Richard Piepenbrock

Fixing paper assignments

  1. Please select all papers that belong to the same person.
  2. Indicate below which author they should be assigned to.
Provide a valid ORCID iD here. This will be used to match future papers to this author.
Provide the name of the school or the university where the author has received or will receive their highest degree (e.g., Ph.D. institution for researchers, or current affiliation for students). This will be used to form the new author page ID, if needed.

TODO: "submit" and "cancel" buttons here

2004

pdf bib
Linguistic Annotation of the Spoken Dutch Corpus: If We Had To Do It All Over Again
Ineke Schuurman | Wim Goedertier | Heleen Hoekstra | Nelleke Oostdijk | Richard Piepenbrock | Machteld Schouppe
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04)

After the successful completion of the Spoken Dutch Corpus (1998 -- 2003) the time is ripe to take some time to sit back and reflect on our achievements and the procedures underlying them in order to learn from our experiences. In this paper we will in particular pay attention to issues affecting the levels of linguistic annotation, but some more general issues deserve to be treated as well (bug reporting, consistency). We will try to come up with solutions, but sometimes we want to invite further discussion from other researchers.
Search
Co-authors
Venues
Fix data