How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations
Midori Tatsumi, Takako Aikawa, Kentaro Yamamoto, Hitoshi Isahara
Abstract
This paper is a partial report of a research effort on evaluating the effect of crowd-sourced post-editing. We first discuss the emerging trend of crowd-sourced post-editing of machine translation output, along with its benefits and drawbacks. Second, we describe the pilot study we have conducted on a platform that facilitates crowd-sourced post-editing. Finally, we provide our plans for further studies to have more insight on how effective crowd-sourced post-editing is.- Anthology ID:
- 2012.amta-wptp.8
- Volume:
- Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice
- Month:
- October 28
- Year:
- 2012
- Address:
- San Diego, California, USA
- Editors:
- Sharon O'Brien, Michel Simard, Lucia Specia
- Venue:
- AMTA
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- Association for Machine Translation in the Americas
- Note:
- Pages:
- Language:
- URL:
- https://aclanthology.org/2012.amta-wptp.8
- DOI:
- Cite (ACL):
- Midori Tatsumi, Takako Aikawa, Kentaro Yamamoto, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2012. How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations. In Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice, San Diego, California, USA. Association for Machine Translation in the Americas.
- Cite (Informal):
- How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations (Tatsumi et al., AMTA 2012)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/proper-vol2-ingestion/2012.amta-wptp.8.pdf