Comparing Two Basic Methods for Discriminating Between Similar Languages and Varieties
Pablo Gamallo, Iñaki Alegria, José Ramom Pichel, Manex Agirrezabal
Abstract
This article describes the systems submitted by the Citius_Ixa_Imaxin team to the Discriminating Similar Languages Shared Task 2016. The systems are based on two different strategies: classification with ranked dictionaries and Naive Bayes classifiers. The results of the evaluation show that ranking dictionaries are more sound and stable across different domains while basic bayesian models perform reasonably well on in-domain datasets, but their performance drops when they are applied on out-of-domain texts.- Anthology ID:
- W16-4822
- Volume:
- Proceedings of the Third Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (VarDial3)
- Month:
- December
- Year:
- 2016
- Address:
- Osaka, Japan
- Venue:
- VarDial
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee
- Note:
- Pages:
- 170–177
- Language:
- URL:
- https://aclanthology.org/W16-4822
- DOI:
- Cite (ACL):
- Pablo Gamallo, Iñaki Alegria, José Ramom Pichel, and Manex Agirrezabal. 2016. Comparing Two Basic Methods for Discriminating Between Similar Languages and Varieties. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (VarDial3), pages 170–177, Osaka, Japan. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee.
- Cite (Informal):
- Comparing Two Basic Methods for Discriminating Between Similar Languages and Varieties (Gamallo et al., VarDial 2016)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/nodalida-main-page/W16-4822.pdf