@inproceedings{augenstein-2021-determining,
    title = "Determining the Credibility of Science Communication",
    author = "Augenstein, Isabelle",
    editor = "Beltagy, Iz  and
      Cohan, Arman  and
      Feigenblat, Guy  and
      Freitag, Dayne  and
      Ghosal, Tirthankar  and
      Hall, Keith  and
      Herrmannova, Drahomira  and
      Knoth, Petr  and
      Lo, Kyle  and
      Mayr, Philipp  and
      Patton, Robert M.  and
      Shmueli-Scheuer, Michal  and
      de Waard, Anita  and
      Wang, Kuansan  and
      Wang, Lucy Lu",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing",
    month = jun,
    year = "2021",
    address = "Online",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.sdp-1.1",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1",
    pages = "1--6",
    abstract = "Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible {--} e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.",
}