@inproceedings{augenstein-2021-determining,
title = "Determining the Credibility of Science Communication",
author = "Augenstein, Isabelle",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing",
month = jun,
year = "2021",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.sdp-1.1",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1",
pages = "1--6",
abstract = "Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible {--} e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.",
}
Markdown (Informal)
[Determining the Credibility of Science Communication](https://aclanthology.org/2021.sdp-1.1) (Augenstein, sdp 2021)
ACL