Natural language processing applications are increasingly prevalent, but social biases in their outputs remain a critical challenge. While various bias evaluation methods have been proposed, these assessments show unexpected instability when input texts undergo minor stylistic changes. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of how different style transformations impact bias evaluation results across multiple language models and bias types using causal inference techniques. Our findings reveal that formality transformations significantly affect bias scores, with informal style showing substantial bias reductions (up to 8.33% in LLaMA-2-13B). We identify appearance bias, sexual orientation bias, and religious bias as most susceptible to style changes, with variations exceeding 20%. Larger models demonstrate greater sensitivity to stylistic variations, with bias measurements fluctuating up to 3.1% more than in smaller models. These results highlight critical limitations in current bias evaluation methods and emphasize the need for reliable and fair assessments of language models.

Analysing the differences in how events are represented across texts, or verifying whether the language model generations hallucinate, requires the ability to systematically compare their content. To support such comparison, structured representation that captures fine-grained information plays a vital role.In particular, identifying distinct atomic facts and the discourse relations connecting them enables deeper semantic comparison. Our proposed approach combines structured discourse information extraction with a classifier, FDSpotter, for factual consistency verification. We show that adversarial discourse relations pose challenges for language models, but fine-tuning on our annotated data, DiscInfer, achieves competitive performance. Our proposed approach advances factual consistency verification by grounding in linguistic structure and decomposing it into interpretable components. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on the evaluation of two tasks: data-to-text generation and text summarisation. Our code and dataset will be publicly available on GitHub.

Text-rich images are ubiquitous in real-world applications, serving as a critical medium for conveying complex information and facilitating accessibility.Despite recent advances driven by Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), existing benchmarks suffer from limited scale, fragmented scenarios, and evaluation protocols that fail to fully capture holistic image understanding.To address these gaps, we present TIU-Bench, a large-scale, multilingual benchmark comprising over 100,000 full-image annotations and 22,000 rigorously validated question-answer (QA) pairs that span 18 subtasks across diverse real-world scenarios.TIU-Bench introduces a novel full-image structured output format that jointly models geometric, textual, and relational information, enabling fine-grained evaluation of perception and reasoning capabilities. Furthermore, we propose a two-stage understanding framework named T2TIU, which first generates a structured representation of the entire image and subsequently conducts reasoning on this representation to address complex visual-textual queries.Extensive experiments on 10 state-of-the-art generative models highlight the challenges and opportunities in advancing text-rich image understanding.Our benchmark and framework provide a comprehensive platform for developing and evaluating next-generation multimodal AI systems.

While several previous studies have analyzed gender bias in research, we are still missing a comprehensive analysis of gender differences in the AI community, covering diverse topics and different development trends. Using the AI Scholar dataset of 78K researchers in the field of AI, we identify several gender differences: (1) Although female researchers tend to have fewer overall citations than males, this citation difference does not hold for all academic-age groups; (2) There exist large gender homophily in co-authorship on AI papers; (3) Female first-authored papers show distinct linguistic styles, such as longer text, more positive emotion words, and more catchy titles than male first-authored papers. Our analysis provides a window into the current demographic trends in our AI community, and encourages more gender equality and diversity in the future.

Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to infer complex semantic relations among entities in a document. Distant supervision (DS) is able to generate massive auto-labeled data, which can improve DocRE performance. Recent works leverage pseudo labels generated by the pre-denoising model to reduce noise in DS data. However, unreliable pseudo labels bring new noise, e.g., adding false pseudo labels and losing correct DS labels. Therefore, how to select effective pseudo labels to denoise DS data is still a challenge in document-level distant relation extraction. To tackle this issue, we introduce uncertainty estimation technology to determine whether pseudo labels can be trusted. In this work, we propose a Document-level distant Relation Extraction framework with Uncertainty Guided label denoising, UGDRE. Specifically, we propose a novel instance-level uncertainty estimation method, which measures the reliability of the pseudo labels with overlapping relations. By further considering the long-tail problem, we design dynamic uncertainty thresholds for different types of relations to filter high-uncertainty pseudo labels. We conduct experiments on two public datasets. Our framework outperforms strong baselines by 1.91 F1 and 2.28 Ign F1 on the RE-DocRED dataset.

Causal inference is becoming an increasingly important topic in deep learning, with the potential to help with critical deep learning problems such as model robustness, interpretability, and fairness. In addition, causality is naturally widely used in various disciplines of science, to discover causal relationships among variables and estimate causal effects of interest. In this tutorial, we introduce the fundamentals of causal discovery and causal effect estimation to the natural language processing (NLP) audience, provide an overview of causal perspectives to NLP problems, and aim to inspire novel approaches to NLP further. This tutorial is inclusive to a variety of audiences and is expected to facilitate the community’s developments in formulating and addressing new, important NLP problems in light of emerging causal principles and methodologies.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) predicts sentiment polarity towards a specific aspect in the given sentence. While pre-trained language models such as BERT have achieved great success, incorporating dynamic semantic changes into ABSA remains challenging. To this end, in this paper, we propose to address this problem by Dynamic Re-weighting BERT (DR-BERT), a novel method designed to learn dynamic aspect-oriented semantics for ABSA. Specifically, we first take the Stack-BERT layers as a primary encoder to grasp the overall semantic of the sentence and then fine-tune it by incorporating a lightweight Dynamic Re-weighting Adapter (DRA). Note that the DRA can pay close attention to a small region of the sentences at each step and re-weigh the vitally important words for better aspect-aware sentiment understanding. Finally, experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and the rationality of our proposed model and provide good interpretable insights for future semantic modeling.