Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in code generation. Despite the remarkable success, we observed that LLMs often misunderstand or overlook some problem-specific undertrained keywords during code generation, compromising the accuracy of the generated code. After explicitly explaining these undertrained keywords using well-trained terms in the prompt, LLMs are more likely to generate correct code implementation. Inspired by this observation, we propose a novel technique named SEK(Self-Explained Keywords), which empowers an LLM for better code generation by extracting and explaining the key terms in the problem description with the LLM itself. Comprehensive experiments across four benchmarks, i.e., HumanEval(+), MBPP(+), APPS and BigCodeBench, with five representative LLMs, show that SEK can significantly improve LLMs in code generation, yielding substantial and consistent gains. For instance, SEK improves the Pass@1 of DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct from 85.4% to 93.3% on the Humaneval benchmark. Further analysis confirms that SEK enables the LLMs to shift their attention from low-frequency keywords to their corresponding explanations.

While existing code large language models (code LLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities in code generation, their autoregressive sequential generation inherently lacks reversibility. This limitation hinders them from timely correcting previous missing statements during coding as humans do, often leading to error propagation and suboptimal performance. We introduce JumpCoder, a novel model-agnostic framework that enables human-like online modification and non-sequential generation to augment code LLMs. The key idea behind JumpCoder is to insert new code into the currently generated code when necessary during generation, which is achieved through an auxiliary infilling model that works in tandem with the code LLM. Since identifying the best infill position beforehand is intractable, we adopt an infill-first, judge-later strategy, which experiments with filling at the k most critical positions following the generation of each line, and uses an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) parser alongside the Generation Model Scoring to effectively judge the validity of each potential infill. Extensive experiments using six state-of-the-art code LLMs across multiple and multilingual benchmarks consistently indicate significant improvements over all baselines. Our code is available in the uploaded attachment.