The opaque nature of neural networks, often described as black boxes, poses significant challenges in understanding their learning mechanisms, which limit our ability to fully optimize and trust these models.Inspired by how humans learn, this paper proposes a novel neural network training strategy that employs multitask learning with progressive difficulty subtasks, which we believe can potentially shed light on the internal learning mechanisms of neural networks.We implemented this strategy across a range of NLP tasks, data sets, and neural network architectures and observed notable improvements in model performance.This suggests that neural networks may be able to extract common features and internalize shared representations across similar subtasks that differ in their difficulty.Analyzing this strategy could lead us to more interpretable and robust neural networks, enhancing both their performance and our understanding of their nature.

In this study, we explore the performance oflarge language models (LLMs) using differ-ent prompt engineering approaches in the con-text of legal text classification. Prior researchhas demonstrated that various prompting tech-niques can improve the performance of a di-verse array of tasks done by LLMs. However,in this research, we observe that professionaldocuments, and in particular legal documents,pose unique challenges for LLMs. We experi-ment with several LLMs and various promptingtechniques, including zero/few-shot prompting,prompt ensembling, chain-of-thought, and ac-tivation fine-tuning and compare the perfor-mance on legal datasets. Although the newgeneration of LLMs and prompt optimizationtechniques have been shown to improve gener-ation and understanding of generic tasks, ourfindings suggest that such improvements maynot readily transfer to other domains. Specifi-cally, experiments indicate that not all prompt-ing approaches and models are well-suited forthe legal domain which involves complexitiessuch as long documents and domain-specificlanguage.