This is an internal, incomplete preview of a proposed change to the ACL Anthology.
For efficiency reasons, we don't generate MODS or Endnote formats, and the preview may be incomplete in other ways, or contain mistakes.
Do not treat this content as an official publication.
Serry TaiseerSibaee
Fixing paper assignments
Please select all papers that belong to the same person.
Indicate below which author they should be assigned to.
Arabic Large Language Models are usually evaluated using Western-centric benchmarks that overlook essential cultural contexts, making them less effective and culturally misaligned for Arabic-speaking communities. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the Arabic Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) Benchmark to assess its cultural alignment and relevance for Arabic Large Language Models (LLMs) across culturally sensitive topics. A team of eleven experts annotated over 2,500 questions, evaluating them based on fluency, adequacy, cultural appropriateness, bias detection, religious sensitivity, and adherence to social norms. Through human assessment, the study highlights significant cultural misalignments and biases, particularly in sensitive areas like religion and morality. In response to these findings, we propose annotation guidelines and integrate culturally enriched data sources to enhance the benchmark’s reliability and relevance. The research highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity in evaluating inclusive Arabic LLMs, fostering more widely accepted LLMs for Arabic-speaking communities.
This research delves into the issue of hallucination detection in Large Language Models (LLMs) using Arabic language datasets. As LLMs are increasingly being used in various applications, the phenomenon of hallucination, which refers to generating factually inaccurate content despite grammatical coherence, poses significant challenges. We participate in the OSACT 2024 Shared-task (Detection of Hallucination in Arabic Factual Claims Generated by ChatGPT and GPT4). We explore various approaches for detecting and mitigating hallucination, using models such as GPT-4, Mistral, and Gemini within a novel experimental framework. Our research findings reveal that the effectiveness of these models in classifying claims into Fact-Claim, Fact-Improvement, and Non-Fact categories varies greatly, underscoring the complexities of addressing hallucination in morphologically rich languages. The study emphasizes the need for advanced modelling and training strategies to enhance the reliability and factual accuracy of LLM-generated content, laying the groundwork for future explorations in mitigating hallucination risks. In our experiments we achieved a 0.54 F1 in GPT-4 LLM.