This paper details experiments conducted for completing the GEM 2024 Data-to-Text task for a WebNLG dataset (Gardent et al., 2017). We show that model performance varies greatly across English, Spanish, Chinese, and Russian. Data filtering was done with automatic model judgments via error detection, which performs differently per language. We report English and Spanish dev set results for a data filtering and knowledge distillation approach to generating natural language outputs for sets of triples across a variety of domains. Specifically, we compare three generation conditions: 1) few-shot prompting with ChatGPT (GPT4), 2) fine-tuning LLama2 on the unfiltered dataset, and 3) fine-tuning Llama2 on a filtered version of the dataset. Russian and Chinese efforts did not result in submissions due to inconsistent or incoherent translations being produced in either the data synthesis or final generation stages. We provide details on these shortcomings but largely focus on Spanish and English efforts that align with our task submissions. We ultimately submitted outputs in English and Spanish that were generated using a version of Llama2 fine-tuned on a filtered dataset.