Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs) are vital for event prediction, yet current methods face limitations. Graph neural networks mainly depend on structural information, often overlooking semantic understanding and requiring high computational costs. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLMs) support zero-shot reasoning but lack sufficient capabilities to grasp the laws of historical event development. To tackle these challenges, we introduce a training-free Analogical Replay (AnRe) reasoning framework. Our approach retrieves similar events for queries through semantic-driven clustering and builds comprehensive historical contexts using a dual history extraction module that integrates long-term and short-term history. It then uses LLMs to generate analogical reasoning examples as contextual inputs, enabling the model to deeply understand historical patterns of similar events and improve its ability to predict unknown ones. Our experiments on four benchmarks show that AnRe significantly exceeds traditional training and existing LLM-based methods. Further ablation studies also confirm the effectiveness of the dual history extraction and analogical replay mechanisms.

Despite the remarkable reasoning capabilities demonstrated by large language models (LLM), the substantial computational overhead limits their practices. Some efforts have been directed toward distilling multi-step reasoning capabilities into smaller models through chain-of-thought (CoT). While CoT facilitates multi-step reasoning, the dependencies between reasoning steps are not always clearly discernible, which may lead to inconsistent reasoning. In this paper, we introduce fine-grained attribution reasoning distillation (FARD), which incorporates grounded citations to consolidate the relationships between reasoning steps. Specifically, FARD distills attribution reasoning rationales from LLMs to substitute CoT reasonings, which clarifies the dependencies among reasoning steps. Besides, we regularize the model’s attention pattern by leveraging the causal dependencies between reasoning steps, thereby enhancing the consistency of reasoning. Grounded attribution reasoning also enhances interpretability and verifiability, thereby facilitating faithful reasoning. We evaluate FARD on mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks. The experimental results indicate that FARD outperforms CoT distillation methods in mathematical reasoning, demonstrating its effectiveness. Furthermore, the small models trained with FARD have shown outstanding performance in out-of-distribution reasoning, proving strong generalization capabilities.

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, they still face challenges in knowledge-intensive multi-hop reasoning. Recent work explores iterative retrieval to address complex problems. However, the absence of intermediate guidance often leads to inaccurate retrieval and intermediate reasoning errors, leading to incorrect reasoning. To address these, we propose Self-Critique Guided Iterative Reasoning (SiGIR), which uses self-critique feedback to guide the iterative reasoning process. Specifically, through end-to-end training, we enable the model to iteratively address complex problems via question decomposition, while also being able to self-evaluate its intermediate reasoning steps. During iterative reasoning, the model engages in branching exploration and employs self-evaluation to guide the selection of promising reasoning trajectories. Extensive experiments on three multi-hop reasoning datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, surpassing the previous SOTA by 8.6%. Furthermore, our thorough analysis offers insights for future research. Our code, data, and models are available at https://github.com/zchuz/SiGIR-MHQA.

Situational awareness refers to the capacity to perceive and comprehend the present context and anticipate forthcoming events, which plays a critical role in aiding decision-making, anticipating potential issues, and adapting to dynamic circumstances. Nevertheless, the situational awareness capabilities of large language models have not yet been comprehensively assessed. To address this, we propose SA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that covers three tiers of situational awareness capabilities, covering environment perception, situation comprehension and future projection. SA-Bench provides a comprehensive evaluation to explore the situational awareness capabilities of LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on advanced LLMs, including GPT-4, LLaMA3, Qwen1.5, among others. Our experimental results indicate that even SOTA LLMs still exhibit substantial capability gaps compared to humans. In addition, we thoroughly analysis and examine the challenges encountered by LLMs across various tasks, as well as emphasize the deficiencies they confront. We hope SA-Bench will foster research within the field of situational awareness.