% Use this file for citations not found in the ACL Anthology (contained in "anthology.bib").

@book{Aho:72,
    author  = {Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman},
    title   = {The Theory of Parsing, Translation and Compiling},
    year    = "1972",
    volume  = "1",
    publisher = {Prentice-Hall},
    address = {Englewood Cliffs, NJ}
}

@book{APA:83,
    author  = {{American Psychological Association}},
    title   = {Publications Manual},
    year    = "1983",
    publisher = {American Psychological Association},
    address = {Washington, DC}
}

@article{Chandra:81,
	author = {Ashok K. Chandra and Dexter C. Kozen and Larry J. Stockmeyer},
	year = "1981",
	title = {Alternation},
	journal = {Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery},
	volume = "28",
	number = "1",
	pages = "114--133",
	doi = "10.1145/322234.322243",
}

@inproceedings{andrew2007scalable,
  title={Scalable training of {L1}-regularized log-linear models},
  author={Andrew, Galen and Gao, Jianfeng},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning},
  pages={33--40},
  year={2007},
}

@book{Gusfield:97,
    author  = {Dan Gusfield},
    title   = {Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences},
    year    = "1997",
    publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
    address = {Cambridge, UK}
}

@article{rasooli-tetrault-2015,
    author    = {Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli and Joel R. Tetreault},
    title     = {Yara Parser: {A} Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser},
    journal   = {Computing Research Repository},
    volume    = {arXiv:1503.06733},
    year      = {2015},
    url       = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06733},
    note    = {version 2}
}

@article{Ando2005,
	Acmid = {1194905},
	Author = {Ando, Rie Kubota and Zhang, Tong},
	Issn = {1532-4435},
	Issue_Date = {12/1/2005},
	Journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
	Month = dec,
	Numpages = {37},
	Pages = {1817--1853},
	Publisher = {JMLR.org},
	Title = {A Framework for Learning Predictive Structures from Multiple Tasks and Unlabeled Data},
	Volume = {6},
	Year = {2005}
}

@article{Laban2022SummaCRN,
  title={SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization},
  author={Philippe Laban and Tobias Schnabel and Paul N. Bennett and Marti A. Hearst},
  journal={Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics},
  year={2022},
  volume={10},
  pages={163-177}
}

@inproceedings{zha-etal-2023-alignscore,
    title = "{A}lign{S}core: Evaluating Factual Consistency with A Unified Alignment Function",
    author = "Zha, Yuheng  and
      Yang, Yichi  and
      Li, Ruichen  and
      Hu, Zhiting",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2023",
    address = "Toronto, Canada",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.634",
    pages = "11328--11348",
    abstract = "Many text generation applications require the generated text to be factually consistent with input information. Automatic evaluation of factual consistency is challenging. Previous work has developed various metrics that often depend on specific functions, such as natural language inference (NLI) or question answering (QA), trained on limited data. Those metrics thus can hardly assess diverse factual inconsistencies (e.g., contradictions, hallucinations) that occur in varying inputs/outputs (e.g., sentences, documents) from different tasks. In this paper, we propose AlignScore, a new holistic metric that applies to a variety of factual inconsistency scenarios as above. AlignScore is based on a general function of information alignment between two arbitrary text pieces. Crucially, we develop a unified training framework of the alignment function by integrating a large diversity of data sources, resulting in 4.7M training examples from 7 well-established tasks (NLI, QA, paraphrasing, fact verification, information retrieval, semantic similarity, and summarization). We conduct extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks including 22 evaluation datasets, where 19 of the datasets were never seen in the alignment training. AlignScore achieves substantial improvement over a wide range of previous metrics. Moreover, AlignScore (355M parameters) matches or even outperforms metrics based on ChatGPT and GPT-4 that are orders of magnitude larger.",
}

@InProceedings{N18-1101,
  author = "Williams, Adina
            and Nangia, Nikita
            and Bowman, Samuel",
  title = "A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for
           Sentence Understanding through Inference",
  booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of
               the North American Chapter of the
               Association for Computational Linguistics:
               Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long
               Papers)",
  year = "2018",
  publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
  pages = "1112--1122",
  location = "New Orleans, Louisiana",
  url = "http://aclweb.org/anthology/N18-1101"
}

@inproceedings{
he2021deberta,
title={DEBERTA: DECODING-ENHANCED BERT WITH DISENTANGLED ATTENTION},
author={Pengcheng He and Xiaodong Liu and Jianfeng Gao and Weizhu Chen},
booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2021},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=XPZIaotutsD}
}

@article{gpt4,
  title={GPT-4 Technical Report},
  author={OpenAI},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2023},
  volume={abs/2303.08774},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257532815}
}

@inproceedings{gpt3,
 author = {Brown, Tom and Mann, Benjamin and Ryder, Nick and Subbiah, Melanie and Kaplan, Jared D and Dhariwal, Prafulla and Neelakantan, Arvind and Shyam, Pranav and Sastry, Girish and Askell, Amanda and Agarwal, Sandhini and Herbert-Voss, Ariel and Krueger, Gretchen and Henighan, Tom and Child, Rewon and Ramesh, Aditya and Ziegler, Daniel and Wu, Jeffrey and Winter, Clemens and Hesse, Chris and Chen, Mark and Sigler, Eric and Litwin, Mateusz and Gray, Scott and Chess, Benjamin and Clark, Jack and Berner, Christopher and McCandlish, Sam and Radford, Alec and Sutskever, Ilya and Amodei, Dario},
 booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
 editor = {H. Larochelle and M. Ranzato and R. Hadsell and M.F. Balcan and H. Lin},
 pages = {1877--1901},
 publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},
 title = {Language Models are Few-Shot Learners},
 url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf},
 volume = {33},
 year = {2020}
}

@InProceedings{mickus-EtAl:2024:SemEval2024,
author = {Mickus, Timothee and Zosa, Elaine and Vázquez, Raúl and Vahtola, Teemu and Tiedemann, Jörg and Segonne, Vincent and Raganato, Alessandro and Apidianaki, Marianna},
title = {SemEval-2024 Shared Task 6: SHROOM, a Shared-task on Hallucinations and Related Observable Overgeneration Mistakes},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024)},
month = {June},
year = {2024},
address = {Mexico City, Mexico},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
pages = {1980--1994},
abstract = {This paper presents the results of the SHROOM, a shared task focused on detecting hallucinations: outputs from natural language generation (NLG) systems that are fluent, yet inaccurate. Such cases of overgeneration put in jeopardy many NLG applications, where correctness is often mission-critical. The shared task was conducted with a newly constructed dataset of 4000 model outputs labeled by 5 annotators each, spanning 3 NLP tasks: machine translation, paraphrase generation and definition modeling. The shared task was tackled by a total of 58 different users grouped in 42 teams, out of which 27 elected to write a system description paper; collectively, they submitted over 300 prediction sets on both tracks of the shared task. We observe a number of key trends in how this approach was tackled—many participants rely on a handful of model, and ofte! n rely either on synthetic data for fine-tuning or zero-shot prompting strategies. While a majority of the teams did outperform our proposed baseline system, the performances of top-scoring systems are still consistent with a random handling of the more challenging items.},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2024.semeval2024-1.270} [aclanthology.org]
}