Dans cet article, nous nous intéressons à l’indexation de documents de domaines de spécialité par l’intermédiaire de leurs termes-clés. Plus particulièrement, nous nous intéressons à l’indexation telle qu’elle est réalisée par les documentalistes de bibliothèques numériques. Après analyse de la méthodologie de ces indexeurs professionnels, nous proposons une méthode à base de graphe combinant les informations présentes dans le document et la connaissance du domaine pour réaliser une indexation (hybride) libre et contrôlée. Notre méthode permet de proposer des termes-clés ne se trouvant pas nécessairement dans le document. Nos expériences montrent aussi que notre méthode surpasse significativement l’approche à base de graphe état de l’art.

Keyphrase annotation is the task of identifying textual units that represent the main content of a document. Keyphrase annotation is either carried out by extracting the most important phrases from a document, keyphrase extraction, or by assigning entries from a controlled domain-specific vocabulary, keyphrase assignment. Assignment methods are generally more reliable. They provide better-formed keyphrases, as well as keyphrases that do not occur in the document. But they are often silent on the contrary of extraction methods that do not depend on manually built resources. This paper proposes a new method to perform both keyphrase extraction and keyphrase assignment in an integrated and mutual reinforcing manner. Experiments have been carried out on datasets covering different domains of humanities and social sciences. They show statistically significant improvements compared to both keyphrase extraction and keyphrase assignment state-of-the art methods.

Keyphrase extraction is the task of finding phrases that represent the important content of a document. The main aim of keyphrase extraction is to propose textual units that represent the most important topics developed in a document. The output keyphrases of automatic keyphrase extraction methods for test documents are typically evaluated by comparing them to manually assigned reference keyphrases. Each output keyphrase is considered correct if it matches one of the reference keyphrases. However, the choice of the appropriate textual unit (keyphrase) for a topic is sometimes subjective and evaluating by exact matching underestimates the performance. This paper presents a dataset of evaluation scores assigned to automatically extracted keyphrases by human evaluators. Along with the reference keyphrases, the manual evaluations can be used to validate new evaluation measures. Indeed, an evaluation measure that is highly correlated to the manual evaluation is appropriate for the evaluation of automatic keyphrase extraction methods.