@inproceedings{supryadi-etal-2025-reprohum,
    title = "{R}epro{H}um {\#}0067-01: A Reproduction of the Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Summarization",
    author = "Supryadi  and
      Liu, Chuang  and
      Xiong, Deyi",
    editor = "Arviv, Ofir  and
      Clinciu, Miruna  and
      Dhole, Kaustubh  and
      Dror, Rotem  and
      Gehrmann, Sebastian  and
      Habba, Eliya  and
      Itzhak, Itay  and
      Mille, Simon  and
      Perlitz, Yotam  and
      Santus, Enrico  and
      Sedoc, Jo{\~a}o  and
      Shmueli Scheuer, Michal  and
      Stanovsky, Gabriel  and
      Tafjord, Oyvind",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM{\texttwosuperior})",
    month = jul,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Vienna, Austria and virtual meeting",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/nschneid-patch-1/2025.gem-1.56/",
    pages = "609--614",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-261-9",
    abstract = "Human evaluation is crucial as it offers a nuanced understanding that automated metrics often miss. By reproducing human evaluation, we can gain a better understanding of the original results. This paper is part of the ReproHum project, where our goal is to reproduce human evaluations from previous studies. We report the reproduction results of the human evaluation of cross-lingual summarization conducted by (CITATION). By comparing the original and reproduction studies, we find that our overall evaluation findings are largely consistent with those of the previous study. However, there are notable differences in evaluation scores between the two studies for certain model outputs. These discrepancies highlight the importance of carefully selecting evaluation methodologies and human annotators."
}