Giulia D’Agostino


2025

pdf bib
Extracting a Prototypical Argumentative Pattern in Financial Q&As
Giulia D’Agostino | Michiel Van Der Meer | Chris Reed
Proceedings of the 2025 CLASP Conference on Language models And RePresentations (LARP)

Argumentative patterns are recurrent strategies adopted to pursue a definite communicative goal in a discussion. For instance, in Q&A exchanges during financial conference calls, a pattern called Request of Confirmation of Inference (ROCOI) helps streamline conversations by requesting explicit verification of inferences drawn from a statement.Our work presents two ROCOI extraction approaches from interrogative units: sequence labeling and text-to-text generation. We experiment with multiple models for each task formulation to explore which models can effectively and robustly perform pattern extraction. Results indicate that machine-based ROCOI extraction is an achievable task, though variation among metrics that are designed for different evaluation dimensions makes obtaining a clear picture difficult. We find that overall, ROCOI extraction is performed best via sequence labeling, though with ample room for improvement. We encourage future work to extend the study to new argumentative patterns.

2024

pdf bib
Capturing Analysts’ Questioning Strategies in Earnings Calls via a Question Cornering Score (QCS)
Giulia D’Agostino | Andrea Rocci | Chris Reed
Proceedings of the Eighth Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing and the 1st Agent AI for Scenario Planning

pdf bib
Segmentation of Complex Question Turns for Argument Mining: A Corpus-based Study in the Financial Domain
Giulia D’Agostino | Chris A. Reed | Daniele Puccinelli
Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)

Within the financial communication domain, Earnings Conference Calls (ECCs) play a pivotal role in tracing (a) the presentational strategies and trust-building devices used by company representatives and (b) the relevant hot-topics for stakeholders, from which they form an (e)valuation of the company. Due to their formally regulated nature, ECCs are a favoured domain for the study of argumentation in context and the extraction of Argumentative Discourse Units (ADUs). However, the idiosyncratic structure of dialogical exchanges in Q&A sessions of ECCs, particularly at the level of question formulation, challenges existing models of argument mining, which assume adjacency of related question and answer turns in the dialogue. Maximal Interrogative Units (MIUs) are a novel approach to grouping together topically contiguous argumentative components within a question turn. MIU identification allows application of existing argument mining techniques to a less noisy unit of text, following removal of discourse regulators and splitting into sub-units of thematically related text. Evaluation of an automated method for MIU recognition is also presented with respect to gold-standard manual annotation.