Puns, as a unique form of linguistic creativity, present significant challenges in cross-lingual translation, particularly between linguistically distant languages like Chinese and English, where it’s often considered a “mission impossible”. We introduce Pun2Pun, a novel benchmark for quantitatively evaluating pun translation between Chinese and English while preserving both linguistic mechanisms and humorous effects. We propose the adaptation of Constant-Variable Optimization (CVO) Model for translation strategy and concomitant Overlap (Ovl) metric for translation quality assessment. Our approach provides a robust quantitative evaluation framework to assess models’ complex linguistic and cultural reasoning capabilities in pun translation. Through extensive experiments on both textual and visual puns, we demonstrate that our translation strategy model significantly improves performance, particularly for better-performing models. Our findings reveal exciting potentials and current limitations of LLMs in preserving sophisticated humor across linguistic and cultural boundaries.

Decision-making tasks have highlighted fundamental challenges in grounding decisions within real-world contexts. Traditional decision knowledge utilization methods often struggle to effectively integrate structured decision constraints, limiting their ability to decompose high-level tasks, maintain logical consistency, and adapt to dynamic environments. To bridge this gap, we introduce StructuThink, a knowledge-structured reasoning framework that enhances LLM-based agents with explicit decision constraints. Specifically, we propose the Task Transition Knowledge Graph (TTKG) that learning decision knowledge in embodied scenarios. Leveraging this knowledge, we propose the StructuThink framework, comprising a subtask chain constructor for grounding natural language instructions and a constraint-based executor for adaptive and consistent decision-making. We validate StructuThink across multiple benchmarks, including ALFWorld and WebShop, where it achieves higher task success rates (improving by up to 7%) and more efficient action sequences (requiring up to 15% fewer steps) than baseline methods. Our approach enables LLMs to more effectively ground decision-making in domain-specific scenarios, enhancing both interpretability and reliability, thus paving the way for more reliable and adaptable decision-making systems.

Workflows play a crucial role in enhancing enterprise efficiency by orchestrating complex processes with multiple tools or components. However, hand-crafted workflow construction requires expert knowledge, presenting significant technical barriers. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved the generation of workflows from natural language instructions (aka NL2Workflow), yet existing single LLM agent-based methods face performance degradation on complex tasks due to the need for specialized knowledge and the strain of task-switching. To tackle these challenges, we propose WorkTeam, a multi-agent NL2Workflow framework comprising a supervisor, orchestrator, and filler agent, each with distinct roles that collaboratively enhance the conversion process. As there are currently no publicly available NL2Workflow benchmarks, we also introduce the HW-NL2Workflow dataset, which includes 3,695 real-world business samples for training and evaluation. Experimental results show that our approach significantly increases the success rate of workflow construction, providing a novel and effective solution for enterprise NL2Workflow services.