BLEU is Not Suitable for the Evaluation of Text Simplification

Elior Sulem, Omri Abend, Ari Rappoport


Abstract
BLEU is widely considered to be an informative metric for text-to-text generation, including Text Simplification (TS). TS includes both lexical and structural aspects. In this paper we show that BLEU is not suitable for the evaluation of sentence splitting, the major structural simplification operation. We manually compiled a sentence splitting gold standard corpus containing multiple structural paraphrases, and performed a correlation analysis with human judgments. We find low or no correlation between BLEU and the grammaticality and meaning preservation parameters where sentence splitting is involved. Moreover, BLEU often negatively correlates with simplicity, essentially penalizing simpler sentences.
Anthology ID:
D18-1081
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
October-November
Year:
2018
Address:
Brussels, Belgium
Editors:
Ellen Riloff, David Chiang, Julia Hockenmaier, Jun’ichi Tsujii
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
738–744
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/D18-1081
DOI:
10.18653/v1/D18-1081
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Elior Sulem, Omri Abend, and Ari Rappoport. 2018. BLEU is Not Suitable for the Evaluation of Text Simplification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 738–744, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
BLEU is Not Suitable for the Evaluation of Text Simplification (Sulem et al., EMNLP 2018)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/nschneid-patch-2/D18-1081.pdf
Attachment:
 D18-1081.Attachment.zip
Code
 eliorsulem/HSplit-corpus