Yawen Duan


Fixing paper assignments

  1. Please select all papers that belong to the same person.
  2. Indicate below which author they should be assigned to.
Provide a valid ORCID iD here. This will be used to match future papers to this author.
Provide the name of the school or the university where the author has received or will receive their highest degree (e.g., Ph.D. institution for researchers, or current affiliation for students). This will be used to form the new author page ID, if needed.

TODO: "submit" and "cancel" buttons here


2025

pdf bib
Libra-Leaderboard: Towards Responsible AI through a Balanced Leaderboard of Safety and Capability
Haonan Li | Xudong Han | Zenan Zhai | Honglin Mu | Hao Wang | Zhenxuan Zhang | Yilin Geng | Shom Lin | Renxi Wang | Artem Shelmanov | Xiangyu Qi | Yuxia Wang | Donghai Hong | Youliang Yuan | Meng Chen | Haoqin Tu | Fajri Koto | Cong Zeng | Tatsuki Kuribayashi | Rishabh Bhardwaj | Bingchen Zhao | Yawen Duan | Yi Liu | Emad A. Alghamdi | Yaodong Yang | Yinpeng Dong | Soujanya Poria | Pengfei Liu | Zhengzhong Liu | Hector Xuguang Ren | Eduard Hovy | Iryna Gurevych | Preslav Nakov | Monojit Choudhury | Timothy Baldwin
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (System Demonstrations)

As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, leaderboards play a significant role in steering their development. Existing leaderboards often prioritize model capabilities while overlooking safety concerns, leaving a significant gap in responsible AI development. To address this gap, we introduce Libra-Leaderboard, a comprehensive framework designed to rank LLMs through a balanced evaluation of performance and safety. Combining a dynamic leaderboard with an interactive LLM arena, Libra-Leaderboard encourages the joint optimization of capability and safety. Unlike traditional approaches that average performance and safety metrics, Libra-Leaderboard uses a distance-to-optimal-score method to calculate the overall rankings. This approach incentivizes models to achieve a balance rather than excelling in one dimension at the expense of some other ones. In the first release, Libra-Leaderboard evaluates 26 mainstream LLMs from 14 leading organizations, identifying critical safety challenges even in state-of-the-art models.