Language models (LMs) rely on their parametric knowledge augmented with relevant contextual knowledge for certain tasks, such as question answering. However, the contextual knowledge can contain private information that may be leaked when answering queries, and estimating this privacy leakage is not well understood. A straightforward approach of directly comparing an LM’s output to the contexts can overestimate the privacy risk, since the LM’s parametric knowledge might already contain the augmented contextual knowledge. To this end, we introduce context influence, a metric that builds on differential privacy, a widely-adopted privacy notion, to estimate the privacy leakage of contextual knowledge during decoding. Our approach effectively measures how each subset of the context influences an LM’s response while separating the specific parametric knowledge of the LM. Using our context influence metric, we demonstrate that context privacy leakage occurs when contextual knowledge is out of distribution with respect to parametric knowledge. Moreover, we experimentally demonstrate how context influence properly attributes the privacy leakage to augmented contexts, and we evaluate how factors– such as model size, context size, generation position, etc.– affect context privacy leakage. The practical implications of our results will inform practitioners of the privacy risk associated with augmented contextual knowledge.

Incorporating automatic speech recognition (ASR) into field linguistics workflows for language documentation has become increasingly common. While ASR performance has seen improvements in low-resource settings, obstacles remain when training models on data collected by documentary linguists. One notable challenge lies in the way that this data is curated. ASR datasets built from spontaneous speech are typically recorded in consistent settings and transcribed by native speakers following a set of well designed guidelines. In contrast, field linguists collect data in whatever format it is delivered by their language consultants and transcribe it as best they can given their language skills and the quality of the recording. This approach to data curation, while valuable for linguistic research, does not always align with the standards required for training robust ASR models. In this paper, we explore methods for identifying speech transcriptions in fieldwork data that may be unsuitable for training ASR models. We focus on two complimentary automated measures of transcription quality that can be used to identify transcripts with characteristics that are common in field data but could be detrimental to ASR training. We show that one of the metrics is highly effective at retrieving these types of transcriptions. Additionally, we find that filtering datasets using this metric of transcription quality reduces WER both in controlled experiments using simulated fieldwork with artificially corrupted data and in real fieldwork corpora.