semantic equivalence ranges from 6% (GPT-5.2) to 60% (Gemini), diverging substantially from chrF++ scores. For the open-weight models, enabling reasoning changes refusal behavior far more than translation quality: it surfaces the limitation rather than overcoming it. Diacritic-normalization analysis shows models produce roughly correct base characters but place diacritical marks inconsistently. All results and evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/robotson/lakota-translation-benchmark.

Digital tools serving language revitalization tend to fall into two categories: 1) linguist-oriented documentation tools that prioritize annotation, morphological analysis, and archival preservation, and 2) community-facing applications that emphasize accessibility and language learning. Few systems integrate the former with the latter, and practical barriers — including the cost of computational expertise, single-user workflows, and limited data governance — further constrain their utility. These disconnects incur additional development and communication costs for revitalization teams consisting of linguists and community members. We introduce “langlit”, a collaborative web-based platform that attempts to tailor documentation workflows for the language revitalization context within a single system. The platform integrates a finite-state morphological analyzer with a three-tier human-in-the-loop annotation workflow, searchable corpus interfaces with multiple query modalities, interactive word construction guided by the morphological grammar, corpus-linked hypothesis tracking with provenance, and a grammar-derived editable dictionary. All components share a single underlying FST grammar, and the system supports configurable access controls, collaborative editing, and optional LLM integration with transparent data handling. Designed for redeployment across languages through a modular architecture, “langlit” is published as an open-source repository on GitHub. We situate our system within the existing landscape of revitalization tools through a comparative analysis and discuss how integrated, community-informed design can better serve the specific goals of language revitalization.

We present the first systematic benchmark of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for low-resource neural machine translation (NMT) of indigenous languages of the Americas. We evaluate eight PEFT methods alongside full fine-tuning on NLLB-200-distilled-600M across 13 indigenous-to-Spanish language pairs spanning four resource tiers (357-125,008 training sentences). OFT (Orthogonal Finetuning) achieves the highest development-set chrF++ among PEFT methods (26.63) while training only 0.28% of parameters. LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) offers a strong efficiency-quality tradeoff (25.27 chrF++, 0.19%). On held-out test data, full fine-tuning ranks first (25.12) with OFT a close second (25.06; p = 0.43). VeRA (Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptation) and Prefix Tuning consistently underperform. These results demonstrate that PEFT is a viable alternative to full fine-tuning for indigenous-language NMT.

This paper presents a multi-dialect text classifier for Quechua that augments neural models with rule-based linguistic information to address challenges in low-resource, morphologically complex settings. The approach is built on a carefully curated dataset spanning multiple genres, including annotated parallel bible corpora, and encodes manually annotated lexical variation and polypersonal verbal agreement as explicit features within a transformer-based classifier. Results show that neural models substantially outperform statistical baselines, enabling highly accurate multi-class classification across 27 Quechua dialects. The impact of linguistic augmentation is context-dependent: gains are minimal in high-resource settings but more pronounced in low-resource and cross-domain conditions. Overall, this work aims to contribute to the development of dialect-sensitive NLP methods for Quechua and other low-resource, morphologically rich languages.

Interlinear glossing is essential for the study and revitalization of endangered languages. However, it remains a time-consuming process that requires extensive linguistic expertise. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a potential solution. In this research, we study the case of Mapudungun, an endangered language spoken in Chile and Argentina, to generate automatic interlinear glosses using the Gemini 2.5 Pro model. Our study investigates which information configuration through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) yields the best results. We compare the integration of a formal grammar, a dictionary, a small annotated corpus, and a combination of all these resources. Our evaluation shows that while dictionary integration causes a significant degradation in performance, grounding the model with a structured corpus maximizes accuracy relative to the resources employed. Notably, we find that a remarkably small dataset of 589 meaning units provides enough normative guidance to significantly improve the morphological tagging task. This work highlights the viability of utilizing minimally annotated corpora to assist in the documentation of morphologically complex languages.

Large language models (LLMs) struggle with low-resource polysynthetic languages, yet the nature of their failures remains underexplored. We evaluate GPT-4o-mini, Gemma~3~27B, Llama~3.3~70B, and NLLB-200 on Spanish$\leftrightarrow$Wixárika translation using zero-shot and 5-shot prompting. All systems are unusable, scoring below 3 BLEU and 21 chrF. Qualitative analysis reveals that LLMs largely ignore source content and instead generate fluent hallucinations. Spanish outputs frequently include indigenous cultural stereotypes such as deer, deities, rain dance, and shamans, regardless of the input, while Wixárika outputs are repetitive across different inputs and morphologically implausible. Few-shot prompting yields model-dependent improvements, with Gemma and Llama improving substantially at higher shot counts while GPT-4o-mini remains flat. These results demonstrate that current LLMs are unable to represent polysynthetic morphology and instead default to exoticizing Indigenous culture and identity. We call for the development of inclusive morphological-aware modeling strategies and increased resource creation to ensure that Indigenous languages of the Americas are represented safely and accurately.

This paper presents IndigiEval, a framework for evaluating the language and cultural proficiency of several commercially available large language models (LLMs) across five North American Indigenous languages (Mvskoke, Choctaw, Cherokee, Cheyenne, and Hawaiian). This framework is a qualitative evaluation method intended for communities with small speaker populations to be able to critically evaluate LLM performance with minimal data and human effort. IndigiEval includes tasks such as answering cultural questions, translation, text generation, and speech recognition. The results of our experiments indicate that no currently available LLM performs well across all evaluation categories, and that LLMs frequently hallucinate orthographies, grammatical structures, cultural knowledge, and vocabulary for all languages and cultures considered. Our proposed evaluation framework is not intended as a comprehensive score, but rather a qualitative and flexible framework to inform language communities about a given LLM’s potential as a resource, since each language has unique environments, strengths, and availability of resources.

This paper presents a study focused on advancing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for the under-resourced language Dënë Sųłıné through data-centric approaches. We explore multiple strategies to enhance the quality of training data—both audio recordings and transcriptions—to address the challenges posed by mixed-quality datasets. Our experiments investigate which data preparation techniques most effectively improve ASR performance in this context. Our findings show that reducing non-phonemic spelling variation in the corpus significantly improves model generalization, resulting in a substantial increase in recognition accuracy. Additionally, we demonstrate that increasing manually reviewed transcriptions consistently improves word and character error rates, while audio enhancement slightly reduces performance, highlighting the complex trade-offs in low-resource ASR development.

This paper describes ongoing work to develop a corpus of Cahuilla language from the John Peabody Harrington collection, which contains linguistic and ethnographic fieldnotes documenting Indigenous languages of California and other regions across the Americas. Handwritten notes present numerous processing challenges, including scratch-outs, multilingual entries in Spanish and other Indigenous languages, unique abbreviations, and varying script orientations. We compare the efficacy of deep learning text recognition models to convert images of the notes into a machine-readable format, with a focus on respecting tribal data sovereignty in our methods. We find that Pylaia is the most accurate model for our data. Finally, we present the preliminary findings and indicate future directions for developing a Cahuilla corpus.

In this paper, we aim to answer the following question: could corpus duplication be useful in Natural Language Processing (NLP) for low-resource languages? In these languages (or pi-languages), corpora available for training Large Language Models are virtually non-existent. Specifically, we study the impact of corpus expansion in Nahuatl, an agglutinative and polysynthetic Amerindian pi-language characterised by extensive dialectal variation. Our goal is to increase the size of Nahuatl corpora, which currently consist of a limited number of tokens, through controlled duplication techniques. Our experimental setup employs incremental duplication alongside appropriate corpus balancing, with the objective of training embeddings optimised for downstream NLP tasks. Consequently, static embeddings were trained and evaluated on a sentence-level semantic similarity task. Our results show a significant improvement in performance when incremental duplication is applied, compared to results obtained without corpus expansion. To our knowledge, this technique has not yet been explored in this field.

We present a morphosyntactically controlled transformation dataset for Quechua Collao and evaluate large language models on a sentence-level transformation task under varying prompting conditions. Results show that performance depends on the interaction between model behavior, context size, and linguistic complexity, with smaller models benefiting more from additional examples and morphological hints providing selective gains.

The preservation of under-resourced languages requires digital tools and resources shaped by and for their speakers. We present the first dedicated ASR resources for Puno Quechua (ISO 639-3: qxp): (1) the largest speech corpus for any single Quechua variety, consisting in 66 hours of recordings for scripted and spontaneous speech (including 36 hours of manually transcribed and validated data), collected via a participatory design campaign; (2) the first systematic ASR benchmark for Puno Quechua, evaluating state-of-the-art models and fine-tuning Whisper-base, wav2vec2-base, and XLS-R-300M, with and without continued pre-training (CPT); (3) an open release of all datasets and fine-tuned models.

In the context of real-world language technology applications, the language or variety in which a given text is written is often unknown or uncertain. Yet, this information is crucial in order to adequately select and apply appropriate models or resources. Language identification (LID), or the process of determining the language or variety of a text sample, is thus often an important fundamental task in natural language processing. LID can be particularly challenging when: (1) there are not many labeled texts for training; and (2) similar or related languages are involved, since these may share a number of surface-level features. In this paper, we present an LID system for Nahuatl, a group of closely-related language varieties spoken in Mexico and Central America. Nahuatl LID involves both of the aforementioned challenges: Nahuatl varieties can be quite similar, sharing morphemes and even many lexical items, and there is a relative paucity of representative, variant-labeled Nahuatl text. We describe LID experiments for a total of 11 Nahuatl varieties, achieving generally good results (90.59% ±0.09% in 5-fold cross-validation experiments). Many of the outstanding errors are the result of confusion between three highly similar Huasteca variants.

The term “low-resource” is used pervasively in NLP but communicates almost nothing precise. We propose RAN (Resource Abundance Notation), a compact, multi-dimensional notation for quantifying a language’s NLP resource profile. A RAN score is written as S/M/L_1-B_1/L_2-B_2/..., where S = floor(log10(speakers)), M = floor(log10(monolingual sentences)), and each L_i-B_i pair records a bilingual partner and floor(log10(parallel sentences)). Values derive from canonical sources: Wikidata for speakers, OSCAR 23.01 for monolingual corpora, and (where available) OPUS for parallel corpora. We score 20 typologically diverse languages and correlate each profile against published benchmarks for three tasks: machine translation (MT, via NLLB-200 chrF++), named entity recognition (NER, via XTREME XLM-R WikiANN F1), and part-of-speech tagging (POS, via XTREME XLM-R UD accuracy). The RAN components carry complementary information: a linear model using all three explains 52% of MT variance, 76% of NER variance, and 72% of POS variance. Among single predictors, B_max (the largest bilingual corpus, regardless of partner) is strongest for the cross-lingual transfer tasks (NER, POS), while M and B_en are strongest for MT. RAN is designed first as a communication tool, not a predictive model.

For Mapudungun arn→es translation, morphology-aware tokenization can substitute for a 5× increase in model parameters. We fine-tune three sizes of Meta’s NLLB-200 on Mapudungun–Spanish translation across eight tokenization strategies, including our novel Morfessor-VC method, whichconstrains Morfessor morpheme segmentation to tokens already present in NLLB’s pretrainedvocabulary. Our 600M Morfessor-VC model is competitive with our own fine-tuned 3.3B Standard BPE model on arn→es (43.2 vs. 42.9 chrF++, ∆ = +0.3, p = 0.039, 95% CI [0.02, 0.60]) while using five times fewer parameters, and all fine-tuned conditions surpass frontier LLMs by over 27 chrF++. Mapudungun is an indigenous polysynthetic language spoken by 200,000+ Mapuche people in Chile and Argentina, absent from NLLB-200 and not supported by major commercial MT providers; prior work predates large-scale multilingual models and does not address the tokenization challenges posed by its agglutinativemorphology. These results establish new state-of-the-art baselines for Mapudungun MT and provide a practical foundation for community language tools in pedagogy, social media, and language revitalization.

Qom, a language of the Guaycuruan family, is a low-resource language for NLP and speech processing. We present the first parallel Qom–Spanish corpus in a computationally usable format, comprising 33,392 parallel segments, totaling 1,469,905 Qom tokens and 891,344 Spanish tokens. A subset of 2,943 segments excludes Bible-derived content. It includes alignments at different levels: sentences, sentence fragments, and paragraphs, and is compiled from multiple sources, both previously available and newly collected. We also present bidirectional neural machine translation baselines based on NLLB-200, achieving competitive performance in both translation directions on the full dataset, and lower performance on the non-Bible subset. An ablation study shows that training exclusively on biblical data reduces performance on non-biblical text, highlighting the importance of domain diversity in low-resource machine translation.

Publicly available spoken language identification (LID) systems provide sparse and inconsistent coverage of indigenous languages of the Americas and languages of the Pacific Islands. No system on HuggingFace covers Central Alaskan Yup’ik except the largest variant of Meta’s MMS-LID family, and only three MMS-LID variants cover Samoan, while Whisper and VoxLingua107-based models lack both despite including other Polynesian languages. We describe an ongoing effort to build a coarse-labeled LID dataset for Yup’ik and Samoan from US public broadcast archives, benchmark publicly available LID systems on it, and train a simple MLP classifier on frozen wav2vec~2.0 representations as a prototype. We report preliminary corpus statistics, off-the-shelf model performance, and prototype results. Guided by the distinctive phonological typology of the target languages, we outline a phonologically-informed fine-tuning direction as future work.

This paper presents the University of Florida Gators submission to the AmericasNLP 2026 shared task on cultural image captioning for Indigenous languages. The system uses a two-stage pipeline: first generating Spanish captions from images with a vision-language model, then translating them into target languages using retrieval-augmented many-shot prompting with Gemini 2.5 Flash. The paper reports strong improvements over the shared task baseline across multiple languages, analyzes the role of retrieval, synthetic exemplars, and morphology-aware prompting, and discusses limitations related to dev-set exemplars, cascade errors, and chrF++ based evaluation.

We describe our system for the AmericasNLP 2026 Shared Task on Cultural Image Captioning for Indigenous Languages of the Americas. Our post-training pipeline starts from Aya Vision 32B: the vision-language model is first fine-tuned on machine translation data from prior AmericasNLP shared tasks and then further fine-tuned on the cultural Image Captioning data. This approach uses translation as an intermediate training task, while the final system produces captions directly in the requested Indigenous language rather than translating a Spanish caption afterward. Our experiments show that machine translation fine-tuning is an important initialization step. The resulting fine-tuned vision-language model also shows translation capabilities for the languages considered in this work. In addition, our zero-shot GPT-5.5 submission ranks first in the Maya language track under the official human-evaluation stage.

The AmericasNLP 2026 shared task challenges systems to generate culturally grounded image captions in indigenous languages of the Americas, a setting that demands both cultural awareness and linguistic accuracy for severely underresourced languages. We present IUHoosiers, Indiana University’s system for the Guaraní track. Rather than fine-tuning, our approach centers on inference-time knowledge injection: for each test image, we retrieve relevant Guaraní grammatical and cultural resources using BM25 and inject them into a large vision language model’s prompt alongside the image, enabling language-specific cultural and linguistic grounding without any parameter updates. IUHoosiers placed first for Guaraní in both automatic evaluation (24.67 chrF++) and human evaluation (3.45/5), outperforming all other participating systems.

This system description presents a Wixarika image captioning system for the AmericasNLP 2026 Shared Task on Cultural Image Captioning for Indigenous Languages. The system uses Spanish as a pivot language, combining CLIP-based image retrieval, Qwen3-VL Spanish caption generation, the official Sheffield-compatible Spanish-to-Wixarika MT model, and character n-gram language-model reranking. We report local 5-fold development results, official test results, error analysis, and implementation details for reproducibility.

Culturally grounded image captioning for under-resourced Indigenous languages is challenging due to severe data scarcity and the need to describe culturally specific visual content. This paper describes our submission to the AmericasNLP 2026 shared task, where we evaluate two architectural paradigms for caption generation across Bribri, Guaraní, Yucatec Maya, Wixárika, and Orizaba Nahuatl. First, we implement a cascaded system that combines a large vision-language model with a machine translation pipeline, showing that culturally contextualized, persona-based prompting improves over the official baseline in most comparable settings. Second, we develop a direct, end-to-end Single-stage approach by adapting PaliGemma 2 using LoRA fine-tuning, continued pre-training, and multilingual joint training. Our single-stage experiments show that, despite severe domain mismatch and reliance on synthetic training data, multilingual training and continued pre-training improve automatic chrF++ relative to single-language LoRA fine-tuning in some settings. Overall, cascaded pipelines remain the strongest among the evaluated approaches under current data constraints, while single-stage models remain a promising but currently data-limited path toward direct Indigenous-language image captioning.

We describe our submission to all five tracks of the AmericasNLP 2026 Shared Task on Cultural Image Captioning: Bribri, Guaraní, Yucatec Maya, Orizaba Nahuatl, and Wixárika. Our system is an LLM-assisted rule-based machine translation (LLM-RBMT) captioner. For each language, a coding agent reads the small development split and open-web linguistic references and writes a complete Pydantic grammar package with a closed vocabulary. At inference time, a vision–language model sees the image and the schema, emits a structured SentenceList under constrained decoding, and a deterministic Python renderer produces the surface string. The model never generates target-language tokens. The same architecture handles all five languages with no fine-tuning, no parallel corpora, and no human edits to the generated packages. On the official test set, the system placed first on human evaluation in Bribri and Orizaba Nahuatl, third on Yucatec Maya, and first on ChrF++ in Yucatec Maya. We suggest that a strength of the approach is that outputs are restricted to simple sentences that are grammatically correct by construction, modulo the correctness of the generated grammar itself.

We describe the USP system for the AmericasNLP 2026 Shared Task on Culturally Relevant Image Captioning for Indigenous Languages, covering Guaraní (grn), Maya Yucateco (yua), Nahuatl (nah), Wixárika (hch), and Bribri (bzd). We propose a two-stage cascade: Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct (Bai et al., 2025) generates Spanish captions via language-specific cultural prompts; language-specific fine-tuned NLLB-200-distilled-600M (NLLB Team et al., 2022) models then translate them into each target language. We train on AmericasNLP 2023 data (Ebrahimi et al., 2023) augmented with public parallel corpora. Our system achieves competitive results, including 3rd place in Guaraní human evaluation (2.41/5.0) and 5th in Bribri (1.09/5.0) among 8 teams. We also report that NLLB-200-distilled-600M silently lacks vocabulary entries for Bribri and Maya Yucateco, producing English output without error.

This paper describes the NAIST submission to the AmericasNLP 2026 Shared Task on Indigenous Language Image Captioning. We investigate two approaches for generating captions in Bribri, Guaraní, Nahuatl, Wixárika, and Yucatec Maya. The first is a nearest-neighbor retrieval system that uses CLIP image embeddings to retrieve the most similar image from the development set and directly reuse its caption. The second is a generation pipeline that combines scene analysis, dictionary-grounded lexical planning, retrieved gloss templates, and interlinear gloss representations to constrain generation in low-resource settings.The retrieval-based approach substantially outperformed the gloss-based pipeline under chrF++ evaluation and was competitive across all submitted systems, achieving first-place automated system rankings for Bribri and Wixárika and third place for Nahuatl. The gloss-based pipeline produced weaker automatic evaluation results and exposed problems with dictionary coverage, orthographic mismatches between resources, and unstable grammatical generation. Our results suggest that retrieval-based methods provide a strong baseline for low-resource captioning tasks when high-quality examples are available.

Indigenous languages of the Americas face severe endangerment, and the scarcity of culturally grounded resources remains a critical barrier to revitalization efforts. We present the AmericasNLP 2026 Shared Task on Cultural Image Captioning for Indigenous Languages, the first shared task dedicated to generating captions for images depicting Indigenous cultures of the Americas, written in the Indigenous languages themselves. To support this, we introduce and publicly release a newly constructed dataset spanning five cultures and their dominant languages: Bribri, Guaraní, Yucatec Maya, Central Veracruz Nahuatl, and Wixárika. Evaluation follows a two-stage process, combining automatic evaluation using ChrF++ with human evaluation of the top-performing systems for each language. Eight teams participate, submitting 27 systems in total. Results indicate that the task remains largely unsolved: while the strongest systems produce understandable captions, they fall short on descriptive detail and, critically, cultural grounding.

Inspired by the human expert thinking paradigm in operations research, this work introduces a new concept of reasoning tasks: Textual Constrained Optimization (TCO) problems. A TCO problem is characterized by a natural language description that implicitly specifies an underlying structured model with variables, constraints, and objectives. We propose a novel Syllogism-driven Textual Constrained Optimization Reasoning (STCOR) paradigm, driven by classical syllogistic logic. Unlike contemporary stepwise methods, our framework structures reasoning into three phases: meta-modeling, which acts as the major premise by retrieving a relevant class-driven prototype template; formalization, which serves as the minor premise by instantiating the template into an explicit logical model from textual queries; and solving, which derives the final answer as conclusion. To support the end-to-end implementation, we further develop a tri-level optimization algorithm TriRL.

In today’s fast-paced information era, logical fallacies, defined as defective patterns of reasoning, inevitably contribute to the growth of information disorder. However, often fallacies appear in nuanced forms that complicate automated classification. In this study, we investigate whether merging abstract logical structures with context-level linguistic cues proves beneficial for fallacy classification, developing a framework that inductively extracts such patterns from fallacious examples and their explanations using Large Language Models (LLMs). We evaluate the impact of these patterns across different LLMs and experimental zero- and one-shot configurations, showing statistically significant improvements over zero-shot baselines and outperforming competing approaches. Cross-dataset experiments validate generalization, establishing data-driven pattern extraction as an effective method for generating logical representations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators of argument quality. However, existing studies typically assess models only through their agreement with human scores, leaving the reasoning process behind these judgments unexplored. In this paper, we propose a three-level audit framework for evaluating the reliability of LLM-based argument quality assessment. The framework distinguishes between (1) surface alignment, measuring agreement between LLM-predicted scores and human annotations; (2) instructional alignment, assessing whether generated rationales adhere to the intended evaluation criteria; and (3) faithfulness alignment, examining whether predicted scores are supported by the generated rationales. To operationalize this audit, we introduce structural rationale prompting, which guides LLMs to generate structured justifications before assigning scores across 11 dimensions of the Dagstuhl-15512 argument quality corpus. We evaluate several LLMs under this framework and find that structural rationale prompting substantially improves agreement with human annotations compared to definition-based prompting. Furthermore, the generated rationales generally follow the evaluation instructions and remain highly consistent with the predicted scores. Overall, our results suggest that auditing LLM evaluators beyond surface score agreement provides deeper insight into the reliability and transparency of LLM-based evaluation.

Stance classification is a core task in argument mining and subjectivity analysis, crucial for understanding public discourse and opinion dynamics on social media. Despite their impressive few-shot capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain sensitive to prompt construction, including the selection and ordering of in-context examples. In this paper, we propose a Topic-Guided prompting method for argument stance classification that dynamically integrates topic-specific information into the few-shot context. We evaluate our method on five LLMs across three datasets spanning formal debates and user-generated online comments. Our extensive evaluation shows that our proposed Topic-Guided prompting outperforms standard few-shot prompting and state-of-the-art example selection strategies. Further analysis indicates that our method reduces the bias towards the ’support’ class observed in several models, resulting in more balanced predictions across stances and thus a more robust approach to stance classification.

Annotated datasets are essential for developing and evaluating argument mining systems, yet information about argument mining datasets remains scattered across papers, repositories, and task-specific surveys. To address this, we introduce AMResources (http://purl.archive.org/amresources), an online catalog that organizes argument mining datasets by task, and captures relationships among datasets, releases, and papers. We draw particular attention to relationships such as re-annotation and dataset extension. To curate dataset information into a consistent and provenance-aware structure, AMResources links datasets to canonical papers. For each dataset release, AMResources records standardized metadata such as language, genre, unit type and unit count, annotator characteristics, agreement reporting, and accessibility. We argue that such structured dataset documentation remains critical in the era of large language models, where annotated datasets increasingly serve as high-quality evaluation benchmarks and where tracing dataset provenance and annotation layers is necessary for systematic comparisons across tasks.

Despite the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate coherent comparative answers, automatic comparative question answering (CQA) remains challenging due to the absence of standardized evaluation criteria and the high resource demands of manual assessment. To address these problems, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to assess the quality of CQA summaries using LLMs-as-a-Judge. We formulate 15 evaluation criteria for assessing comparative answers generated by various sources, including LLMs, human experts, and prior work. To capture a diverse range of comparative answers, LLM summaries were generated under various prompting scenarios. We evaluate the effectiveness of our framework using both human assessment and LLMs, demonstrating the consistency between automated and manual evaluations. Finally, we fine-tune Llama-3-8B-Instruct on a dataset generated from the best-performing CQA models in our evaluation.

Images can powerfully strengthen arguments, conveying ideas more immediately and compellingly than text alone. With the rise of text-to-image models, a broad audience can now generate custom visuals to illustrate their arguments. Yet a fundamental mismatch undermines this potential: these models are trained on concrete scene descriptions, while arguments operate at the level of general, abstract principles. Naively prompting such a model with an argumentative text therefore rarely produces images that genuinely illustrate the argument. To address this challenge, we propose an aspect-aware image generation approach. Given an argument, our method first identifies the key aspects that an illustrative image should convey, then constructs a detailed scene description grounded in both the argument and those aspects, and finally generates an image using that scene description as the prompt. A human-assessment evaluation demonstrates that this approach yields images that illustrate arguments significantly better than those produced by naive prompting.

Large language models have improved argument mining substantially, but the associated computational cost complicates deployment, replication, and systematic comparison. We examine how much compression an open-source large language model can tolerate before argument classification quality degrades. Using gpt-oss-20b as the base model, we study pruning with Wanda and post-training quantization under a zero-shot prompting setup. We evaluate compressed variants on three argument-mining resources, namely UKP, Args.me, and ARIES, and contrast their behavior with general language-model benchmarks. The results show a consistent pattern: moderate pruning preserves most of the original performance on argument classification, whereas activation quantization causes larger and more systematic drops. The findings suggest that argument classification is more compression-tolerant than general-purpose evaluation suites, but only up to a point, and they should not be interpreted as evidence that aggressive compression is universally safe. We therefore position compression as a practical way to reduce model cost for argument analysis, while emphasizing that claims about efficiency gains must distinguish between preserved predictive quality and realized runtime speedups.

