Computer-aided design (CAD) is crucial in prototyping 3D objects through geometric instructions (i.e., CAD programs). In practical design workflows, designers often engage in time-consuming reviews and refinements of these prototypes by comparing them with reference images. To bridge this gap, we introduce the CAD review task to automatically detect and correct potential errors, ensuring consistency between the constructed 3D objects and reference images. However, recent advanced multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle to recognize multiple geometric components and perform spatial geometric operations within the CAD program, leading to inaccurate reviews. In this paper, we propose the CAD program repairer (ReCAD) framework to effectively detect program errors and provide helpful feedback on error correction. Additionally, we create a dataset, CADReview, consisting of over 20K program-image pairs, with diverse errors for the CAD review task. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our ReCAD significantly outperforms existing MLLMs, which shows great potential in design applications.

User interface understanding with vision-language models (VLMs) has received much attention due to its potential for enhancing software automation.However, existing datasets used to build UI-VLMs either only contain large-scale context-free element annotations or contextualized functional descriptions for elements at a small scale.In this work, we propose the AutoGUI pipeline for automatically annotating UI elements with detailed functionality descriptions at scale.Specifically, we leverage large language models (LLMs) to infer element functionality by comparing UI state changes before and after simulated interactions. To improve annotation quality, we propose LLM-aided rejection and verification, eliminating invalid annotations without human labor.We construct a high-quality AutoGUI-704k dataset using the proposed pipeline, featuring diverse and detailed functionality annotations that are hardly provided by previous datasets.Human evaluation shows that we achieve annotation correctness comparable to a trained human annotator. Extensive experiments show that our dataset remarkably enhances VLM’s UI grounding capabilities and exhibits significant scaling effects. We also show the interesting potential use of our dataset in UI agent tasks. Please view our project at https://autogui-project.github.io/.

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in multimodal understanding, but they frequently suffer from hallucination - generating content inconsistent with visual inputs. In this work, we explore a novel perspective on hallucination mitigation by examining the intermediate activations of LVLMs during generation. Our investigation reveals that hallucinated content manifests as distinct, identifiable patterns in the model’s hidden state space. Motivated by this finding, we propose Activation Steering Decoding (ASD), a training-free approach that mitigates hallucination through targeted intervention in the model’s intermediate activations. ASD operates by first identifying directional patterns of hallucination in the activation space using a small calibration set, then employing a contrast decoding mechanism that computes the difference between positive and negative steering predictions. This approach effectively suppresses hallucination patterns while preserving the model’s general capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly reduces hallucination across multiple benchmarks while maintaining performance on general visual understanding tasks. Notably, our approach requires no model re-training or architectural modifications, making it readily applicable to existing deployed models.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances factual accuracy by integrating external knowledge, yet it introduces a critical issue: erroneous or biased retrieval can mislead generation, compounding hallucinations, a phenomenon we term Hallucination on Hallucination. To address this, we propose Debate-Augmented RAG (DRAG), a training-free framework that integrates Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) mechanisms into both retrieval and generation stages. In retrieval, DRAG employs structured debates among proponents, opponents, and judges to refine retrieval quality and ensure factual reliability. In generation, DRAG introduces asymmetric information roles and adversarial debates, enhancing reasoning robustness and mitigating factual inconsistencies. Evaluations across multiple tasks demonstrate that DRAG improves retrieval reliability, reduces RAG-induced hallucinations, and significantly enhances overall factual accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/Huenao/Debate-Augmented-RAG.

Large language models (LLMs) have made significant strides in natural language processing by leveraging their ability to comprehend and reason with factual knowledge. However, a significant amount of factual knowledge is stored in structured data, which has unique characteristics not typically encountered in the unstructured texts used for pretraining LLMs. To evaluate the capability of LLMs in handling facts structurally stored, we introduce a benchmark called StructFact, which includes meticulously annotated factual questions, spanning five tasks that reflect the intrinsic properties of structured data. This benchmark aims to delineate the strengths and limitations of LLMs in reasoning with structured data for knowledge-intensive tasks in practical applications. Extensive experiments conducted on 10 common LLMs have yielded several insights, one notable finding being that these models struggle significantly with the heterogeneity of structured data during reasoning.

Sequential recommenders predict users’ next interactions based on historical behavior and are essential in modern recommendation systems. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise, their size and high inference costs limit deployment on resource-constrained devices. Small Language Models (SLMs) provide a more efficient alternative for edge devices, but bridging the recommendation performance gap between LLMs and SLMs remains challenging. Typical approaches like supervised fine-tuning or vanilla knowledge distillation (KD) often lead to suboptimal performance or even negative transfer. Our motivational experiments reveal key issues with vanilla KD methods: feature imitation suffers from redundancy and uneven recommendation ability across layers, while prediction mimicking faces conflicts caused by differing weight distributions of prediction heads. To address these challenges, we propose a simple yet effective framework, C2KD, to transfer task-relevant knowledge from two complementary dimensions. Specifically, our method incorporates: (1) cross-layer feature imitation, which uses a dynamic router to select the most relevant teacher layers and assimilate task-relevant knowledge from the teacher’s late layers, allowing the student to concentrate on the teacher’s specialized knowledge; and (2) cross-head logit distillation, which maps the intermediate features of the student to the teacher’s output head, thereby minimizing prediction discrepancies between the teacher and the student. Extensive experiments across diverse model families demonstrate that our approach enables 1B-parameter SLMs to achieve competitive performance compared to LLMs (e.g., Llama3-8B), offering a practical solution for real-world on-device sequential recommendations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing tasks, such as text generation and semantic understanding. However, their performance on numerical reasoning tasks, such as basic arithmetic, numerical retrieval, and magnitude comparison, remains surprisingly poor. This gap arises from their reliance on surface-level statistical patterns rather than understanding numbers as continuous magnitudes. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on either linguistic competence or structured mathematical problem-solving, neglecting fundamental numerical reasoning required in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose NumericBench, a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate six fundamental numerical capabilities: number recognition, arithmetic operations, contextual retrieval, comparison, summary, and multi-step reasoning. NumericBench includes datasets ranging from synthetic number lists to crawled real-world data, addressing challenges like long contexts, noise, and multi-step reasoning. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-4 and DeepSeek, reveal persistent weaknesses in numerical reasoning, highlighting the urgent need to improve numerically-aware language modeling. The benchmark is released in: https://github.com/TreeAI-Lab/NumericBench.