The rise of toxic content on digital platforms has intensified the demand for automatic moderation tools. While English has benefited from large-scale annotated corpora, Spanish remains under-resourced, particularly for nuanced cases of toxicity such as irony, sarcasm, or indirect aggression. We present an extended version of the NECOS-TOX corpus, comprising 4,011 Spanish comments collected from 16 major news outlets. Each comment is annotated across three levels of toxicity (Non-Toxic, Slightly Toxic, and Toxic), following an iterative annotation protocol that achieved substantial inter-annotator agreement (k = 0.74). To reduce annotation costs while maintaining quality, we employed a human-in-the-loop active learning strategy, with manual correction of model pre-labels. We benchmarked the dataset with traditional machine learning (ML) methods, domain-specific transformers, and instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs). Results show that compact encoder models (e.g., RoBERTa-base-bne, 125M parameters) perform on par with much larger models (e.g., LLaMA-3.1-8B), underscoring the value of in-domain adaptation over raw scale. Our error analysis highlights persistent challenges in distinguishing subtle forms of toxicity, especially sarcasm and implicit insults, and reveals entity-related biases that motivate anonymization strategies. The dataset and trained models are released publicly.

Question Answering on Tabular Data (or Table Question Answering) has seen tremendous advances with the coming of new generation Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite this, significant challenges still remain to be solved if we are to develop robust enough approaches for general usage. One of these is ambiguity in question answering, which historically has not merited much attention due to the previously limited capabilities of LLMs. In this work, we outlay the main types of ambiguousness inherent to tabular data. Then, we discuss how they are influenced by the way our models interact with the information stored in the tables, and we test the capabilities of some LLMs in detecting them. This work provides an initial ground for a deeper discussion on how to approach ambiguity in Tabular Data in the age of LLMs.

Language models are susceptible to vulnerability through adversarial attacks, using manipulations of the input data to disrupt their performance. Accordingly, it represents a cibersecurity leak. Data manipulations are intended to be unidentifiable by the learning model and by humans, small changes can disturb the final label of a classification task. Hence, we propose a novel attack built upon explainability methods to identify the salient lexical units to alter in order to flip the classification label. We asses our proposal on a disinformation dataset, and we show that our attack reaches high balance among stealthiness and efficiency.

This paper describes the participation of the SINAI research group at WASSA 2022 (Empathy and Personality Detection and Emotion Classification). Specifically, we participate in Track 1 (Empathy and Distress predictions) and Track 2 (Emotion classification). We conducted extensive experiments developing different machine learning solutions in line with the state of the art in Natural Language Processing. For Track 1, a Transformer multi-output regression model is proposed. For Track 2, we aim to explore recent techniques based on Zero-Shot Learning models including a Natural Language Inference model and GPT-3, using them in an ensemble manner with a fine-tune RoBERTa model. Our team ranked 2nd in the first track and 3rd in the second track.