This paper presents a study of the linguistic knowledge and generalization capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing ontheir morphosyntactic competence. We design three diagnostic tasks: (i) labeling syntactic information at the sentence level - identifying subjects, objects, and indirect objects; (ii) derivational decomposition at the word level - identifying morpheme boundaries and labeling thedecomposed sequence; and (iii) in-depth study of morphological decomposition in German and Amharic. We evaluate prompting strategies in GPT-4o and LLaMA 3.3-70B to extract different types of linguistic structure for typologically diverse languages. Our results showthat GPT-4o consistently outperforms LLaMA in all tasks; however, both models exhibit limitations and show little evidence of abstract morphological rule learning. Importantly, we show strong evidence that the models fail to learn underlying morphological structures. Therefore,raising important doubts about their ability to generalize.

We present the findings of the WMT 2025 Shared Task LLMs with Limited Resources for Slavic Languages. This shared task focuses on training LLMs using limited data and compute resources for three Slavic languages: Upper Sorbian (hsb), Lower Sorbian (dsb), and Ukrainian (uk), with the objective to develop and improve LLMs for these languages. We consider two tasks which are to be evaluated jointly: Machine Translation (MT) and Multiple-Choice Question Answering (QA). In total, three teams participated in this shared task, with submissions from all three teams for the Sorbian languages and one submission for Ukrainian. All submissions led to an improvement compared to the baseline Qwen2.5-3B model through varying fine-tuning strategies. We note, however, that training purely on MT degrades original QA capabilities. We also report further analyses on the submissions, including MT evaluation using advanced neural metrics for Ukrainian, as well as manual annotation and comparison to the current Sorbian machine translator.

The role of subword segmentation in relation to capturing morphological patterns in LLMs is currently not well explored. Ideally, one would train models like GPT using various segmentations and evaluate how well word meanings are captured. Since this is not computationally feasible, we group words according to their segmentation properties and compare how well a model can solve a linguistic task for these groups. We study two criteria: (i) adherence to morpheme boundaries and (ii) the segmentation consistency of the different inflected forms of a lemma. We select word forms with high and low values for these criteria and carry out experiments on GPT-4o’s ability to capture verbal inflection for 10 languages. Our results indicate that in particular the criterion of segmentation consistency can help to predict the model’s ability to recognize and generate the lemma from an inflected form, providing evidence that subword segmentation is relevant.

We empirically study the ability of a Large Language Model (gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct) to understand morphologically complex words. In our experiments, we looked at a variety of tasks to analyse German compounds with regard to compositional word formation and derivation, such as identifying the head noun of existing and novel compounds, identifying the shared verb stem between two words, or recognizing words constructed with inappropriately used derivation morphemes as invalid. Our results show that the language model is generally capable of solving most tasks, except for the task of identifying ill-formed word forms. While the model demonstrated a good overall understanding of complex words and their word-internal structure, the results also suggest that there is no formal knowledge of derivational rules, but rather an interpretation of the observed word parts to derive the meaning of a word.

We study whether linguistic information in pre-trained multilingual language models can be accessed by human language: So far, there is no easy method to directly obtain linguistic information and gain insights into the linguistic principles encoded in such models. We use the technique of prompting and formulate linguistic tasks to test the LM’s access to explicit grammatical principles and study how effective this method is at providing access to linguistic features. Our experiments on German, Icelandic and Spanish show that some linguistic properties can in fact be accessed through prompting, whereas others are harder to capture.

This paper summarizes the results of our test suite evaluation with a main focus on morphology for the language pairs English to/from German. We look at the translation of morphologically complex words (DE–EN), and evaluatewhether English noun phrases are translated as compounds vs. phrases into German. Furthermore, we investigate the preservation of morphological features (gender in EN–DE pronoun translation and number in morpho-syntacticallycomplex structures for DE–EN). Our results indicate that systems are able to interpret linguistic structures to obtain relevant information, but also that translation becomes more challenging with increasing complexity, as seen, for example, when translating words with negation or non-concatenative properties, and for the morecomplex cases of the pronoun translation task.

We present the findings of the WMT2022Shared Tasks in Unsupervised MT and VeryLow Resource Supervised MT with experiments on the language pairs German to/fromUpper Sorbian, German to/from Lower Sorbian and Lower Sorbian to/from Upper Sorbian. Upper and Lower Sorbian are minoritylanguages spoken in the Eastern parts of Germany. There are active language communitiesworking on the preservation of the languageswho also made the data used in this Shared Taskavailable.In total, four teams participated on this SharedTask, with submissions from three teams for theunsupervised sub task, and submissions fromall four teams for the supervised sub task. Inthis overview paper, we present and discuss theresults.

This paper studies strategies to model word formation in NMT using rich linguistic information, namely a word segmentation approach that goes beyond splitting into substrings by considering fusional morphology. Our linguistically sound segmentation is combined with a method for target-side inflection to accommodate modeling word formation. The best system variants employ source-side morphological analysis and model complex target-side words, improving over a standard system.

Many errors in phrase-based SMT can be attributed to problems on three linguistic levels: morphological complexity in the target language, structural differences and lexical choice. We explore combinations of linguistically motivated approaches to address these problems in English-to-German SMT and show that they are complementary to one another, but also that the popular verbal pre-ordering can cause problems on the morphological and lexical level. A discriminative classifier can overcome these problems, in particular when enriching standard lexical features with features geared towards verbal inflection.

This paper presents a simple method for German compound splitting that combines a basic frequency-based approach with a form-to-lemma mapping to approximate morphological operations. With the exception of a small set of hand-crafted rules for modeling transitional elements, this approach is resource-poor. In our evaluation, the simple splitter outperforms a splitter relying on rich morphological resources.