The current paradigm of language modeling is a two-stage pipeline that first transforms raw text to token indices, where the distribution is then estimated. It inherently discards linguistic relations between tokens during tokenization, creating a fundamental gap. To address this, we propose TriEmbed, a reparameterization method for embeddings that incorporates the morphological relationships inherent in subword tokenizer algorithms. Specifically, by organizing the vocabulary into a Trie structure, we can encode these relations and reparametrize the embeddings, facilitating the recovery of other linguistic relationships during training. Empirical results across various settings demonstrate that TriEmbed outperforms conventional embeddings from the perspective of scaling, while offering more linguistically informative token embeddings.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, highlighting the importance of knowledge editing. Many benchmark has been proposed for researching multimodal knowledge editing. However, previous benchmarks focus on limited scenarios due to the lack of rigorous definition of multimodal knowledge. To better evaluate multimodal knowledge editing, we propose a decomposed definition of multimodal knowledge. Following the decomposed definition of multimodal knowledge, we introduce three scenarios and a novel requirement modality consistency. We construct MC-MKE, a fine-grained **M**ultimodal **K**nowledge **E**diting benchmark emphasizing **M**odality **C**onsistency through strict data selection. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.

Watermarking is a prominent technique to trace the usage of specific large language models (LLMs) by injecting patterns into model-generated content. An ideal watermark should be imperceptible, easily detectable, and robust to text alterations, yet existing methods typically face trade-offs among these properties. This paper utilizes a key-centered scheme to unify existing methods by decomposing a watermark into two components: a key module and a mark module. We show that the trade-off issue is the reflection of the conflict between the scale of the key sampling space during generation and the complexity of key restoration during detection within the key module. To this end, we introduce WaterPool, a simple yet effective key module that preserves a complete key sampling space for imperceptibility while utilizing semantics-based search to improve the key restoration process. WaterPool can integrate seamlessly with existing watermarking techniques, significantly enhancing their performance, achieving near-optimal imperceptibility, and markedly improving their detection efficacy and robustness (+12.73% for KGW, +20.27% for EXP, +7.27% for ITS).

Watermarking has emerged as a prominent technique for LLM-generated content detection by embedding imperceptible patterns. Despite supreme performance, its robustness against adversarial attacks remains underexplored. Previous work typically considers a grey-box attack setting, where the specific type of watermark is already known. Some even necessitates knowledge about hyperparameters of the watermarking method. Such prerequisites are unattainable in real-world scenarios. Targeting at a more realistic black-box threat model with fewer assumptions, we here propose B⁴, a black-box scrubbing attack on watermarks. Specifically, we formulate the watermark scrubbing attack as a constrained optimization problem by capturing its objectives with two distributions, a Watermark Distribution and a Fidelity Distribution. This optimization problem can be approximately solved using two proxy distributions. Experimental results across 12 different settings demonstrate the superior performance of B⁴ compared with other baselines.

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable ability in code generation. However, generating the correct solution in a single attempt still remains a challenge. Prior works utilize verification properties in software engineering to verify and re-rank solutions in a majority voting manner. But the assumption behind them that generated verification properties have better qualities than solutions may not always hold. In this paper, we treat them equally as different perspectives of LLMs’ reasoning processes. We propose the Multi-Perspective Self-Consistency (MPSC) framework incorporating both inter- and intra-consistency across outputs from multiple perspectives. Specifically, we prompt LLMs to generate diverse outputs from three perspectives, Solution, Specification and Test case, constructing a 3-partite graph. With two measure functions of consistency, we embed both inter- and intra-consistency information into the graph. The optimal choice of solutions is then determined based on analysis in the graph.MPSC significantly boosts performance of foundation models (ChatGPT in this paper) on various benchmarks, including HumanEval (+15.91%), MBPP (+6.43%) and CodeContests (+9.37%), even surpassing GPT-4.

With the rapid development of NLP, large-scale language models (LLMs) excel in various tasks across multiple domains now. However, existing benchmarks may not adequately measure these models’ capabilities, especially when faced with new knowledge. In this paper, we address the lack of benchmarks to evaluate LLMs’ ability to handle new knowledge, an important and challenging aspect in the rapidly evolving world. We propose an approach called KnowGen that generates new knowledge by altering existing entity attributes and relationships, resulting in artificial entities that are distinct from real-world entities. With KnowGen, we introduce a benchmark named ALCUNA to assess LLMs’ abilities in knowledge understanding, differentiation, and association. We benchmark several LLMs, reveals that their performance in face of new knowledge is not satisfactory, particularly in reasoning between new and internal knowledge. We also explore the impact of entity similarity on the model’s understanding of entity knowledge and the influence of contextual entities. We appeal to the need for caution when using LLMs in new scenarios or with new knowledge, and hope that our benchmarks can help drive the development of LLMs in face of new knowledge.