Current knowledge editing methods for large language models (LLMs) struggle to maintain logical consistency when propagating ripple effects to associated facts. We propose ChainEdit, a framework that synergizes knowledge graph-derived logical rules with LLM logical reasoning capabilities to enable systematic chain updates. By automatically extracting logical patterns from structured knowledge bases and aligning them with LLMs’ internal logics, ChainEdit dynamically generates and edits logically connected knowledge clusters. Experiments demonstrate an improvement of more than 30% in logical generalization over baselines while preserving editing reliability and specificity. We further address evaluation biases in existing benchmarks through knowledge-aware protocols that disentangle external dependencies. This work establishes new state-of-the-art performance on ripple effect while ensuring internal logical consistency after knowledge editing.

As large language models (LLMs) continue to scale up, knowledge editing techniques that modify models’ internal knowledge without full retraining have gained significant attention. MEMIT, a prominent batch editing algorithm, stands out for its capability to perform mass knowledge modifications. However, we uncovers a critical limitation that MEMIT’s editing efficacy significantly deteriorates when processing batches containing multiple edits sharing the same subject. Our analysis reveals the root cause lies in MEMIT’s key-value modeling framework: when multiple facts with the same subject in a batch are modeled through MEMIT’s key-value mechanism, identical keys (derived from the shared subject) are forced to represent different values (corresponding to distinct knowledge), resulting in update conflicts during editing. Addressing this issue, we propose MEMIT-Merge, an enhanced approach that merges value computation processes for facts sharing the same subject, effectively resolving the performance degradation in same-subject batch editing scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that at a batch size of 5, while the original MEMIT’s success rate drops to 46%, MEMIT-Merge maintains a 98% editing success rate, showcasing remarkable robustness to subject entity collisions.