Fine-grained argumentation mining goes beyond coarse-grained distinctions such as claim and premise, by delving deeper into the underlying strategies employed (e.g., the use of facts or values to persuade the audience). Despite the advancements brought about by pre-trained language models, the task remains challenging. We investigate whether auxiliary knowledge such as emotion and moral value lexicon features can improve the classification of fine-grained argumentation strategies. Our Neural Flair Transformer Classifier (NFTC), in its base form, fine-tunes a transformer-based document encoder (RoBERTa) for end-to-end argument component classification. Evaluated across four corpora from diverse domains spanning public participation, persuasive forums, product reviews, and student essays, NFTC consistently outperforms majority-voting and Qwen2.5-7B baselines, achieving competitive performance on all datasets. Moreover, gains are observed against a fine-tuned LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct model, regarded in prior work as a leading approach. Injecting additional knowledge into NFTC yields mixed effects: emotion and moral value features provide consistent gains in product reviews and persuasive forums, but not in the other two domains. Our findings suggest that the utility of subjective knowledge is domain and schema dependent.

This paper presents the UZH Shared Task at the 13th Workshop on Argument Mining and Reasoning, co-located with ACL 2026, which focuses on reconstructing argumentative structure in highly formal legal-political texts, namely United Nations resolutions and recommendations. The shared task addresses the challenge of recovering paragraph-level reasoning patterns from the fairly formulaic structure of international decision-making records. It comprises two subtasks: (1) paragraph classification, where systems identify paragraph type (preambular or operative) and assign one or more thematic tags, and (2) argumentative relation prediction, where systems infer links between paragraphs and label them with relation types.

We present LLM-INSTRUCT, the winning system for the UZH Shared Task at ArgMining 2026 on paragraph-level argument mining in UN and UNESCO resolutions. The task requires paragraph-type classification, prediction of a subset of 141 official tags, and directed relation prediction under a strict JSON schema setting using only open-weight models up to 8B parameters. We frame the task as constrained structured prediction. The system first narrows the candidate tag space with metadata-aware dense retrieval, then applies constrained decoding with per-dimension caps, and escalates only uncertain cases to a three-agent debate branch.

Subtask 1 of the UZH Shared Task 2026 asks for paragraph-level classification of UN resolutions as preambular or operative and multi-label tagging from a 141-code, 15-dimension taxonomy, scored by tag F1 and an open-weight LLM-as-Judge on reasoning quality. Two earlier pipelines we built failed in opposite ways. An embedding-retrieval system dropped relevant tags before the LLM saw them; a per-dimension prompting system was accurate but too slow to iterate. The submitted system fixes both. A deterministic French-English lexical classifier assigns paragraph types at type macro-F1 of 0.910 on the official silver standard with no LLM calls, and DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B predicts tags through a single merged prompt that exposes the full taxonomy.

The highly formal and negotiated language of United Nations (UN) resolutions presents unique challenges for argument mining. This paper describes our system submitted to the ArgMining 2026 Shared Task: Reconstructing the Reasoning in United Nations Resolutions. Adhering to the strict constraint of utilising open-weight models with at most 8 billion parameters, we propose a hybrid, compute-efficient architecture powered by Qwen3-8B. For the preambular-operative classification, we implement a set of deterministic rules related to the specificity of UN documents, supplemented by an LLM-based multi-label classifier for thematic dimensions and a directed-graph extraction approach for argumentative relation prediction.

We describe our system for the UZH ArgMining 2026 Shared Task on reconstructing argumentative structure in UN/UNESCO resolutions. The task requires (1) classifying paragraph types and assigning thematic tags from a 141-label taxonomy, and (2) predicting directed argumentative relations between paragraphs. Our pipeline combines a quantised Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backed by FAISS-indexed dense embeddings for few-shot prompting and tag candidate pre-filtering. For relation prediction, we apply a sliding-window cosine pre-filter that reduces the quadratic pair space to near-linear cost. A parallelisable, fault-tolerant pipeline with atomic checkpointing enabled complete processing of 2,959 paragraphs across three concurrent Kaggle T4 sessions despite 12-hour GPU limits. Our system achieved 2nd place overall on the shared task leaderboard.

United Nations and UNESCO resolutions encode complex collective reasoning through highly structured preambles and operative clauses. Reconstructing this implicit argumentative structure is a challenging natural language processing task. This paper describes our submission to the UZH Shared Task at the ArgMining Workshop 2026. Adhering to the strict constraint of using open-weight models with at most 8B parameters, we propose a highly efficient, modular pipeline built entirely upon the Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct architecture. To address Subtask 1, we decouple the problem, employing a 4-bit quantized LoRA adapter via the Unsloth framework for paragraph type classification and a type-informed chain-of-thought approach for thematic tagging and relation prediction.

This paper describes the submission of team POINTERS to the UZH ArgMining 2026 Shared Task, which aims to recover the argumentation structure of UN and UNESCO resolutions by labeling paragraph types, assigning specific tags, and predicting relations between paragraphs. We take a generative approach, treating each resolution as a sequence of claim-evidence pairs connected by explicit reasoning strategies. First, each paragraph is classified as preambular or operative and assigned tags, with the model required to quote specific phrases to justify every decision. Second, for each paragraph, we first retrieve semantically related candidates using sentence transformers, then use reasoning strategies as a diagnostic scaffold to label the relation—supporting, complemental, contradictive, or modifying—along with a quoted, strategy-grounded rationale.

Extracting argument structures from legal-political discourse reveals how policies and actions are proposed, debated, and formalized, but remains challenging due to the complexity of long-form, structured text. This work proposes a modular, retrieval-augmented system for traceable and structured argument mining in long, bilingual United Nations resolutions. This paper describes our system submission to the UZH Shared Task 2026, focusing on practical design choices for argument structure modeling under task and model constraints. Our system employs a parameter-efficient (at most 8B) open-source model, Qwen3:8B in thinking mode, to perform paragraph classification, multi-label tag assignment, and multi-label relation prediction through a modular, retrieval-augmented pipeline.

This tutorial examines the integration of Theory of Mind (ToM) into AI-driven tutoring systems, with a focus on how large language models (LLMs) can represent learners’ cognitive and emotional states to enable adaptive, personalized feedback. Participants will learn foundational ToM concepts from cognitive science and psychology and how these ideas can be operationalized in AI systems. We discuss mutual ToM, in which both tutors and learners model each other’s mental states, and address challenges including misconception detection, metacognitive modeling, and privacy in data-driven tutoring. The tutorial also includes hands-on demonstrations of machine ToM in programming education using benchmark datasets such as CS1QA and CodeQA. By combining theoretical foundations, empirical insights, and practical exercises, this tutorial will provide an overview of designing human-centered, ethically aware, and cognitively informed AI tutoring systems.

We introduce a thermal–visual fusion approach to improve non-invasive Voice Activity Detection (VAD) for classroom engagement monitoring. In noisy multi-speaker classrooms using a single microphone, acoustic-only methods fail to reliably isolate individual speakers. Our method integrates facial thermal signatures—capturing respiratory and speech-related heat patterns—with visual lip-motion cues to provide an acoustic-independent speech signal. This provides a localized, privacy-preserving, and acoustic-independent indicator of speech activity.This system acts as a visual-diarization frontend, informing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems not only when speech occurs, but precisely which student is speaking. Using up to 19 engineered features, our Thermal-Only Random Forest classifier achieved a Recall of 0.9234 and an F1-score of 0.8105 in subject-independent evaluations, outperforming visual-only baselines. The system was validated as a proof-of-concept on a Raspberry Pi 5 in a controlled laboratory setting, demonstrating real-time feasibility. These results demonstrate that thermal–visual fusion enables more reliable linguistic analysis of collaborative learning and provide critical input for AI agents to facilitate group participation in real-world educational settings that lead to more successful learning outcomes.

Automatic pronunciation assessment (APA) provides L2 learners with scalable and timely feedback on pronunciation proficiency in a target language, typically through goodness of pronunciation (GOP) features. GOP quantifies how well a pronounced phoneme matches the expected target sound by comparing acoustic features against the model’s posterior probabilities. Traditional GOP relies on forced alignment to obtain these posteriors, but it suffers from acoustic-induced misalignments that degrade assessment reliability. Although the standard CTC-GOP approach bypasses forced alignment, it is limited by the inherent peaky behavior of CTC-based ASR models, which produces sparse posteriors and lacks stable temporal information. To address these issues in standard CTC, we propose a context-aware CTC framework incorporating output context dependency (OCD) in the CTC topology, along with label prior (LP) and maximum conditional entropy (EnCTC) regularization, to mitigate peakiness and produce more stable ASR logits suitable for GOP computation. Experiments on the speechocean762 corpus demonstrate that our best context-aware configurations achieve superior phoneme-level performance, outperforming the TDNN-F baseline and standard CTC in unified GOPT (phoneme PCC 0.641 vs. 0.612; word total PCC 0.582 vs. 0.549) while narrowing the gap in hierarchical HierCB scoring. These improvements widen the scoring margin between correct and mispronounced phonemes from 0.708 to 0.816 in GOPT. They also reveal that mitigating CTC peakiness and incorporating context dependency significantly enhance CTC-GOP stability and robustness, especially for alignment-free APA models.

Automated coaching for oral presentations sits at the intersection of computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT), prosody modeling, and speech synthesis, yet no prior work has systematically surveyed and compared existing systems along these dimensions. This survey reviews and categorizes automated presentation coaching systems, spanning pronunciation tutors, fluency and prosody coaches, multimodal trainers, and conference Q A practice tools. We introduce a five-dimensional task taxonomy - covering segmental pronunciation, lexical stress, suprasegmental prosody, pacing, and content faithfulness - and explicitly map surveyed systems onto it to reveal coverage gaps. We further review the core technical methods these systems employ: TTS-based exemplar generation and diagnostic methods for pronunciation, prosody, and fluency assessment. Key open challenges include the scarcity of annotated presentation corpora, achieving accent-fair feedback across diverse L1 backgrounds, and delivering low-latency diagnostics for real-time rehearsal.

Effective mathematics education requires identifying and responding to students’ mistakes. For AI to support pedagogical applications, models must perform well across different levels of student proficiency. Our work provides an extensive, year-long snapshot of how 11 vision-language models (VLMs) perform on DrawEduMath, a QA benchmark involving real students’ handwritten, hand-drawn responses to math problems. We find that models’ weaknesses concentrate on a core component of math education: student error. All evaluated VLMs underperform when describing work from students who may require more pedagogical help, and across all QA, they struggle the most on questions related to assessing student error. Thus, while VLMs may be optimized to be math problem solving experts, our results suggest that they require alternative development incentives to adequately support educational use cases.

This paper presents an empirical evaluation of the German Grammar Profile (GGP), a CEFR-aligned resource of criterial features, and its corresponding extraction system PALME. We design a systematic test suite in which each feature extractor is evaluated on controlled positive and negative examples. The results show that PALME achieves high precision and recall across all CEFR levels, with over 90% of features achieving scores above 0.8. Qualitative analysis shows that lower performance primarily results from morphological ambiguity in noun and adjective case marking. To evaluate the usefulness of the criterial features of the GGP for CEFR-aligned readability assessment, we assess their predictive power using Explainable Boosting Machines on graded readers. The model achieves strong performance (precision: 0.75, recall: 0.73). Our qualitative analysis shows that features related to specific verb constructions follow patterns consistent with developmental stages predicted by Processability Theory. These findings underline the value and relevance of criterial features for modeling language development in readability assessment.

With the emergence of large language models (LLMs) as a powerful class of generative artificial intelligence (AI), their use in tutoring has become increasingly prominent. Prior works on LLM-based tutoring typically learn a single tutor policy and do not capture the diversity of tutoring styles. In real-world tutor–student interactions, pedagogical intent is realized through adaptive instructional strategies, with tutors varying the level of scaffolding, instructional directiveness, feedback, and affective support in response to learners’ needs. These differences can all impact dialogue dynamics and student engagement. In this paper, we explore how tutor personas embedded in human tutor-student dialogues can be used to guide LLM behavior without relying on explicitly prompted instructions. We train a steering vector using preference optimization: an activation-space direction that guides model responses toward specific tutor personas. We find that this steering vector captures tutor-specific variation across dialogue contexts, improving semantic alignment with ground-truth tutor utterances and increasing preference-based evaluations, while largely preserving lexical similarity. Analysis of the learned scaling coefficients further reveals interpretable structure across tutors, corresponding to consistent differences in tutoring behavior. These results demonstrate that activation steering offers an effective and interpretable way for controlling tutor-specific variation in LLMs using signals derived directly from human dialogue data.

Educational interventions are effective tools for enhancing student learning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) allow for generating adaptive feedback at scale, current studies lack clear methodologies for providing Just-in-Time (JiT) feedback in authentic instructional settings. In this paper, we present a framework that provides adaptive feedback by grounding LLMs with domain-specific expert knowledge. Our approach collects written reasoning logic (strategy essays) from students, analyzes potential error types based on the content of that reasoning, and delivers non-intrusive feedback designed to clarify missing or incorrect concepts. We deploy this framework in a large-scale college course (N > 1,000), where it improved student performance by over 80% compared to previous semesters. Lastly, we validate the framework’s pedagogical utility by analyzing the learning trajectories; we demonstrate how iterative conversations with LLM facilitate shifting one’s misconception to correct understanding.

Automatic speaking assessment (ASA) manages to quantify the language competence of foreign language learners by providing a proficiency score based on their spoken response. Existing efforts in ASA typically employ a neural grader integrated with a set of handcrafted features to assess learners’ oral proficiency from multiple facets. Despite decent performance, the black-box nature of these neural graders remains a significant barrier to providing interpretable explanations for the grading results. In light of this, we propose RABIT for ASA, a novel Rationale-based knowledge distillation framework for interpretable grading decisions via a small language model. Specifically, RABIT first extracts multi-faceted grading rationales from a large language model (LLM) pertaining to the learner’s response and the scoring guidelines. Subsequently, a compact yet efficient language model, equipped with distinct output heads, is jointly optimized to estimate a proficiency score while generating a sequence of grading rationales in an autoregressive manner. A series of experiments conducted on General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) dataset validates the feasibility and superiority of our method over several cutting-edge baselines.

Large language models have strong potential for use in intelligent tutoring systems, but they often fail to follow effective pedagogical strategies, such as guiding students without revealing final answers. We study the application of a two-stage alignment pipeline for math mistake remediation, combining supervised fine-tuning on tutoring dialogs with Direct Preference Optimization on synthetic preference pairs. We construct a dataset that integrates existing tutoring corpora with synthetic data generated along pedagogical dimensions, such as scaffolding and factuality, and study different input configurations that incorporate solution correctness and gold answers. Experiments show that this approach improves both factual accuracy and pedagogical quality over base models and existing tutoring models. Human evaluation further indicates that our best model is competitive with a strong proprietary baseline, while providing additional benefits in terms of openness, transparency, and reproducibility. Our results highlight the effectiveness of preference-based pedagogical alignment, while also revealing challenges in reliably evaluating tutoring quality.

This paper describes linguistic and technological challenges encountered within an applied project aimed at expanding a large e-learning portal from its original Czech to three other languages: Ukrainian, English and German. Although there seems to be a general belief that machine translation is a solved task in 2026, we show that translating educational content, which in our case is highly terminological, multimodal, interactive and encoded in XML, brings along many challenges of different types, some easily solvable and some not. We also compare our results from the early phase of the project (Transformer-based machine translation) with those after the switch to the LLM-based translation methods. We show that both MT methods are prone to different types of errors, some of which are quite new (such as the undesired correction of counterfactual statements) and require new ways of handling them. The resulting four-language edition of the educational web portal will be freely available to educators, students and researchers by the end of 2026.

Generative AI is increasingly used to accelerate assessment content development, yet its effectiveness for generating content used in complex assessment tasks for knowledge-rich domains such as medical education is unclear. This study evaluates automated LLM-supported workflows for generating patient-centered communication assessment items that allow students to practice their communication skills. We compared two content generation approaches—constrained linear and exploratory branching—each implemented with and without anchoring in vetted multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Ten subject-matter experts (SMEs) evaluated 80 communication items across six quality dimensions using structured rubrics. The constrained linear approach yielded better ratings than exploratory branching approaches, particularly for medical accuracy and alignment with learning objectives and patient-centered behaviors. MCQ anchoring did not improve medical accuracy. Only a minority of items met all criteria without requiring revision, and no items were unanimously approved by all SMEs. These findings underscore the importance of workflow design in LLM-supported assessment content generation, the continued need for human oversight, and the current limitations of automated content generation in medical education.

Automated essay scoring (AES) research often relies on rank-based correlation metrics to validate analytic assessment. However, such metrics obscure both intrinsic intercorrelations among analytic dimensions that arise from the structure of writing proficiency itself and halo effects, whereby holistic impressions bleed into fine-grained component scores. As a result, high correlations may mask a system’s true diagnostic behaviour. In this study, we propose a novel self-referential assessment evaluation framework that focuses on identifying intra-learner strengths and weaknesses rather than assessing inter-learner rankings. We conduct experiments on the publicly available ICNALE GRA, a uniquely dense second-language writing dataset annotated holistically and analytically by up to 80 trained raters. To obtain reliable reference scores, we apply two-facet Rasch modelling to calibrate rater severity and derive fair average scores across ten analytic aspects and holistic proficiency. We compare the analytic scoring performance of human operational raters and three large language models (LLMs) in a zero-shot setting. Our results show that LLMs tend to outperform single human raters in identifying relative weaknesses (negative feedback) across several proficiency aspects, while human raters remain stronger at identifying relative strengths (positive feedback). Overall, our findings highlight the limitations of rank-based evaluation for analytic assessment and demonstrate the value of intra-learner, profile-based methods for assessing and deploying LLMs in AES.

Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) can record learner interactions in fine-grained detail at scale. This opens the door to data-driven methods for investigating system performance and identifying points for improvement. In this paper, we draw on authentic log data from an English language ITS (N_logs = 5646, N_students = 368) to investigate the performance of its feedback algorithm. In step 1 of our analysis, we profiled feedback accuracy by exploring how well the system provided error-specific feedback to malformed student answers in gap-filling grammar exercises using an expert-created set of feedback generation rules. We then identified frequently occurring student errors that triggered incorrect or unspecific feedback and refined the rule set used to detect and respond to these errors with correct specific feedback. In step 2, we validated the rule modifications on an unseen dataset. Comparing the performance of the initial and updated rule sets, we find significant improvement that generalizes to unseen data. Our study thus illustrates how an empirical evaluation of authentic data can complement feedback creators’ expertise by informing rule refinement decisions that yield significant and generalizable performance improvements to feedback in ITS systems.

Most existing math benchmarks for LLMs focus on evaluating whether models produce correct solutions. In educational settings, however, it is equally important to understand whether LLMs grasp the pedagogical intent behind math problems, beyond simply arriving at the right answer. Tagging curriculum standards is challenging for the same reason: distinguishing fine-grained standards requires understanding subtle pedagogical distinctions. In this paper, we use the MathFish benchmark, which frames curriculum alignment as a multi-label prediction task over 385 Common Core State Standards, to evaluate a three-stage pipeline inspired by observed failure modes in retrieval and structural reasoning: curriculum-informed hard negatives (M1), a cross-encoder reranker (M2), and a ReAct agent paired with an LLM-as-a-judge critic (M3). We additionally evaluate a training-free alternative (A1) that combines hybrid sparse-dense retrieval with curriculum-graph reranking. M3 achieves 31.3% exact-match accuracy, approximately 6.5× higher than the three-shot GPT-4-Turbo baseline. Error analysis shows that, despite these improvements, the pipeline still struggles with missing predictions, grade-level misalignment, and sibling-standard confusion, reinforcing that precise curriculum alignment remains a fundamentally difficult problem in educational NLP.

Beyond performance, model transparency is a crucial factor in Automated Essay Scoring, yet current systems often lack explainability, limiting their pedagogical value and users’ trust. Existing explainability methods, such as gradient-based attribution or feature-importance approaches, either produce counterintuitive explanations or are too complex for classroom use. To address this limitation, we make use of fine-grained prediction at the sentence level as a way to enhance explainability. We propose ablation strategies to derive sentence-level pseudo scores from essay-level gold scores and use them to train sentence-level models. We evaluate their performance against essay-level baselines on two datasets (ASAP and MEWS), and compare their sentence-level output to a human baseline. Results indicate a trade-off between essay-level performance and sentence-level granularity. For the language quality trait, most sentence-level models achieve performance comparable to the essay-level baseline, whereas for content, the approach yields more positive results on prompts with shorter

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) requires models to make edit decisions under competing objectives: correcting errors while either minimizing changes or maximizing fluency.However, we lack a principled characterization of how instruction-following Large Language Models (LLMs) shift their edit decisions across such editing modes, and whether standard evaluation setups faithfully reflect these shifts.We address this gap by defining three modes—Neutral, Minimal-Edit, and Fluency-Edit—and measuring neutral-anchored performance shifts to quantify instructional sensitivity.We benchmark seven LLMs, including proprietary and open-weight models, in a unified zero-shot prompting schema on CoNLL-2014, BEA-2019, and JFLEG datasets.The Minimal-Edit instruction mitigates over-editing and typically boosts precision; in some settings, strong models also improve recall, suggesting more selective and effective corrections.In contrast, the Fluency-Edit instruction often encourages broader paraphrastic rewriting that may improve perceived fluency while lowering GLEU, suggesting both a metric-objective mismatch and a shift away from targeted local correction.Notably, Claude-Sonnet-4.5 demonstrates superior zero-shot capabilities, outperforming previously reported scores and matching or even exceeding few-shot results across CoNLL-2014 (F_0.5: 67.05), BEA-2019 (F_0.5: 64.91), and JFLEG (GLEU: 66.09).

Lecture-style instruction is one of the most prevalent forms of learning in postsecondary education in the United States. Despite the factors that make lectures a convenient format, they tend to present few opportunities for meaningful engagement between students and the course materials being presented due to factors such as the overhead associated with interacting with large numbers of students. By utilizing large language models, we have created a pipeline built upon the ExplainIt classroom response system for processing student self-explanations produced during lectures using automatically generated knowledge components. This pipeline can facilitate deeper engagement with course materials, offer traceability in assessment results, and allows instructors to respond to student errors or misconceptions in real-time during lecture. While previous work using a proprietary large language model has examined the basic functionality of this pipeline, this work more closely examines the consistency and quality of this pipeline using both a large closed-weight model and a smaller open-weight model, with or without retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The use of open-source models could allow institutions deploying ExplainIt to maintain control of their student data without substantially sacrificing performance. We find that while there are small statistically significant differences in performance between the RAG conditions of each LLM, they are nearly comparable at this task. Additionally, the LLM-generated knowledge components are of higher quality when relevant course material is provided for RAG, although consistency is not improved. These results indicate that both large closed-weight and smaller open-weight models show promise in this task, but fine-tuning may be necessary to improve performance further.

Automated short answer grading (ASAG) with large language models (LLMs) is commonly evaluated with aggregate metrics such as macro-F1 and Cohen’s kappa. However, these metrics provide limited insight into how grading performance varies across student responses of differing grading difficulty. We introduce an evaluation framework for LLM-based ASAG based on item response theory (IRT), which models grading correctness as a function of latent grader ability and response grading difficulty. This formulation enables response-level analysis of where LLM graders succeed or fail and reveals robustness differences that are not visible from aggregate scores alone. We apply the framework to 17 open-weight LLMs on the SciEntsBank and Beetle benchmarks. The results show that even models with similar overall performance differ substantially in how sharply their grading accuracy declines as response difficulty increases. In addition, confusion patterns show that errors on difficult responses concentrate disproportionately on the partially_correct_incomplete label, indicating a tendency toward intermediate-label collapse under ambiguity. To characterize difficult responses, we further analyze semantic and linguistic correlates of estimated difficulty. Across both datasets, higher difficulty is associated with weaker semantic alignment to the reference answer, stronger contradiction signals, and greater semantic isolation in embedding space. Overall, these results show that item response theory offers a useful framework for evaluating LLM-based ASAG beyond aggregate performance measures.

This paper explores the application of a Large Language Model (LLM) using k-shot prompting with large k for automatically scoring a German Written Elicited Imitation Test (WEIT), a test for assessing literacy-dependent procedural knowledge in German as a foreign language. In this test, test-takers are briefly presented with written sentences which they then have to reproduce in writing as accurately as possible. The responses are scored on an ordinal scale which differentiates between different types of errors (e.g. lexical vs. grammatical). We find that with increasing k (in a range from 1 to 700) accuracy increases significantly but it also depends on the drawn sample and varies across different runs of the same prompt. Overall, the k-shot setting which relies on in-context learning without being provided with the scoring rubric outperforms a baseline where only the scoring rubric is provided to the model. However, the LLM does not outperform previous results based on rule-based or BERT-based models.

We discuss the development of kelvi.ca, an open source web-based dictionary and morphological parser designed to aid Tamil learners in developing their literacy skills. Tamil is an agglutinative language and heavily suffixal. Existing Tamil dictionaries only carry stems, not conjugated or inflected forms, and for a beginner learner of the language, isolating the stem in an unfamiliar word can be very challenging. Kelvi provides 1) the stem of any input word alongside its definition, and 2) non-technical descriptions of any suffixes that are part of this input, so that learners will gradually start to recognize these suffixes and be able to understand and produce new Tamil words themselves. In detailing our process of collaborative research, user interviews, suffix database creation, and error analysis, we also hope to show that Kelvi can be adapted for other languages and has the potential to be a useful pedagogical aid for learner literacy development, especially for agglutinative and/or polysynthetic languages which tend to be otherwise underserved in the mainstream.

Automatic question generation with large language models has advanced rapidly, yet producing assessment-ready items, complete with mark schemes and expected answers, remains challenging, especially when generation must reliably target higher-order cognitive levels in Bloom’s Taxonomy. We propose a multi-agent, multi-stage framework that generates structured assessment tuples for both short-answer questions (SAQs) and scenario-based questions (SBQs), combining Bloom-specialized generation agents with staged decomposition and automated verification. We further introduce a rubric-guided LLM-as-a-judge evaluation framework with Bloom-specific alignment metrics. Experiments on university-level AI course material across five generation pipelines show that prompt-level Bloom conditioning alone is insufficient to reliably achieve cognitive control. In contrast, our structured approach yields consistent and notable improvements in alignment, mark scheme quality, and output yield, particularly for higher-order Bloom levels over baseline pipelines.

Pronunciation feedback in language learning depends on accurate detection of learner errors, but it is unclear whether modern ASR systems are suitable for this purpose. Their language models recover intended words rather than what was actually pronounced, systematically masking mispronunciations. This is a tendency we call intent bias. By evaluating eight ASR systems spanning three architectures on two L2 English corpora, we find that overcorrection rate correlates inversely with word error rate. In other words, ASR systems with lower WER tend to mask more pronunciation errors. We propose surface-faithful reranking, an inference-time method that uses phoneme-level acoustic similarity to select N-best hypotheses closer to what the learner actually said. Without retraining or access to model internals, the method reduces the false acceptance rate of mispronunciations by 6.0 percentage points on L2-ARCTIC and 5.6 on speechocean762. The improvement is consistent across age groups and first-language backgrounds, though substantial overcorrection remains, pointing to the need for pronunciation-aware ASR objectives.

