We present CoGS-NLI, a Natural Language Inference (NLI) evaluation benchmark testing understanding of English phrasal constructions drawn from the Construction Grammar Schematicity (CoGS) corpus. This dataset of 1,500 NLI triples facilitates assessment of constructional understanding in a downstream inference task. We present an evaluation benchmark based on the performance of two language models, where we vary the number and kinds of examples given in the prompt, with and without chain-of-thought prompting. The best-performing model and prompt combination achieves a strong overall accuracy of .94 when provided in-context learning examples with the target phrasal constructions, whereas providing additional general NLI examples hurts performance. This evidences the value of resources explicitly capturing the semantics of phrasal constructions, while our qualitative analysis suggests caveats in assuming this performance indicates a deep understanding of constructional semantics.

We introduce UniversalCEFR, a large-scale multilingual multidimensional dataset of texts annotated according to the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference) scale in 13 languages. To enable open research in both automated readability and language proficiency assessment, UniversalCEFR comprises 505,807 CEFR-labeled texts curated from educational and learner-oriented resources, standardized into a unified data format to support consistent processing, analysis, and modeling across tasks and languages. To demonstrate its utility, we conduct benchmark experiments using three modelling paradigms: a) linguistic feature-based classification, b) fine-tuning pre-trained LLMs, and c) descriptor-based prompting of instruction-tuned LLMs. Our results further support using linguistic features and fine-tuning pretrained models in multilingual CEFR level assessment. Overall, UniversalCEFR aims to establish best practices in data distribution in language proficiency research by standardising dataset formats and promoting their accessibility to the global research community.

Misinformation detection remains today a challenging task for both annotators and computer systems. While there are many known markers of misinformation—e.g., logical fallacies, propaganda techniques, and improper use of sources—labeling these markers in practice has been shown to produce low agreement as it requires annotators to make several subjective judgments and rely on their own knowledge, external to the text, which may vary between annotators. In this work, we address these challenges with a collection of linguistically-inspired litmus tests. We annotate a schema of 25 logical fallacies, each of which is defined with rigorous tests applied during annotation. Our annotation methodology results in a comparatively high IAA on this task: Cohen’s kappa in the range .69-.86. We release a corpus of 12 documents from various domains annotated with fallacy labels. Additionally, we experiment with a large language model baseline showing that the largest, most advanced models struggle on this challenging task, achieving an F1-score with our gold standard of .08 when excluding non-fallacious examples, compared to human performance of .59-.73. However, we find that prompting methodologies requiring the model to work through our litmus tests improves performance. Our work contributes a robust fallacy annotation schema and annotated corpus, which advance capabilities in this critical research area.

We collect novel data in the public service domain to evaluate the capability of the state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) models in capturing regional differences in accents in the United Kingdom (UK), specifically focusing on two accents from Scotland with distinct dialects. This study addresses real-world problems where biased ASR models can lead to miscommunication in public services, disadvantaging individuals with regional accents particularly those in vulnerable populations. We first examine the out-of-the-box performance of the Whisper large-v3 model on a baseline dataset and our data. We then explore the impact of fine-tuning Whisper on the performance in the two UK regions and investigate the effectiveness of existing model evaluation techniques for our real-world application through manual inspection of model errors. We observe that the Whisper model has a higher word error rate (WER) on our test datasets compared to the baseline data and fine-tuning on a given data improves performance on the test dataset with the same domain and accent. The fine-tuned models also appear to show improved performance when applied to the test data outside of the region it was trained on suggesting that fine-tuned models may be transferable within parts of the UK. Our manual analysis of model outputs reveals the benefits and drawbacks of using WER as an evaluation metric and fine-tuning to adapt to regional dialects.