@inproceedings{ajao-2026-power,
    title = "Power Asymmetries, Bias, and {AI}, a Reflection of Society on Low-Resourced Languages - {A}frican Languages as Case Study",
    author = "Ajao, Simbiat",
    editor = "Chimoto, Everlyn Asiko  and
      Lignos, Constantine  and
      Muhammad, Shamsuddeen  and
      Abdulmumin, Idris  and
      Siro, Clemencia  and
      Adelani, David Ifeoluwa",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on {A}frican Natural Language Processing ({A}frica{NLP} 2026)",
    month = mar,
    year = "2026",
    address = "Rabat, Morocco",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/manual-author-scripts/2026.africanlp-main.24/",
    pages = "235--242",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-364-7",
    abstract = "In recent times, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become the primary intermediary to information access, services, and opportunities. Currently, there are growing concerns as to how existing social inequalities are reproduced and amplified through AI. This is significantly evident in language technologies, where a small number of dominant languages or what we{'}ll refer to as big languages and cultural contexts shape the training, design, and evaluation of models. This paper examines the intersections of power asymmetries, linguistic bias, and cultural representation in AI, with a major focus on African languages and communities. We argue that current Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems reflect a high level of global imbalances in the availability of data, infrastructure, and decision making power, often marginalizing low-resourced languages and cultural peculiarities. It is important we know that how these data are structured is a great determinant in what their outcome will be. With reference to examples from speech recognition, machine translation, and large language models, we highlight the social and cultural consequences of linguistic exclusion, including reduced accessibility, misinterpretation, and digital invisibility. Finally, we identify and discuss pathways toward more equitable language technologies, emphasizing community-led data practices, interdisciplinary collaboration, and context-aware evaluation frameworks. By foregrounding language as both a technical and political concern, this work advocates for African-centered approaches to NLP that promote fairness, accountability, and linguistic justice in AI development."
}