We investigate the predictive power of keystroke logging data for automated essay scoring using the newly collected PISA FLA writing process dataset. Based on 3,882 writing sessions, we extract a comprehensive set of keystroke-based process features, including temporal measures, pause and burst patterns, deletion behavior, production efficiency, and navigation activity and evaluate their ability to predict holistic essay scores on a 0–5 scale. We specifically compare process-feature-based models with content-based scoring approaches trained on data written with and without the help of an AI chatbot, and investigate how predictive power evolves over the course of a writing session by training models at multiple time thresholds.Our analysis reveals that keystroke features provide genuine early predictive signal, capturing aspects of writing fluency and revision behavior that distinguish writers before their texts are long enough to score conventionally. Additionally, our results suggest that process-based scoring is a viable complement to product-based approaches, with promise for formative, real-time feedback during writing.

Research in AI applied to education increasingly relies on large-scale, high-quality datasets to support the development and evaluation of learning analytics and intelligent educational systems. Open educational resources provide a promising foundation, yet few datasets integrate structured instructional content with assessment materials in a multimodal form. In this study, we introduce a large-scale multimodal educational dataset (EduMUSE - Educational Multimodal Understanding & Solution Dataset) constructed from OpenStax undergraduate textbooks across multiple domains. The dataset integrates hierarchically structured instructional text, figures, exercises, and, when available, official solutions. For exercises with solutions, we introduce an automatic method that associates each exercise with a focused instructional subsection rather than entire textbook chapters, estimating subsection relevance via solution likelihood under candidate contexts using a vision–language model. We analyze the impact of contextualization on the behavior of vision–language models across different contexts. Results indicate that subsection-level instructional context has a measurable impact on model performance, with variation across model scales and task formulations. The dataset and code are released as open source at https://github.com/upb-nlp/BEA-EduMUSE/ to support reproducible research in multimodal educational modeling and to facilitate generating similar datasets using our approach.

We introduce FDE-Arg, a newly compiled dataset of argumentative student essays in German. We use two Llama models of different sizes to label sentence-level content zones both in FDE-Arg and in an existing dataset of source-dependent argumentative essays. We investigate three approaches for improving model performance: a) Incorporating targeted task information into the prompt text; b) few-shot prompting with up to 10 examples selected on the basis of similarity with the target instance; and c) parameter-efficient fine-tuning. We observe that both incorporating additional information in the prompts and similarity-based few-shot prompting have produced highly promising performance gains over the baseline.

This paper addresses the problem of fine-grained error classification in stepwise algebraic problem solving, with the objective of enabling accurate and timely feedback in large-scale educational environments. Using authentic student response data, we compare a carefully engineered rule-based baseline with large language models (LLMs) in zero-shot and few-shot configurations, as well as multistep LLM-based approaches. We further consider hybrid architectures that combine symbolic computation with LLM inferential processes, with particular emphasis on enhancing the robustness and faithfulness of intermediate representations and mitigating error propagation across successive stages of the computational pipeline. Our empirical results indicate that, although the baseline model delivers strong and reliable performance for narrowly defined error categories, structured multi-step approaches improve performance relative to single-step methods by achieving superior precision, F1 scores, and overall accuracy.

Automated short answer scoring (ASAS) is shifting from discriminative, fine-tuned models to large language models (LLMs) used in few-shot settings. This paradigm leverages LLMs’ broad world knowledge and ease of deployment, but limited task-specific data may reduce alignment on complex scoring tasks. In particular, its impact on scoring partially correct responses that require nuanced interpretation remains underexplored.We investigate the relationship between the degree of task-specific adaptation of different models and quality-conditioned scoring agreement. We compare three LLMs (GPT-5.2, GPT-4o, Claude Opus 4.5) in few-shot mode, a fine-tuned BERT-based encoder, and a human expert on two open-ended biology items, using several hundred student responses and ground truth scores provided by a biology education expert.The results show that human–human agreement is highest and stable across the full quality spectrum. All AI models perform well on fully correct and fully incorrect responses, but exhibit substantial degradation on mid-range responses. This mid-range degradation is conditioned on task-specific adaptation: It is most severe in few-shot LLMs with few examples and decreases as task-specific data increases, with fine-tuned encoder models performing best.This mid-range degradation may lead to inequitable evaluation of responses produced by students with developing understanding. Our findings highlight the importance of quality-conditioned fairness, with particular attention to mid-range responses.

Various aspects of the Elicited Imitation Test (EIT), a sentence repetition task for language assessment, can be automated, for example in terms of test administration or automatic scoring. It is potentially also possible to generate test items with Large Language Models (LLMs). This study investigates the potential of GPT-4o for item creation in the context of EIT, creating a parallel form to two popular and validated tests. We analysed the tests in terms of their linguistic and psychometric properties. While the items created by the LLM show some difference in grammatical structures when compared to human-written items, linguistic complexity results did not differ significantly between tests. Psychometric properties showed only minor differences. These findings lend support to the potential of Automatic Item Generation with LLMs in the context of sentence repetition tasks and might support the process of standardisation in SLA research and testing by enabling parallel test creation.

Answer explanations for medical multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a valuable learning tool, but producing them is resource intensive. Writing high quality explanations requires specialized medical expertise and careful alignment with the keyed answer, distractors, and the clinical vignette. This paper evaluates whether a template-aware, retrieval-guided large language model (LLM) workflow can support this production task in a real formative assessment setting. Using a 50-item medical education self-assessment, we compared AI-generated and expert-written MCQ explanations in a blinded study involving eight medical faculty and sixteen medical students. Each participant rated 25 of 50 paired explanations on clarity, amount of information, and structure. The clearest empirical difference was in amount of information: AI-generated explanations were rated significantly higher than expert-written explanations in a cumulative link mixed model analysis (OR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.33, 2.99], p = 0.001). Ratings of clarity and structure did not differ significantly between conditions. Based on faculty ratings, a smaller proportion of AI-generated explanations were judged to require correction (20%) compared with expert-written explanations (38%). These findings suggest that AI can reduce first-draft authoring effort in explanation writing while still requiring expert review to ensure content accuracy.

Russian grammar correction models can improveon aggregate benchmarkswhile getting worse at specific grammar rules.We show this through per-rule evaluationon a diagnostic benchmark of 48 prescriptive rules:finetuning on synthetic data improves overall F_0.5while driving subordinate-clause comma accuracyfrom 14% to 1%.The suppression is invisible under corpus-level metricsand undetectable with existing coarse, corpus-specific tagsets;it is recoverable only when diagnosed at rule granularity.To enable this analysis,we develop a 98-category error taxonomygrounded in Rozental’s reference grammarand SyntErr, an open-source synthetic data generatorwhose per-rule distribution is an explicit parameter,designed to support arbitrary rule sets and languages.Finetuning eight open models (0.8B–12B)on 39K synthetic examplesyields up to 75.3 F_0.5,approaching frontier API modelswith models small enough to run on device.We release the taxonomy, generator,per-rule evaluation data, and all training artifacts.

Grammatical error correction (GEC) is a natural language processing task critical for improving language quality, supporting communication efficacy, and for language learning and teaching. To date, most research in GEC has focused on major, resource-rich languages such as English, while lower-resource languages remain underexplored. In this paper, we focus on GEC for Finnish. We build a dataset based on data from real-world language learners. We explore various approaches to GEC, including fine-tuning transformer models and zero-shot LLM prompting. We also adapt ERRANT, a popular GEC evaluation tool, for the Finnish language, to evaluate the performance of the models. Our results indicate that the performance of GEC for Finnish is promising, but requires further research. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth exploration of GEC for Finnish; we provide benchmarks, datasets, and code for GEC for Finnish—by releasing our training and test data and the code for Finnish ERRANT—to support further research on this important task.

Young athletes, parents, and coaches are increasingly exposed to training metrics from wearable technology, yet such metrics are difficult to interpret without contextual explanation. We present a rule-grounded data-to-text framework for supporting data literacy in youth football through concise, stakeholder-specific summaries of training sessions. A rule layer maps duration-normalised indicators to structured facts about session profile, internal intensity, speed exposure, and movement dynamics, which are then verbalised by a large language model for coaches, parents, or players. We compare direct generation from raw metrics, generation from rule-derived facts, and an augmented rule-grounded configuration, ENRICHED, that supplements validated facts with raw metrics and explicit threshold definitions. In this setting, selected open-weight models are additionally adapted using LoRA. The framework is developed using 122 anonymised player-session records from a U15 environment and evaluated on a held-out subset of ten sessions with stakeholder-oriented reference summaries. The results indicate that rule grounding improves reliability and audience adaptation compared with direct generation from raw metrics, particularly by reducing unsupported or overly strong interpretations. A school-based expert evaluation with physical education teachers further suggests that player-facing explanations in the evaluated ENRICHED setting can remain accurate, comprehensible, and practically useful. We position the framework as an interpretable data-literacy support interface for youth sport analytics.

This paper looks at the impact of annotators sharing a language background with learners when annotating learner data using the Universal Dependencies (UD) framework. We perform a study comparing annotations by two different annotators working on sets of L2 Swedish sentences (learner sentences and target corrections) from the Swedish Learner Language corpus (SweLL) written by learners for whom French is a main writing language. The annotators are both L2 speakers of Swedish but have different knowledge of French: one is a native French speaker and the other has no knowledge of French. We find high annotator agreement, which may indicate an non-significant impact, though we qualitatively observe an advantage in sharing language background.

Productive struggle is a critical component of mathematics education, requiring students to actively work through ideas rather than just making errors. However, identifying this struggle from text transcripts is challenging because students often mask confusion with epistemic hedging rather than direct statements. Zero-shot large language models exhibit a conservative bias, systematically under-detecting struggle in classroom discourse. We introduce a two-stage NLP pipeline comprising a lexical heuristic gate and an LLM subtype classifier. Our model achieves 90.0% binary accuracy and 84.0% 4-category accuracy. We demonstrate the pedagogical value of this tool by showing that struggle is uniquely concentrated during explicit mathematical reasoning, offering educators a scalable method for root-cause analysis.

Large language models (LLMs) can provide automated feedback in educational settings, but aligning an LLM’s style with a specific instructor’s tone while maintaining diagnostic correctness remains challenging. We ask: how can we update an LLM for automated feedback generation to align with a target instructor’s style without sacrificing core knowledge? We study how Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) can adapt a transformer-based LLM to generate programming feedback that matches a professor’s grading voice. We introduce PERSA, an RLHF pipeline that combines supervised fine-tuning on professor demonstrations, reward modeling from pairwise preferences, and Proximal-based policy optimization, while deliberately constraining learning to style-bearing components.Motivated by analyses of transformer internals, PERSA applies parameter efficient fine-tuning. It updates only the top transformer blocks and their feed-forward projections, minimizing global parameter drift while increasing stylistic controllability. We evaluate our proposed approach on three code-feedback benchmarks (APPS, PyFiXV, and CodeReviewQA) using complementary metrics for style alignment and fidelity. Across both Llama-3 and Gemma-2 backbones, PERSA delivers the strongest professor-style transfer while preserving perfect correctness; for example on APPS, it boosts Style Alignment Score (SAC) to 96.2% (from 34.8% for Base) with Correctness Accuracy (CA) up to 100% on Llama-3, and Gemma-2. Overall, PERSA offers a practical route to personalized educational feedback by aligning both what it says (content correctness) and, crucially, how it says it (instructor-like tone, structure, and guidance).

Recent advances in the capabilities of conversational agents based on large language models make them a very promising tool for role playing K-12 students in order to train educators in conversational teaching practices, such as eliciting student thinking, explaining disciplinary content, and facilitating a classroom discussion. In fact, such simulations can and have been developed relatively quickly and without data to machine-learn from – neither classroom data nor human-simulated data. To enhance the usefulness and effectiveness of such teaching simulations, it is necessary to provide pedagogically sound, timely, and personalized feedback to the educator about their simulation performance. In this study, we present experiments on fine-tuning models to evaluate educator performance in an elicitation teaching simulation. The models are developed with data collected during usability testing of the simulation and evaluated on real user data. We show that even with relatively little fine-tuning data, robust performance can be obtained

Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) platforms have become common, but a significant gap remains between automated assessment and expert human feedback. We address this gap by introducing a supervised learning method that uses a multi-component student writing profile (comprising estimated CEFR levels, grammatical error rates, and vocabulary distribution) to align AI scoring with expert human judgements. In the context of an online essay-writing platform for second language learners of English, our model achieves a 36% reduction in RMSE for holistic essay scoring and an 84% improvement in similarity to human-expert annotation of grammatical errors compared to automarker scores (26% and 57% improvement from the best-performing comparable earlier work, by Zaidi et al. (2019) . Furthermore, we demonstrate that the model can predict a student’s final submission profile (CEFR level and grammatical error rate) from earlier drafts and that predictions generalise to a subsequent task, offering new possibilities for automated curriculum planning. Finally, we introduce a visualisation tool that provides educators with clear expert-aligned longitudinal views of student development.

This study examines automated scoring fairness in a formative assessment context: the automated evaluation of medical students’ communication skills. Building on the premise that definitions of fairness are value-dependent, we investigate how conclusions about group differences may vary under different weighting schemes for false positives (FPs) and false negatives (FNs). Results show that when errors are treated symmetrically, no statistically significant differences are observed across demographic groups based on race or gender. This pattern remains stable when error weights are varied, with no consistent or robust disparities emerging. A small number of isolated differences appear under moderate FN weighting. Overall, the findings suggest that fairness conclusions in this setting are relatively robust to variations in error weighting. At the same time, the study highlights the importance of making value assumptions explicit when evaluating automated scoring systems, particularly in formative contexts where error trade-offs carry pedagogical implications for feedback, learner engagement, and educational equity.

Generating diverse, pedagogically valid stories for Arabic early-grade reading assessments requires balancing tight constraints on vocabulary, reading level, and narrative structure against the need to avoid repetitive plots that undermine assessment validity. We investigate noise steering, injecting calibrated Gaussian perturbations into the internal representations of transformer models at inference time, as a training-free diversity method evaluated across five small Arabic-centric language models (7–9B parameters). We compare four injection strategies against high-temperature sampling baselines, measuring diversity, quality, constraint adherence, and reading grade level. Residual stream noise consistently improves narrative diversity with minimal quality or constraint cost and preserves early-grade reading level across all Arabic-centric models. Attention entropy noise injection (AENI) stabilizes the otherwise unreliable attention-logit noise while recovering quality. High-temperature sampling inflates reading grade level and causes catastrophic collapse on several models. We find internal representation-level perturbation to be a more suitable diversity strategy than output-level stochasticity for constrained educational content generation.

When programming students encounter errors in their code, compiler messages or static analysis output often provide limited guidance, particularly for novice programmers. Personalized feedback from instructors can be effective but does not scale well. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable automated feedback generation at scale.This study examines whether LLM-generated feedback with different levels of guidance is associated with differences in students’ problem-solving behavior. We analyze effects on time to solution and number of attempts, and examine whether these effects differ by programming experience. We design three feedback types and compare them to a baseline in which students receive only compiler error messages. Results from an online programming course show that LLM-generated feedback is associated with faster time to solution compared to the no-feedback baseline, with less guided feedback showing slightly stronger effects. Overall, the findings suggest that feedback structure plays an important role in how students progress toward correct solutions and motivate further work on adaptive feedback designs and longer-term learning outcomes.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of AI-powered tutoring systems that provide interactive support via dialogue. To enable these tutoring systems to provide personalized support, it is essential to assess student performance at each turn, motivating knowledge tracing (KT) in dialogue settings. However, existing dialogue-based KT approaches often ignore question difficulty and rely on opaque LLM latent representations, hindering accurate and interpretable prediction. In this work, we propose an interpretable difficulty-aware conversational KT framework that leverages LLMs to explicitly model student knowledge state and the difficulty of tutor-posed tasks at each dialogue turn. The framework incorporates the original question and the next tutor-posed task to estimate the student’s knowledge state and the difficulty of the upcoming turn. It further integrates Item Response Theory to map LLM outputs into student ability and question difficulty parameters, enabling interpretable prediction of student performance grounded in cognitive theories of learning. We evaluate the framework on two tutor-student dialogue datasets. Quantitative and qualitative results show that our framework outperforms existing KT baselines, meanwhile generating interpretable outputs consistent with cognitive theory. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/umass-ml4ed/Difficulty-Aware-DialogKT.

Rubrics are the primary reference for manual scoring of constructed responses, and there is growing interest in their use in automated scoring methodologies. In this work, we propose Aspect-Grounded Rubric–Answer Alignment (AGRAA), a rubric-based end-to-end scoring framework that models rubric descriptors as latent aspect spaces. Concretely, rubric descriptors are represented as low-dimensional subspaces derived from contextualised transformer embeddings, and student responses are scored according to how strongly their representations align with these rubric-induced spaces relative to the residual space outside them. This formulation provides a geometrically grounded interpretation of rubric-based scoring while enabling end-to-end training with standard transformer encoders. We introduce three distinct architectural variants and evaluate them on multiple short-answer and essay scoring datasets. Across these tasks, AGRAA achieves predictive performance highly competitive with strong neural and feature-based baselines. In addition, the framework yields interpretable intermediate representations that expose which rubric-defined aspects contribute to scoring decisions, enabling decision-aligned explanations grounded in rubric descriptors.

This paper investigates whether automated short answer grading can reliably support teachers when marking conceptual physics responses in settings with limited labelled data. Using free-text responses derived from Force Concept Inventory-style questions, the study shows that incorporating subject-specific knowledge improves grading consistency, particularly in early deployment scenarios. The system reduces grading errors and provides more reliable agreement with reference judgments, especially for more challenging questions. These results suggest that automated grading can assist teachers by supporting marking decisions and prioritising responses for review, while still requiring human oversight.

Conversational English as a Foreign Language (EFL) tutoring relies on dynamically generated exercises rather than fixed item banks, so traditional difficulty estimation cannot verify whether a task is appropriately calibrated to a learner. We propose a framework that measures difficulty alignment directly from observable interactional behavior, classifying each exercise into one of three states (Under-Challenged, Optimally Challenged, or Over-Challenged) based on turn-level sequences of student attempts, errors, confusion, and tutor scaffolding. Using 1,566 exercises from the Teacher-Student Chatroom Corpus, we validate the classification against human annotation (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79 at the state level) and show that a learner’s cumulative trajectory of these states predicts success on subsequent exercises. Aggregating these predictions into a within-session capability-shift proxy, we find that sessions with higher proportions of over-challenging exercises systematically yield lower estimated shifts, while optimally challenging interactions are significantly associated with greater improvement than under-challenging ones — patterns consistent with Krashen’s Input Hypothesis.

Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is a core skill in education, where the process of peer interaction is highly important. However, existing educational dialogue datasets mostly focus on classroom instruction or tutoring (i.e., teacher/tutor-student interaction), yet datasets centering small-group, student-student interaction are limited. This thus leaves research with limited resources for studying how students interact, coordinate, and solve problems together in real educational settings. To address this, we introduce PeerMathDial, the first dataset of peer CPS dialogues collected from authentic middle school math classrooms. It contains 55 dialogues from 27 students, totaling 6,406 turns. To facilitate research on CPS discourse analysis, we further build a corpus-grounded dialogue act taxonomy assisted by LLMs. Using the dataset and the dialogue act taxonomy, we demonstrate the practical applications of PeerMathDial across three use cases. First, we track how dialogues evolve over time and measure the impact of teacher interventions. Second, we align dialogue actions with student surveys to reveal the connection between students’ traits (e.g., confidence, leadership) and their actual behaviors. Third, by evaluating LLMs on dialogue act prediction, we glimpse at the potential of LLMs for student simulation in educational applications. Our dataset and source code will be released to the community.

Investigating the degree to which large language models (LLMs) affect teaching and learning in universities can help identify strategies for integrating LLMs in a way that supports, rather than undermines, student learning outcomes. This study examined how varying levels of LLM assistance affect writing performance, engagement, and perceived authorship. We report a pilot study in which 24 college students were randomly assigned to write a short essay with no LLM access, limited access (<=3 prompts, responses capped at 100 words), or unlimited access. Overall essay quality was statistically indistinguishable across groups. Yet writing behavior and perceived authorship diverged sharply: students with limited access reported higher ownership (62.5% would submit the essay as independent work, vs. 25% in the unlimited group), stronger organizational gains, and more strategic, revision-focused prompting. The unlimited group spent more time writing, produced essays more similar to LLM output, and reported reduced creative expression. Our findings suggest that constraining, rather than banning, LLM access may preserve authorship confidence while retaining the scaffolding benefits of AI assistance.

Large audio language models (LALMs) integrate audio representations with large language models to enable unified understanding of spoken content. Their capabilities have been increasingly investigated across several benchmarks; however, the examination of their use in rating L2 speech is still in its infancy. This study explores the abilities of LALMs in scoring three L2 speech global dimensions: foreign accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility. Ninety audio samples produced by L2 speakers were rated by ten native speaker raters as well as five LALM models. Model performance was evaluated against the human composite mean using Pearson r, Spearman p, mean absolute error (MAE), and systematic bias, with the human leave-one-out correlation (r = .46-.73 across dimensions) serving as an empirical performance benchmark. The results showed that no LALM reached human-level performance on any dimension. Only one model (i.e., Gemini) achieved a significant correlation with human ratings on comprehensibility (r = .28, p < .01), while Qwen2-Audio showed modest correlation on intelligibility (r = .32, p < .01). MAE ranged from 0.75 to 3.99 for accentedness (human: 1.24), 1.35 to 3.00 for comprehensibility (human: 1.24), and 12.03 to 15.43 for intelligibility (human: 8.49). All models exhibited systematic biases, with deviations ranging from -9.31 to +13.19 points. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications for automated L2 speech assessment.

While the Natural Language Processing community has dedicated significant resources in developing educational technologies (EdTech) that support this shift, it remains unclear whose interests are being best served among the stakeholders of education. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review of 204 papers published in venues of the Association for Computational Linguistics’ Special Interest Group on Building Educational Applications in 2024 and 2025, and validate these against EdTech papers from the wider ACL Anthology. By examining stakeholder inclusion and the prioritisation of research tasks, our findings reveal a critical tension: a push and pull between private-sector incentives and the foundational needs of educational infrastructure. Our analysis reveals that teachers are systematically under-represented as beneficiaries of research (33.3%) despite being the most affected, that real-world deployment remains rare (9.8%), and that ethical engagement tends toward acknowledgement rather than action. Drawing on exemplary papers in our corpus, we offer concrete recommendations for more responsible EduNLP research practices.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely applied in educational practices, such as for generating children’s stories. However, the generated stories are often too difficult for children to read, and the operational cost of LLMs hinders their widespread adoption in educational settings. We used an existing expert-designed children’s reading curriculum and its corresponding generated stories from GPT-4o and Llama 3.3 70B to design different experiments for fine-tuning three 8B-parameter LLMs, which then generated new English reading stories that were subjected to quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Our method prioritizes controllability over scale, enabling educators to target reading levels and error patterns with a compact, affordable model. Our evaluation results show that with appropriate fine-tuning designs, children’s English reading stories generated by 8B LLMs perform better on difficulty-related metrics than those from zero-shot GPT-4o and Llama 3.3 70B, with almost no discernible safety issues. Such fine-tuned LLMs could be more broadly used by teachers, parents, and children in classrooms and at home to generate engaging English reading stories with children’s interests, controllable difficulty and safety.

Arabic readability assessment is under-explored compared to English, and existing models are typically evaluated only within the training domain. We introduce the Jordanian School Textbook Corpus (JSTC), 82,512 segments from 240 textbooks spanning grades 1–12, and combine it with DARES to train XGBoost classifiers, fine-tuned CAMeLBERT transformers, and hybrid architectures evaluated both in-domain and on the BAREC out-of-domain benchmark. CAMeLBERT achieves strong in-domain performance (QWK = 0.830) but its cross-domain QWK collapses to 0.085, while XGBoost over 127 handcrafted linguistic features alone maintains the highest cross-domain QWK (0.240); adding [CLS] embeddings to those features actively harms transfer. Probing reveals that CAMeLBERT layers implicitly capture some linguistic features but higher-level signals overwhelm them, and Captum attribution identifies nouns and nominal particles such as al- as the most important tokens. The results argue for prioritizing linguistically-grounded features over contextual embeddings when cross-domain robustness is required.

Prediction of item difficulty from its text content is of substantial interest for automated generation of test items. In this paper, we focus on the related problem of recovering IRT-based difficulty when the data originally reported item p-value (percent correct responses). We model this item difficulty using a repository of reading passages and student data from US standardized tests from New York and Texas for grades 3-8 spanning the years 2018-23. This repository is annotated with meta-data on (1) linguistic features of the reading items, (2) test features of the passage, and (3) context features. Using a penalized regression model, we achieve an RMSE of 0.59 (compared to a 0.92 baseline) and a 0.77 correlation between true and predicted difficulty. We further evaluated the impact of LLM embeddings (ModernBERT, BERT, and LLaMA), finding that they marginally improve performance but function effectively as standalone alternatives to traditional linguistic features. Finally, we demonstrate how this difficulty prediction model powers a publicly available, human-in-the-loop tool for generating reading comprehension items.

When the same LLM generates assessment items, simulates student responses, and scores them, the validation loop is self-referential. We introduce Generative-Evaluative Agreement (GEA), a validity criterion measuring whether an LLM’s scoring function recovers the skill levels its generative function was instructed to produce. In the first direct measurement of GEA on a two-stage adaptive assessment, the model recovers roughly half the intended variance (r = 0.698) with systematic positive bias. GEA is strong (r > 0.7) for syntactically verifiable skills but near zero for design-level skills, and low-skill overestimation inflates scores near the routing threshold. We argue that granular, skill-decomposed rubrics are the principal proposed mechanism for strengthening GEA and outline complementary mitigations.

Large language models can generate feedback on free-form student writing, but it is unclear whether such feedback is correct and pedagogically useful. We evaluate LLM-generated feedback on 65 undergraduate proof-writing exercises using Hattie and Timperley’s feedback framework and a grade agreement metric, comparing two models (GPT-4.1, GPT-5) under two workflow configurations graded by two independent LLM evaluators. A mark-scheme-augmented workflow improves grade correlation with human experts for both models, and its precomputed mark schemes allow instructors to audit the system before deployment. GPT-5 produces higher-quality feedback across all dimensions. The metrics we collect give some evidence that in the setting studied, feedback quality is high, and several sanity checks on our experiments support this finding. However, providing meaningful self-regulation support and controlled tests with students remain to be done. The results in this contribution show that feedback theory provides a useful lens for evaluating automated mathematical feedback.

