This is an internal, incomplete preview of a proposed change to the ACL Anthology.
For efficiency reasons, we don't generate MODS or Endnote formats, and the preview may be incomplete in other ways, or contain mistakes.
Do not treat this content as an official publication.
FedericoBorazio
Fixing paper assignments
Please select all papers that belong to the same person.
Indicate below which author they should be assigned to.
Grounded natural language understanding in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) requires integrating linguistic, visual, and world knowledge to ensure effective task execution. We propose an approach that enhances Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with a novel explicit dialogue planning phase, allowing robotic agents to systematically refine their understanding of ambiguous commands through structured clarification steps. This reduces hallucinations and improves task feasibility.To evaluate this approach, we introduce a novel dataset of over 1,100 annotated dialogues in English and Italian, designed for fine-tuning and assessing Multi-Modal models in HRI scenarios. Experimental results show that dialogue planning improves response accuracy and quality, and contributes to cross-lingual generalisation, enabling models trained in one language to transfer effectively to another. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of structured, goal-driven, and explicit dialogue planning in Multi-Modal LLMs for grounded interaction.
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has called for robust benchmarks to assess their abilities, track progress, and compare iterations. While existing benchmarks provide extensive evaluations across diverse tasks, they predominantly focus on English, leaving other languages underserved. For Italian, the EVALITA campaigns have provided a long-standing tradition of classification-focused shared tasks. However, their scope does not fully align with the nuanced evaluation required for modern LLMs. To address this gap, we introduce “Challenge the Abilities of LAnguage Models in ITAlian” (CALAMITA), a collaborative effort to create a dynamic and growing benchmark tailored to Italian. CALAMITA emphasizes diversity in task design to test a wide range of LLM capabilities through resources natively developed in Italian by the community. This initiative includes a shared platform, live leaderboard, and centralized evaluation framework. This paper outlines the collaborative process, initial challenges, and evaluation framework of CALAMITA.
This paper introduces a novel framework to harness Large Language Models (LLMs) for Epidemic Intelligence, focusing on identifying and categorizing emergent socio-political phenomena within health crises, with a spotlight on the COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach diverges from traditional methods, such as Topic Models, by providing explicit support to analysts through the identification of distinct thematic areas and the generation of clear, actionable statements for each topic. This supports a Zero-shot Classification mechanism, enabling effective matching of news articles to fine-grain topics without the need for model fine-tuning. The framework is designed to be as transparent as possible, producing linguistically informed insights to make the analysis more accessible to analysts who may not be familiar with every subject matter of inherently emerging phenomena. This process not only enhances the precision and relevance of the extracted Epidemic Intelligence but also fosters a collaborative environment where system linguistic abilities and the analyst’s domain expertise are integrated.