Emmanuelle Dietz


Fixing paper assignments

  1. Please select all papers that belong to the same person.
  2. Indicate below which author they should be assigned to.
Provide a valid ORCID iD here. This will be used to match future papers to this author.
Provide the name of the school or the university where the author has received or will receive their highest degree (e.g., Ph.D. institution for researchers, or current affiliation for students). This will be used to form the new author page ID, if needed.

TODO: "submit" and "cancel" buttons here


2025

pdf bib
Toward Reasonable Parrots: Why Large Language Models Should Argue with Us by Design
Elena Musi | Nadin Kökciyan | Khalid Al Khatib | Davide Ceolin | Emmanuelle Dietz | Klara Maximiliane Gutekunst | Annette Hautli-Janisz | Cristián Santibáñez | Jodi Schneider | Jonas Scholz | Cor Steging | Jacky Visser | Henning Wachsmuth
Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop

In this position paper, we advocate for the development of conversational technology that is inherently designed to support and facilitate argumentative processes. We argue that, at present, large language models (LLMs) are inadequate for this purpose, and we propose an ideal technology design aimed at enhancing argumentative skills. This involves re-framing LLMs as tools to exercise our critical thinking skills rather than replacing them. We introduce the concept of reasonable parrots that embody the fundamental principles of relevance, responsibility, and freedom, and that interact through argumentative dialogical moves. These principles and moves arise out of millennia of work in argumentation theory and should serve as the starting point for LLM-based technology that incorporates basic principles of argumentation.