Effective tutoring requires distinguishing optimal, valid but suboptimal, and incorrect student solutions, a distinction central to intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) but untested for LLM-based tutors. As LLMs are increasingly explored as conversational complements to ITS, evaluating their diagnostic precision is essential. We present a benchmark of seven LLM feedback agents in propositional logic using knowledge-graph-derived ground truth across 10,836 solution–feedback pairs and three feedback conditions. Models achieved near-ceiling performance on optimal steps but systematically over-rejected valid but suboptimal reasoning and over-validated incorrect solutions, precisely where adaptive tutoring matters most. These failures persisted across models regardless of solution context, suggesting architectural rather than informational limits. Moreover, accurate diagnosis did not reliably produce pedagogically actionable feedback, revealing a gap between diagnostic judgment and instructional effectiveness. Our findings suggest that LLMs are better suited for hybrid architectures where KG-grounded models handle diagnosis while LLMs support open-ended scaffolding and dialogue.

Students learning algorithms often need support as they interpret traces, debug reasoning errors, and apply procedures across unfamiliar problem instances. In this paper, we present KITE (Knowledge-Informed Tutoring Engine), a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based intelligent tutoring system designed to serve as a classroom teaching assistant for algorithmic reasoning and problem-solving tasks. KITE uses an intent-aware Socratic response strategy to tailor support to different student needs, responding with targeted hints, guiding questions, and progressive scaffolding intended to strengthen students’ algorithmic problem-solving ability. To keep responses aligned with course content, KITE uses a multimodal RAG pipeline that retrieves relevant information from course materials. We evaluate KITE using three forms of assessment: RAGAs-based metrics for response grounding and quality, expert evaluation of pedagogical quality, and a simulated student pipeline in which a weaker language model interacts with KITE across two-turn dialogues and produces revised answers after receiving feedback. Results indicate that KITE produces contextually grounded and pedagogically appropriate responses. Further, using simulated students, KITE’s feedback helped the student models produce more accurate follow-up responses on procedural and tracing questions, suggesting that its scaffolding can support algorithmic problem-solving. This work contributes a tutoring architecture and an evaluation approach for assessing retrieval-grounded explanations and scaffolded problem-solving feedback.

Grammatical error correction approaches rarely characterize the pedagogical value of corrected errors. We propose a framework that combines LLM-based second-language writing correction with a rule-based characterization module to identify pedagogically relevant, fine-grained grammatical properties in learner texts. The characterization module targets 252 European Portuguese properties which are categorized by the CEFR level at which they are taught according to an authoritative curriculum, and property accuracy is inferred from contrasts between the learner and corrected texts. We evaluate the framework extrinsically by training interpretable automatic proficiency assessment models on accuracy features extracted from characterized errors in a Portuguese learner corpus. Across different prompting strategies, we show that models trained on features derived from LLM-corrected texts perform similarly to those trained on features derived from annotator-corrected texts and comparably to models trained on linguistic complexity features. Feature importance overlap is likewise high, and similar predictive patterns are observed in both annotator-based and LLM-based models, further supporting the validity of the proposed framework.

We present a modular pipeline for educational analogy generation, decomposed into four stages – source finding, sub-concept generation, explanation generation, and evaluation – grounded in Structure Mapping Theory. Evaluating 12 LLMs across six model families on SCAR and ParallelPARC, we find that sub-concept grounding substantially improves retrieval precision and explanation quality but offers limited benefit in open-ended generation. We further validate an LLM-as-a-judge methodology against human annotations, finding that Claude Sonnet 4.6 aligns more reliably with human rankings than with absolute scores. Our results highlight cross-stage interactions that isolated studies cannot capture, and position sub-concept grounding as a key driver of analogy quality.

Grammatical error correction using large language models often suffers from the over-correction issue. To mitigate this, we propose a training-free inference method that performs edit-level majority voting over multiple candidates generated by a single model, without requiring model modifications or additional training. Across nine benchmarks covering English, Czech, German, Ukrainian, Korean, Hindi, and Romanian, the proposed method outperforms both greedy and MBR decoding in most cases. Moreover, it yields stable correction quality regardless of the instruction prompts used. We release two repository supporting GEC datasets and LLM inference.

Phonics stories are essential for early literacy, requiring controlled repetition of grapheme-phoneme (GP) patterns while maintaining simplicity, suitability, and quality. Generating such texts poses a challenge for large language models (LLMs), which must balance multiple phonological and pedagogical constraints. We evaluate six LLMs in a zero-shot setting across 16 prompt configurations, producing 8,688 outputs and 39,096 stories. Outputs are assessed using a multi-dimensional framework covering phonological alignment, developmental lexical appropriateness, readability, and narrative quality. Results show that while LLMs generate highly readable and age-appropriate text, they exhibit variability in phoneme control and narrative coherence. Prompt design significantly affects performance, revealing trade-offs between focusing on multiple phonological, linguistic, and pedagogical constraints, while model choice also leads to significant differences. These findings highlight the challenges of controllable educational text generation and the importance of prompt design in balancing instructional objectives. We release our prompts, generated stories, and evaluation framework to support future work in phonics-based story generation for early readers.

Adaptive language-learning systems often model progress through correctness in constrained exercises, where the target response is predefined. In dialogue-based tutors, by contrast, learners can respond appropriately in many ways, making evidence of progress harder to interpret. This raises a learner-modeling problem: determining whether learner production provides useful evidence of progress, which aspects are informative, and how they might support adaptation. We address this problem using pilot data from an LLM-based English grammar tutor, comprising 40 pre- and post-test tasks, treatment interactions, and 2,406 learner messages. We propose a coding scheme for learner production in dialogue and explore whether the resulting evidence types can support future adaptive decisions. Findings show that learner production in dialogue can support adaptive grammar practice: prior target use predicted short-term performance, while finer-grained evidence helped distinguish different levels of productive control. We discuss implications for adaptive grammar-based dialogue systems that use learner production to support communicative practice.

We present a framework for evaluating adaptive personalization of educational reading materials with theory-grounded simulated learners. Unlike typical intelligent tutoring systems that adapt questions or feedback, we treat reading as the primary intervention and use question answering only as an observation channel for Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT). This enables controlled comparison of LLM-powered adaptive and non-adaptive reading policies before classroom deployment.The framework links open educational content to a shared ontology of learning objectives and knowledge components, which is used to generate aligned reading–assessment pairs targeting one objective at a time. Simulated learners update their knowledge through a comprehension-and-memory process that models encoding, integration with prior knowledge, and misconception revision.The learner model combines established theories of reading with constrained answer selection, ensuring responses are generated only from information the learner has plausibly retained. Together, these components provide an interpretable offline testbed for studying whether adaptive reading improves learning outcomes.

Constructive, personalized, and timely feedback is essential to student learning. However, providing such feedback in large classes remains a major challenge. Large language models (LLMs) offer alternatives to support instructors by generating relevant feedback that highlights both student strengths and areas for improvement. Nevertheless, most existing LLM-based feedback systems rely on proprietary APIs and are often tailored to specific tasks, which limits their accessibility, flexibility, and applicability in resource-constrained educational settings. In this study, we investigate the potential of two open-source LLMs (DeepSeek R1 and Qwen 3.5) to support automated feedback generation across three disciplines (e.g., programming assignments, essays, and mathematics problems). We evaluate two prompting strategies (unified and multi-agent) across these domains and use human judgment criteria to assess feedback quality. Through this analysis, we examine the potential of open-source models as practical, scalable alternatives to proprietary API-based systems for developing freely accessible feedback-generation tools. Our results show that a single open-source model can generate useful feedback across diverse domains, though with varying effectiveness. DeepSeek R1 performs better on reasoning-intensive tasks such as mathematics, while Qwen 3.5 works best for holistic tasks such as writing, but both models struggle with programming tasks. We find that model architecture matters more than prompting strategy, and reasoning-optimized models excel in structured domains, while general-purpose models perform better on holistic tasks. Finally, we conclude that a multi-agent approach does not consistently guarantee improved results over a single unified LLM approach.

This paper reports findings from the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction for English Learners across three L1s (Spanish, German and Mandarin). The task featured open and closed tracks, using data from the British Council’s Knowledge-based Vocabulary Lists (KVL). Submissions were received from 23 teams employing diverse modelling approaches, including transformers, Large Language Models, feature-based approaches and ensembles. Results were evaluated using RMSE, with winning systems significantly exceeding the baseline and establishing new state-of-the-art benchmarks. This paper offers an examination of the participating systems, performance across tracks and L1s, and the factors that can affect prediction accuracy.

This paper presents SATLab’s participation in the BEA 2026 shared task on predicting the difficulty of English words for L2 learners. The proposed system uses features mainly derived from word frequency lists, lexical norms, and psychometric data, which are input into a gradient boosting decision tree model. It outperformed the Baseline system but performed significantly worse than the top-performing teams. Feature contributions to model performance are analysed using gain scores and Spearman rank correlations, and a brief analysis of the most significant errors is provided.

This paper describes a feature-based system submitted to the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction (closed track). The system models vocabulary difficulty for English learners using linguistically motivated features capturing frequency, cross-linguistic similarity, phonological and orthographic complexity, and semantic properties, supplemented by multilingual embeddings (reduced via PCA). Multiple regression models were evaluated using cross-validation, with final predictions generated from ensemble and single-model configurations per language.The system achieves competitive performance across all three L1 groups (German, Spanish, and Chinese), outperforming the XLM-RoBERTa baseline in seven of nine runs in terms of RMSE, with the strongest gains observed for Chinese and more modest improvements for Spanish. An ablation study further demonstrates that frequency and cross-linguistic similarity factors contribute most substantially to predictive performance, with effects varying across L1s. These findings highlight the role of interpretable linguistic features in modeling vocabulary difficulty in an L1-aware setting.

The paper describes how the author used AI coding agents and a technique called vibe coding to successfully tackle the BEA 2026 shared task on vocabulary difficulty prediction. Three sets of predictions (runs) were submitted to the competition, corresponding to three experiments the author ran by giving the coding agent different levels of agency: (1) a one-off solution fully planned and implemented by the AI, (2) an AI self-determined iterative process that ran for 24 hours, and (3) a collaborative human-in-the-loop process where solutions were discussed between the author and the AI. Competition results showed that the collaborative mode delivered the best performance, demonstrating that at the current stage domain expert input and decision making are important and necessary for vibe coding solutions to practical machine learning problems.

This paper presents team SAAKTH’s system for the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction (Closed Track). We address the key challenge that English word difficulty is not fixed but varies with English learners’ native language. Our approach combines a fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa-large encoder with handcrafted psycholinguistic features engineered separately for each L1 group. These features are integrated via a shallow multilayer perceptron and optimized separately per L1, with five-seed ensembling and XGBoost-based blending for stability. Our system achieves RMSEs of 0.997 (es), 1.002 (de), and 0.932 (cn) on the development set, improving 20–25% over the baseline. Results highlight the effectiveness of L1-aware modeling under limited data.

We describe the SurreyCTS system for the BEA 2026 shared task on lexical difficulty prediction. Our approach combines multilingual transformer encoders (RemBERT and COMET) with engineered linguistic features including semantic funnelling, lexical similarity, attention-derived signals, and language-aware representations. A weighted ensemble of the five strongest systems placed fifth among open-track teams, outperforming the open-track baseline across all three learner L1 groups (Spanish, German, and Chinese).

We describe our system submitted to the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction for English Learners. Our approach combines handcrafted linguistic features with fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa transformers in a multi-model ensemble, participating in both the closed and open tracks. Our system outperforms the baselines on both tracks across all three L1s, with best RMSEs of 1.058 (closed, CN) and 0.992 (open, CN). Post-hoc error analysis reveals that polysemous words in rare senses and nominalized -ing forms constitute the primary failure mode.

We study vocabulary difficulty prediction for second language (L2) learners, a key component for adaptive language learning and assessment. Existing approaches often treat difficulty as an intrinsic property of words or contexts, overlooking representation-dependent variation and learner-specific factors such as L1 transfer.We participate in the BEA 2026 Shared Task Closed Track using the Spanish (L1) subset of the KVL dataset. We propose a two-stage framework that decouples representation learning from learner-aware calibration. Stage 1 constructs diverse representations using multiple pretrained encoders with varied pooling and prediction strategies, capturing complementary aspects of lexical and contextual complexity. Stage 2 models systematic residual errors with psycholinguistic and cross-lingual features, enabling explicit correction of prediction biases.Experiments show that our method outperforms strong baselines, improving RMSE (1.257 -> 0.976) and correlation (0.765 -> 0.857). These results highlight the importance of jointly modeling representation diversity and learner-specific effects. Our system ranked 3rd in the official BEA 2026 Shared Task Closed Track.

We present a unified, language-agnostic system for the BEA 2026 Shared Task on vocabulary difficulty prediction. The system uses a single training pipeline across Spanish, German, and Mandarin Chinese without any language-specific adaptation. Input features include serialized text fields and four scalar length-based features, processed using an XLM-RoBERTa encoder with attention-mask-weighted mean pooling. Hyperparameters are tuned with Optuna under reduced cross-validation, followed by full 5-fold training and checkpoint-based ensembling.Our approach improves over the official closed-track baseline across all three L1 conditions, demonstrating that a shared architecture and training strategy can yield consistent gains without language-specific engineering. Error analysis shows higher prediction error at difficulty extremes, suggesting a regression-to-the-mean tendency.

What makes a word difficult to learn, and how does the difficulty depend on the learner’s native language? We computationally model vocabulary difficulty for English learners whose first language is Spanish, German, or Chinese with gradient-boosted models trained on features related to a word’s familiarity (e.g., frequency), meaning, surface form, and cross-linguistic transfer. Using Shapley values, we determine the importance of each feature group. Word familiarity is the dominant feature group shared by all three languages. However, predictions for Spanish- and German-speaking learners rely additionally on orthographic transfer. This transfer mechanism is unavailable to Chinese learners, whose difficulty is shaped by a combination of familiarity and surface features alone. Our models provide interpretable, L1-tailored difficulty estimates that can be used to design vocabulary curricula.

We submit a system for the closed track of the BEA 2026 shared task on L1-aware vocabulary difficulty prediction (Spanish, German, Mandarin Chinese). We compared three families of approaches: hand-crafted tabular features with tree-based regressors, fine-tuned multilingual encoders, and decoder-based artificial learner simulation using LoRA-tuned Pythia models, each evaluated with and without NMT-augmented English context. Our best system is an ensemble of four base and four NMT-augmented multilingual encoders combined through per-language stacking (Nelder-Mead and ElasticNet meta-learner), which placed 2nd in the closed track across all three languages. We also report a monotonic scaling study of the decoder-based artificial learner simulation pipeline.

This paper describes our submission to the BEA 2026 shared task 1 on vocabulary item difficulty prediction in multilingual settings. We investigated whether transformer-based representations learned directly from item content can support the prediction of vocabulary item difficulty across different L1 groups. Our approach adopted a multilingual BERT-based architecture, specifically the mmBERT, with representation augmentation at both the layer and token levels, followed by a multi-task cascade learning that incorporates part-of-speech information as an auxiliary structural signal. Results showed that multi-task mmBERT consistently outperforms the shared-task XLM-RoBERTa baseline across languages, while gains from more complex aggregation are not uniform. The findings showed that strong multilingual representations provide a competitive foundation for vocabulary item difficulty prediction, while the benefits of additional architectural complexity depend on the language and training setting.

This paper describes our submission to the BEA 2026 Shared Task on L1-Aware English Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction. We build per-L1 CatBoost regressors over 1,161 candidate linguistic, psycholinguistic, dictionary, and LLM-derived features drawn from 129 feature sets; out-of-fold predictions from fine-tuned encoder and decoder-LLM regression heads enter the model as additional features. Features are selected via Recursive Feature Elimination with nested cross-validation, producing compact per-L1 models of 29-150 features per run. For the closed track we introduce a per-feature-column compliance audit that classifies 57 of 129 feature sets as track-eligible under the organiser rulings, an audit that forced a rebuild of the selection and ensembling pipelines in the final week. We further show that decoder-LLM LoRA regression heads — LLaMA-3.1-8B being the single strongest model in our pool — provide the largest marginal gains in the open track, and that a simpler per-L1 CatBoost on RFE-selected features matches or exceeds Ridge-stacking ensembles over the same base models. Our systems ranked 1st in the closed track and 2nd in the open track on all three L1s (Spanish, German, Mandarin), reducing baseline RMSE by 29.9% in the closed track and 35.9% in the open track on average.

Vocabulary difficulty prediction aims to estimate how difficult a word is for a learner. This is an important problem because word difficulty is shaped not only by the word itself, but also by the learner’s background and the context in which the word appears. In this work, we predict continuous difficulty scores for English target words using learnerspecific information. Our approach combines a fine-tuned DeBERTa v3 Large model with a CatBoost regressor trained on transformer-based embeddings. The final score is produced through weighted ensembling, where DeBERTa provides the main prediction and CatBoost adds a smaller complementary signal. Our final system achieved RMSE scores of 1.040 for Spanish, 0.992 for German, and 0.882 for Chinese. The results were also stable across multiple runs, showing that the model behaved consistently under small changes in ensemble weight. These findings show that a simple hybrid system can provide reliable performance for vocabulary difficulty prediction. They also suggest that combining strong contextual representations with a lightweight regression model is an effective way to model learner-sensitive word difficulty.

We describe the RETUYT-INCO participation in the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction for English Learners, a regression task that predicts GLMM psychometric difficulty scores for English target words given an L1 cue (Spanish, German, and Mandarin). We submitted two systems to the closed track (which restricts participants to the provided shared-task data and standard NLP resources, excluding external corpora and large language models): a feature-engineered XGBoost regressor for all three L1s, and, for Spanish, a 3-seed ensemble of mdeberta-v3-base fine-tuned with the same handcrafted features prepended as input text tokens. Our best test result is 1.094 RMSE on Spanish (ensemble), a 13.0% reduction over the XLM-RoBERTa-base closed baseline. We highlight two findings. First, a LaBSE cross-lingual cosine between the L1 source word and the English target word is the largest single-feature addition in our incremental ablation, reducing average development-split (dev) RMSE by 0.091 on top of an already strong string/frequency/POS feature set. Second, feature-only XGBoost, with no neural fine-tuning and no GPU, already beats the XLM-RoBERTa-base closed-track development baseline on average across the three L1s (1.273 vs. 1.287 RMSE).

We describe our submission to the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Multilingual Lexical Complexity Prediction. The system fine-tunes XLM-RoBERTa Large separately for Spanish, German, and Chinese, feeding each instance as a flat concatenation of the source word, its sentential context, an English clue, and the English target word. Training uses z-score label normalization and two independent runs thatdiffer in learning rate, scheduler, and random seed; a weighted ensemble of their predictions (0.6/0.4) consistently reduces variance on the validation set. On the official test set the system scores RMSE = 1.170 and Pearson = 0.812.

Lexical difficulty prediction is a fundamental problem in language learning and readability assessment, requiring models to estimate word difficulty across different first-language (L1) backgrounds. However, existing approaches rely on regression-only training with scalar supervision, which does not explicitly structure the representation space, limiting their ability to capture cross-lingual alignment and ordinal difficulty. To mitigate these issues, we propose Context-Aligned Contrastive Regression, which integrates Ridge regression ensemble with two complementary objectives, i.e., Cross-View Context and Ordinal Soft Contrastive Learning. Experiments on three L1 datasets show that (i) contrastive objectives improve cross-lingual representation alignment while preserving language-specific nuances, (ii) the learned representations capture the ordinal structure of lexical difficulty, and (iii) the ensemble effectively mitigates systematic biases of individual models, leading to more stable performance across difficulty levels.

This paper presents our system for the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Vocabulary Difficulty Prediction for English Learners. The task requires predicting psychometrically calibrated GLMM difficulty scores for English vocabulary items across three learner first-language (L1) backgrounds: Spanish (ES), German (DE), and Mandarin Chinese (CN). Our approach studies how hand-crafted linguistic features can complement contextual multilingual transformer representations. We engineer 33 phonological, morphological, semantic, contextual, and cross-lingual features, and evaluate feature-only regressors, Solo transformer models, Hybrid transformer models, and prediction-level ensembling. Our official Closed Track submissions were generated with XLM-RoBERTa-large Solo and Hybrid models, which improved over the official baseline for all three L1 groups, achieving test RMSEs of 1.182 (ES), 1.117 (DE), and 1.006 (CN) with a mean of 1.103. We then conducted a post-submission refinement using mDeBERTa-v3-base components and a Ridge stacking ensemble, which further reduced test RMSE to 1.037 (ES), 0.997 (DE), and 0.913 (CN), with a mean of 0.982, a mean improvement of 0.121 over our best XLM-RoBERTa-large system.

This paper describes UOL@IDEM’s closed-track submission to the BEA 2026 shared task on L1-aware vocabulary difficulty prediction. We model the task as regression and train separate systems for Spanish, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Our system combines multilingual contextual representations with engineered features capturing frequency, surface form, retrieval evidence, semantic alignment, cognate similarity, and masked-language-model predictability. Development results show consistent gains over the official closed-track baselines, with sentence-embedding encoders such as BGE-M3, multilingual E5, and LaBSE performing best. Official submissions achieve RMSE scores of 1.132, 1.037, and 0.891 for Spanish, German, and Chinese, respectively. Feature analysis identifies frequency as the most stable predictor, while contextual predictability, form similarity, retrieval, and semantic features provide complementary L1-sensitive signals. Error analysis shows strong ranking performance but weaker calibration for the easiest items, which are often overpredicted.

We describe two types of models for vocabulary difficulty prediction: a high-accuracy black-box model, which achieved the top shared task result in the open track, and an explainable model, which outperforms a fine-tuned encoder baseline. As the black-box model, we fine-tuned an LLM using a soft-target loss function for effective application to the rating task, achieving r > 0.91. The explainable model provides insights into what impacts the difficulty of each item while maintaining a strong correlation (r > 0.77). We further analyze the results, demonstrating that the difficulty of items in the British Council’s Knowledge-based Vocabulary Lists (KVL) is often affected by spelling difficulty or the construction of the test items, in addition to the genuine production difficulty of the words. We make our code available online.

We present the BEA 2026 shared task on rubric-based short answer scoring for German. Rubric-based short answer scoring is a case of automatic short answer scoring (ASAS) that requires models to apply textual scoring rubrics to student answers as a basis for assigning scores. For the shared task, we introduced a novel German-language dataset from multiple STEM domains to provide a comprehensive benchmark for this problem. The dataset was designed to evaluate both performance and generalization (the latter, by distinguishing between seen and unseen questions), as well as coarse- and fine-grained scoring (2-way vs. 3-way). The systems submitted to the shared task cover a wide range of approaches, including fine-tuned large language models, prompt-based methods, human-AI collaboration strategies, or a combination of these. The results show that structured, task-adapted LLM systems achieved the strongest performance across all tracks. The winning system, IWM-DKM, combined LoRA fine-tuning of Qwen models with rubric-aware input structuring, including checklist-style reasoning, rubric reframing as decision trees, background knowledge injection, and ensemble voting. Other systems similarly relied on fine-tuned LLMs, retrieval-augmented prompting, encoder–LLM ensembles, or weighted aggregation strategies. Overall, the shared task results show that rubric-based scoring benefits most from systems that explicitly operationalise rubric semantics, while generalisation to unseen questions remains a central challenge.

Open-source LLMs with simple, zero-shot prompts are at best middling graders on the BEA 2026 Automated Grading Shared Task – blunt-edge models, in fact. However, they are good enough to support human graders and save them time. We demonstrate the application of a hybrid grading approach that first transparently defines the success criteria and then pairs a zero-shot LLM grader with human review. The hybrid approach outperforms the LLM grader on its own and has the added advantage of keeping the human in the loop.

This paper describes the ASLAN system contribution to the BEA 2026 Shared Task on rubric-based short answer scoring for German (Gombert et al., 2026). We investigate three complementary modeling paradigms: similarity-based scoring, instance-based classification, and rubric-prompted large language models (LLMs). For the unseen answers track, where test answers belong to prompts observed during training, we compare question-specific and generic scoring models as well as ensemble variants. For the unseen questions track, where models must generalize to previously unseen prompts, we primarily rely on zero-shot LLM-based scoring using the scoring rubrics. Our experiments show that similarity-based models outperform instance-based models and LLM-based models in the unseen answers setting. In addition, we find that ensemble methods improve robustness over individual models.

We describe the WSE Research system for the BEA 2026 Shared Task 2 on Rubric-based Short Answer Scoring for German. Our system combines rubric-conditioned prompting with TF-IDF exemplar retrieval, LoRA fine-tuning of open-source Qwen models, and prediction aggregation across complementary scorers. The central question is when prompt engineering, parameter-efficient adaptation, and aggregation each help for rubric-based grading. On the ALICE-LP-1.0 trial set, a fine-tuned Qwen2.5-32B reaches QWK 0.769, surpassing the strongest prompted commercial baseline (Gemini 3 Flash, 0.748). On the official test set, the system ranks second on three tracks and third on the remaining one. Overall, the results show that rubric-conditioned fine-tuning is a competitive and cost-effective alternative to commercial APIs for German short answer scoring, while aggregation helps on seen questions but larger single models generalize better to unseen rubrics.

We discuss the AMATI submission to the BEA 2026 Shared Task on Rubric-based Short Answer Scoring for German. Our neuro-symbolic system uses a combination of symbolic rules, automatically learned with a form of Inductive Logic Programming, and the Mistral-large language model. We wanted to investigate whether the combination would improve overall grading performance, while using the automatically induced symbolic rules for explainability, and the LLM for robustness. We find that the combination of approached resulted in improved overall performance for the 3-way task. However, including the symbolic rules did not improve upon Mistral’s performance in the 2-way test.This paper presents our approach to the unseen answers challenges. Our team finished 6th out of 9 in the 2-way challenge, and 5th out of 8 in the 3-way challenge. In the 3-way challenge, neither our symbolic system nor the use of Mistral alone would have placed higher than 6th of the 8 competitors, illustrating the improvement of the combined approach over either of the individual approaches.

In this paper, we present the IWM-DKM team submissions to the BEA 2026 Shared Task 2: Rubric-based Short Answer Scoring for German. We systematically explored how fine-tuned language models can be reliably employed for short answer scoring, for which three aspects turn out to be particularly beneficial: supplementing the fine-tuning process with generated domain expertise, restructured rubrics, and thinking traces. To increase the robustness of the scoring, we combine distinct approaches in an ensemble. Our best submissions finished in first place across all tracks, indicating promise for the further application of these strategies in automatic scoring.

