The field of text privatization often leverages the notion of *Differential Privacy* (DP) to provide formal guarantees in the rewriting or obfuscation of sensitive textual data. A common and nearly ubiquitous form of DP application necessitates the addition of calibrated noise to vector representations of text, either at the data- or model-level, which is governed by the privacy parameter 𝜀. However, noise addition almost undoubtedly leads to considerable utility loss, thereby highlighting one major drawback of DP in NLP. In this work, we introduce a new sentence infilling privatization technique, and we use this method to explore the effect of noise in DP text rewriting. We empirically demonstrate that non-DP privatization techniques excel in utility preservation and can find an acceptable empirical privacy-utility trade-off, yet cannot outperform DP methods in empirical privacy protections. Our results highlight the significant impact of noise in current DP rewriting mechanisms, leading to a discussion of the merits and challenges of DP in NLP as well as the opportunities that non-DP methods present.

Applications of Differential Privacy (DP) in NLP must distinguish between the syntactic level on which a proposed mechanism operates, often taking the form of *word-level* or *document-level* privatization. Recently, several word-level *Metric* Differential Privacy approaches have been proposed, which rely on this generalized DP notion for operating in word embedding spaces. These approaches, however, often fail to produce semantically coherent textual outputs, and their application at the sentence- or document-level is only possible by a basic composition of word perturbations. In this work, we strive to address these challenges by operating *between* the word and sentence levels, namely with *collocations*. By perturbing n-grams rather than single words, we devise a method where composed privatized outputs have higher semantic coherence and variable length. This is accomplished by constructing an embedding model based on frequently occurring word groups, in which unigram words co-exist with bi- and trigram collocations. We evaluate our method in utility and privacy tests, which make a clear case for tokenization strategies beyond the word level.