Doug Arnold


Fixing paper assignments

  1. Please select all papers that belong to the same person.
  2. Indicate below which author they should be assigned to.
Provide a valid ORCID iD here. This will be used to match future papers to this author.
Provide the name of the school or the university where the author has received or will receive their highest degree (e.g., Ph.D. institution for researchers, or current affiliation for students). This will be used to form the new author page ID, if needed.

TODO: "submit" and "cancel" buttons here


1999

pdf bib
Web Access to Corpora: the W3Corpora Project
Doug Arnold
EACL 1999: Computer and Internet Supported Education in Language and Speech Technology

1996

pdf bib
TSNLP - Test Suites for Natural Language Processing
Sabine Lehmann | Stephan Oepen | Sylvie Regnier-Prost | Klaus Netter | Veronika Lux | Judith Klein | Kirsten Falkedal | Frederik Fouvry | Dominique Estival | Eva Dauphin | Herve Compagnion | Judith Baur | Lorna Balkan | Doug Arnold
COLING 1996 Volume 2: The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

1994

pdf bib
Test Suites for Natural Language Processing
Lorna Balkan | Doug Arnold | Siety Meije
Proceedings of Translating and the Computer 16

1993

pdf bib
Experiments in Reusability of Grammatical Resources
Doug Arnold | Toni Badia | Josef van Genabith | Stella Markantonatou | Stefan Momma | Louisa Sadler | Paul Schmidt
Sixth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

1992

pdf bib
Rationalism and the treatment of referential dependencies
Doug Arnold | Louisa Sadler
Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

pdf bib
A Constraint-Based Approach to Translating Anaphoric Dependencies
Louisa Sadler | Doug Arnold
COLING 1992 Volume 2: The 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

1991

pdf bib
EUROTRA: an assessment of the current state of the EC’s MT programme Machine Translation Seen as Interactive Multilingual Text Generation
Doug Arnold | Louisa Sadler
Proceedings of Translating and the Computer 13: The theory and practice of machine translation – a marriage of convenience?

1989

pdf bib
An Approach to Sentence-Level Anaphora in Machine Translation
Gertjan van Noord | Joke Dorrepaal | Doug Arnold | Steven Krauwer | Louisa Sadler | Louis des Tombe
Fourth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

1988

pdf bib
‘Relaxed’ compositionality in machine translation
Doug Arnold | Steven Krauwer | Louis des Tombe | Louisa Sadler
Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

1987

pdf bib
A Model for Preference
Dominique Petitpierre | Steven Krauwer | Louis des Tombe | Doug Arnold | Giovanni B. Varile
Third Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

1985

bib
A MUl View of the <C,A>, T Framework in EUROTRA
Doug Arnold | Lieven Jaspaert | Rod Johnson | Steven Krauwer | Mike Rosner | Louis des Tombe | Nino Varile | Susan Warwick
Proceedings of the first Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

bib
A Preliminary Linguistic Framework for EUROTRA, June 1985
Louis des Tombe | Doug Arnold | Lieven Jaspaert | Rod Johnson | Steven Krauwer | Mike Rosner | Nino Varile | Susan Warwick
Proceedings of the first Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages

1984

pdf bib
Robust processing in machine translation
Doug Arnold | Rod Johnson
Proceedings of the International Conference on Methodology and Techniques of Machine Translation: Processing from words to language

We attempt to develop a general theory of robust processing for natural language, and especially Machine Translation purposes. That is, a general characterization of methods by which processes can be made resistant to malfunctioning of various kinds. We distinguish three sources of malfunction: (a) deviant inputs, (b) deviant outputs, and (c) deviant pairings of input and output, and describe the assumptions that guide our discussion (sections 1 and 2). We classify existing approaches to (a)and (b)-robustness, noting that not only do such approaches fail to provide a solution to (c)-type problems, but that the natural consequence of these solutions is to make (c)-type malfunctions harder to detect (section 3) In the final section (4) we outline possible solutions to (c)-type malfunctions.

pdf bib
Robust Processing in Machine Translation
Doug Arnold | Rod Johnson
10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics