Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved software development automation, including bug localization, code synthesis, program repair, and test generation. However, most prior work on program repair focuses on isolated elements, such as classes or functions, neglecting their interdependencies, which limits repair accuracy. We present SynFix, a RelationGraph-based approach that integrates LLMs with structural search and synchronization techniques for coordinated program repair across codebases. SynFix constructs a RelationGraph to capture relationships among classes, functions, variables, and their interactions (e.g., imports, inheritance, dependencies). Each RelationGraph node includes detailed code descriptions to help LLMs understand root causes and retrieve relevant contexts. By analyzing one-hop nodes in the RelationGraph, SynFixensures repairs account for dependent updates across components. Patch validation is conducted using regression tests from the SWE-bench benchmark suite. Evaluated on SWE-bench datasets, SynFix resolves 52.33% of issues in SWE-bench-lite (300 GitHub issues), 55.8% in SWE-bench-verified (500 issues), and 29.86% in SWE-bench-full (2,294 issues), outperforming baselines such as Swe-Agent, Agentless and AutoCodeRover. The codebase is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AutoFix-EC86/.

The task of converting natural language questions into executable SQL queries, known as text-to-SQL, has gained significant interest in recent years, as it enables non-technical users to interact with relational databases. Many benchmarks, such as SPIDER and WikiSQL, have contributed to the development of new models and the evaluation of their performance. In addition, other datasets, like SEDE and BIRD, have introduced more challenges and complexities to better map real-world scenarios. However, these datasets primarily focus on high-resource languages such as English and Chinese. In this work, we introduce Dialect2SQL, the first large-scale, cross-domain text-to-SQL dataset in an Arabic dialect. It consists of 9,428 NLQ-SQL pairs across 69 databases in various domains. Along with SQL-related challenges such as long schemas, dirty values, and complex queries, our dataset also incorporates the complexities of the Moroccan dialect, which is known for its diverse source lan-guages, numerous borrowed words, and unique expressions. This demonstrates that our dataset will be a valuable contribution to both the text-to-SQL community and the development of resources for low-resource languages.

The expanding financial markets of the Arab world require sophisticated Arabic NLP tools. To address this need within the banking domain, the Arabic Financial NLP (AraFinNLP) shared task proposes two subtasks: (i) Multi-dialect Intent Detection and (ii) Cross-dialect Translation and Intent Preservation. This shared task uses the updated ArBanking77 dataset, which includes about 39k parallel queries in MSA and four dialects. Each query is labeled with one or more of a common 77 intents in the banking domain. These resources aim to foster the development of robust financial Arabic NLP, particularly in the areas of machine translation and banking chat-bots.A total of 45 unique teams registered for this shared task, with 11 of them actively participated in the test phase. Specifically, 11 teams participated in Subtask 1, while only 1 team participated in Subtask 2. The winning team of Subtask 1 achieved F1 score of 0.8773, and the only team submitted in Subtask 2 achieved a 1.667 BLEU score.

Code review, which aims at ensuring the overall quality and reliability of software, is a cornerstone of software development. Unfortunately, while crucial, Code review is a labor-intensive process that the research community is looking to automate. Existing automated methods rely on single input-output generative models and thus generally struggle to emulate the collaborative nature of code review. This work introduces CodeAgent, a novel multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) system for code review automation. CodeAgent incorporates a supervisory agent, QA-Checker, to ensure that all the agents’ contributions address the initial review question. We evaluated CodeAgent on critical code review tasks: (1) detect inconsistencies between code changes and commit messages, (2) identify vulnerability introductions, (3) validate code style adherence, and (4) suggest code revisions. The results demonstrate CodeAgent’s effectiveness, contributing to a new state-of-the-art in code review automation. Our data and code are publicly available (https://github.com/Daniel4SE/codeagent).

The “Multilingual Corpus of World’s Constitutions” (MCWC) serves as a valuable resource for the NLP community, offering a comprehensive collection of constitutions from around the world. Its focus on data quality and breadth of coverage enables advanced research in constitutional analysis, machine translation, and cross-lingual legal studies. The MCWC prepares its data to ensure high quality and minimal noise, while also providing valuable mappings of constitutions to their respective countries and continents, facilitating comparative analysis. Notably, the corpus offers pairwise sentence alignments across languages, supporting machine translation experiments. We utilise a leading Machine Translation model, fine-tuned on the MCWC to achieve accurate and context-aware translations. Additionally, we introduce an independent Machine Translation model as a comparative baseline. Fine-tuning the model on the MCWC improves accuracy, highlighting the significance of such a legal corpus for NLP and Machine Translation. The MCWC’s rich multilingual content and rigorous data quality standards raise the bar for legal text analysis and inspire innovation in the NLP community, opening new avenues for studying constitutional texts and multilingual data analysis.

Data anonymisation is often required to comply with regulations when transfering information across departments or entities. However, the risk is that this procedure can distort the data and jeopardise the models built on it. Intuitively, the process of training an NLP model on anonymised data may lower the performance of the resulting model when compared to a model trained on non-anonymised data. In this paper, we investigate the impact of de-identification on the performance of nine downstream NLP tasks. We focus on the anonymisation and pseudonymisation of personal names and compare six different anonymisation strategies for two state-of-the-art pre-trained models. Based on these experiments, we formulate recommendations on how the de-identification should be performed to guarantee accurate NLP models. Our results reveal that de-identification does have a negative impact on the performance of NLP models, but this impact is relatively low. We also find that using pseudonymisation techniques involving random names leads to better performance across most tasks.