Argumentative Fallacy Detection in Political Debates

Eva Cantín Larumbe, Adriana Chust Vendrell


Abstract
Building on recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP), this work addresses the task of fallacy detection in political debates using a multimodal approach combining text and audio, as well as text-only and audio-only approaches. Although the multimodal setup is novel, results show that text-based models consistently outperform both audio-only and multimodal models, confirming that textual information remains the most effective for this task. Transformer-based and few-shot architectures were used to detect fallacies. While fine-tuned language models demonstrate strong performance, challenges such as data imbalance, audio processing, and limited dataset size persist.
Anthology ID:
2025.argmining-1.36
Volume:
Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop
Month:
July
Year:
2025
Address:
Vienna, Austria
Editors:
Elena Chistova, Philipp Cimiano, Shohreh Haddadan, Gabriella Lapesa, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz
Venues:
ArgMining | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
369–373
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/mtsummit-25-ingestion/2025.argmining-1.36/
DOI:
10.18653/v1/2025.argmining-1.36
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Eva Cantín Larumbe and Adriana Chust Vendrell. 2025. Argumentative Fallacy Detection in Political Debates. In Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop, pages 369–373, Vienna, Austria. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Argumentative Fallacy Detection in Political Debates (Cantín Larumbe & Chust Vendrell, ArgMining 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/mtsummit-25-ingestion/2025.argmining-1.36.pdf