In this paper, we present the RETUYT-INCO participation at the BEA 2026 shared task “Rubric-based Short Answer Scoring for German”. Our team participated in track 1 (Unseen answers three-way), track 3 (Unseen answers two-way) and track 4 (Unseen questions two-way). Since these tracks required scoring short student answers using specific rubrics, we looked for ways to handle the changing nature of the task. We created a method called Meta-prompting. In this approach, an LLM creates a custom prompt based on examples from the Train set. This prompt is then used to grade new student answers. Along with this method, we also describe other approaches we used, such as classic machine learning, fine-tuning open-source LLMs, and different prompting techniques. According to the official results, our team placed 6th out of 8 participants in Track 1 with a QWK of 0.729. In Track 3, we secured 4th place out of 9 with a QWK of 0.674, and we also placed 4th out of 8 in Track 4 with a QWK of 0.49.

Automated short-answer scoring (ASA) is an important yet challenging task in educational assessment as it aims to evaluate open-ended student responses against predefined scoring rubrics that are often interrelated. Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in text understanding and reasoning, their application to ASA has primarily focused on prompt-based inference, largely due to the limited availability of annotated data required for effective model training. In this work, we investigate parameter-efficient fine-tuning strategies for LLMs using ASA annotations in German. Our experiments show that fine-tuned LLMs consistently outperform both prompt-based and ensemble-based language models, suggesting domain-adaptive LLM fine-tuning is more effective than prompting alone for ASA.

We see growing concerns about how the increasingly pervasive deployment of AI systems whose outputs appear human-like might impact people. These concerns have already motivated work both examining what makes such outputs appear human-like, as well as developing interventions to help reduce perceptions of human-likeness or mitigate adverse impacts. In this paper, we report on an exploratory crowd study we designed to examine challenges for assessing the effectiveness of interventions, including whether interventions intended to minimize perceptions of human-likeness also mitigate adverse impacts. We find variations both in what kinds of outputs different participants deem more human-like, as well as in their preferences for human-like outputs. Even when participants seem to prefer the outputs they deem more human-like, many of them also recognize that such outputs can have adverse impacts. Drawing on these results and prior work, we discuss challenges to and considerations for assessing the effectiveness of interventions.

Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce convincing geometric arguments, yet their outputs are not reliable enough to be treated as proofs without independent verification. In parallel, symbolic geometry tools (e.g. automated theorem provers in dynamic geometry systems) offer strong rigor guarantees, but require formalized inputs and can struggle with problem formalization, auxiliary construction, and proof presentation. This survey synthesizes work at the intersection of these lines: hybrid LLM–symbolic systems for geometry that (i) translate natural language and diagrams into formal constraints, (ii) search for solution plans and proof steps using learned or heuristic methods, and (iii) verify the resulting steps using symbolic provers or proof assistants. We propose a taxonomy organized around (a) the role of the LLM in the pipeline (parser, strategist, prover, critic), (b) the target proof artifact (answer-only, informal proof, semi-formal step trace, or kernel-checked formal proof), and (c) the verification backend (numeric testing, algebraic provers, synthetic provers, and proof-assistant kernels). We review representative systems in NLP and AI (e.g. GeoS, Inter-GPS, FormalGeo, AlphaGeometry, AutoGPS, and recent heuristic-only deductive solvers), and connect them to broader neurosymbolic paradigms for faithful reasoning (e.g. SatLM, LINC, and autoformalization). Finally, we outline evaluation protocols emphasizing step-level soundness and robustness, and we discuss open problems in multimodal formalization, handling of non-degeneracy conditions, human-readable certified proofs, and reproducibility.

Recent years have produced a small but rapidly growing set of results where Large Language Models (LLMs) - usually embedded in a search-and-verification loop - advance the state of the art on problems previously regarded as “open” in the pragmatic sense of lacking a best-known construction, bound, or proof certificate. This paper surveys that emerging line of work with a Big Picture emphasis: what makes these successes possible, what should count as “solved”, and what design patterns generalize? We (i) propose an evidence ladder for interpreting “LLM solved an open problem” claims, (ii) map mathematical subfields by difficulty dimensions that matter for LLM-based discovery, (iii) curate a timeline of key breakthroughs leading to verifiable discovery systems, and (iv) synthesize the techniques and frameworks - tool use, retrieval, search, and verification - that repeatedly appear in successful case studies. We give particular attention to formal-methods backends common in security and verification contexts, including Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers, as scalable middle-layer verifiers between lightweight tests and proof assistants. We close with an evaluation and reproducibility checklist aimed at making the next wave of claims easier to trust, reproduce, and build upon, while separating peer-reviewed or certificate-backed results from fast-moving community reports that are useful signals but not yet stable evidence.

Current hallucination detection systems operate under a flawed assumption: that model outputs deviating from factual grounding are uniformly problematic regardless of task context, modality, or cultural setting. Through analysis of computational humor as a motivating case study, we demonstrate that identical model behaviors require radically different evaluations depending on context. We propose reframing hallucination detection as task-output alignment assessment, introducing a three-dimensional framework spanning factual grounding requirements, novelty requirements, and risk tolerance.

When Large Language Models (LLMs) combined with prompt-based approaches as human simulacra emerged, they promised revolutionary shortcuts. Models trained on vast internet corpora may replicate human behavior and communication through text-based alignment. The initial optimism of the NLP community positioned LLMs as universal human proxies capable of replacing participants in surveys, generating authentic social media content, and simulating diverse cultural perspectives. We systematically dismantle this “myth of universal generalization” and document a shift toward methodological rigor. Our research reveals fundamental limitations: LLMs exhibit inhuman response patterns in psychometric assessments and produce detectable synthetic content. We analyze the difference between superficial linguistic fluency and genuine human-like representation, and reframe the current paradigm from asking “can LLMs replace humans?” to “under what validated conditions might LLMs serve as useful research components in social sciences?” Our work shows how interconnected research efforts challenge foundational assumptions and establishes best practices for deploying LLMs as human simulacra.

A socio-technical gap exists between how NLP systems are developed and evaluated and how people use them in practice. To help close this gap, I propose a direction for scientific progress in NLP centered on advancing trustworthy AI-mediated communication between humans, using cross-lingual and cross-cultural interaction as a stress test for this goal – settings where common ground is hard-won, miscommunication can go unnoticed, and human users often lack the means to independently evaluate AI outputs. I outline a research agenda emphasizing two complementary requirements spanning both sides of the interaction. On the model side, I study how multilingual systems access and use knowledge across languages, and when they systematically privilege sources in certain languages. On the user side, I design decision-support mechanisms and evaluate how they shape user’s reliance on imperfect outputs. Taken together, these results motivate future work for aligning multilingual NLP with real communicative practice, with the goal of building AI systems that more reliably serve diverse communities. This paper summarizes and draws heavily on my PhD thesis proposal.

Transformers have dominated sequence processing tasks for the past seven years—most notably language modeling. However, the inherent quadratic complexity of their attention mechanism remains a significant bottleneck as context length increases. We review and distill the recent efforts to overcome this bottleneck, including advances in (sub-quadratic) attention variants, recurrent neural networks, state space models, and hybrid architectures. We critically analyze approaches regarding compute and memory complexity, benchmark results, and fundamental limitations to assess whether the dominance of pure-attention transformers may soon be challenged, which we consider possible, particularly in domain-specific and edge-device applications.

Cross-lingual transfer has become a central paradigm for extending natural language processing (NLP) technologies to low-resource languages. By leveraging supervision from high-resource languages, multilingual language models can achieve strong task performance with little or no labeled target-language data. However, it remains unclear to what extent cross-lingual transfer can substitute for language-specific efforts. In this paper, we synthesize prior research findings and data collection results on Luxembourgish, which, despite its typological proximity to high-resource languages and its presence in a multilingual context, remains insufficiently represented in modern NLP technologies. Across findings, we observe a fundamental interdependence between cross-lingual transfer and language-specific efforts. Cross-lingual transfer can substantially improve target-language performance, but its success depends critically on the availability of sufficiently high-quality, task-aligned target-language data. At the same time, such resources, particularly in low-resource settings, are typically too limited in scale to drive strong performance on their own. Instead, such resources reach their full potential only when leveraged within a cross-lingual framework. We therefore argue that cross-lingual transfer and language-specific efforts should not be viewed as competing alternatives. Instead, they function as complementary components of a sustainable low-resource NLP pipeline. Based on these insights, we provide practical guidelines for integrating and balancing cross-lingual transfer with language-specific development in sustainable low-resource NLP pipelines.

This paper reflects on twenty years of building NLP resources and research infrastructure for Arabic, a language spoken by hundreds of millions yet historically underserved relative to languages such as English or Chinese. The first decade focused on foundational linguistic infrastructure; the second shifted toward computational social science, social media analysis, and socially oriented applications. Rather than cataloguing outputs, the paper examines what the experience of building them revealed. Three counterintuitive lessons emerge: building datasets is as much a social process as a technical one; communities formed around shared tasks often matter more than the tasks themselves; and moving from language resources to computational social science exposes challenges that traditional NLP training does not address. We discuss three failures: a depression detection corpus that never reached clinical practice, a period of spreading across too many shared tasks without sufficient depth, and a long-standing assumption that Modern Standard Arabic infrastructure would transfer cleanly to dialectal tasks. These experiences suggest that the hardest problems in developing NLP for underserved communities are not linguistic but social, institutional, and epistemic, and require competencies the field rarely teaches.

This work aims to shine a spotlight on the topic of metalanguage. We first define metalanguage, link it to NLP and LLMs, and then discuss our two labs’ metalanguage-centered efforts. Finally, we discuss four dimensions of metalanguage and metalinguistic tasks, offering a list of understudied future research directions.

Language models have changed from unreliable text generators to highly-capable large models with trillions of parameters. Capability increases come hand-in-hand with increases in scale, making understanding the internal representations of models more challenging. Since millions of users increasing rely on language models to interact with external tools or make decisions in medium or high-stakes scenarios, we need to establish control over model behavior and know when to trust model outputs. In this paper, we discuss our contributions on harnessing the latent spaces by proposing steering vectors for control and developing latent space-based model calibrators for trust. Together, our contributions help demystify the latent spaces of language models and offer new insights into how to harness model internals to build more trustworthy language technology.

Language models are increasingly used to quantify cultural phenomena, but what makes such measurement distinctively cultural? This paper argues that NLP work on culture is a material-discursive practice: the apparatus—model, data, annotation, evaluation—participates in constituting the cultural reality it measures, rather than passively recording it. Drawing on Karen Barad’s concept of the agential cut—the contingent boundary between phenomenon and instrument—I show that the apparatus’s substantive design choices draw such boundaries, and that the boundary is entangled from the start because language models have already internalized much of the cultural material they measure. I illustrate this through three case studies on television and film dialogue and two examinations of the apparatus itself: erasure of character names as cultural markers, and attunement to historically distant Restoration drama. This big picture analysis proposes a research program that is theory-driven, empirically rigorous, and culturally contingent, treating each agential cut as a conscious commitment.

Memorisation in deep learning is undergoing a paradigm shift; it is increasingly recognised as a mechanism that can support, rather than hinder, generalisation. This is particularly relevant in NLP, where language combines compositional, generalisable structure with non-compositional expressions such as idioms, requiring memorisation from models and humans alike. My PhD work investigated memorisation in transformer models in generic terms, and through the lens of (non-)compositionality, from both data and model-internal perspectives. I analysed which training examples require memorisation, whether memorisation supports generalisation, and where memorisation occurs within model layers. I also studied how transformers process non-compositional idiom translations and how they balance compositional generalisation with non-compositional memorisation. Based on my findings, I stress that memorisation is an inherent part of learning natural language, can be beneficial, and is partially predictable. Yet it is not cleanly separable from generalisation, both at the level of data and of model parameters. Here, I summarise those findings and reflect on my PhD work.

Computational mental health (CMH) classifiers often degrade under distribution shift because human annotators and distant-supervision pipelines reward different linguistic signals. We introduce TSS (Triple-Stream Stress probe), a multi-channel diagnostic framework that decomposes text into (A) lexical character n-grams, (B) a small, mostly content-free morpho-syntactic channel, and (C) a 154-feature psycholinguistic style channel. Across four English datasets (N = 12,906), TSS reveals a lexical interference effect: adding lexical features to the style channel reduces Macro-F1 on human-labeled data (mean drop 0.072, p < 10⁻⁴) but not on auto-labeled data. We propose Degree of Divergence (DoD), a difference-in-differences statistic adapted from econometrics for label-source auditing, with instance-level bootstrap inference; the headline estimate is DoD_BC–A = 0.0374, 95% CI [0.0097,0.0651], p = 0.0032. A platform-stratified Twitter-only DoD (which removes the Reddit vs. Twitter contrast) reproduces the pattern with bootstrap inference: DoD^Tw_BC–A = +0.096 (p < 0.001) and DoD^Tw_AC–A = −0.089 (p < 0.001). Interventional masking (pos_only) retains ∼95–99% of Channel C’s performance after destroying content words on human datasets, indicating that the style channel does not rely primarily on lexical surface form. TSS is positioned as a diagnostic audit framework, not a clinical screening tool: it flags label-source-specific shortcut learning before generalization claims are made.

Large language models achieve strong performance on biomedical question answering and summarization benchmarks, yet traditional evaluation metrics often fail to detect clinically significant factual errors. We introduce a unified evaluation framework that combines reference-based measures with evidence-grounded factuality verification to assess biomedical text generation. Evaluating four open-source models across three benchmarks (BioASQ, PubMedQA, MedLFQA), we find that 13.4?24.7% of generated claims are contradicted and 23?41% are unsupported, despite high lexical overlap scores. Our proposed Fact-Aligned Score (FAS) correlates strongly with claim-level verifiability (rho=0.68), substantially outperforming ROUGE-L (rho=0.41). We release an open-source toolkit with model outputs and analysis scripts to support reproducible factuality evaluation and safer deployment of biomedical LLMs.

Seizure freedom is a key clinical outcome for people with epilepsy (PWE) yet it is primarily recorded in free-text notes and letters in the United Kingdom, making it difficult to aggregate and track at scale. This paper introduces a generative LLM-based pipeline boosted by synthetic data to identify a PWE’s seizure freedom status in clinicians’ records. We fine-tuned seven different LLMs with between 4-14 billion parameters using LoRA to compare models trained on synthetic records against those trained on expert annotated records. The best performing configuration, based on Qwen-2.5-14B, was trained entirely on synthetic records and used chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning (both generated by GPT-5). This achieved an F1 score of 0.90±0.02 on double-annotated test data and outperformed the equivalent model trained on authentic clinician records, which achieved 0.87±0.04. The synthetically trained models also have the benefit of outputting their CoT reasoning process for greater decision-making transparency and can also make use of the unused supervised training data for significantly increased test examples. This work has implications for monitoring a key treatment outcome for PWE automatically and at scale.

This paper studies how to improve biomedical named entity recognition (NER) using large language models (LLMs), especially for low-resource languages like Bangla and Basque. The main goal is to understand how different prompt styles and output formats affect model performance. The study finds that the way we design prompts is very important. Among all methods, question-style prompting works best across all languages. It helps the model understand the biomedical task more clearly and improves accuracy. In fact, improvements are much greater in Bangla and Basque compared to high-resource languages like English and Spanish. Another key finding is about the output format. Traditional BIO tagging (labeling each word) performs poorly with LLMs because it is strict and sensitive to small errors. Instead, span-based extraction (directly extracting text phrases) works much better and gives higher F1 scores. This is because LLMs naturally generate text spans rather than token-level labels. The paper also analyzes errors. Common problems include hallucination, missing entities, and boundary mistakes. Translation-based prompts can reduce hallucination, while question-style prompts reduce empty outputs in biomedical NER. Overall, the study shows that choosing the right prompt and output format is very important, especially for low-resource high-vocabulary languages. It provides useful guidance for building better multilingual medical information extraction systems.

Extracting structured knowledge from unstructured text is a fundamental challenge in machine learning, particularly for concepts organized within complex hierarchical ontologies. In genomics, identifying phenotypes from clinical narratives is crucial for diagnostic precision, yet current methods struggle with contextual interpretation and subtle clinical descriptions. We present a hierarchy-aware workflow for ontology-based phenotype linking that combines semantic and hierarchical signals. Our approach integrates Large Language Models for span detection with retrieval and a hybrid reranking strategy using both Euclidean (semantic) and hyperbolic (hierarchical) embeddings trained on the Human Phenotype Ontology. We show that while hyperbolic embeddings alone do not outperform standard semantic retrieval, they provide complementary structural signals that improve performance over strong baselines when combined with Euclidean representations. In particular, the hybrid approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods and yields more hierarchically coherent predictions, especially in settings involving implicit phenotype mentions. Experiments on a public benchmark (ID-68) and a newly released clinical dataset (CHU-50), publicly released with code and data, highlight both performance gains and improved alignment with ontology structure. We further introduce a hierarchy-aware evaluation framework that reflects clinical relevance beyond exact-match metrics.

Automated epileptic seizure detection from electroencephalography (EEG) signals is a clinically important task in which feature selection is typically performed using purely statistical criteria. We investigate whether a small instruction-tuned large language model (LLM) can guide iterative feature selection for binary seizure detection on the Epileptic Seizure Recognition dataset (11{,}500 samples, 178 features). The LLM agent (Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct) receives five complementary statistical summaries and selects a feature subset through multi-round reasoning. The agent achieves 96.5% accuracy and 0.911 F1 with 40 features, compared to 97.9% accuracy and 0.946 F1 for the best full-feature baseline (SVM-RBF on 178 features). Critically, 39 of the agent’s 40 features coincide with the top-39 mutual-information features, and a deterministic Top-39 MI filter, evaluated by the same Random Forest classifier, attains the same 96.5% accuracy and 0.911 F1. We therefore present this work as an empirical baseline: at the 1.5B-parameter scale, the LLM behaves close to a univariate MI ranker. We situate the result against the recent LLM-based feature selection literature and enumerate the ablations and multi-dataset extensions required to determine whether larger or domain-specialized LLMs add value beyond statistical filtering.

The MedCPT model has demonstrated that strong biomedical retrievers can be trained using proprietary PubMed search logs. In this work, we study whether freely available citation sentences are sufficient to train similarly effective models. We construct a large-scale training dataset of ~ 62 million citation sentence-abstract pairs extracted from PubMed Central. We train a lightweight BERT-based retriever-reranker model called CiteRec on this dataset and evaluate it across three benchmark settings: (a) the biomedical subset of BEIR for information retrieval, (b) SciRepEval for generalizable scientific document embeddings, and (c) CitancePlus, a new set of ~ 90 thousand citation sentence-abstract pairs for PubMed-scale citation recommendation. We show that CiteRec performs competitively with MedCPT on the biomedical BEIR subset and outperforms it on SciRepEval. On CitancePlus, CiteRec achieves strong performance for citation recommendation over the full PubMed corpus, outperforming both MedCPT and a substantially larger Qwen3-Embedding-8B retriever.

Standard clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) benchmarks often yield inflated metrics by forcing deterministic classification on ambiguous instances, thereby obscuring the clinical risks of overconfident predictions. To bridge this gap, we propose a risk-aware hybrid selective classification framework, evaluated on early Human Immunodeficiency Virus suspicion identification in Spanish clinical notes. Our dual-verification approach explicitly decouples aleatoric uncertainty through Mondrian conformal prediction and epistemic uncertainty using a Multi-Centroid Mahalanobis Distance veto. Empirical evaluations reveal that standard uncertainty metrics and baseline classifiers are structurally insufficient for safe medical triage, suffering severe coverage collapse when forced to operate under strict reliability constraints. In contrast, by demanding that clinical narratives pass both probabilistic and geometric safeguards, the proposed framework successfully isolates a highly trustworthy operational domain.The obtained results show that explicit, decoupled uncertainty quantification is essential for translating biomedical NLP into responsible clinical practice.

SciFact is a widely-used benchmark for scientific claim verification (645 citations, included in the BEIR evaluation suite). We present, to our knowledge, the first systematic annotation audit of its development and training sets, combining automated screening with a small language model ($0.11 in API fees) and exhaustive manual verification against source publications. We identify 11 gold-label errors in the development set (5.3%, 95% CI 2.7?9.2%, of 209 audited claim?document pairs) and 13 in the training set (2.3%, 95% CI 1.2?3.9%, of 564 audited pairs). The dev errors exhibit a directional asymmetry?9 of 11 mislabel a claim as SUPPORT (one-sided binomial p=0.033, two-sided p=0.065)?and fall into four recurring types. Correcting the dev labels raises binary macro-F1 by 1.7?3.8 points across GPT-5.4 (mini, nano) and Claude Haiku 4.5; gains are larger in 3-way evaluation when mislabeled evidence is recast as NEI (e.g., +9.2 with Haiku 4.5). The binary range is comparable in magnitude to inter-system margins on the SciFact leaderboard. A simple claim-only probe with Haiku 4.5 does not support label memorization as the main explanation for these gains. We release corrected annotations and a blind annotator packet, and recommend that benchmark users prefer the corrected release going forward.

Retrieval strategy selection is a critical but understudied design decision in biomedical RAG systems. Existing evaluations rely on lexical metrics that miss answer grounding, or require proprietary infrastructure that limits reproducibility. We present BioRAG, a head-to-head ablation of seven retrieval strategies on BioASQ-13b, evaluated using four RAGAs metrics with a locally deployed judge at zero monetary cost. Hybrid BM25 plus dense retrieval with Reciprocal Rank Fusion achieves faithfulness of 0.534 and context recall of 0.507, improvements of 50% and 85% over naive dense retrieval, confirmed across three random seed re-samples. HyDE improves faithfulness by 14% but reduces context precision by 52%, a tradeoff not previously documented on BioASQ. No single strategy dominates all four metrics, indicating that strategy selection must be application-driven. Sensitivity analysis across k in {3,5,10} confirms ranking stability. A domain mismatch diagnostic confirms 2% corpus coverage failure. The full pipeline runs on consumer hardware without paid APIs, directly addressing BioNLP 2026’s emphasis on reproducibility and evaluation frameworks for health-related applications.

De-identification systems prioritize recall to protect privacy, but excessive over-tagging reduces data utility. We propose an agentic refiner that reviews high-recall annotations using lightweight tools (validation functions, adaptive context retrieval, persistent to-do state, and modular review skills) to improve precision while minimizing recall loss. Experiments across three multilingual datasets show that the agent achieves significant improvements to binary precision. To support fine-grained analysis, we further introduce a synthetic error dataset of common and systemic failure modes, on which the agent corrects 99% of injected errors in the medical datasets. Our results suggest that agent-based refinement provides a flexible and effective mechanism for improving de-identification precision as a modular extension to existing high-recall systems.

We investigate whether explicit syntactic features improve transformer-based biomedical relation extraction when added to typed entity marker pooling. We evaluate two augmentation strategies on top of BiomedBERT: (1) verb token augmentation, which concatenates the hidden state of the dependency root verb to the entity representations, and (2) a two-layer graph convolutional network (GCN) that refines encoder hidden states over the dependency parse before entity pooling. We experimented on three biomedical datasets: ChemProt, DDI, and AIMed with three random seeds. We found neither strategy consistently outperformed the entity-only baseline. The GCN yielded modest gains on AIMed (+0.007 F1) and ChemProt (+0.003 F1) but decreased performance on DDI (-0.013 F1). Verb token augmentation helps only on AIMed (+0.004 F1) and underperforms on the other two datasets. A syntactic characterization of the datasets reveals that DDI has substantially higher passive voice usage (50.7% of relation-bearing sentences) than AIMed (27.0%) or ChemProt (30.9%), suggesting that syntactic augmentation is more effective when sentences exhibit active verbal structure with semantically informative predicates. These results suggest that corpus-level syntactic characteristics, particularly passive voice usage, may moderate the utility of explicit syntactic augmentation, though the small magnitude of observed differences warrants caution in interpretation.

Drug repurposing methods rely heavily on knowledge graph (KG) embeddings, but building and curating these graphs takes considerable effort. We present two findings on the Hetionet drug-disease benchmark and an epilepsy ranking task. First, PubMedBERT text embeddings, fed through the same downstream classifiers and identical 10-fold splits as four re-trained KG baselines (TransE, ComplEx, DistMult, RotatE), reach AUROC $0.910$, above all four (best: RotatE, $0.854$); a Random Forest on the same vectors scores $0.880$. The comparison is asymmetric in one important way: PubMedBERT was pretrained on the literature Hetionet was curated from, so the result is best read as “text-with-literature-supervision vs.graph-only,” and a head-to-head with text-augmented KG methods (KG-BERT, TxGNN) is left as follow-up. Second, across all seven combinations of text, molecular (ECFP4), and gene expression (LINCS L1000) features, cross-attention fusion of weaker modalities into text consistently degrades performance, despite a gated mechanism intended to suppress unhelpful modalities; the residual path forces the strong modality to absorb noise. The model also ranks proconvulsants (amoxapine, flumazenil) near the top, because text embeddings encode strength of association with a disease but not its direction.

Clinical NLP systems are increasingly used for triage support, prediction, and decision assistance in EHR-based settings, where demographic fairness is a critical concern. A common evaluation approach is counterfactual demographic perturbation: modifying attributes such as age or sex while holding clinical evidence fixed and measuring output changes. However, we show that such counterfactual audits can be misleading when interpreted in isolation. Across three clinical LLMs, we find that non-demographic control perturbations (e.g., paraphrases) often induce output variability comparable to or greater than demographic edits. This can contribute to overestimation or misinterpretation of demographic bias.To address this, we propose a baseline-aware audit framework that explicitly compares demographic perturbations against control baselines. Our analysis reveals that (i) label-level stability can mask substantial variation in generated rationales and recommendations, and (ii) age-based perturbations generally induce larger effects than sex-based ones in borderline cases. Crucially, we identify a high intrinsic instability (“noise floor”; 0.46–0.71 Jaccard instability) in clinical LLM generations, while additional matched-metric analyses show that demographic perturbations are often comparable to non-demographic baseline variability.These findings highlight a key limitation of existing fairness evaluations: without establishing appropriate baselines, apparent demographic sensitivity may be over- or mis-attributed to bias rather than broader generative instability. We argue that baseline-aware counterfactual audits, which explicitly compare demographic effects against intrinsic model noise, provide a more reliable lens for evaluating clinical NLP systems in high-stakes settings.

Text embeddings have become an essential part of a variety of language applications. However, methods for interpreting, exploring and reversing embedding spaces are limited, reducing transparency and precluding potentially valuable generative use cases. In this work, we develop an open-source, domain-agnostic framework for aligning Large Language Models to embedding spaces using the recently reported Embedding Language Model (ELM) method. We demonstrate our framework by training models to recover, summarize, and compare clinical trial abstracts from embeddings alone. In addition to inverting embeddings back to text more reliably than existing methods, our models can decode novel, interpolated embeddings into new clinical trial abstracts that human experts cannot distinguish from real ones. We further show that these generated abstracts are responsive to moving embeddings along concept vectors for age and sex of study subjects. Our public ELM implementation and experimental results will aid the alignment of Large Language Models to embedding spaces in the biomedical domain and beyond.

