This paper evaluates the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models in Islamic inheritance law, ʿilm al-mawārīth. We assess the performance of seven LLMs using a benchmark of 1,000 multiple-choice questions covering diverse inheritance scenarios, designed to test each model’s ability—from understanding the inheritance context to computing the distribution of shares prescribed by Islamic jurisprudence. The results show a wide performance gap among models. o3 and Gemini 2.5 achieved accuracies above 90%, while ALLaM, Fanar, LLaMA, and Mistral scored below 50%. These disparities reflect important differences in reasoning ability and domain adaptation.We conduct a detailed error analysis to identify recurring failure patterns across models, including misunderstandings of inheritance scenarios, incorrect application of legal rules, and insufficient domain knowledge. Our findings highlight the limitations of current models in handling structured legal reasoning and suggest directions for improving their performance in Islamic legal reasoning.

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the QIAS 2025 shared task, organized as part of the ArabicNLP 2025 conference and co-located with EMNLP 2025. The task was designed for the evaluation of large language models in the complex domains of religious and legal reasoning. It comprises two subtasks: (1) Islamic Inheritance Reasoning, requiring models to compute inheritance shares according to Islamic jurisprudence, and (2) Islamic Knowledge Assessment, which covers a range of traditional Islamic disciplines. Both subtasks were structured as multiple-choice question answering challenges, with questions stratified by varying difficulty levels. The shared task attracted significant interest, with 44 teams participating in the development phase, from which 18 teams advanced to the final test phase. Of these, 6 teams submitted entries for both subtasks, 8 for Task 1 only, and two for Task 3 only. Ultimately, 16 teams submitted system description papers. Herein, we detail the task’s motivation, dataset construction, evaluation protocol, and present a summary of the participating systems and their results.

The SemEval 2023 shared task 10 “Explainable Detection of Online Sexism” focuses on detecting and identifying comments and tweets containing sexist expressions and also explaining why it is sexist. This paper describes our system that we used to participate in this shared task. Our model is an ensemble of different variants of fine tuned DeBERTa models that employs a k-fold cross-validation. We have participated in the three tasks A, B and C. Our model ranked 2 nd position in tasks A, 7 th in task B and 4 th in task C.

Messaging platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and Twitter have gained recently much popularity owing to their ability in connecting users in real-time. The content of these textual messages can be a useful resource for text mining to discover and unhide various aspects, including emotions. In this paper we present our submission for SemEval 2019 task ‘EmoContext’. The task consists of classifying a given textual dialogue into one of four emotion classes: Angry, Happy, Sad and Others. Our proposed system is based on the combination of different deep neural networks techniques. In particular, we use Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTM, B-LSTM, GRU, B-GRU), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Transfer Learning (TL) methodes. Our final system, achieves an F1 score of 74.51% on the subtask evaluation dataset.

In this paper, we present two approaches for Arabic Fine-Grained Dialect Identification. The first approach is based on Recurrent Neural Networks (BLSTM, BGRU) using hierarchical classification. The main idea is to separate the classification process for a sentence from a given text in two stages. We start with a higher level of classification (8 classes) and then the finer-grained classification (26 classes). The second approach is given by a voting system based on Naive Bayes and Random Forest. Our system achieves an F1 score of 63.02 % on the subtask evaluation dataset.

Dans ce papier, nous décrivons les systèmes développés au LSE pour le DEFT 2018 sur les tâches 1 et 2 qui consistent à classifier des tweets. La première tâche consiste à déterminer si un message concerne les transports ou non. La deuxième, consiste à classifier les tweets selon leur polarité globale. Pour les deux tâches nous avons développé des systèmes basés sur des réseaux de neurones convolutifs (CNN) et récurrents (LSTM, BLSTM et GRU). Chaque mot d’un tweet donné est représenté par un vecteur dense appris à partir des données relativement proches de celles de la compétition. Le score final officiel est de 0.891 pour la tâche 1 et de 0.781 pour la tâche 2.

In this paper we present our system for detecting valence task. The major issue was to apply a state-of-the-art system despite the small dataset provided: the system would quickly overfit. The main idea of our proposal is to use transfer learning, which allows to avoid learning from scratch. Indeed, we start to train a first model to predict if a tweet is positive, negative or neutral. For this we use an external dataset which is larger and similar to the target dataset. Then, the pre-trained model is re-used as the starting point to train a new model that classifies a tweet into one of the seven various levels of sentiment intensity. Our system, trained using transfer learning, achieves 0.776 and 0.763 respectively for Pearson correlation coefficient and weighted quadratic kappa metrics on the subtask evaluation dataset.

Dans cet article, nous nous intéressons au titrage automatique des segments issus de la segmentation thématique de journaux télévisés. Nous proposons d’associer un segment à un article de presse écrite collecté le jour même de la diffusion du journal. La tâche consiste à apparier un segment à un article de presse à l’aide d’une mesure de similarité. Cette approche soulève plusieurs problèmes, comme la sélection des articles candidats, une bonne représentation du segment et des articles, le choix d’une mesure de similarité robuste aux imprécisions de la segmentation. Des expériences sont menées sur un corpus varié de journaux télévisés français collectés pendant une semaine, conjointement avec des articles aspirés à partir de la page d’accueil de Google Actualités. Nous introduisons une métrique d’évaluation reflétant la qualité de la segmentation, du titrage ainsi que la qualité conjointe de la segmentation et du titrage. L’approche donne de bonnes performances et se révèle robuste à la segmentation thématique.