Conflict scholars increasingly use computational tools to track violence and cooperation at a global scale. To study foreign locations, researchers often use machine translation (MT) tools, but rarely evaluate the quality of the MT output or its effects on Large Language Model (LLM) performance. Using a domain-specific multi-lingual parallel corpus, this study evaluates the quality of several MT tools for text in English, Arabic, and Spanish. Using ConfliBERT, a domain-specific LLM, the study evaluates the effect of MT texts on model performance, and finds that MT texts tend to yield better results than native texts. The MT quality assessment reveals considerable translation-induced distortions, reductions in vocabulary size and text specialization, and changes in syntactical structure. Regression analysis at the sentence-level reveals that such distortions, particularly reductions in general and domain vocabulary rarity, artificially boost LLM performance by simplifying the MT output. This finding cautions researchers and practitioners about uncritically relying on MT tools without considering MT-induced data loss.