Clinical decision support systems that operate across multiple downstream care pathways must first determine which pathway or pathways are relevant for a given patient. We study this routing problem in gastrointestinal surveillance, where paired endoscopy and histopathology text reports may indicate multiple concurrent conditions and therefore require multi-label routing. In this context, standard hard-label evaluation can be insufficient: a model may achieve reasonable overall performance while still excluding clinically important pathways when uncertain. We formulate gastrointestinal report routing as a multi-label uncertainty-aware classification task over six pathway labels and compare lightweight lexical baselines, frozen embedding models and a fine-tuned transformer baseline under two complementary uncertainty mechanisms: threshold-based abstention and set-valued conformal prediction. Using 1,773 paired reports from a single NHS trust with disjoint train, calibration and test splits, we evaluate both hard-routing performance and the downstream review burden introduced by uncertainty-aware prediction. The fine-tuned ClinicalBERT model achieved the strongest overall performance (0.811 subset accuracy, 0.861 macro-F1) and the lowest AURC of 0.084 under min-margin abstention. Threshold-based abstention consistently reduced exact-match routing error on accepted reports. For conformal routing at ?=0.10, Mondrian calibration achieved high mean positive-label recall coverage across learned baselines (0.883-0.917). The fine-tuned model achieved 0.891 mean recall coverage with a mean prediction set size of 1.70, 0.642 candidate-label precision and 0.61 false-positive labels per report. Compared with a recall-tuned threshold baseline at similar recall, Mondrian CP produced smaller candidate sets, higher candidate-label precision and fewer false-positive pathway suggestions. These results show that uncertainty-aware evaluation exposes clinically important failure modes missed by aggregate metrics. They also show that high-recall routing is not cost-free: set-valued prediction can reduce missed-pathway risk but must be interpreted as candidate generation for downstream review rather than automated pathway selection.

MedCAT is an open-source framework for clinical named entity recognition and linking (NER+L) widely used in research and healthcare settings. We present MedCAT v2, a re-engineered version designed to improve modularity, extensibility, and maintainability while preserving the core functionality and performance of previous releases. The new architecture introduces a registry-based component system and a flexible pipeline that enables easy substitution of components, integration of alternative methods, and future expansion, including support for pre-trained components across the full NER+L and contextualisation workflow. This enables systematic exploration of clinical NER+L design trade-offs by evaluating different components in the pipeline. Evaluation across multiple public datasets shows equivalent or improved performance compared to earlier versions, with reduced integration overhead and improved runtime flexibility. The framework also supports optional extensions such as meta-annotation, relation extraction, providing a unified and reproducible environment for clinical NLP in real-world settings.

Due to unique concepts, syntactic structure, and vocabulary of specialized domains, it is common to train specialized Language models (LMs) for their target domain. For example, BioClinicalBERT is a specialized LM designed for clinical applications. These specialized LMs are typically created starting with a foundation model (such as BERT-base) which has been pretrained for the general English domain, and then adapted to the target domain via additional pretraining. Alternatively, LMs may be pretrained from scratch on data from the target domain. Both techniques are extremely computationally expensive and as such, these specialized LMs are often publicly released for other researchers. For some domains, such as the biomedical domain there are many, similar models available, and as a developer, this raises the question, which pretrained LM should I choose? Alternatively, in novel domains for which no specialized LMs exist, it raises different questions: Is it worth the cost to pretrain a LM from scratch? Should I adapt a general English model instead? Should I just use a general English model without adaptive pretraining? This is a particularly salient question when considering a limited budget. i.e. Should I pay for compute time or for annotators to create a larger dataset. In this paper we compare results of nine LMs across nine datasets spanning the clinical, scientific, and biomedical-related social media domains. From these comparisons we make several conclusions that can simplify the hyperparameter-tuning process and inform researchers and developers in novel domains. Broadly, these are that the effects of adaptive fine-tuning are small. If an adapted model exists in your domain, choose the one most closely related to your task. If no model exists, using a foundation model is likely sufficient.

The development of large language models (LLMs) has led to increased focus on their adaptation to specialized domains and languages, yet the effectiveness of domain adaptation strategies remains unclear. We present a study of medical domain adaptation using French medical question answering (QA) as a case study. We compare continual pretraining (CPT), supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and their combination across three model families, multiple sizes, and three initialization types, explicitly disentangling adaptation effects from base model choice. We evaluate both multiple-choice (MCQA) and open-ended QA (OEQA) under greedy and constrained decoding using automatic metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation. For MCQA, CPT+SFT most often achieves the best scores, but gains over SFT are small and frequently not statistically significant, making SFT a strong and cost-effective default. For OEQA, CPT consistently improves overlap-based metrics, while SFT often degrades generation quality; instruction tuning and CPT+SFT are preferred by LLM-based evaluation. Cross-lingual experiments further show effective transfer from French adaptation to English benchmarks. Overall, we provide practical guidelines for selecting adaptation strategies under computational constraints.

Automatic report labeling facilitates the identification of clinical findings from unstructured text and enables large-scale annotation for medical imaging research. Existing rule-based labelers struggle with the diverse descriptions in clinical reports, while fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs) requires large amounts of labeled data that are often unavailable in clinical settings. In this paper, we propose PromptRad, a knowledge-enhanced multi-label prompt-tuning approach for radiology report labeling under low-resource settings. PromptRad reformulates multi-label classification as masked language modeling and incorporates synonyms from the UMLS Metathesaurus into a multi-word verbalizer to enrich category representations. By fine-tuning the PLM without additional classification layers, PromptRad requires substantially less labeled data than conventional fine-tuning. Experiments on liver CT (computed tomography) reports show that PromptRad outperforms dictionary-based and fine-tuning baselines with only 32 labeled training examples, and achieves competitive performance with GPT-4 despite using a much smaller model. Further analysis demonstrates that PromptRad captures complex negation patterns more effectively than existing methods, making it a promising solution for report labeling in data-scarce clinical scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/ila-lab/PromptRad.

This paper introduces LEA-Dialog, a multi-turn diagnostic dialogue dataset for lower-extremity arteriovenous diseases, together with a carefully developed diagnostic handbook and a process-aligned agentic framework for structured outpatient diagnosis. The dataset provides stage annotations for each turn and guideline-grounded probability trends, enabling evaluation beyond final diagnostic accuracy. Experiments show that the framework improves reasoning stability and reduces drift across both online and offline LLMs, with particularly large gains for smaller offline models.

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong general language capabilities but remain limited in chemical reasoning, particularly for tasks requiring structured, mechanistic understanding of molecular reactions. We present Knowledge Graph Reaction LLM (KGRxn-LLM), a framework that augments LLMs with a hierarchical chemical knowledge graph (KG) to ground reasoning in molecular transformations and reaction patterns. Existing benchmarks primarily emphasize reaction or molecular fact recall, providing limited assessment of reaction-level mechanistic reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce KGRxn-Bench, a benchmark of 1,200 questions designed to evaluate LLMs on reaction-centric reasoning tasks, including functional group identification, reaction type classification, and product and reagent prediction. Experimental results show that our approach of grounding LLMs in structured KG substantially improves performance across multiple tasks and model backbones, outperforming domain-specific fine-tuned models on KG-covered splits and most hold-out splits.

The global transition to the ICD-11 taxonomy demands robust automated medical coding, yet comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) on this task remain absent. We introduce MAX-EVAL-11, the first large-scale benchmark for full-spectrum ICD-11 medical coding. MAX-EVAL-11 comprises 10,000 MIMIC-III discharge summaries with mapped, expert-validated ICD-11 annotations spanning 99.87% of the diagnostic taxonomy. To better reflect clinical utility, we propose a novel hierarchical evaluation framework that assigns partial credit based on ICD-11’s 5-level structure, addressing the brittleness of traditional exact-match metrics. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs reveals significant performance gaps. The best-performing model (Claude 4 Sonnet) achieves a weighted score of 0.433, outperforming both general-purpose peers and specialized medical models (MedCoder). Crucially, all models exhibit near-zero exact match rates (0?4.8%) and rely primarily on hierarchical credit, underscoring the extreme difficulty of precise ICD-11 code generation. Furthermore, the superiority of general-purpose LLMs over legacy ICD-10 medical models (with ICD-11 codelist) suggests that broad reasoning capabilities currently outweigh domain-specific training for complex taxonomy scaling.

Reliable extraction of structured information from radiology reports using Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge, particularly for complex, non-English texts such as Hebrew. This study proposes an agent-based, uncertainty-aware framework to enhance the reliability and interpretability of LLM predictions in clinical contexts. A total of 9,683 Hebrew radiology reports from Crohn’s disease patients (2010?2023) across three medical centers were analyzed. Of these, 512 reports were manually annotated for six gastrointestinal organs and 15 pathological findings, while the remainder were automatically labeled using HSMP-BERT. Structured data extraction was performed with Llama 3.1 (Llama 3-8b-instruct) employing Bayesian Prompt Ensembles (BayesPE), which utilized six semantically equivalent prompts to quantify uncertainty. An Agent-Based Decision Model aggregated prompt outputs into five calibrated confidence levels and was benchmarked against three entropy-based approaches. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and Cohen’s Kappa before and after filtering high-uncertainty cases. The agent-based model outperformed all baselines, achieving an F1 score of 0.3967, recall of 0.6437, and Kappa of 0.3006; after excluding cases with uncertainty = 0.5, the F1 score increased to 0.4787 and Kappa to 0.4258. The proposed framework improves uncertainty calibration and predictive reliability, advancing the safe deployment of LLMs in medical data extraction.

NER requires token-level classification using both left and right context, which makes encoder-only models like BERT naturally well-suited for the task. Decoder-only LLMs, by contrast, use causal masking during training, so their token representations lack right-side context, limiting their effectiveness on structured prediction tasks like NER despite their strong general capabilities. To address this, the authors propose fine-tuning decoder-only LLMs with causal attention replaced by full attention, combined with label-supervised discriminative training. While similar ideas exist in prior work, those studies were limited in scope. This work evaluates seven LLMs across four model families (Gemma, Qwen2.5, Llama3.1, Llama3.2) and compares full fine-tuning against LoRA. Results show that the proposed approach with an appropriate LoRA configuration outperforms encoder baselines (BERT, RoBERTa, DeBERTa), and achieves strong NER performance without auxiliary data or architectural modifications, though it does not reach SOTA on BC5CDR and CoNLL2003.

Nutrition misinformation on social media often arises from selective interpretation of scientific evidence rather than outright falsehoods, making it difficult to detect. We introduce a curated, expert-annotated Instagram dataset focused on seed oils and omega-6, two domains characterized by contested dietary claims. We evaluate feature-based, embedding-based, and transformer-based models under in-domain and cross-domain settings. Results show strong in-domain performance across all models, with Sentence-BERT achieving the highest AUPRC (up to 0.96). However, performance drops substantially under cross-domain transfer, indicating limited robustness to topic shift. Analysis suggests that while contextual embeddings capture strong in-domain semantic signals, linguistically and psychologically grounded features are more stable under distribution shift. These findings highlight the value of combining semantic and interpretable linguistic signals for robust misinformation detection.

Standard coherence metrics for biomedical topic models encode no clinical knowledge and cannot detect clinically implausible topic groupings. We propose SNOMED CT Wu?Palmer hierarchy distance as a post hoc, ontology-grounded diagnostic. On vascular surgery (47,318 articles) and craniofacial surgery (27,493 articles) corpora, the metric flags clinically heterogeneous topics that coherence misses?e.g., abdominal aortic aneurysm repair grouped with deep vein thrombosis (d = 0.600). Diagnostic signals are nearly identical across eight BERTopic embedding strategies including ontology-enhanced models, but diverge across model families: BERTopic alone produces a positive within- vs. cross-topic Cohen’s d, while LDA, NMF, and Top2Vec at matched topic counts score below their own cross-topic baselines (Cohen’s d 0; Mann?Whitney p 0.99). The score is therefore sensitive to topic-model output choice, not only to embedding choice within a single pipeline. A pre-clustering screening experiment finds near-zero correlation (|?| 0.08) between embedding cosine and SNOMED CT similarity, arguing that ontological validation belongs after clustering rather than as an embedding screen. We additionally describe a two-stage UMLS-CUI stopword filter that preserves high-frequency domain-specific concepts which naive frequency filtering would discard. After one-time concept curation, the diagnostic itself is automated and requires no per-topic expert scoring.

Large language models (LLMs) can generate or synthesize clinical text for a wide range of applications, from improving clinical documentation to augmenting clinical text analytics. Yet evaluations typically focus on a narrow aspect – such as similarity or utility comparisons – even though these aspects are complementary and best viewed in parallel. In this study, we aim to conduct a systematic evaluation of LLM-generated clinical text, which includes intrinsic, extrinsic, and factuality evaluations of synthetic clinical notes rephrased from MIMIC databases at million-note scale. Our analysis demonstrates that synthetic notes preserve core clinical information and predictive utility for coarse-grained tasks despite substantial linguistic changes, but lose fine-grained details for task like ICD coding. We show this loss of detail can be substantially mitigated by rephrasing notes by chunks rather than by the whole note, but at the cost of reduced factual precision under incomplete context. Through fact-checking and error analysis, we further find that synthesis errors are dominated by misinterpretation of clinical context, alongside temporal confusion, measurement errors, and fabricated claims. Finally, we show that the synthetic notes – despite their task-agnostic nature – can effectively augment task-specific training for rare ICD codes.

Clinical coding maps clinical documentation to standardized medical codes, an essential yet time-consuming administrative task that could benefit from automation. Current models on ICD coding are typically optimized for codes from a specific ICD version. However, in reality, ICD systems evolve continuously, and different versions are adopted across time periods and regions. Moreover, ICD coding suffers from the long-tail problem, and rare code performance can be a bottleneck for developing implementable models. We examine whether it is viable to train version-independent models by combining data annotated in different ICD versions, which may help address these challenges. We add ICD-9 data to the training of a modified label-wise attention model for ICD-10 prediction, and find that despite the version mismatch, adding ICD-9 yields a 27% increase in micro F1 for 18K rare ICD codes compared to training on ICD-10 alone. On 8K frequent ICD-10 codes, the multi-version training also substantially improves macro metrics, with far fewer model parameters.

The advent of single-cell RNA sequencing has enabled unprecedented resolution of cell fate decisions and regulatory mechanisms during peri-implantation human embryogenesis, in which accurate cell type annotation is a fundamental prerequisite and the first step for subsequent fate and mechanism inference. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance in various fields. However, current studies mostly rely on traditional methods and have not explored the application of LLMs in the field of human embryonic cell annotation. The main reason is the lack of instruction tuning datasets and evaluation benchmarks. In this paper, we proposed EmCellLLM, the first open sourced LLMs that are specialized for human embryonic cell type prediction task based on fine-tuning Qwen3-8B with EmCell4Instruction, the first embryonic cell type prediction instruction dataset. To support LLM instruction tuning, we also build EmCellBench, the first benchmark for evaluating human embryonic cell type prediction ability of LLMs. We compare our models with a variety of LLMs on EmCellBench, where our model outperforms all other open-sourced LLMs as well as DeepSeek.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are no longer mere laboratory objects of study. LLMs have become everyday tools in society across diverse populations and domains. In clinical contexts, LLMs have already been devised as clinical support applications. However, along with benefits, negative or adverse effects might arise, such as LLMs potentially providing psychologically distressing advice to adolescents when used for mental health support. This raises questions on the benefits of LLMs and calls for real-world evaluations: Are LLMs really helpful and effective for the intended purposes people are using them or will use them for? To answer this type of question we propose to use Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). RCTs are considered the most strict experimental design in the fields of Medicine, Psychiatry, Psychology, among others; however, the use of RCTs in the NLP field is almost negligible. In spite of the NLP field being the de facto locus of research on LLMs, other fields, prominently Medicine, are leading the RCT evaluations on LLMs. In this primer paper, we present a concise introduction to the principles of RCTs to guide NLP researchers to design RCT studies for evaluating LLMs.

The biomedical literature contains rich structured knowledge, including citation links that encode relationships between scientific studies, but such information is typically ignored in standard language model pre-training. We propose a citation-aware continual pre-training method for decoder-only language models that incorporates citation graph information from PubMed into next-token prediction by placing citation-linked abstract pairs within a shared context. We evaluate our method on multiple biomedical QA benchmarks using two model families. Results show that citation-aware continual pre-training achieves higher average accuracy than both the original base models and citation-unaware pre-training across biomedical tasks.

While humans can easily produce various types of answers, such as definitions, examples or paraphrases, Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to provide correct answers to medical questions that require diverse answer formats. In this paper, we introduce TrackList, a fine-grained linguistic and statistical analysis pipeline to investigate the impact of the pre-training data on LLMs answers to diverse linguistic queries. We also propose RefoMed-EN, a medical dataset consisting of 6,170 human-annotated medical terms alongside their corresponding definitions, denominations, exemplifications, explanations, or paraphrases. We investigated whether the high or low frequency of a concept (head or tail knowledge) impacts the language model’s performance for answering medical questions. We evaluated the quality of the LLM’s output using syntactic and semantic similarity metrics, statistical correlations and embeddings. Results showed that the LLM’s answer quality for definition-type questions is the highest, while for the exemplification-type being the lowest. Additionally, we showed that for definition-type medical questions (“What is multiple sclerosis?”), LLMs are prone to paraphrase more for popular medical concepts, and less on more specialized medical knowledge.

Discharge instructions are patient-facing, safety-critical documents that guide medication use, follow-up care, and recovery after hospitalization. Because they must synthesize information across the clinical record and often include post-discharge guidance not stated verbatim in the EHR, they are a difficult target for clinical text generation. In this work, we study discharge instructions in MIMIC-IV through a grounding-first lens. Using two LLMs, we decompose each discharge instruction into medically relevant statements and verify them against the Electronic Health Record (EHR). We find that discharge instructions for Surgical admissions are much longer, averaging roughly 24–25 statements per admission versus 11–12 in Non-Surgical cases, while supported content remains similar in absolute count. The additional Surgical content is dominated by statements that are not directly stated in the record or require clinically plausible extrapolation. Through this analysis, we advocate for better grounding and completeness evaluations at a fine-grained level, establishing a foundational step toward safer and more reliable discharge-instruction generation.

Prion diseases are rare, rapidly progressive, and fatal neurodegenerative disorders that remain difficult to diagnose, particularly in their early stages because of nonspecific clinical presentations. However, to our knowledge, there is no publicly available prion-disease-focused dataset designed to capture a broad range of clinically relevant entities from the biomedical literature. We introduce PrionNER, a manually annotated named entity recognition dataset for prion disease clinical information in PubMed abstracts. The current release comprises 317 abstracts, 2,943 sentences, and 6,955 text-bound entity annotations spanning 15 coarse-grained and 31 fine-grained clinically oriented entity types covering diseases, symptoms, diagnostics, findings, anatomy, treatments, and temporal and statistical evidence. Inter-annotator agreement reaches 81.78 exact-match F1, indicating strong annotation consistency. We benchmark supervised BERT baselines, W2NER, and zero-shot extractors on PrionNER. W2NER is the strongest supervised model, and Gemma-4-31B is the strongest zero-shot model, but the benchmark remains challenging, especially for structurally complex mentions and fine-grained clinically adjacent label distinctions. PrionNER provides a clinically grounded benchmark for prion-disease information extraction and supports research on rare-disease biomedical NLP under low-resource, fine-grained, and non-flat extraction conditions. The dataset, annotation guidelines, and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/daotuanan/PrionNER/

Individuals with particular mental health disorders may find it difficult to learn about their own condition. Therefore, efforts have been made to create materials that explain complex medical information in simpler words, which are also beneficial for caregivers and others. However, text simplification is commonly done in English and only sporadically in other languages. In this study, we explore potential ways for language-agnostic medical text simplification for the mental health domain. Our approach is to simplify the ICD-11 articles on primary psychotic disorders in English, German and French, using small LMs and various metrics for evaluating different aspects of the texts: lexical complexity and readability. Our results show that acceptable texts were produced only in English, and that a joint analysis of Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity (MTLD) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) provides the most insight, capturing both the best outcomes and signaling different types of issue. The study is preliminary and requires further investigation.

The rapid growth of biomedical literature presents a major challenge for organizing knowledge and identifying emerging research trends. While PubMed provides effective access to relevant articles, it does not support understanding the conceptual structure of document collections. Existing tools rely on predefined features, ontologies, or parameter-sensitive clustering methods, limiting their ability to uncover fine-grained, data-driven topics in a reproducible manner. We present BioTopicXplor, an on-demand web server for interactive exploration of biomedical literature derived from arbitrary PubMed queries. The system integrates ConvexTopics, a convex optimization?based topic modeling framework that guarantees convergence to a global optimum and eliminates the need for predefined parameters. This enables the generation of reproducible and fine-grained topic structures across large document collections. Given a PubMed query, BioTopicXplor retrieves relevant articles, performs topic discovery, and organizes the resulting subtopics into a hierarchical structure of higher-level themes. To enhance interpretability, the system incorporates large language models to generate concise, literature-grounded summaries and descriptive titles for each topic, with links to supporting evidence. We demonstrate the utility of BioTopicXplor through a case study on anti-aging research, where the system reveals meaningful thematic structures and supports knowledge discovery.

Patient portal messages often embed clinical questions inside long, emotionally nuanced narratives, requiring clinicians to infer the underlying information need. We study the task of rewriting verbose patient-authored narratives into concise, clinician-interpreted questions framed as if querying an electronic health record (EHR) system. We evaluate a lightweight LLM-based rewrite pipeline that constrains outputs to 10-15 words and uses rule-based validation with regeneration. We test the approach on 140 distinct patient questions drawn from the ArchEHR-QA dataset and shared task. Each system output is double-annotated by two annotators for quality (Good/Ok/Bad) and error types (Generic, Malformed, Tangential, Hallucination). Results show that while models follow output constraints, they often produce overly generic or tangential questions, and occasional hallucinations introduce unsupported clinical details. Across both clinician-question and patient-narrative comparison settings, automatic metrics show substantial overlap across human quality labels; in pairwise meta-evaluation, BERTScore is the strongest proxy for human preferences. We release our code and annotations to support future work.

Clinical documentation is essential for patient care, billing, and medical research, but it is subject to entrenched bias. While manual chart reviews can identify such bias, they are labor-intensive and expert-dependent. We introduce and evaluate StigMAD, a Multi-Agent Debate framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect stigmatizing language in clinical documentation. We investigate reasoning (multi-agent debate), self-reflection, and self-consistency within this framework. Extensive experiments on clinical notes and patient summaries demonstrate that our framework provides significant advantages over rule-based and supervised baselines. A domain-specific LLM (MedGemma) achieved its highest performance using the StigMAD reasoning framework, while a general-purpose LLM (Llama) showed superior results with the self-consistency framework. These findings suggest that open-source LLMs, steered by structured prompting and reflective reasoning, can effectively support the scalable auditing of stigmatizing language, marking a critical step toward more equitable clinical NLP systems.

Accurate labeling of relevance between biomedical abstracts is essential for improving information retrieval, semantic similarity modeling, training of ranking systems and other Natural Language Processing tasks. However, manual annotations are time-consuming, labor intensive and costly. Studies show that large language models (LLMs) can facilitate automated annotation, but their performance still falls short of human expert-level accuracy, especially in domain-specific tasks. It has been shown that combining annotations from multiple non-expert annotators can achieve performance comparable to, or even exceeding, that of trained experts. Based on this evidence, we treat AI-generated annotations as contributions from non-expert annotators and combine them using Learning to Rank framework. Our results show significant improvement in overall annotation quality. The proposed method looks promising to reduce reliance on human annotation while maintaining reliable performance for large-scale biomedical applications.

Recent high-complexity agentic systems such as DeepRare perform strongly on rare disease diagnosis benchmarks, but it remains unclear when gains come from structured knowledge access and when they come from parametric LLM knowledge. We compare phenotypebased retrieval, LLM reranking, and unrestricted LLM diagnosis across seven benchmarks covering 10,382 cases. We find a clear performance crossover driven by retrieval coverage?the fraction of cases whose true diagnosis is within the retriever’s top-50: on highcoverage datasets, ontology-based retrieval dominates; on low-coverage datasets, openended LLM diagnosis takes the lead. Building on this, adding an LLM reranker over retrieved candidates further improves accuracy across our patient-case benchmarks, closing most of the remaining gap to agentic systems (within 2 pp on MME and LIRICAL). We trace the crossover to two structural failure modes of ontology-based retrieval?annotation sparsity and phenotypic homogeneity?and show that aggregate scores across mixed benchmarks can hide these qualitatively different diagnostic settings. These findings motivate per-dataset evaluation and hybrid diagnostic systems that combine retrieval, reranking, and parametric LLM generation based on case characteristics.

Coreference resolution in biomedical texts presents unique challenges due to complex domain-specific terminology, high ambiguity in mention forms, and long-distance dependencies between coreferring expressions. In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of generative large language models (LLMs) for coreference resolution in the biomedical domain. Using the CRAFT corpus as our benchmark, we assess the LLMs’ performance with four prompting experiments that vary in their use of local, contextual enrichment, and domain-specific cues such as abbreviations and entity dictionaries.

Extracting structured cancer registry information from pathology and medical reports is challenging due to heterogeneous reporting styles and implicit clinical reasoning. We propose a modular multi-agent framework that decomposes registry abstraction into semantic chunking, retrieval, field-specific extraction, validation, evaluation, and aggregation stages. The dataset includes 818 annotated cancer cases from Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. Evaluation in this study focuses on breast (n=454) and colorectal (n=174) reports across grade, morphology, TNM staging, and laterality extraction tasks. The framework is compared against prompt-based LLaMA 3.3 baselines using accuracy and weighted/macro F1-score metrics. The proposed framework improved performance in context-dependent tasks, particularly grade extraction, where weighted F1-score increased from 0.71 to 0.78 for breast cancer and from 0.56 to 0.67 for colorectal cancer. Improvements were also observed for colorectal laterality extraction. For other extraction tasks, particularly highly structured tasks such as TNM staging and morphology extraction, the multi-agent framework achieved performance comparable to direct prompting. Although the baseline achieved slightly higher average weighted F1-scores overall, the proposed framework provides improved modularity, traceability, and pipeline-level interpretability through explicit intermediate reasoning stages, supporting error analysis and future clinician-guided refinement.

