An Empirical Analysis of Edit Importance between Document Versions

Tanya Goyal, Sachin Kelkar, Manas Agarwal, Jeenu Grover


Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel approach to infer significance of various textual edits to documents. An author may make several edits to a document; each edit varies in its impact to the content of the document. While some edits are surface changes and introduce negligible change, other edits may change the content/tone of the document significantly. In this paper, we perform an analysis on the human perceptions of edit importance while reviewing documents from one version to the next. We identify linguistic features that influence edit importance and model it in a regression based setting. We show that the predicted importance by our approach is highly correlated with the human perceived importance, established by a Mechanical Turk study.
Anthology ID:
D17-1295
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
September
Year:
2017
Address:
Copenhagen, Denmark
Editors:
Martha Palmer, Rebecca Hwa, Sebastian Riedel
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
2780–2784
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/D17-1295
DOI:
10.18653/v1/D17-1295
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Tanya Goyal, Sachin Kelkar, Manas Agarwal, and Jeenu Grover. 2017. An Empirical Analysis of Edit Importance between Document Versions. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2780–2784, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
An Empirical Analysis of Edit Importance between Document Versions (Goyal et al., EMNLP 2017)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/nschneid-patch-1/D17-1295.pdf