Abstract
During the 2016 United States presidential election, politicians have increasingly used Twitter to express their beliefs, stances on current political issues, and reactions concerning national and international events. Given the limited length of tweets and the scrutiny politicians face for what they choose or neglect to say, they must craft and time their tweets carefully. The content and delivery of these tweets is therefore highly indicative of a politician’s stances. We present a weakly supervised method for extracting how issues are framed and temporal activity patterns on Twitter for popular politicians and issues of the 2016 election. These behavioral components are combined into a global model which collectively infers the most likely stance and agreement patterns among politicians, with respective accuracies of 86.44% and 84.6% on average.- Anthology ID:
- C16-1279
- Volume:
- Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers
- Month:
- December
- Year:
- 2016
- Address:
- Osaka, Japan
- Editors:
- Yuji Matsumoto, Rashmi Prasad
- Venue:
- COLING
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee
- Note:
- Pages:
- 2966–2977
- Language:
- URL:
- https://aclanthology.org/C16-1279
- DOI:
- Cite (ACL):
- Kristen Johnson and Dan Goldwasser. 2016. “All I know about politics is what I read in Twitter”: Weakly Supervised Models for Extracting Politicians’ Stances From Twitter. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pages 2966–2977, Osaka, Japan. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee.
- Cite (Informal):
- “All I know about politics is what I read in Twitter”: Weakly Supervised Models for Extracting Politicians’ Stances From Twitter (Johnson & Goldwasser, COLING 2016)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/nschneid-patch-4/C16-1279.pdf