Aspect-Based Opinion Summarization with Argumentation Schemes

Wendi Zhou, Ameer Saadat-Yazdi, Nadin Kökciyan


Abstract
Reviews are valuable resources for customers making purchase decisions in online shopping. However, it is impractical for customers to go over the vast number of reviews and manually conclude the prominent opinions, which prompts the need for automated opinion summarization systems. Previous approaches, either extractive or abstractive, face challenges in automatically producing grounded aspect-centric summaries. In this paper, we propose a novel summarization system that not only captures predominant opinions from an aspect perspective with supporting evidence, but also adapts to varying domains without relying on a pre-defined set of aspects. Our proposed framework, ASESUM, summarizes viewpoints relevant to the critical aspects of a product by extracting aspect-centric arguments and measuring their salience and validity. We conduct experiments on a real-world dataset to demonstrate the superiority of our approach in capturing diverse perspectives of the original reviews compared to new and existing methods.
Anthology ID:
2025.argmining-1.11
Volume:
Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop
Month:
July
Year:
2025
Address:
Vienna, Austria
Editors:
Elena Chistova, Philipp Cimiano, Shohreh Haddadan, Gabriella Lapesa, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz
Venues:
ArgMining | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
116–125
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/landing_page/2025.argmining-1.11/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Wendi Zhou, Ameer Saadat-Yazdi, and Nadin Kökciyan. 2025. Aspect-Based Opinion Summarization with Argumentation Schemes. In Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop, pages 116–125, Vienna, Austria. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Aspect-Based Opinion Summarization with Argumentation Schemes (Zhou et al., ArgMining 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/landing_page/2025.argmining-1.11.pdf