Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a graph-based semantic representation that has been incorporated into numerous downstream tasks, in particular due to substantial efforts developing text-to-AMR parsing and AMR-to-text generation models. However, there still exists a large gap between fluent, natural sentences and texts generated from AMR-to-text generation models. Prompt-based Large Language Models (LLMs), on the other hand, have demonstrated an outstanding ability to produce fluent text in a variety of languages and domains. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which LLMs can improve the AMR-to-text generated output fluency post-hoc via prompt engineering. We conduct automatic and human evaluations of the results, and ultimately have mixed findings: LLM-generated paraphrases generally do not exhibit improvement in automatic evaluation, but outperform baseline texts according to our human evaluation. Thus, we provide a detailed error analysis of our results to investigate the complex nature of generating highly fluent text from semantic representations.