Resolving contradictions in biomedical literature requires more than factual recall; it demands identifying the hidden variables that explain divergent findings. Existing NLI benchmarks such as MedNLI operate at the sentence level and fail to capture document-level conflicts driven by differences in dosage, cell type, or study design. We introduce BioConflict, a benchmark of 250 expert-annotated paper pairs (500 abstracts) across ten biomedical topics, formalizing three tasks: conflict detection, contextual variable extraction, and consensus synthesis. We evaluate five general-purpose large language models and two domain-specific baselines, finding that general-purpose large language models achieve strong conflict detection (F1 up to 0.89) but exhibit brittle reasoning in synthesis, while domain-specific models lag significantly on all generative tasks. These findings highlight the need for context-aware biomedical AI capable of resolving, not merely retrieving, conflicting scientific evidence.

We investigate how tokenization granularity affects the representation of medical terminology in language models. Prior work links tokenization granularity to downstream performance under contextualized settings for specifically pretrained and fine-tuned models. We instead ask whether this relationship already emerges at the level of isolated term representations across existing pretrained models. We introduce an intrinsic definition retrieval task using UMLS term-definition pairs, with comparison to WordNet. We show that despite substantially heavier fragmentation of medical terminology, the models remain relatively robust in maintaining semantic alignment between medical terms and their definitions. At the same time, tokenization granularity still correlates with retrieval performance, indicating that effects previously observed in downstream biomedical tasks are already reflected at the level of isolated term representations. Encoder models benefit primarily from whole-token preservation, while for decoder LLMs, tokenization effects emerge mainly at deeper retrieval ranks.

Clinical dialogue-to-note generation is challenging because clinically salient evidence is noisy, distributed across turns, and often revised later in the encounter. Direct transcript-only prompting and coarse intermediate scaffolds can therefore suffer from omissions, section leakage, unsupported fill-in, and brittle final-state tracking. We propose Clinical Atomic Propositions (CAPs), a dialogue-aware intermediate representation for faithful clinical note generation. CAPs extract source-grounded clinical assertions while preserving modifiers such as verification status, temporality, speaker/source, and action type. We also study an optional event consolidation layer that groups CAPs into problem-oriented care bundles before note rendering. We evaluate five methods on a 197-case ACI-Bench cohort: a transcript-only baseline, prompt-based reimplementations of Cluster2Sent and MEDSUM-ENT, CAP, and CAP+Event. The main task uses a sectioned-note template, with SOAP-template rendering and transcript-free rendering reported as ablations. We use MEDSUM-ENT-style GPT-R/P/F1 metrics and a proposition-grounded semCAP-R/P/F1 audit to measure concept-level and source-grounded faithfulness, complemented by case-level win/tie/loss analysis and clinician deep review. Results show that CAP improves preservation of transcript-grounded clinical propositions while remaining competitive on concept-level GPT metrics. CAP+Event is not uniformly better than CAP, but qualitative and boundary analyses show when problem-oriented consolidation can improve organization and when compression can introduce omissions. We release code, prompts, intermediate representations, generated notes, and evaluation artifacts at a public repository.

Processing unstructured clinical narratives remains a major challenge in medical Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly when critical information is embedded within lengthy and heterogeneous reports. Clinical notes often describe key diagnostic and therapeutic events through a verbose narrative, making automatic event identification difficult. In this work, we frame the identification of clinical events as a text segmentation task.We conduct a comparative study of three segmentation strategies applied to oncology reports: (i) a fully regex-based approach, (ii) a cascaded regex?LLM pipeline, and (iii) the same cascade architecture augmented with a recovery mechanism to mitigate LLM rephrasing. Segmentation quality is evaluated using complementary structural metrics (Pk, WindowDiff, Boundary Similarity, Segment Count Accuracy, and Text Overlap IoU), and its impact is also observed on downstream segment tagging, performed to identify the corresponding event type (e.g. surgery, biopsy, imaging, treatment, laboratory).The results demonstrate the high potential of LLM-based approaches, particularly in preserving semantic coherence within segments and generalization on new data sources. However, regex-based segmentation achieves higher performance according to structural segmentation metrics, also leading to better downstream clinical event identification. In general, these results highlight the critical role of context-adaptive high-quality segmentation strategies in the structuring of verbose clinical narratives and in the accurate identification of key patient events.

Clinical reasoning over electronic health records (EHRs) involves heterogeneous operations, including text interpretation, numerical computation, temporal filtering, and guideline-based aggregation. However, many existing LLM-based approaches still cast these heterogeneous operations as a single end-to-end generation process, obscuring their different reliability requirements and making intermediate failures difficult to inspect. We therefore propose a framework based on operation-mechanism alignment that represents clinical reasoning as a directed acyclic graph of typed operations, where each node is assigned to the execution mechanism best suited to its reliability requirements. The framework also preserves structured evidence provenance for intermediate results. Across six clinician-annotated binary decision tasks, the framework outperforms direct prompting, single-step retrieval-augmented prompting, and chain-of-thought baselines, supporting operation-mechanism alignment as a practical design principle for reliable clinical reasoning over EHRs.

Despite Spanish being one of the most widely spoken languages in the world, biomedical NLP resources and systematic evaluations remain limited relative to English. We address this gap by constructing and releasing two Spanish biomedical corpora: (1) MeSHClass-ES, a 29,063 abstract bilingual corpus translated from PubMed with Opus-MT, and (2) AnatEM-ES, the AnatEM anatomical entity corpus translated with a chunk-level LLM-based pipeline that jointly preserves BIO annotations across 13,849 entity mentions. Both corpora achieve a mean COMET score of 0.73 despite using different translation systems. We benchmark nine encoder models spanning general-domain Spanish, domain-specific, and multilingual architectures for both tasks. RigoBERTa-2.0 leads both tasks (micro-F1 classification 0.69, tied with SciBETO-large; NER F1 0.66). Both domain pretraining and model capacity drive performance, with the gap slightly more pronounced for NER (4-point spread) than classification (3-point spread). XLM-RoBERTa-large emerges as a competitive multilingual baseline. A parallel evaluation of four open-weight decoders (7?9B) reveals a task-dependent encoder-decoder gap: QLoRA-adapted Gemma-2-9B reaches 88% of the best encoder on classification (micro-F1 .61 vs .69), but for NER every decoder configuration we tested stays at or below 40% of the best encoder F1. We release both corpora on the HuggingFace Hub1, translation pipelines, and evaluation code on GitHub.

Biomedical retrieval-augmented LLMs are often evaluated under helpful retrieved context, but in practice the evidence can also be misleading or internally conflicting. This paper studies uncertainty under those harder settings using the HealthContradict benchmark and six open-weight models. We evaluate five controlled evidence conditions: no context, correct-only context, incorrect-only context, and two mixed conditions that contain the same correct and contradictory documents in opposite orders. Correct evidence improves both accuracy and calibration, while incorrect evidence substantially degrades both. Under conflicting evidence, document order also matters: reversing the order of the same two documents changes 11.4%–25.2% of predictions and consistently reduces performance when the incorrect document appears first. We further evaluate a conflict-aware abstention score that combines model confidence with a detector of evidence conflict. In the two hardest conditions, incorrect-only and incorrect-first conflict, this score improves selective accuracy over confidence-only abstention, with mean gains of 7.2–33.4 and 3.6–14.4 points across 75%, 50%, and 25% coverage. These results show that biomedical RAG systems should be evaluated not only under helpful retrieval, but also under misleading and conflicting evidence.

Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) is a National Institute of Mental Health framework for studying mental disorders by integrating information across genetics, circuits, and behavior. Manually curating biomedical abstracts relevant to RDoC is a significant challenge due to semantically overlapping construct definitions (e.g., “Acute Threat,” “Potential Threat,” and “Sustained Threat”) and the exponential growth of biomedical literature. This study compares two modeling strategies, domain-adapted fine-tuning and in-context prompting, across two RDoC-related subtasks from the official BioNLP-OST 2019 RDoC shared task. For Task 1, unlabeled PubMed abstracts are retrieved and ranked by relevance to eight of the RDoC constructs. We compare a TF-IDF baseline against ModernBERT and Llama (zero-shot and five-shot) using Mean Average Precision (MAP). For Task 2, the objective is to identify the single most relevant sentence from an abstract for a given construct, evaluated using per-construct accuracy. The fine-tuning track performs end-to-end fine-tuning of BioBERT, PubMedBERT, ModernBERT, and RoBERTa using a cross-encoder input format and per-construct grid search. These are compared against the in-context learning of several open-source language models. Both our approaches are competitive against the best-performing team’s score from the BioNLP-OST 2019 RDoC shared task. Taken together, these findings suggest that five-shot prompted LLMs and domain-adapted fine-tuned transformers are viable tools for semi-automating the expert annotation in RDoC curation.

Clinical sources and patient-authored reviews often describe antidepressant side effects in different ways, but these differences are rarely measured directly. We present ClinPeer-AE, a linked dataset for comparing side-effect evidence from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, WebMD, and Drugs.com while preserving source identity. Across five widely prescribed antidepressants, we find low overlap between clinical and peer sources, large differences in relative emphasis, and evidence that many peer-only effects also appear in U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports. These findings suggest that patient reviews provide useful context about recurring medication experiences and offer a complementary view of how side effects are described outside formal clinical settings.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) holds promise for clinical question answering over electronic health records (EHRs), but existing systems treat retrieval as an opaque subroutine, limiting auditability and reliability in patient care workflows. We introduce a deterministic multi-stage retrieval pipeline for longitudinal EHR question answering that decomposes retrieval into four distinct, ablated stages where each stage is instrumented with diagnostic metrics, making the flow of clinical evidence measurable and auditable at every step. Evaluated on a broad LLM-annotated cohort and an expert-annotated cardiovascular benchmark developed alongside clinicians from real ICU records, the full pipeline achieves 22-23% relative recall gain over a strong dense retrieval baseline across both cohorts, with consistent improvements in downstream answer quality. The pipeline’s deterministic and transparent design addresses a critical gap in clinical NLP: retrieval systems that clinicians and researchers can not only rely on, but inspect, audit, and build upon for real-world deployment.

Transformer-based models such as PLM-CA achieve strong performance for automatic ICD coding, but their attention weights do not provide faithful explanations of their predictions. This is a major limitation for electronic medical records, where users often need concise and trustworthy evidence for each assigned code. To address this issue, we jointly train a sentence extractor and an ICD code classifier such that predictions are based only on the extracted sentences. As a result, the extracted sentences serve as faithful rationales for each predicted code and substantially reduce the effort required to inspect long medical records. Experiments on MIMIC-III show that our method approaches the performance of a transformer baseline that processes the full record while using only a small fraction of the document.

Highly technical medical terms are difficult for patients to understand during fast-paced hospital consultations, leading them to rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) for simplified explanations. However, LLMs can produce inaccurate or false information. Since expert evaluation is costly and time-consuming, LLM-as-a-Judge (LaaJ) approach is increasingly adopted to assess the quality of LLM-generated text. In this paper, we investigate the reliability and robustness of LaaJ for specialized medical knowledge by evaluating six LLMs for their judgment capabilities on three dimensions: correctness, readability, and completeness. We utilized three judgment setups: Vanilla, Epistemic, and Bias to probe robustness, and assess them against human expert annotations to measure alignment. To address the lack of specialized medical benchmarks, we introduce BrainCancerDB, an English dataset of 219 brain cancer terms with 23,652 annotations. Our findings indicate that while LLM-Judges and humans display similar trends in ranking simplified explanations, LLM-Judges tend to be more lenient on correctness, which may have serious implications in medical setting. Additionally, we observe that hallucinations in LaaJ setups can be mitigated by epistemic markers.

Molecular representation learning aims to capture chemically meaningful structures for various downstream tasks such as accurate molecular property prediction. However, incorporating functional group (FG) information into SMILES-based models remains challenging. The absence of explicit alignment between graph-defined FG atom sets and tokens in sequence prevents complete substructure masking, while multiple valid SMILES forms of the same molecule lead to inconsistent FG representations in token space. To address these challenges, we propose FACT (Functional Group Alignment and Consistency in Token Space), an end-to-end framework for structure-aware SMILES-based representation learning. FACT introduces an atom?token alignment module for complete FG span masking during pre-training and enforces FG consistency across different SMILES forms during fine-tuning. Experiments on MoleculeNet benchmarks show that FACT achieves state-of-the-art or competitive performance on eight tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of alignment and consistency learning for molecular representation.

Large Language Models such as GPT-4o and GPT-5 achieve strong zero-shot performance on biomedical claim verification, but cost and opacity limit scalable use. We fine-tune three small LLMs; Phi-3-mini (3.8B), Qwen2.5-3B, and Mistral-7B; via QLoRA on SciFact and HealthVer, providing the first study of QLoRA models against GPT-4o and fine-tuned BioLinkBERT encoders. Mistral-7B QLoRA achieves higher F1 than both GPT-4o and GPT-5 (up to 12% gain) at 44.5x lower cost using just 1,008 training examples, representing a compelling cost-quality trade-off. We conduct extensive in-domain and cross-domain evaluation: models trained on SciFact tested on HealthVer and vice versa, at matched sizes to isolate dataset structure from data quantity. We identify a previously unreported structural artifact in SciFact that inflates in-domain scores, and show through bidirectional out-of-domain evaluation that training on structurally sound data enables robust cross-domain transfer. We plan to release all code and adapter checkpoints.

Reliable biomedical and clinical retrieval requires more than strong ranking performance: it requires a practical way to find systematic model failures and curate the training evidence needed to correct them. Late-interaction models such as ColBERT provide a first solution thanks to the interpretable token-level interaction scores they expose between document and query tokens. Yet this interpretability is shallow: it explains a particular document–query pairwise score, but does not reveal whether the model has learned a clinical concept in a stable, reusable, and context-sensitive way across diverse expressions. As a result, these scores provide limited support for diagnosing misunderstandings, identifying irreasonably distant biomedical concepts, or deciding what additional data or feedback is needed to address this. In this short position paper, we propose Diagnosable ColBERT, a framework that aligns ColBERT token embeddings to a reference latent space grounded in clinical knowledge and expert-provided conceptual similarity constraints. This alignment turns document encodings into inspectable evidence of what the model appears to understand, enabling more direct error diagnosis and more principled data curation without relying on large batteries of diagnostic queries.

Much of our knowledge about anatomy and physiology is found in text format in research papers and medical textbooks. For an information system to have access to this knowledge, extracting and translating it into a computable format that can be stored in an ontology or knowledge graph is advantageous. Unfortunately, existing text mining corpora, which are needed to train and evaluate data mining models, are old and consist almost entirely of research papers, which rarely contain complete information needed to capture complex normal physiological processes and, subsequently, understand the pathophysiology of a disease. As a first step to filling in this gap, we have developed a guide for annotating medical textbooks for physiological events and entities involved in these events. In addition to providing our guidelines and describing the guideline development process, we analyze the coverage of normal physiology in existing ontologies.

Clinical Concept Normalization is essential for clinical research applications involving trial protocols, such as patient-trial matching. Existing approaches focus heavily on specific domains and need large, annotated datasets. To address these challenges, we propose CENT, a context engineering framework that combines semantic matching for candidate retrieval and Large Language Model (LLM) prompting for disambiguation. We applied CENT on a publicly available dataset of procedures normalized to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) concepts and evaluated the framework using both binary and hierarchical metrics that take into account hierarchical characteristics of predicted codes. CENT achieves superior performance on clinical procedures normalization in both binary and hierarchical metrics compared to semantic matching or LLM-only approaches, without requiring fine-tuning. Advanced prompt strategies, including Chain-of-Thought and Tree-of-Thoughts, achieve high performance at practical cost. We further applied CENT to predict codes in two clinical protocol-derived datasets to validate its performance on noisy procedure texts. CENT is scalable and adaptable for normalization across diverse clinical vocabularies in real-world clinical applications.

Clinical documentation places significant time demands on medical professionals, consumes institutional resources, and is prone to errors that may compromise patient care. Recent advances in LLMs offer promising approaches for automating clinical note generation; however, the impact of different AI architectural designs remains underexplored, particularly for agentic AI systems. This study compares three architectures — single-LLM, multi-agentic, and swarm-agentic — for automated SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) note generation from doctor–patient dialogues. All approaches employ QLoRA-finetuned Ministral 3 models (3B and 8B parameters) trained on the MedSynth dataset (Mianroodi et al., 2025), comprising 10,030 dialogue–note pairs across 2,006 ICD-10 code classes. Performance is evaluated using ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L, and BERTScore against a lexical-overlap baseline (dialogue vs. ground-truth SOAP, no inference). Results show that all finetuned models substantially outperform the baseline, while differences between architectural variants remain marginal. The single-LLM setup achieves the strongest performance across all metrics; 3B and 8B variants perform nearly identically on semantic similarity (BERTScore), while ROUGE differences are small but statistically significant. Qualitative inspection further reveals that residual differences across architectures are driven primarily by shared dataset priors rather than by architectural reasoning capacity. The results are based on synthetic data without human evaluation and reflect architectural behavior only.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) reduces hallucination in large language models by grounding outputs in retrieved evidence, but it does not guarantee that the resulting citations support the associated claims. We present VERICITE, a framework for evaluating citation faithfulness in retrieval-augmented medical QA. Our system retrieves PubMed abstracts via the NCBI E-Utilities API, prompts LLMs to generate answers with inline citations, and verifies each citation at the sentence level using a DeBERTa-v3-large NLI model. We evaluate four LLMs on 500 BioASQ questions at retrieval depths of 3 and 5, with extended experiments up to k = 15 and an oracle setting with gold standard documents. Only 27?41% of citation pairs are supported at the sentence level at retrieval depths of 3 and 5, with support rates declining further at larger k. Under the oracle condition, answer quality improves, but citation faithfulness does not substantially improve, suggesting that generation-side citation behavior contributes substantially to unfaithful citations.

This paper presents an overview of the Medical Decision Extraction, Analysis, and Classification task (MedExACT) of BioNLP 2026. The focus of this task is the extraction and labeling of medical decisions in ICU discharge summaries. The task is built on MedDec, a MIMIC-III-based dataset of 451 expert-annotated summaries, and asks systems to extract and classify spans of text that contain medical decisions according to the decision categories defined in the Decision Identification and Classification Taxonomy for Use in Medicine (DICTUM). The official ranking combines span F1 and token F1 with a worst-group robustness metric computed over sex, race, and English-proficiency subgroups. MedExACT attracted broad international interest, with 130 official submissions from 36 teams comprising about 60?100 participants, and has improved information extraction performance by nearly 15% over the previous state of the art. The submitted systems predominantly use long-context encoder models, ensemble decoding, boundary-refinement modules, and robustness-aware training or model selection, with the best submitted run reaching a final fairness-based F1 of 0.596.

Biomedical abstracts play a critical role in downstream NLP applications, such as information retrieval, biocuration, and biomedical knowledge discovery. However, a non-trivial number of biomedical articles do not have abstracts, diminishing the utility of these articles for downstream tasks. We propose DPR-BAG (Divide, Prompt, and Refine for Biomedical Abstract Generation), a training-free, zero-shot framework that generates coherent and factually grounded abstracts for biomedical articles with full text but no abstract. DPR-BAG decomposes full-text documents into structured rhetorical facets following the Background-Objective-Methods-Results-Conclusions (BOMRC) schema, performs parallel LLM-based summarization for each facet, and applies a final refinement stage to restore global discourse coherence. On PMC-MAD, a distribution-aligned dataset of 46,309 biomedical articles, DPR-BAG improves abstractive novelty over strong extractive and fine-tuned baselines, while maintaining factual consistency. Our ablation study reveals a counterintuitive finding: increasing prompt complexity or explicitly injecting entity-level guidance can degrade factual alignment, highlighting the importance of controlled prompting strategies. These findings underscore the potential of training-free, structure-aware frameworks for scalable biomedical abstract generation in low-resource settings. Our data and code are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/pmc-mad/PMC-MAD and https://github.com/ScienceNLP-Lab/MultiTagger-v2/tree/main/DPR-BAG.

Despite advances in information extraction driven by deep learning and large language models, performance gaps remain in highly specialized biomedical fields, where domain-specific complexity poses challenges for generalist models.In this work, we focus on the domain of autoimmunity where the main entities of interest are autoimmune diseases, autoantibodies (i.e. molecules that may mark or cause these diseases), their molecular targets, their location in the body, and the associated clinical signs. Herein, we present AAbAAC (AutoAntibodies and Autoimmunity Annotated Corpus), a corpus of 115 abstracts selected from PubMed that we manually annotated for those entities and their relationships. First, AAbAAC was used to evaluate several methods on the task of named entity recognition (NER), and second, to fine-tune NER models. Our study demonstrates the utility of AAbAAC for information extraction in the domain of autoimmunity, showing expected improvement in NER performance after fine-tuning. This illustrates the value of small-scale annotation efforts for specialized domains and contributes to the computational study of autoimmunity. The AAbAAC corpus is available at: https://github.com/f-maury/AAbAAC .

Biomedical named entity recognition (NER) and entity linking (EL) strongly depend on annotated corpora, but the utility of these resources for benchmarking is often assumed rather than characterized. We present a corpus-centric framework for diagnosing benchmark-relevant properties directly from corpus annotations, concept links, train-test splits, document metadata, and terminology mappings. The framework organizes standardized statistics into five families: (1) scale, density and label distribution, (2) lexical and conceptual structure, (3) train-test overlap, (4) metadata composition, and (5) terminology coverage where applicable. Applying the framework to nine corpora spanning diseases, chemicals, and cell types, we find that corpus properties can differ substantially, even when they address the same apparent task. We find differences in the evaluation signal they provide, the generalization demands they impose, the degree of train?test reuse they permit, and the regions of biomedical literature and concept space they represent. These differences suggest that commonly reported corpus statistics can be insufficient to characterize what biomedical NER and EL benchmarks evaluate. We argue that corpus-centric diagnostics provide a practical framework for analyzing corpora beyond surface descriptors such as corpus size and entity type, for identifying potential transfer risks, and for interpreting the scope of benchmarking conclusions. We release the framework as open-source code with an interactive dashboard to support reproducing our analyses and characterizing additional corpora.

Hallucinations in biomedical question answering are hard to define and compare because the literature uses overlapping and inconsistent terms. There is currently no grounded definition set that works for biomedical QA, with real examples from open-source LLMs. We introduce a layered definition of hallucinations for biomedical QA, hierarchically structured from the overarching idea of Hallucination in relation to generated model content, to source and consistency orientations, and finally to subtypes. We ground our definition taxonomy in source-attributed literature definitions and reproducible examples from REMOVED FOR REVIEW, where cases can be traced to the question, source passage, generated answer, and annotation record. We provide a framework with annotation, comparison, and error analysis to provide a clearer reference for evidence-grounded biomedical QA. We aim for this example-grounded taxonomy to support automated detection of hallucinations and their potential harmfulness.

Systematic reviews underpin evidence-based medicine but can outdate quickly when new evidence appears. We formulate a novel prediction task: given a review and new studies that have appeared since its publication, predict whether the review’s conclusions will change. A dataset of 3,326 Cochrane review-update pairs is constructed and a range of approaches explored including feature-based baselines, zero and few-shot LLMs, in addition to parameter efficient fine-tuning. Fine-tuning Qwen2.5 14B achieves the highest AUC-ROC (70.4%).

Systematic reviews are fundamental to evidence-based medicine, but the clinical evidence they contain is primarily expressed in unstructured text, making large-scale extraction and reuse difficult. Existing biomedical NLP methods have achieved strong performance on span-level extraction from clinical trials and abstracts; however, these approaches are insufficient for systematic reviews, where evidence is often distributed across multiple studies, sentences, and sections and must be aggregated into normalized document-level attributes. We introduce VaxScope, a benchmark dataset for document-level structured evidence extraction from immunization-related systematic reviews. VaxScope is constructed through an expert-guided semi-automatic annotation pipeline that combines automatic candidate generation with domain expert validation to ensure consistency and annotation quality. We formalize the task as document-level structured extraction, where target labels are defined at the review level and require aggregating evidence beyond isolated textual spans. We further establish baselines for document-level structured extraction using abstract-level input representations and evaluate how access to evidence-grounded contextual input improves performance over abstract-only settings. Baseline experiments show that PubMedBERT achieves the best overall performance (Avg F1: 0.850), with evidence-grounded input improving performance particularly for fields requiring distributed contextual reasoning.

The variation in writing style encapsulates nuanced characteristics, which are often exploited for author or demographic identification. In the medical domain, language models are frequently deployed to capture relevant information from unstructured or complex data, such as clinical notes that often include patients’ medical histories. Such data is largely free-form and unstructured, obtained through diverse clinician?patient interactions. In this work, we present a case study investigating whether variations in clinicians’ writing styles can lead to differences in medical context understanding capabilities for pre-trained language models (PLMs) on downstream tasks, such as medical event classification. Our findings indicate that variation in writing style, characterized by linguistic features, can indeed lead to suboptimal performance in deployed systems. Furthermore, we explore linguistic guided counterfactual reasoning in order to mitigate the impact of writing style variation which suggests LLM-based stylistic normalization to be effective for this purpose.

The exponential growth of biomedical literature has made manual curation of biological interaction networks increasingly difficult. Existing automated biological interaction extraction systems address the scaling challenge but treat extraction as a final step, delivering structured output with limited or no integrated support for biologists to interactively verify, correct and contextually interrogate extracted interactions against their source evidence within the same environment. We present Knowledge-Assisted Literature Mining for Biological Interaction Analysis (KALIMBA), an end-to-end, human-in-the-loop platform that integrates three complementary extraction methods (NLP-only, LLM-only, and hybrid) alongside expert annotation and evidence-grounded conversational querying through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) chat module driven by a dual-context prompt, within a single unified workflow. Evaluation on a corpus of 40 signaling-focused papers demonstrates that the LLM-only back-end recovers substantially more interactions than the NLP-only approach. RAG chat evaluation by a domain expert confirms that the conversational module provides scientifically grounded responses that support curation decisions beyond what the structured interaction table alone conveys.

Medical question answering is a high-stakes setting where factual errors can have serious consequences. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely viewed as a promising solution, and prior work has reported substantial gains for large medical QA models. We revisit this assumption across a broad range of open-weight instruction-tuned models spanning 7B to 72B parameters. Across five models, ten biomedical QA datasets, four retrieval methods, and four retrieval corpora, we find that retrieval yields only small and inconsistent improvements over a no-retrieval baseline, typically within 1–2 points. In contrast, the choice of backbone model has a much larger effect than the choice of retriever or corpus, and expert and layman retrieval sources perform similarly in most settings. These results suggest that the main bottleneck is not retrieval quality alone, but the model’s limited ability to use retrieved evidence effectively.

