We describe work on enhancing the performance of transformer-based encoder-decoder models for OCR post-correction on modern and historical Icelandic texts, where OCRed data are scarce. We trained six models, four from scratch and two fine-tuned versions of Google’s ByT5, on a combination of real data and texts populated with artificially generated errors. Our results show that the models trained from scratch, as opposed to the fine-tuned versions, benefited the most from the addition of artificially generated errors.

Word embedding models have become commonplace in a wide range of NLP applications. In order to train and use the best possible models, accurate evaluation is needed. For extrinsic evaluation of word embedding models, analogy evaluation sets have been shown to be a good quality estimator. We introduce an Icelandic adaptation of a large analogy dataset, BATS, evaluate it on three different word embedding models and show that our evaluation set is apt at measuring the capabilities of such models.