Output format is often an unreported factor in LLM evaluations for structured NLP tasks such as Slot Filling or Named Entity Recognition. This work proposes to explore the impact of the output structured format generated by LLMs. We show that measured performance and reliability depend on the requested format (JSON, XML or inline Key-Values). A study is performed across four SLU and three NER benchmarks and considering 13 instruction-tuned open-weight LLMs, using standardized and open-source prompts and parsers. This format-specific evaluation reveals statistically significant swings of 2-46 F1 points depending on model and dataset. Additionally, we propose a lightweight selection procedure to determine the best format per model-dataset combination using only a small development slice; thus reducing trial-and-error in practice.

Knowledge Graph construction from natural language requires extracting structured triplets from complex, information-dense sentences. In this paper, we investigate if the decomposition of text into atomic propositions (minimal, semantically autonomous units of information) can improve the triplet extraction. We introduce MPropositionneur-V2, a small multilingual model covering six European languages trained by knowledge distillation from Qwen3-32B into a Qwen3-0.6B architecture, and we evaluate its integration into two extraction paradigms: entity-centric (GLiREL) and generative (Qwen3). Experiments on SMiLER, FewRel, DocRED and CaRB show that atomic propositions benefit weaker extractors (GLiREL, CoreNLP, 0.6B models), improving relation recall and, in the multilingual setting, overall accuracy. For stronger LLMs, a fallback combination strategy recovers entity recall losses while preserving the gains in relation extraction. These results show that atomic propositions are an interpretable intermediate data structure that complements extractors without replacing them.

Diversity has been gaining interest in the NLP community in recent years. At the same time, state-of-the-art transformer models such as ModernBERT use very large pre-training datasets, which are driven by size rather than by diversity. This summons to investigate theimpact of diversity on pre-training. We do so in this study, with the express intent of reducing pre-training dataset size, while retaining atleast comparable performance. We compare diversity-driven sampling algorithms, and we use the best one to pre-train several ModernBERT models on French with a fixed compute budget. We fine-tune and evaluate them on a variety of French benchmarks. We compare them with models pre-trained on randomly sampled data of commensurate size, with the same compute budget. We find that both random and diversity-driven sampling may reduce the pre-training dataset by up to 94% and the pre-training time by up to 73% while maintaining performance. Moreover, in some tasks, the inherent quality of models, estimated via head-only fine-tuning, is up to 10 points higher with diversity sampling than with random sampling.