Abstract
《水浒传》是独著还是合著,施耐庵和罗贯中是何关系一直存在争议。本文将其作者争议粗略归纳为施耐庵作、罗贯中作、施作罗续、罗作他续、施作罗改五种情况,以罗贯中的《平妖传》为参照,用假设检验、文本聚类、文本分类、波动风格计量等方法,结合对文本内容的分析,考察《水浒传》的写作风格,试图为其作者身份认定提供参考。结果显示,只有罗作他续的可能性大,即前70回为罗贯中所作,后由他人续写,其他四种情况可能性都较小。- Anthology ID:
- 2020.ccl-1.5
- Volume:
- Proceedings of the 19th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics
- Month:
- October
- Year:
- 2020
- Address:
- Haikou, China
- Editors:
- Maosong Sun (孙茂松), Sujian Li (李素建), Yue Zhang (张岳), Yang Liu (刘洋)
- Venue:
- CCL
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- Chinese Information Processing Society of China
- Note:
- Pages:
- 43–53
- Language:
- Chinese
- URL:
- https://aclanthology.org/2020.ccl-1.5
- DOI:
- Cite (ACL):
- Li Song and Ying Liu. 2020. 用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of “Tales of the Marshes”: Comparing with “Pingyaozhuan” of Luo Guanzhong). In Proceedings of the 19th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 43–53, Haikou, China. Chinese Information Processing Society of China.
- Cite (Informal):
- 用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of “Tales of the Marshes”: Comparing with “Pingyaozhuan” of Luo Guanzhong) (Song & Liu, CCL 2020)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/nschneid-patch-4/2020.ccl-1.5.pdf