LLM-based drug–drug interaction (DDI) assessment remains difficult to audit when predictions are not explicitly tied to evidence. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves grounding, predictions are not guaranteed to be entailed by retrieved items. We present CrossDDI, a verification-first framework that separates LLM-based evidence extraction from deterministic, LLM-free arbitration over DrugBank and PubMed, requiring positive predictions to be linked to explicit supporting evidence. Evaluated on 1,000 DDInter 2.0 pairs under a positive–unlabeled setting, CrossDDI achieves recall of 0.576–0.593 over confirmed positives with interaction prediction rates comparable to RAG, while reducing cross-backbone variation (0.018 vs. 0.066). Analysis identifies literature evidence acquisition and attribution as the primary bottleneck: PubMed retrieval covers only 40.5% of confirmed positives, and Path B-only evidence is substantially less reliable than structured evidence. These results suggest that verification-first architectures can improve traceability and backbone consistency, while broader and more reliable literature evidence is needed to extend coverage beyond structured sources.

Even in the era of large language models (LLMs), biomedical relation extraction (RE) still plays a major role in timely creation of knowledge graphs that further guide biomedical knowledge discovery. The main task in RE is to extract a relation “as expressed” in an input text. At times, crucial definitional information or other auxiliary information about the entities involved may be missing from the input text. Augmenting it from other external textual sources appears helpful on the surface but can be harmful too, as these sources can overwhelm the signal in the original input, leading to false positives or false negatives. To counter this, we leverage a pre-trained biomedical text retriever to augment original inputs with additional instance-specific snippets. This is done through a gating mechanism that allows the retrieved snippets to enhance but not overwhelm the signal from the original input. We evaluate our approach on three standard biomedical relation extraction datasets (CDR, BioRED, and ChemProt) and show consistent improvements (up to 10 F1 points) compared with strong supervised baselines involving both encoder and decoder models. All our code and the datasets used are available for reuse: \url{https://github.com/bionlproc/GRAFT-RE}.

We present an overview of PsyDefDetect, the shared task on detecting levels of psychological defense mechanisms in emotional support dialogues, co-located with BioNLP@ACL 2026. Grounded in the clinically validated Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS) framework, the task asks systems to classify a target seeker utterance, given its preceding dialogue context, into one of nine categories: seven hierarchical DMRS levels plus two auxiliary labels. Participants worked on PsyDefConv, a newly released corpus of 200 dialogues and 2336 help-seeker utterances annotated under DMRS with substantial inter-annotator agreement. The task attracted 172 participants on CodaBench who produced 563 submissions, with 21 teams officially registering their results for the final ranking. The best system achieved a macro F1-score of 0.420, surpassing the strongest fine-tuned baseline reported in the dataset paper by a notable margin, yet leaving clear headroom. Our analysis highlights (i) a persistent tendency to over-predict the majority High-Adaptive class, (ii) a widening gap between accuracy and macro-F1 that reveals class-imbalance sensitivity, and (iii) the value of theory-aware and LLM-based approaches for fine-grained defensive-function classification. We release all task materials and invite the community to continue work on this novel intersection of clinical psychology and NLP.

Systematic reviews of clinical trials require analysts to extract attributes that are rarely stored as ready-made columns. For example, the drug class of an immunotherapy named in a regimen, the additional agents combined with it, or whether a listed endpoint is a primary or secondary outcome. These attributes must be inferred from the visible content of other fields through normalization, classification, or structured extraction, and existing approaches such as direct LLM prompting, text-to-SQL, and agentic pipelines leave this reasoning implicit in a single generation step or pay a heavy execution cost for limited accuracy gains. We propose SCOPE (Structured Clinical hybrid Planning for Evidence retrieval in clinical trials), a multi-LLM planner-based framework that decomposes the task into row selection, structured planning, and execution. The planner makes the source field, reasoning rules, and output constraints explicit before answer generation, reducing ambiguity relative to direct prompting. We evaluate SCOPE on 1,500 hybrid reasoning questions over oncology clinical-trial tables against zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, TableGPT2, BlendSQL, and EHRAgent. Results show that explicit multi-LLM planning improves accuracy for reasoning-based questions while offering a stronger accuracy-efficiency tradeoff than heavier agentic baselines. Our findings position clinical trial reasoning as a distinct table understanding problem and highlight hybrid planner-based decomposition as an effective solution.

Visual-language models (VLMs) are rapidly advancing on tasks that require visual understanding of text, tables, plots, and diagrams. Yet extracting structured information from text-heavy scientific diagrams remains challenging, as it requires not only OCR but also recovery of layout, grouping, and flow relationships. We study this problem in the context of CONSORT flow diagrams, which summarize participant screening, randomization, follow-up, and analysis in randomized controlled trials. We introduce a 200-example benchmark of PubMed Central diagrams, annotated by a biomedical team specializing in systematic literature reviews and clinical evidence extraction, and evaluate schema-constrained CONSORT extraction across proprietary and open-weight model families. Using structure-aware metrics, we compare single-pass and stepwise extraction strategies. Expert-guided single-pass extraction performs best for proprietary frontier models, with Gemini 3 Pro achieving the strongest overall results, whereas stepwise prompting improves less capable open-weight models on challenging arm-level extraction. These results offer practical deployment guidance and suggest that high-quality schema-constrained extraction is feasible, but not yet solved.

Tabular data is widely used in important areas such as healthcare and finance, but building accurate models in real-world settings faces three main challenges: protecting data privacy, handling distributed data, and maintaining strong performance. Existing methods do not solve these issues together. Converting tabular data into text for Large Language Models (LLMs) can expose sensitive information, struggle with anonymized features and exact numerical values, and require expensive training while often not outperforming traditional tree-based models. In addition, many real-world datasets are spread across different institutions, making centralized training impossible. We propose a federated framework that connects distributed tabular data with LLM reasoning using decision tree rules as privacy-preserving intermediaries. Each client trains a local Random Forest and shares only extracted rules?feature comparisons and thresholds, without revealing raw data. These rules are combined into a global pool, allowing an LLM to generate a better partitioning rule without accessing any original data, adding an extra layer of privacy. Using this rule, each client learns local gradient-based corrections, which are then aggregated. We also show that this process reduces prediction error. Experiments on 12 datasets, including seven medical tasks, show that our method consistently outperforms federated baselines and achieves results close to centralized models.

We introduce MedBench, a benchmark for evaluating medical language models as deliberating agents rather than isolated predictors. MedBench evaluates eight models (4B?32B) on 19,625 questions from six medical QA datasets using Consensus-Aware Model Panel (CAMP), a two-tier protocol in which five 4B?8B models answer independently, revise after observing peer reasoning, and escalate persistent disagreements to larger 20B?32B models. Compared with zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought baselines, CAMP shows that deliberation is not uniformly accuracy-improving, but reveals interaction-driven behaviors hidden by single-model evaluation. On PubMedQA without external context, the 4B?8B panel outperforms the evaluated 20B?32B individual zero-shot models (54.1% vs. 33.9%), and achieves the best evaluated result with context (75.7%), suggesting that structured interaction can sometimes complement scale. Across five datasets, initial inter-model agreement is positively associated with correctness and serves as a useful difficulty signal. However, on MedXpertQA, unanimous agreement yields only 6.6% accuracy despite 14.4% overall accuracy, suggesting correlated ignorance, where shared biases make consensus misleading. Error analysis shows that most failures are debate-insufficient cases, where incorrect majorities persist despite interaction (93?97%), while debate-harmful cases account for 3?7%. MedBench positions deliberative evaluation as a complement to accuracy-centric benchmarking, measuring when model interaction corrects errors, reinforces shared mistakes, or signals the need for stronger evidence and human review.

dbt mimic omop is a free, open-source resource that converts the MIMIC-IV dataset to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) format on consumer level hardware. CDM approaches are increasingly adopted in both industry and academia due to the need for interoperability and reproducibility, including in clinical NLP tasks such as cohort selection, information extraction, and retrieval-augmented generation. The MIMIC-IV database is among the most widely used critical care research datasets, yet existing pipelines to transform it to OMOP depend on enterprise database infrastructure and complex orchestration, limiting accessibility for practitioners and resource-constrained researchers. We further integrate free-text clinical notes (195.6M clinical annotations) and chest radiographs into the OMOP note nlp and imaging extension tables, making all MIMIC-IV modalities (structured data, free-text, and imaging) accessible through a common data model. This resource generates a more comprehensive dataset than existing alternatives and is intended to be used to aid in system development, testing, and evaluation.

The rapid expansion of biomedical literature makes manual identification of novel drug-disease relationships increasingly difficult. Existing approaches have leveraged LLMs to mine abstracts or construct knowledge graphs for drug repurposing. There are two key limitations: finite context windows for capturing macro-level research trends, and single-pass black-box pipelines make it difficult to verify outputs. This paper proposes a pipeline for discovering new drug targets by combining disease and drug research trends using Large Language Models (LLMs). Our method extracts PICO components from PubMed abstracts, normalizing the Population and Intervention Component to ICD and ATC codes, respectively. A temporal frequency delta matrix is constructed to capture publication count shifts across 2013 to 2022, then used to discover novel drug areas. Compared with the abstract-based baseline, our approach showed qualitative signs of generating combinations that were more closely aligned with observed research trends and, in some cases, more clinically plausible. These findings suggest the potential usefulness of structured trend information for LLM-based exploration, although the differences between the two methods were limited and the results remain preliminary. Future work will focus on validating the consistency and reliability of these candidates.

Family health history (FHx) offers insight into a person’s health and disease risk, but it is largely held within free-text clinical formats that require processing for maximal utility of the data. The rapid deployment of ambient AI scribes and conversational agents in clinical settings necessitates evaluation on dynamic patient-clinician and patient-agent dialogs. To address this gap, we introduce two new datasets of patient FHx dialog documents designed to benchmark information extraction and entity linking. Distinct from clinician-entered datasets, patient-reported dialog data has its own semantic and content characteristics, which need to be studied for more patient-centered healthcare. We contribute a publicly available resource called FHexchange, with new annotations for family members, clinical observations, related entities, and standardized UMLS CUIs, offering the clinical NLP community a robust evaluation bed for emerging generative AI tools.

Dementia detection from spontaneous speech offers a scalable approach to cognitive screening, yet NLP systems remain predominantly English-centric. This limitation is especially acute in the Philippines, where Filipino?English code-switching is pervasive and no prior work has addressed NLP-based dementia detection.We present the first systematic evaluation of transformer-based dementia detection in Filipino speech and the first assessment of NeoBERT in a clinical NLP setting. To separate language from domain effects, we construct a parallel bilingual dataset of 4,000 DementiaBank-derived transcripts, with Filipino translations produced manually to preserve discourse-level markers of cognitive decline. We evaluate five model families, TF-IDF + LogReg, BERT, NeoBERT, XLM-R, and RoBERTa-Tagalog, under monolingual, zero-shot cross-lingual, and bilingual fine-tuning settings. We find that in-domain performance does not transfer across languages, with English-trained BERT dropping to Macro-F1 = 0.455 on Filipino, and that architectural modernization alone does not improve robustness. Bilingual fine-tuning, however, eliminates cross-lingual degradation across all transformer models, converging to Macro-F1 = 0.969–0.973. These results suggest that multilingual clinical NLP performance is driven primarily by linguistic coverage during training rather than model scale or architecture.

We present IndicMedDialog, a parallel multi-turn medical dialogue dataset spanning English and nine Indic languages (Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Marathi, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu). The dataset extends the MDDial corpus with LLM-generated synthetic consultations, translated using TranslateGemma, verified by native speakers, and refined through a script-aware post-processing pipeline to correct phonetic, lexical, and character-spacing errors introduced during automatic translation. Building on this dataset, we fine-tune IndicMedLM via parameter-efficient adaptation (LoRA) of a quantized small language model, incorporating an optional patient pre-context to personalise multi-turn symptom elicitation. We evaluate IndicMedLM against zero-shot multilingual baselines across ten languages and conduct systematic error analysis, identifying five failure modes: Instruction Drift, Label Collapse, Cross-Domain Confusion, Tokenization Failure, and Paraphrase-over-Label Generation. Results show strong post-processed diagnostic accuracy in Hindi, Marathi, and Bengali, while Assamese, Tamil, and Telugu remain in an extreme failure tier attributable to base-model tokenizer gaps, a finding with direct patient safety implications. Medical expert evaluation confirms the clinical plausibility and safety of the generated consultations.

Three-dimensional Computed Tomography (3D CT) is a cornerstone of precision medicine. Most AI diagnostic models analyze large num bers of CTslices uniformly, treating all slices as equally important. While this has partly accel erated radiologists’workflows, it overlooks that clinically relevant information is often sparsely distributed throughout a volume. Without tar geted or weighted processing, fine-grained cues may be missed and substantial computation wasted on diagnostically uninformative slices. Wepropose aradiologist-simulating framework for selective and efficient 3D CT interpreta tion. Evaluated on a 3D CT dataset covering eight thoracic lesion types, it was compared with state-of-the-art multimodal large language models such as GPT-4o and supervised visual backbones including ViT and ResNet-50. Us ing accuracy, F1-score, AUC, and blind radiolo gist assessment, Screen-CLIP achieved an AUC of 0.87 and F1-score of 0.82, surpassing ViT Base (AUC: 0.84). For report generation, our method outperformed M3D across all metrics, reaching a BLEU-Avg of 29.03, and achieved the highest average Doctors’ Score (6.16/10) in a preliminary human evaluation.

Biomedical language models can generate overly confident clinical statements despite incomplete or ambiguous evidence. We study whether linguistic uncertainty (the hedged epistemic stance expressed in phrases such as “consistent with” or “cannot exclude”) is encoded in model representations and can be controlled without retraining. Across six biomedical language models spanning two architectures (causal decoders and bidirectional encoders), we show that uncertainty is captured by robust low-dimensional linear structure in hidden states. We then apply activation steering to manipulate this representation directly, increasing hedged generation in decoder models and inducing targeted uncertainty related shifts in encoder representations. Together, these results show that epistemic stance is not merely a surface linguistic phenomenon but an interpretable and controllable feature of biomedical language model representations, with implications for safer and more calibrated clinical text generation.

We study how simple linguistic features relate to reader preferences in medical question answering. Our dataset contains answers to medical questions ranked in order of quality. We examine eight interpretable features of the answer text: length in words, average words per sentence, percentage of polysyllabic words, medical named entity density, perplexity, coherence, and dependency distance. We find substantial variation across annotators in both the strength and direction of these relationships. Answer length shows some of the strongest associations and predictive signals, but preferences are not consistent across annotators, with some favoring longer answers and others favoring shorter ones. A leave-one-out ablation study shows the relative impact on the predictive accuracy of our models. Overall, these results suggest that linguistic form can influence reader preference in medical text, but that these effects vary across readers and may be more complex than simple linear correlations.

This paper presents an overview of the MedGenVidQA 2026 shared task on medical video question answering, collocated with the 25th BioNLP workshop at ACL 2026. The shared task addressed three related sub-tasks of the medical multimodal (textual and video) question answering: (i) multimodal retrieval tasks, (ii) multimodal answer generation with citations, and (iii) a visual answer localization task. The key theme of the stated task is to develop reliable multimodal question answering systems for consumers and medical professionals by leveraging generative models. A total of nine teams participated in the shared task challenges and submitted a total of forty-three submissions across all tasks. We performed both automated and human assessments to evaluate the submissions. This paper describes the tasks, datasets, evaluation metrics, participation, and baseline systems for all three tasks. Additionally, we summarize the techniques and results of the evaluation of the various approaches explored by the participating teams. Finally, we discuss the key findings and implications for the development of multimodal medical question answering.

This paper presents an overview of the ClinicalSkillQA 2026 shared task, which was organized with the BioNLP Workshop at ACL 2026. The goal of this shared task is to evaluate continuous perception and procedural reasoning in clinical skill assessment by requiring systems to reconstruct the correct temporal order of shuffled clinical key frames and generate rationales grounded in clinical workflow knowledge. The benchmark contains 200 test-only instances sampled from clinical skill videos, covering three emergency-care procedures. Each instance is annotated with the ground-truth temporal order and an expert-verified rationale. A total of seven teams participated in the task, collectively making 90 submissions, with four teams providing system description papers. Systems are evaluated using Task Accuracy, Pairwise Accuracy, and BERTScore, which measure exact sequence reconstruction, local temporal consistency, and rationale quality, respectively. In this paper, we describe the task setup, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria. We further summarize the methodologies adopted by participating teams and present a comprehensive analysis of the submitted systems. The official results suggest that current models still struggle with continuous perception and procedural reasoning, especially when they must integrate visual evidence, temporal structure, and clinical workflow knowledge.

This paper describes our participation in the CRF Filling Shared Task 2026, which aims to automatically populate a predefined Case Report Form (CRF) from clinical notes describing patients with dyspnea.We propose a two-stage pipeline based on large language models (LLMs). In the first stage, a few-shot prompted LLM extracts candidate CRF fields from the clinical note and outputs them in a structured JSON format. In the second stage, a separate LLM verifies each extracted field against the original note and removes predictions that are not supported by explicit textual evidence. This verification step aims to reduce false positives generated during extraction.Experiments on the development set show that the verification stage significantly reduces unsupported predictions while preserving most correct extractions, resulting in improved macro F1. On the official test set, the proposed system achieves a macro F1 score of 0.56 for both English and Italian. These results indicate that separating extraction and verification can balance recall-oriented extraction with precision-oriented validation in CRF population tasks.

This work addresses the temporal ordering task of clinical frames in the Basic Life Support (BLS) subset of ClinSkillQA. A two-stage hybrid pipeline based on Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct in a zero-shot configuration is proposed. In Stage 1, each image is processed independently to extract factual visual evidence, which is then transformed, using deterministic rules, into a structured representation. In Stage 2, ordering is formulated as an ordinal scoring task over procedural stages, with ties broken using PCA applied to multimodal embeddings. Evaluation followed the official benchmark protocol, considering Task Accuracy, Pairwise Accuracy, and BERTScore. In the test phase, the system achieved Task Accuracy = 0.17, Pairwise Micro Accuracy = 0.60, and BERT F1 = 0.71, with complete coverage in both predictions and rationales. The results demonstrate an interpretable and reproducible foundation, although challenges in fine-grained temporal discrimination remain.

Detecting DMRS defense levels in emotionalsupport dialogues is challenging due to severe class imbalance and fine-grained clinical distinctions between adjacent levels, issueswell documented in psychotherapy-orientedNLP surveys (Na et al., 2025). We presentzzucs for PsyDefDetect at BioNLP 2026 (Naet al., 2026a), adopting a data–supervisionco-design strategy. SCCR applies stratifiedresampling to balance support across nine defense levels. CoR–QLoRA encodes clinical rubrics, including task contracts, taxonomy definitions, and boundary cues, into staticprompts for 8B model fine-tuning. Ablationsshow SCCR improves macro-F1 by 4.9 pointsover random oversampling. Our system fromteam zzucs, submitted on CodaBench underthe display name sly_zzu with submission ID652647, achieves 0.3585 macro-F1 on the official blind-test leaderboard LB1. It ranks6th of 21 registered teams with official submissions and surpasses all published 8B baselines by 4.4 F1 points over the strongest 8Bcomparator, Ministral-8B. The code has beenreleased at https://github.com/jackssdd/zzucs_psydefdetect_code.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)show strong medical visual understanding,however their capability for continuous per-ception in procedural clinical workflows re-mains underexplored. We present Perceive-and-Plan, a decomposed in-context learningparadigm for clinical skill keyframe reorder-ing. The method separates visual perceptionfrom temporal planning via two stages: (1)structured visual perception with saliency-guided Picture-in-Picture (PiP) compositionthat magnifies critical regions (head, chest)as color-coded insets, and (2) temporal rea-soning with chain-style self-verification viafresh conversation reset and visual-evidenceanchoring (BLS Rules R1-R11). Withoutparameter updates, our system scores 71.43overall (2nd place, ClinSkill QA 2026), with0.86 pairwise accuracy and 1.0 rationale cover-age. Structured prompting with visual saliencyguidance measurably improves MLLMs’ pro-cedural understanding.Our code is pub-lished at https://github.com/NanceTide/clinskillqa-perceive-and-plan.

The ClinSkill QA shared task requires models to recover the temporal order of scrambled clinical keyframes and generate explanations. We propose EvidenceFlow, a structured zero-shot framework based on Qwen2.5-VL that decomposes the task into global overview, local evidence modeling, and ordering decision, with two variants: model-led EvidenceFlow-M and rule-guided EvidenceFlow-R. On the official test set, EvidenceFlow-R achieves better ordering performance, while EvidenceFlow-M produces better explanation quality, revealing a trade-off between ordering stability and rationale generation. EvidenceFlow provides an interpretable zero-shot baseline for clinical keyframe ordering.

This paper describes our system for classifying psychological defense mechanisms in emotional support dialogues using the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS), placing second (F1 0.406) among 64 teams.1 A central insight is that defense mechanisms are defined by what is absent: missing affect, blocked cognition, denied reality. We encode this as an affect-cognition integration spectrum in prompt-level clinical rules, which account for the largest single gain (+11.4pp F1).Our architecture is a multi-phase deliberative council of Gemini 2.5 agents where class-specific advocates rate evidence strength rather than voting, achieving F1 0.382 with no fine-tuning - a top-5 result on its own. We find, however, that the council is confidently wrong about minority classes: 59–80% of stable minority predictions are incorrect, driven by a systematic “L7 attractor” in which emotional content defaults to the majority class. A targeted override ensemble from three fine-tuned Qwen3.5 models applies 16 overrides (+2.4pp), selected by a structured multi-agent system (builder, critic, regression guard) that produced a larger F1 gain in one iteration than 8 prior attempts combined.

We build an ensemble of 10 transformer encoders for the MedExACT 2026 shared task on medical decision span detection. The ensemble is diversified along three training directions: encoder initialization (including domain-adaptive pre-training on clinical text), loss function, and data augmentation with LLM-generated synthetic notes and silver-labeled clinical documents. Greedy forward search selects the combination with the highest validation final score. A BERT-based boundary refiner is applied to the ensemble’s predicted spans to correct offset errors before submission.

We describe the Eraserhead system submitted to the PsyDefDetect shared task at BioNLP 2026, which frames psychological defense level detection as a nine-class utterance classification problem over supportive dialogue. Our system is based on Qwen3-14B and combines clinically informed prompt design, per-label oversampling, and careful inference settings for stable prediction. A central challenge of the task is strong class imbalance, with High-Adaptive responses appearing far more often than several minority classes. This makes it easy for models to favor the majority class and achieve reasonable accuracy while performing poorly on rarer categories. To address this, we iteratively adjusted oversampling targets based on error analysis and predicted label distributions across submission rounds. Our final system achieved an official macro F1 of 0.3418 on Leaderboard 1 and 0.3947 on Leaderboard 2, ranking 7th among the 21 registered teams on both leaderboards. We further analyze the main failure modes of the system, especially the difficulty of distinguishing Minor Image Distorting defenses from High-Adaptive responses and the persistent tendency to over-predict the majority class. These findings highlight the broader difficulty of modeling psychological function from text alone.

Detecting levels of psychological defence mechanisms in supportive conversations is inherently ambiguous. In the PsyDefDetect shared task at BioNLP 2026 the eight positive defence categories share surface language and differ only in pragmatic function and trained raters reach only moderate inter-annotator agreement. On such a task the decisive lever is not a stronger single model but error independence, since any single representation will waver on the overlapping defence boundaries. We translate this insight into a 9-voter ensemble spanning three orthogonal axes: class granularity (all nine classes for the gatekeeper, only the eight defence classes for the specialists), training method (generative and discriminative) and base model. The system reaches an F1 score of .420 on the hidden test set, placing first among 21 registered teams.

We describe our system for the PsyDefDetect shared task at BioNLP 2026, which focuses onclassifying help-seeker utterances in multi-turn supportive conversations into nine psychological defense mechanism levels defined by the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS). Our approach fine-tunes roberta-base using a composite training objective that combines focal loss, label smoothing, and squareroot dampened class weights to address the severe label imbalance present in the PSYDEFCONV corpus, where the dominant class constitutes 52% of the training data. The inputrepresentation is constructed by concatenating up to eight dialogue turns with role-specific tags, separated using RoBERTa’s native /s tokens, followed by the target utterance marked using a [TARGET] token. Model selection is performed using macro-F1 based early stopping on a stratified 15% validation split, along with cosine learning rate decay for stable optimization. Our best submission achieves an official Leaderboard 1 (positive classes) macroF1 score of 0.2556, ranking 11th among 21 registered teams.

Extracting medical decisions from discharge summaries is essential for downstream clinical analytics, yet the task remains challenging due to the heterogeneous structure of electronic health records. For the MedExACT track at ACL 2026, we proposed a system that achieved the 4th position. Our approach first applies dynamic section conditioning to capture the contextual dependencies inherent in each document. A transformer backbone is then augmented with category- and section-aware layer mixing, enabling us to fuse global document structure with fine-grained semantic cues. To further improve robustness, we employ an ensemble of instruction-tuned large language models for automatic section extraction, while a fairness-oriented model selection criterion ensures that performance does not degrade on minority demographic subgroups. The resulting system attains a final score of 0.5806 on the held-out test set and demonstrates significant gains over the baseline across all evaluated subpopulations.

Psychological defense mechanisms (PDMs) are unconscious cognitive processes that modulate how individuals perceive and respond to emotional distress. Automatically classifying PDMs from text is clinically valuable but severely hindered by data scarcity and class imbalance, challenges which generative augmentation alone cannot resolve without psychological grounding. In this work, we address these challenges in the PsyDefDetect shared task (BioNLP@ACL 2026) by proposing a context-aware synthetic augmentation framework combined with a hybrid classification model. Our hybrid model integrates contextual language representations with basic clinical features, along with 150 annotated defense items. Experiments demonstrate that definition quality in prompting directly governs generation fidelity and downstream performance. Our method surpasses DMRS Co-Pilot, reaching an accuracy of 58.26% (+40.25%) and a macro-F1 of 24.62% (+15.99%), thereby establishing a strong baseline for psychologically grounded defense mechanism classification in low-resource settings. Source code is available at: https://github.com/htdgv/CASA-PDC.

This paper describes our system for the MedEx-ACT 2026 shared task on extracting and classifying medical decisions from ICU discharge summaries. We frame the task as BIO token classification and train 25 diverse transformer models spanning 13 distinct architectures, including Longformer, DeBERTa, RoBERTa, BioBERT, SciBERT, and others. Each model is trained with category-aware oversampling, focal loss, and demographic-group-aware sampling to address class imbalance and promote fairness across patient subgroups. At inference time, we aggregate predictions via text-normalized majority voting, retaining spans agreed upon by at least 6 of 25 models. Our best submission achieves a final score of 0.5554 on the test set, demonstrating that a simple vote-based ensemble over architecturally diverse models outperforms more complex filtering approaches. We find that architectural diversity is a key driver of ensemble quality and that cross-validation is essential for reliable model selection on small clinical datasets.